We need a "Pro Calorie Counting" thread/discussion
Replies
-
I was fine with all the points up to the plants and avoiding constants. LOL
I'll probably incorporate those points and reference the book when I compile the reasons people want to count.0 -
Counting calories may be a method for people to feel in control of what they are eating. Particularly when paired with a LCHF woe. The CICO that we've all be taught implies that if we are overweight then we have lost control aka "willpower".
LCHF can satiate people so that they are eating at a lower calorie intake. Seeing those results may provide a sense of achievement and belief in self which would further assist in being able to continue to their LCHF plan. Particularly if it's proving easier than if they were eating high carb.0 -
I count because I'm an OCD control freak, but it doesn't change what I eat...
0 -
*duplicate*0
-
RATSMITH69 wrote: »I count because I'm an OCD control freak, but it doesn't change what I eat...
So you don't restrict? That is what I would consider "not counting" but instead call "logging." Perhaps the first thing for each thread should be to define what exactly I mean by counting.- Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
- Not counting would be eating until satisfied or satiated, regardless of how high/low any specific day would be in calories.
Does this change anyone's reasons for counting? I did notice a lot of people said they just like a log or data. I have logged before, without what I consider counting. I'd eat as much/little as I felt like.0 - Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
-
I don't restrict due to calories. I might change things up for less carbs but if I'm hungry I'm gonna eat!!0
-
RATSMITH69 wrote: »I count because I'm an OCD control freak, but it doesn't change what I eat...
So you don't restrict? That is what I would consider "not counting" but instead call "logging." Perhaps the first thing for each thread should be to define what exactly I mean by counting.- Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
- Not counting would be eating until satisfied or satiated, regardless of how high/low any specific day would be in calories.
Does this change anyone's reasons for counting? I did notice a lot of people said they just like a log or data. I have logged before, without what I consider counting. I'd eat as much/little as I felt like.
It doesn't change mine. When I don't count and restrict, and specifically, don't measure, I gain. Counting, restricting and measuring are what enable me to lose what I gained over those few years.0 - Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
-
I'm trying to slowly slide up to maintenance. I'm finding the calorie count useful as I adjust input to weight loss/gain. Especially since my burn rate has changed due to a different body composition than the one I started the diet with.
At the same time, I'm finding it hard to eat more due to being pretty satiated, so I could probably do this on ad libitum cruise-control. Just glad I don't have to do this on faith alone.
0 -
RATSMITH69 wrote: »I count because I'm an OCD control freak, but it doesn't change what I eat...
So you don't restrict? That is what I would consider "not counting" but instead call "logging." Perhaps the first thing for each thread should be to define what exactly I mean by counting.- Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
- Not counting would be eating until satisfied or satiated, regardless of how high/low any specific day would be in calories.
Does this change anyone's reasons for counting? I did notice a lot of people said they just like a log or data. I have logged before, without what I consider counting. I'd eat as much/little as I felt like.
Yup, I track/log, but I don't count/restrict...RATSMITH69 wrote: »I don't restrict due to calories. I might change things up for less carbs but if I'm hungry I'm gonna eat!!
And 100% THIS ^^^^^!!!!!!0 - Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
-
I am amazed and inspired by everyone that does their research. I learn a lot from all of you. The basic reason I log my food is that I easily forget what I have already eaten and can talk myself into poor habits ( I feel ya JennyToy). Logging keeps me focused and in control of what I put into my mouth. It has been a lesson hard learned (and still learning).1
-
RATSMITH69 wrote: »I count because I'm an OCD control freak, but it doesn't change what I eat...
So you don't restrict? That is what I would consider "not counting" but instead call "logging." Perhaps the first thing for each thread should be to define what exactly I mean by counting.- Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
- Not counting would be eating until satisfied or satiated, regardless of how high/low any specific day would be in calories.
Does this change anyone's reasons for counting? I did notice a lot of people said they just like a log or data. I have logged before, without what I consider counting. I'd eat as much/little as I felt like.
It doesn't change mine. When I don't count and restrict, and specifically, don't measure, I gain. Counting, restricting and measuring are what enable me to lose what I gained over those few years.
Same here. Ive been maintaining the last almost four months or so because I have logged but let myself eat what I wanted as long as it was low carb. Havent lost anything and actually gained four pounds or so but stayed steady around that four pound mark.
Late last week I went back to trying to restrict to see if I can start losing again. Lost those four pounds by this morning so going to see if i can lose some more but that means restricting for me.1 - Counting is conscious restriction of calories to a pre-defined range.
-
Hhhhmmm! Seems like calories do count if I want to lose more weight.
 and weight (278.8lbs). I'm counting so I can keep better track, to fight against my thought process of "less is better". I've modified, and I've still got some wiggle room calorie wise today, so if I feel the need I know I can eat a bit more.2
-
Trying to accurately count/guesstimate calories may have a rather wide margin of error.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10412095/gastropod-the-end-of-the-calorie
But I'll bet if calories had just been discovered, everyone would want to count them. Worst case, calories are another fuzzy metric, so why go to pains to ignore them? But counting them in order to help decide whether (or not) you've had enough (too much) seems at least as good as the alternatives, such as:- Measuring food volume (cubic angstroms/yards);
- Relying on feeling of satiety - this assumes your assessment is more consistent from day to day than the pain scale and you have no issues with hunger/satiety hormones or addictive cravings interfering.
- Relying on your lying, cheating scale
No reason CICO, as oversimplified as it's often presented, can't be incorporated in the broader hormonal theory of metabolism.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/comment/391193291 -
Way back in 1958 when I was 25years old with a new baby & a 2½ year old, I first ate low carb. I did not count calories and the weight just dropped off me. Huh, I wonder why?!
