Do you ever wish...
Replies
-
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.
The only picture I can see on the front page of SP is a bunch of Marshmallow Peeps. I have racked my considerable mental powers to see how that could be construed as sexist, and have drawn a blank. Are too many of them pink? If you care to share, I'm all ears.0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.
The only picture I can see on the front page of SP is a bunch of Marshmallow Peeps. I have racked my considerable mental powers to see how that could be construed as sexist, and have drawn a blank. Are too many of them pink? If you care to share, I'm all ears.
Sure, bet you just missed it.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/915105-sorry-guys
While you are in there, be sure to lecture the OP on how being mean and sexist will make her opinion irrelevant.
Be sure to also make assumptions on her character while you are there!0 -
Zach, you always do this. You almost have a point but then you get caught up in being mean and you lose it. No one will ever take you seriously if you can't explain yourself without giving in to the trendy "I'm going to call it tough love but really I'm just being a jerk!" mentality.
TL;DR: Calm yo tits, brah.
This is irrelevant to the argument Kit, in fact she was the first one that "fired a shot".
You taking me seriously or not is also irrelevant. I don't care if you do, my advice is simply that, advice.
Also my comment was directed at OP as advice, she was the one that felt the need to tell me "i was mean and she was offended".
Your original post was rude, dismissive of many people's (including the OP's) sincerely-held beliefs, and indicated a profound disdain for anyone who chooses to live their life differently to you. I'm not surprised shots were fired. Try phrasing things a little less obnoxiously, or attempt to appreciate that others have different viewpoints and standards, and find a way to offer practical advice that takes this into account, rather than dismissing it out of hand, if you want to have a different experience than the "being slammed" you often complain of, here, or in life in general. Constructive advice is one thing, dismissing someone's belief system in such frivolous and disrespectful terms is quite another.
2 things:
Your definition of rude is subjective.
It was not intended to be rude, I was merely pointing out that clinging to arbitrary morality values can backfire.
If you want to interpret it as rude, then by all means? Good news I am not forced to be Mr. Nice and Rainbows. So even if YOU think it is rude, there is nothing you can do to stop my wording.
TLDR: Cry less about a guy on the internet.
Oh trust me, I'm not crying.
Of course I can't change how you word things, but I can suggest, constructively, that if you want people's responses to you to be different (since you seem to be crying about getting"slammed" so often), then you need to consider that perhaps you might achieve that by reconsidering how you present your arguments. Audience matters.
'Rude' is subjective of course, but I think most people would agree that it is impolite, at best, to suggest that someone who has openly stated that she was brought up Catholic, and adheres to many tenets of that faith still, should fling the moral compass that is central to her faith to the winds, just as it would be very rude of me were I to bluntly say to a practising Muslim that veiling and shrouding women is fundamentally wrong, in my eyes.
Thank you! I always want to sound this elegant but it never works out that way.
Zach, your input was not asked for or needed. OP said "anyone wish they were able to do FWB?" You butted in with "just throw the morals you were raised with out the window." That was not needed and not besides you clearly don't agree with the topic.
And as for your comments about me, whatever. Clearly you're insecure otherwise you wouldn't go and personally attack someone on the INTERNET for crying out loud.0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.
The only picture I can see on the front page of SP is a bunch of Marshmallow Peeps. I have racked my considerable mental powers to see how that could be construed as sexist, and have drawn a blank. Are too many of them pink? If you care to share, I'm all ears.
Sure, bet you just missed it.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/915105-sorry-guys
While you are in there, be sure to lecture the OP on how being mean and sexist will make her opinion irrelevant.
Be sure to also make assumptions on her character while you are there!
Does being so angry all the time get exhausting? I certainly would be tired out by maintaining the level of aggression you display here so frequently.
Actually, I hadn't read that thread, and as it does not appear on my first page, the only image I could find from your initial description was indeed the Peeps.
Not sure how a discussion of sexism has evolved from some constructive advice about sensitivity in posting (especially in regards to others' religious beliefs), but I'm happy to continue this elsewhere, should you desire, so that this can get back to the OP. I'll even try to be a good, submissive woman, and let you go first. *
*ETA: Mainly because I'm leaving the office in three minutes, and won't be back to continue this charming discussion until tomorrow. As a gentleman, I'm sure you would normally cede precedence to a lady.0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.
The only picture I can see on the front page of SP is a bunch of Marshmallow Peeps. I have racked my considerable mental powers to see how that could be construed as sexist, and have drawn a blank. Are too many of them pink? If you care to share, I'm all ears.
