Lab Results?

GaleHawkins

I get first blood work on Monday after 10 months of being in nutritional ketosis. I am wondering how my numbers will look. Thursday is a exam for life insurance so if they are messed up that could cost me premium wise. At least I will be under 200 pounds unlike 10 years ago.

MissMaggieElizabeth

So today was doctor day on the above lab tests. He was actually very pleased. Felt testing the size of LDL is an expensive test and at this point my metabolic ratio is looking pretty good considering what it was last year. His earlier comments were made before he knew I had lost 44 pounds. And DANG that 45th pound is hanging in there tight as can be. BUT I measured my waist and it is 2 inches smaller from 2 weeks ago. Guess it is a Non Scale Victory. I do not have to go back for a year unless some thing unforeseen comes up. Feeling very pleased with myself.

pedidiva

Yay, Gale!!

dasher602014

MissMaggieElizabeth wrote: »

So today was doctor day on the above lab tests. He was actually very pleased. Felt testing the size of LDL is an expensive test and at this point my metabolic ratio is looking pretty good considering what it was last year. His earlier comments were made before he knew I had lost 44 pounds. And DANG that 45th pound is hanging in there tight as can be. BUT I measured my waist and it is 2 inches smaller from 2 weeks ago. Guess it is a Non Scale Victory. I do not have to go back for a year unless some thing unforeseen comes up. Feeling very pleased with myself.

So you should be! Good stuff!

deoxy4

Some people think that TG/HDL ratio and LDL particle size are much better assessment tools. The reason Total Cholesterol and LDL are so intensely tested and monitored is to fit into an assessment calculator used to prescribe statins. Any enlightened Lipidologist knows that TC and LDL are only part of the picture.

I don't see a widespread recommendation for LDL particle testing. There is no giant Pharmaceutical company with a drug to improve one's measurements. Pharmaceutical companies would fear that if there was a widespread acceptance of this testing their prescriptions for statins and profits would suffer.

Pharmaceutical companies look for a technology to measure something they can make a widespread panel number in screening. They try to link this measurement to a disease state. They then find a patentable drug to control this measurement. They do extensive clinical studies DESIGNED to promote the efficacy of their drugs. Any studies with non-conclusive results-they spin and any detrimental studies-never see the light of day. They advertise extensively. "Ask your doctor if Webemakindo is right for you." Once a drug is approved by the FDA people within the organization work feverously to find "off label" uses for their drugs to maximize profits.

Sorry if I seem so cynical but I had my 6 month lipid panel done two weeks ago and my TC was 212 and my primary wanted to prescribe me a statin based on the NEW statin calculator. I politely refused. Time to find a new primary.

Like they used to say on Hill Street Blues-"Be careful out there."

deoxy4

MissMaggieElizabeth wrote: »

Showed my test results to eye doctor yesterday as she has been watching my weight drop right before her eyes in the three months I have been going to her. Told her what PCP said and she flat out said SCREW HIM. I am thrilled with these results. And just like you said Knit, when losing weight it skews the results and the fact my ratio has come down so significantly is fantastic and she said NOT to do statins, not that I would, and wait and see how it all works out a year or so from now when the excess weight is gone and I am settled back into my body. She said I am doing fantastic in the short time she has been seeing me.

I will send PCP the links to the videos and information. I already sent him one. Not sure if her really took time to read it. Maybe I can educate this little twerp so he does not do stupid *kitten* to the next patient that comes along and he sends them down the SAD path like he keeps trying to do to me. He is a fresh out of school youngster as I see him and wouldn't it be wonderful if I could educate him. BUT on the other hand doctors are bound to follow the book and when they step out of what they consider the medical line they can get their hands slapped with big law suite. So I get it why he has to do some of this but also feel he needs to understand some of what he is preaching is so wrong.

It is his job to recommend statins because my readings really do look awful if you go by the book. I also have the right to refuse them.

Ditch him. It is not your job to educate or enlighten. Most doctors spew the party line, there is only one way and only one accreditation process. They live in that world and are supported by the system and they live there happily. They have invested a lot and aren't looking to rock the boat. Their attitude is... this is what we got...take it or leave it.

I had recent interaction with my new to me, 60 year old primary who wanted to prescribe me a statin. I asked him why and he told me my cholesterol was too high (TC 212 TG 75 HDL 54) and proceeded to relay the pouring chicken fat down the kitchen sink drain analogy was happening in my arteries. Before I could stop myself I interrupted him in asking if he really believed that analogy being correct. Our interaction went down hill from there. I asked him as he was prescribing statins he must have studies that support lower LDL or total cholesterol linking lower incidence of CHD he could refer to. He told me that adolescents with total cholesterol of 600+ often did not live thru their 20's without use of statins. When I replied to him that they had a specific disease state, hypercholesterolemia, I asked if he was diagnosing me with that disease state. He denied the diagnosis. I asked him if he had any other study and he directed me to any good medical library would have studies for me to do my own research. I declined the prescription and he informed me I was ignoring good medical science.

I am getting another primary where I feel I have some input in my medical care and in more often than not we see eye to eye. I don't think it will be easy but I think it is worth it.