jessupbrady Member

A great use for the Dalek has been found! elf-sterminate!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd5yB9Vmd6I

This was what my kids went through this past week with me - After Episode 14 when it ended they asked if we could watch Season 2. I said that's it - Fox stopped it and said they didn't think enough people would like it. Then the kids ranted and griped for about 5 minutes asking why i made them start if there was not going…

so much this.... my problem is more of a "I snack when I have stress" so it depends on what's around on what I would snack on.

What are you doin in my waters?

you can use [ img ]web address to file[ / img ] without the spaces or click the icon that looks like a paper with a turned corner and past the image url in where it prompts you for a image url

Why am I reminded of the 1976 song by Larry Groce: "Junk Food Junkie"

Curious, are you never able to have a crap food - whether a rest day, 8 hours before your next workout, or ever, ever, ever because you know you will feel differently the next time you do get to a work out?

I'm curious about this. I thought (for good health) it wasn't safe to have too high of a calorie deficit?

Some, including myself, would have to be locked in a chamber, ethical or not, in order to remain consistent on a diet.

the "non-clean" eater is still eating healthy - macros/micros. They ain't livin off of donuts alone.

I'm confused - if clean eating has nothing to do with macro nutrients why are you telling us the macro nutrient of a "clean food"

So, If I understand what you are saying; A hypothetical question was asked and your answers to these hypothetical questions are you cannot think hypothetically.

Actually, I do worse on diets that restrict what I can eat because I start craving those foods more. It doesn't matter how full I am. Also, as a stress-eater I have an exceptionally hard time with being told not to eat a specific food type and tend to binge on them and undo everything I gained to begin with. What people…

I get people lose differently.... but, how does this study answer the original question about clean eating vs non-clean eating. I would make the assumption that this would just mean the original question would assume that both people had the "thrifty" phenotype?

If all things could be completely equal between two people (including micros and macros) and in every way possible (body measurements, health, mind, fitness, etc.) except the source of food, I would say they would lose exactly the same at the same rate. Hitting micros and macros, to me, means a healthy diet. And there is…

People do tend to be abrasive with their views. Meaning, they do not do a great job explaining - just stating. They tend to come back with folks who post bad advice even more abrasive. Take it as a way to learn more, research it, ask about their answer, if you have studies that prove your point (credible studies), then…