Sure, bet you just missed it.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/915105-sorry-guys
While you are in there, be sure to lecture the OP on how being mean and sexist will make her opinion irrelevant.
Be sure to also make assumptions on her character while you are there!
Does being so angry all the time get exhausting? I certainly would be tired out by maintaining the level of aggression you display here so frequently.
Actually, I hadn't read that thread, and as it does not appear on my first page, the only image I could find from your initial description was indeed the Peeps.
Not sure how a discussion of sexism has evolved from some constructive advice about sensitivity in posting (especially in regards to others' religious beliefs), but I'm happy to continue this elsewhere, should you desire, so that this can get back to the OP. I'll even try to be a good, submissive woman, and let you go first. *
*ETA: Mainly because I'm leaving the office in three minutes, and won't be back to continue this charming discussion until tomorrow. As a gentleman, I'm sure you would normally cede precedence to a lady.
My point is, you are the first female zealot here to save damsels in distress from internet meanies,
however you turn a blind eye to the opposite.
This is a common practice here in singles.
My point is, I made the claim to abandon the morality compass, at which Christine decided to butt in with her irrelevant opinion (according to her own logic i might add), and then Kit and now you have decided to crucify me, on the grounds of being mean.
Why is this practice (stomping out all of the meanies) only for men? Why not the meanie women?0 -
Zach, you always do this. You almost have a point but then you get caught up in being mean and you lose it. No one will ever take you seriously if you can't explain yourself without giving in to the trendy "I'm going to call it tough love but really I'm just being a jerk!" mentality.
TL;DR: Calm yo tits, brah.
This is irrelevant to the argument Kit, in fact she was the first one that "fired a shot".
You taking me seriously or not is also irrelevant. I don't care if you do, my advice is simply that, advice.
Also my comment was directed at OP as advice, she was the one that felt the need to tell me "i was mean and she was offended".
Your original post was rude, dismissive of many people's (including the OP's) sincerely-held beliefs, and indicated a profound disdain for anyone who chooses to live their life differently to you. I'm not surprised shots were fired. Try phrasing things a little less obnoxiously, or attempt to appreciate that others have different viewpoints and standards, and find a way to offer practical advice that takes this into account, rather than dismissing it out of hand, if you want to have a different experience than the "being slammed" you often complain of, here, or in life in general. Constructive advice is one thing, dismissing someone's belief system in such frivolous and disrespectful terms is quite another.
2 things:
Your definition of rude is subjective.
It was not intended to be rude, I was merely pointing out that clinging to arbitrary morality values can backfire.
If you want to interpret it as rude, then by all means? Good news I am not forced to be Mr. Nice and Rainbows. So even if YOU think it is rude, there is nothing you can do to stop my wording.
TLDR: Cry less about a guy on the internet.
Oh trust me, I'm not crying.
Of course I can't change how you word things, but I can suggest, constructively, that if you want people's responses to you to be different (since you seem to be crying about getting"slammed" so often), then you need to consider that perhaps you might achieve that by reconsidering how you present your arguments. Audience matters.
'Rude' is subjective of course, but I think most people would agree that it is impolite, at best, to suggest that someone who has openly stated that she was brought up Catholic, and adheres to many tenets of that faith still, should fling the moral compass that is central to her faith to the winds, just as it would be very rude of me were I to bluntly say to a practising Muslim that veiling and shrouding women is fundamentally wrong, in my eyes.
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Wow, just wow.
I want to say a million rude things to you but I will bite my tongue...for now.0 -
Also to note there is a post currently on the front page of singles, where a female posts a picture that is obviously sexist towards men.
Why is there always so much outrage at "men" being mean but never women? Why aren't you in that thread yelling at her?
Oh wait, it is because women here in Singles have an agenda to push, I forgot.
I don't think there is an agenda that we the women are pushing...I would hope not at least. I hadn't seen the post until you mentioned it, but yes it is distasteful and I've added my comment (fully ready to be flamed by both sides on it as well).0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.
The only picture I can see on the front page of SP is a bunch of Marshmallow Peeps. I have racked my considerable mental powers to see how that could be construed as sexist, and have drawn a blank. Are too many of them pink? If you care to share, I'm all ears.
Sure, bet you just missed it.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/915105-sorry-guys
While you are in there, be sure to lecture the OP on how being mean and sexist will make her opinion irrelevant.
Be sure to also make assumptions on her character while you are there!
Does being so angry all the time get exhausting? I certainly would be tired out by maintaining the level of aggression you display here so frequently.
