DecadeDuchess Member

I don't believe that they'd allow that, to occur since access to clean water, prevents diseases via starting. They'd just've them, wear hazard suits.

"That which does not kill me makes me stronger." ~ Friedrich Nietzsche. You'll only naturally build immunity, if it doesn't kill you but you don't put yourself at risk of it, to attempt to build immunity because it might kill you instead of cure you & worse, also spread to others.

I've no worries, concerning getting sick and/or dying of this virus or the flu, even though I am 1 of the venerable {my Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ~ CFS, was via a severe flu & yeah, I got the vaccination prior but it wasn't for the correct strain}. My worry with being hypoglycemic's being unable to ensure, that I've a…

Of course, adults also. That definitely helps, to minimize exposure. I never thought to bring a toy via home, when I was a child but once school began, we brought our homework. My Nephew's Mother did take 1 of her children's toys, to the emergency room, they didn't share it with anyone there & we disinfected it, afterwards.

I really wish that doctor's office waiting areas, wouldn't have toys because healthy children just there for their routine visit then play with the same toys, that the children that're there because they're sick then also play with.

No 1 pleases everyone, thereby my posts're meant for those that don't mind them as they're.

I don't believe that it's appropriate to ask someone to change their lifestyle, over this. The English language isn't absolute. It even changes annually, when new words that're created by random people're chosen to be added to the dictionary. I'd have never entertained answering your question, if my belief was that your…

I was going along the lines of how other words do, that everyone seems to be able to read & understand. They're = they are or I've = I have.

Yeah it's intentional, necessities're = necessities are. It's a habit to combine & shorten words because of low character limits elsewhere.

I am 39 years old, thus I was within 6th grade during the early 1990's & they were removing/replacing reeds, between demonstrations then.

With just 20 pounds to lose, a ½ pound weekly lost's ideal. You're able to eat & drink whatever or how much of whatever you'd like, as long as 1st it's within your calorie budget {a food scale for many helps to ensure this, especially with so little for you to lose there isn't much margin for error} & 2nd it keeps you…

Yeah being within line with your son, was definitely sensible.

I'd fear her getting sick instead of the quarantine. If she's still a minor at the time, she'll be taken care of as any unaccompanied minor'd otherwise be by staff.

I don't know but then again, I don't lick envelopes and/or stamps either.

Yeah, she's a contradiction. I'd rather not imply hypocrite because it doesn't appear to be a conscious act, it's habitual.

I am certain, that she does this when turning book pages & counting cash, as well.

Hear, hear {just found that "Great call", might also be used as criticism & thus I am editing, my post}!

Considering that some of our height's via cartilage, yeah because it's squishy.

I've found, that these people're just users {we mightn't even ever know, what they were using us for or planning to because it might seem nonsensical, to us: I was, someone's power trip} but the moment they believe that we're unusable, they disappear.

While the main panic concerning daily necessities're customers, where I am via business & government here, causes it as well. Prior to the Blizzard of 1996, I took the bus to school whilst it was snowing. There were no delayed openings, ½ days, early release or snow days. After we were coddled by many snow less winters,…

A snowstorm might prohibit someone via making a regular trip to restock, even their usual amount of necessities but it'd also prevent a trip for necessities, should they become sick or've to take care, of someone else whom's then. I only disagree, if posts advocates something dangerous & reply also or only disagree, if I…

I doubt, that they disagree with the post but instead with me.

Some people purchase just enough, between regular shopping trips & thus realistically mightn't have enough, if they've to skip a trip. Also some illnesses, might include an abnormal increase of usage because of diarrhea.

The surf even within shallow water, upon a great day's still powerful. I remember once being told, to stay where I was & got into trouble, when they saw that I didn't but I did, the water unbeknownst to me was moving me along the shoreline. I agree!

I love beaches, I am certain that it was enjoyable!

I understood that, that's why I put "here's" within my comment to differentiate them.

Illnesses that aren't dangerously contagious're private matters but when the government has to intervene, that's a public matter.

The relevance's that both might cause long term absenteeism beyond the control of the employee. If jury duty's considered a necessary protection against firing, it's fair to expect health be also & questionable, as to why it isn't.

It was my response to a reply concerning the fairness of an employee facing long term absenteeism beyond their control regardless of why, that's known here by law & that it should extend to protect others, within those unfortunate situations.

This news' pleasing, thank you for posting it!