Now I am 84 years old with arthritis and pretty immobile. Believe me, I have to count calories! What's more, I enjoy tracking, both my calories and my weight. I must admit that when I first joined mfp I only counted calories and the majority of them would be in carbs but thinking sensibly, I know low carb eating is healthier.6 -
Probably been said but based on my 5 years keto, and now low carb experience I can categorically say that tracking my foods and restricting my calories is the single reason I have lost 110lbs. Eating keto and now low carb and the associated reduction in hunger is the single reason I have been able to stick to it.
Fat is high in calories. Keto is not magic. Eat too many calories and you simply can not lose weight. Many lifelong overeaters, me included, are not able to eat at a deficit intuitively even with reduced hunger on keto. I did an experiment when I had been a long time on keto and well fat adapted and ate what I felt I wanted to eat. I didn’t go crazy. I tracked my carbs only and kept them at around 10g. What I found is that surely and steadily my weight crept up. When I worked out what I was eating - when “only eating til satieted” - I was eating around 2200-2400 calories a day. I absolutely can not lose if I am over 1400 per day.
Many many people try low carb and quit a short time in because they are limiting their carbs but still eating too much and decide it doesn’t work. They have this idea, possibly from some misguided forum posts, that they can overeat like they always have as long as they don’t eat carbs.
Sorry people. There’s no magic diet where you can cut out a certain food group and eat as much as you like and still lose weight.9 -
Agree with @DietPrada. There is a lot of diabetes in my family (thankfully not me) and after years of yo-yo dieting with low fat low calories vs low carb I know I am super carb sensitive. LCHF has been a life saver for me. I lost about 30 lbs since last summer on 1700-1800 calories per day. Then I just stopped losing although nothing changed. Recently changed my calorie allotment to 1600 and dropped 5 lbs in 4 days. When I first started this WOE I only tracked carbs. Felt amazing after a couple of weeks but after the first week of water loss didn’t lose a pound. Checked my calories and I was eating over 2000 per day. Interestingly enuf, didn’t gain any weight either. There is a lot more involved in healthy eating that CICO but calories do matter ..... at least for me.2
-
Agree with @DietPrada. There is a lot of diabetes in my family (thankfully not me) and after years of yo-yo dieting with low fat low calories vs low carb I know I am super carb sensitive. LCHF has been a life saver for me. I lost about 30 lbs since last summer on 1700-1800 calories per day. Then I just stopped losing although nothing changed. Recently changed my calorie allotment to 1600 and dropped 5 lbs in 4 days. When I first started this WOE I only tracked carbs. Felt amazing after a couple of weeks but after the first week of water loss didn’t lose a pound. Checked my calories and I was eating over 2000 per day. Interestingly enuf, didn’t gain any weight either. There is a lot more involved in healthy eating that CICO but calories do matter ..... at least for me.
Stalling out big time only counting carbs is exactly why I came to MFP in 2014. Only when I started counting calories as well did I move beyond 30lb loss and eventually make it to 90.4 -
Way back in 1958 when I was 25years old with a new baby & a 2½ year old, I first ate low carb. I did not count calories and the weight just dropped off me. Huh, I wonder why?!
Now I am 84 years old with arthritis and pretty immobile. Believe me, I have to count calories! What's more, I enjoy tracking, both my calories and my weight. I must admit that when I first joined mfp I only counted calories and the majority of them would be in carbs but thinking sensibly, I know low carb eating is healthier.
Hi there, just a thought from what I've read re low carb and Keto, but they are supposed to help with inflammation of the joints so maybe it would be good for your arthritis.
0 -
I hope so chinatowninchina, the NHS is on it's knees so I'd rather not bother it for new hips and one knee. If I'd stayed low carb from 1958 until now, I may not have needed them...
2 -
As other people have said, for me it’s also about learning portion size. I’ve always eaten healthy foods. Lots and lots of them, lol. Now, I’m figuring out what a six ounce piece of fish is and its macros and calories.2
-
-
Northumberland. I have been only once to Chester, many years ago and very much enjoyed our stay.chinatowninchina wrote: »
0 -
Northumberland. I have been only once to Chester, many years ago and very much enjoyed our stay.chinatowninchina wrote: »
Northumberland also beautiful! 1 -
I lost 35kg on low carb, but lots of it crept back over 4 years. I still ate cleaner than most people i know, but just too much it seems (too much creamy coffee and delicious fat bombs didn’t help!) I started tracking my calories while still eating lchf and have lost 5kg in the first 3 weeks of this. So yes, count and measure if it helps you!1
-
I did very well maintaining without counting calories, but in order to lose weight I seem to have to stay in a specific range. However, I almost wonder if the counting actually causes me to be more honest tracking and that is actually helping more than the actual amount of the calories.1
-
People instinctively want to "relax" when it comes to diets and allow themselves to be more "open" with what they eat, how much, and not have to "worry" about it.....
That isn't a real thing! The truth is it doesn't matter what kind of diet you are on...you can be on the celery only diet and if you eat a 500 calorie surplus of celery past your TDEE you will gain 1 lb a week....
Keto is no different...keto helps because the satiety effect of consuming more fat/protein over carbs allows "most" people to go longer periods without a mental breakdown to consume more food.
People who claim otherwise are simply pushing a myth that without counting it is easy to stay in a deficit...people will instinctively sway to more food over time (not all, but most people).
0 -
For myself, I can maintain doing Keto and not counting. To lose, I must do LCHF and count!1