Actually, I hadn't read that thread, and as it does not appear on my first page, the only image I could find from your initial description was indeed the Peeps.
Not sure how a discussion of sexism has evolved from some constructive advice about sensitivity in posting (especially in regards to others' religious beliefs), but I'm happy to continue this elsewhere, should you desire, so that this can get back to the OP. I'll even try to be a good, submissive woman, and let you go first. *
*ETA: Mainly because I'm leaving the office in three minutes, and won't be back to continue this charming discussion until tomorrow. As a gentleman, I'm sure you would normally cede precedence to a lady.
My point is, you are the first female zealot here to save damsels in distress from internet meanies,
however you turn a blind eye to the opposite.
This is a common practice here in singles.
My point is, I made the claim to abandon the morality compass, at which Christine decided to butt in with her irrelevant opinion (according to her own logic i might add), and then Kit and now you have decided to crucify me, on the grounds of being mean.
Why is this practice (stomping out all of the meanies) only for men? Why not the meanie women?
Zach, why don't you just leave Single Peeps if you think it's so unfair?0 -
Lol, people are looking for legitimate advice, they are not looking for people to blow smoke up their *kitten*.
Again they can take it or leave it. Comment was directed at OP, not at Christine.
Since you have made, currently two posts, to address how "mean i act", yes you are in fact crying.
Sorry to disappoint - no tears here, merely offering some constructive advice. Namely: advice need not be insensitive to be legitimate. 'Bye now!
Weird no comment on the "sexist picture thread"?
I thought we were here to stop the meanies!
EDIT: Oh look the self righteous zealots lose their initiative.
Didn't see that coming.
The only picture I can see on the front page of SP is a bunch of Marshmallow Peeps. I have racked my considerable mental powers to see how that could be construed as sexist, and have drawn a blank. Are too many of them pink? If you care to share, I'm all ears.
Sure, bet you just missed it.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/915105-sorry-guys
While you are in there, be sure to lecture the OP on how being mean and sexist will make her opinion irrelevant.
Be sure to also make assumptions on her character while you are there!
Does being so angry all the time get exhausting? I certainly would be tired out by maintaining the level of aggression you display here so frequently.
Actually, I hadn't read that thread, and as it does not appear on my first page, the only image I could find from your initial description was indeed the Peeps.
Not sure how a discussion of sexism has evolved from some constructive advice about sensitivity in posting (especially in regards to others' religious beliefs), but I'm happy to continue this elsewhere, should you desire, so that this can get back to the OP. I'll even try to be a good, submissive woman, and let you go first. *
*ETA: Mainly because I'm leaving the office in three minutes, and won't be back to continue this charming discussion until tomorrow. As a gentleman, I'm sure you would normally cede precedence to a lady.
My point is, you are the first female zealot here to save damsels in distress from internet meanies,
however you turn a blind eye to the opposite.
This is a common practice here in singles.
My point is, I made the claim to abandon the morality compass, at which Christine decided to butt in with her irrelevant opinion (according to her own logic i might add), and then Kit and now you have decided to crucify me, on the grounds of being mean.
Why is this practice (stomping out all of the meanies) only for men? Why not the meanie women?
Zach, why don't you just leave Single Peeps if you think it's so unfair?
Why do you insist we be hypocritical in this group?0 -
I think we're all taking this a bit too serious here. I don't feel like doing any moderator duties, so maybe y'all could evaluate if this is going anywhere and wrap it up.
** Or start a battle of the sexes thread or something if you feel it is an important topic.0 -
I don't think the "moral compass" comment was rude (but the back and forth afterwards were borderline aggressive, yes).
Because if we're honest, it's just rephrasing with an analogy what the OP said herself in her post. Namely:
"I was raised a nice Catholic girl, so could never actually go through with it. But it would solve soooooo many problems."
Translates in:
"It would solve many problems if I wasn't a nice catholic girl"
Translates in:
"My life would be simpler and more enjoyable if I didn't have to comply with (nice) catholic morality"
Translates in:
"My life would be simpler and more enjoyable if I didn't have my current morality"
Well then, if you think your life would be better this way...
Take your morality compass, find the nearest cliff, frisbee said compass off the cliff, and life gets much simpler, and more enjoyable.
Nothing but yourself is preventing yourself (not that I think anyone should have to do that).
I personally think the main issue for a FWB should be "emotional" rather than "moral".
Though I'm happy for people who are preparing their eternal life to look down on me while I'm making the best of my short slice of earthly life.0 -
Let's get back to talking about FWB sex. Or angry make up sex..considering how this thread has gone. Or any kind of sex. SEX.
That's kind of the point, no?
I find myself in weirdest headspace ever.
I have a high need to emotionally connect with my partner. This could be construed as a teensy bit needy and clingy emotionally by the wrong man for me! I need to like and care enough about someone to really want to have sex with them, and thus it stands to reason, why wouldn't I want a deeper connection with them? Now, this can develop really, really quickly for me.. but still.
So, it happened that a friend of a friend added me on Facebook. We thought we had met before perhaps, but it turns out we actually haven't. He happens to be housesitting in a $5 million dollar beach house currently, and so when I was in the area for another event, he invited me over for a tour. Yes, obviously I saw more than just the house.
It was a FANTASTIC tour in fact.
He is a really nice guy actually, has great references from friends, and strangely enough we will send texts and little comments on Facebook..but told me up front not to get attached and he isn't looking for a relationship. And for some reason..I'm not really interested in that with him either. And yet, as mentioned.. the sex is fantastic.
So all that to say that 1. I never, ever thought I'd be a girl who could have a FWB, 2. I think I do have one, 3. I'm still confused as to why I am okay with it emotionally and 4. I have no regrets yet!0 -
I don't think the "moral compass" comment was rude (but the back and forth afterwards were borderline aggressive, yes).
Because if we're honest, it's just rephrasing with an analogy what the OP said herself in her post. Namely:
"I was raised a nice Catholic girl, so could never actually go through with it. But it would solve soooooo many problems."
Translates in:
"It would solve many problems if I wasn't a nice catholic girl"
Translates in:
"My life would be simpler and more enjoyable if I didn't have to comply with (nice) catholic morality"
Translates in:
"My life would be simpler and more enjoyable if I didn't have my current morality"
Well then, if you think your life would be better this way...
Take your morality compass, find the nearest cliff, frisbee said compass off the cliff, and life gets much simpler, and more enjoyable.
Nothing but yourself is preventing yourself (not that I think anyone should have to do that).
I personally think the main issue for a FWB should be "emotional" rather than "moral".
Though I'm happy for people who are preparing their eternal life to look down on me while I'm making the best of my short slice of earthly life.
Exactly.0 -
wow. There's a lot of hostility from both genders in this thread. Apparently there are several people in here who NEED to get laid even more than I do.0
-
WOW who knew my post would elicit such heated comments! :noway:
Perhaps I should have explained a little more... I do not think it is wrong morally to be/have a FWB. I have moved away from most of the stuff that was pushed into my head as a kid.
But some of it remains... I just think it was ingrained in my head a long time ago that you had to be in love to have sex. It is a hard mode of thought to get away from, and I don't even think I would want to. But there ARE times when a FWB would come in handy, if I was the kind of girl that could do that.
As for my moral compass, I am pretty proud of it and would never toss it off a cliff.
I do understand the advice, however. 0 -
Yeah, I think for me, sex really has to be connected to love/deep feelings. It would just be really hard to be with a man and not have my feelings involved, either before or after getting involved with him sexually.
Friendships involve feelings. You can still care about the person you are nailing on a continual basis, you just don't have to get in an argument if you forget to text them goodnight.
^^^^^^ I've been married and had a LTR ...
I have also had several FWB and even a few FB ... Its not that big a deal. I love my friends just not like that.... The one thing I can suggest is make sure they don't develop romantic feelings for you and visa versa.. Sex is not the relationship , friendship is the relationship with sex thrown in .0 -
So all that to say that 1. I never, ever thought I'd be a girl who could have a FWB, 2. I think I do have one, 3. I'm still confused as to why I am okay with it emotionally and 4. I have no regrets yet!
This is awesome. I hope it works out for you!0 -
WOW who knew my post would elicit such heated comments! :noway:
Perhaps I should have explained a little more... I do not think it is wrong morally to be/have a FWB. I have moved away from most of the stuff that was pushed into my head as a kid.
But some of it remains... I just think it was ingrained in my head a long time ago that you had to be in love to have sex. It is a hard mode of thought to get away from, and I don't even think I would want to. But there ARE times when a FWB would come in handy, if I was the kind of girl that could do that.
As for my moral compass, I am pretty proud of it and would never toss it off a cliff. I do understand the advice, however.
I don't think it's wrong either, but if you don't believe in personally or it is against your morals that is okay as well.
I just know the person I want to have sex with I want to be in love with and I'm not going to let Zach or anyone try to tell me that is wrong.
0 -
So all that to say that 1. I never, ever thought I'd be a girl who could have a FWB, 2. I think I do have one, 3. I'm still confused as to why I am okay with it emotionally and 4. I have no regrets yet!
This is awesome. I hope it works out for you!
Ah..but is it? Or am I selling myself short... that is my question.0 -
So all that to say that 1. I never, ever thought I'd be a girl who could have a FWB, 2. I think I do have one, 3. I'm still confused as to why I am okay with it emotionally and 4. I have no regrets yet!
This is awesome. I hope it works out for you!
Ah..but is it? Or am I selling myself short... that is my question.
I don't think so... If you are REALLY ok with it! But then again I am not the FWB expert. 0 -
So all that to say that 1. I never, ever thought I'd be a girl who could have a FWB, 2. I think I do have one, 3. I'm still confused as to why I am okay with it emotionally and 4. I have no regrets yet!
This is awesome. I hope it works out for you!
Ah..but is it? Or am I selling myself short... that is my question.
Only you can know that. If you are unhappy and secretly hoping more will come from it then you are selling yourself short. If you are genuinely okay with the situation then rock on lady.0 -
Is it just me or does every thread Zack posts in seem to turn into a ***** fest? I also can't tell if it's entertaining or just plain annoying. It's like the Jersey Shore up in here some days.0
-
Is it just me or does every thread Zack posts in seem to turn into a ***** fest? I also can't tell if it's entertaining or just plain annoying. It's like the Jersey Shore up in here some days.
I simply said to abandon her moral compass.
"I was mean." I am pretty sure people simply follow me around looking for ways to argue with me.
Of course without Mike or DM, I am next in line to demonize.0 -
Only you can know that. If you are unhappy and secretly hoping more will come from it then you are selling yourself short. If you are genuinely okay with the situation then rock on lady.
Not unhappy with the situation thus far. Not hoping anymore will come from it either. These are strange and odd times. 0 -
Am I wrong?Is it just me or does every thread Zack posts in seem to turn into a ***** fest? I also can't tell if it's entertaining or just plain annoying. It's like the Jersey Shore up in here some days.
I simply said to abandon her moral compass.
"I was mean." I am pretty sure people simply follow me around looking for ways to argue with me.
Of course without Mike or DM, I am next in line to demonize.
I'm not saying it's all your fault, but isn't your moral compass what keeps people from going on shooting sprees, blowing up planes, raping babies, and other sick s**t like that? Well you just told someone to throw that off a cliff like a frisbee, do you honestly not see how that could be taken the wrong way?0 -
Am I wrong?Is it just me or does every thread Zack posts in seem to turn into a ***** fest? I also can't tell if it's entertaining or just plain annoying. It's like the Jersey Shore up in here some days.
I simply said to abandon her moral compass.
"I was mean." I am pretty sure people simply follow me around looking for ways to argue with me.
Of course without Mike or DM, I am next in line to demonize.
I'm not saying it's all your fault, but isn't your moral compass what keeps people from going on shooting sprees, blowing up planes, raping babies, and other sick s**t like that? Well you just told someone to throw that off a cliff like a frisbee, do you honestly not see how that could be taken the wrong way?
Read flims post, use critical thinking. All will be clear.0 -
Am I wrong?Is it just me or does every thread Zack posts in seem to turn into a ***** fest? I also can't tell if it's entertaining or just plain annoying. It's like the Jersey Shore up in here some days.
I simply said to abandon her moral compass.
"I was mean." I am pretty sure people simply follow me around looking for ways to argue with me.
Of course without Mike or DM, I am next in line to demonize.
I'm not saying it's all your fault, but isn't your moral compass what keeps people from going on shooting sprees, blowing up planes, raping babies, and other sick s**t like that? Well you just told someone to throw that off a cliff like a frisbee, do you honestly not see how that could be taken the wrong way?
Read flims post, use critical thinking. All will be clear.
I actually didn't have a problem until Christine said "that's a little rude..." and then *kitten* got nasty.0 -
SMH
Deliver of advice is solicited as soon as you post a topic on any forum. You don't get to choose who will give it or what they will say. If you don't agree, you get to disagree, and cycle that a million times or until somebody caves.
Get over your poor sensitive selves, state your opinion, take others or not, and seriously...if this is where you get your best advice...find some REAL LIVE FRIENDS.
You peeps are too funny...or sad...or frikkin SMH hilarious.0
This discussion has been closed.