Setting Your Calorie and Macro Targets

1111214161720

Replies

  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    I've been tracking in MFP for 11 days. But I've been tracking on WW since Feb. I came over to MFP because I'm not going to continue with WW bc I've got the basics and now I feel confident enough to go on my own.

    What are your stats?

    Height
    Weight
    Age
    Non exercise activity (e.g. kids, desk job, walking a dog etc)
    How many days a week are you exercising and for how long on average?
  • jdhcm2006
    jdhcm2006 Posts: 2,254 Member
    I've been tracking in MFP for 11 days. But I've been tracking on WW since Feb. I came over to MFP because I'm not going to continue with WW bc I've got the basics and now I feel confident enough to go on my own.

    What are your stats?

    Height
    Weight
    Age
    Non exercise activity (e.g. kids, desk job, walking a dog etc)
    How many days a week are you exercising and for how long on average?

    5'
    145.5 (as of 4/30/14)
    26
    Desk job, that involves moderate standing, walking, lifting heavy coin. No kids, no pets.
    6 days a week, 60 mins
  • replying to save this. seriously.
  • totaldetermination
    totaldetermination Posts: 1,184 Member
    Hi,
    I have been using the default MFP settings for calories (I have a fitbit and an HRM to calculate calories burned). At 1000 calorie deficit I have lost 16 lb in 8 weeks. So I am happy with the calories in / out balance. I eat 1200-1400 calories per day, depending on how active I have been.

    But I feel I should be focusing more on my macros, as I tend to eat a lot of carbs.

    Could you please confirm that I have done the maths to set my macro targets correctly ?

    I am 5 foot 8, 192 lb(currently) , with body fat 36.9%. (just measured by my home scale, but its the most accurate I've got).
    Protein: 1 x 192 x 0.631 (LBM) = 121g x 4 calories = 484 calories divided by 1,300 (calorie target) = 37% - round up to 38%
    Fat: 0.35 x 192 = 67.2g x 9 calories = 605 calories divided by 1,300 = 47% - round up to 48%

    Carbs: balance of 14%

    Is this correct ? (I don't have a lot of experience but it seems like a lot of fat ?)
    Thank you for your time.
  • mzbek24
    mzbek24 Posts: 436 Member
    I tried to work out mine, but when I put them into mfp it comes up at around 70% carbs, 15%protein and 15% fat. (280g, 60g, 27g) That doesn't seem quite right does it? I mean it just seems really out of balance.
  • mzbek24
    mzbek24 Posts: 436 Member
    I tried to work out mine, but when I put them into mfp it comes up at around 70% carbs, 15%protein and 15% fat. (280g, 60g, 27g) That doesn't seem quite right does it? I mean it just seems really out of balance.

    Ah figured it out- had to convert kgs to pounds to do the calculations.
  • StephanieT0602
    StephanieT0602 Posts: 58 Member
    Bump...to read later
  • dinos
    dinos Posts: 1,390 Member
    Bump
  • leadslinger17
    leadslinger17 Posts: 297 Member
    Thanks for the informative post, I just joined this group since I'd like some guidance on nutrition. I put my info into the scooby calculator and am a little confused by the results.

    I am male, 31, 5 ft 10 in tall, and 178lbs. I work at a desk but have kids, do yard work etc. I also exercise probably 4 times a week for about an hour, mostly heavy lifting but a little running and circuit training mixed in.

    The recomp thing sounds pretty difficult to do and honestly, although I'd like to get bigger I think from various sources my goal should be cutting some fat at this point. But the calculator said at 3-5 hrs/wk of moderate exercise, 15% calorie reduction and 4 meals a day with a 30% protein/45% carb/25% fat macro breakdown that I need 2871 calories just to maintain my weight? And 2440 would meet my goal and give me .9 lb weight loss a week?

    Can this be right? This sounds really high to me so I entered 2200 in MFP. I am only just beginning to track my diet again... I was really into it a year ago and lost 25 lbs (190 down to 165) but then felt like I had a good handle on my calories and wanted to started bulking up (and have). Also do I or do I not eat my calories back when doing cardio? Everyone's advice seems different.

    If it helps my measurements as taken by a personal trainer in February of this year (which if I had to guess would be similar right now although some more muscle):

    Tricipes 10.5 (I'm assuming this is in mm)
    Subscapula 18
    Midaxilla 9.5
    Pectoral 15.5
    Abdomen 20
    Suprailiac 13
    Quadriceps 18.5

    Weight 175 lbs
    Lean Weight 147.9 lbs
    Fat Weight 27.1 lbs
    Body Fat Percentage 15.46%
    BMI 25.1 kg/m2

    I'm not sure what method she used for the conversion from the measurements to the body fat percentage but I could find out if that is helpful. Thank you for your help.
  • rocky503
    rocky503 Posts: 430 Member
    What's the latest on a sensible protien intake these days? I just don't see how so much protein is needed for the average person to build some muscle beyond 100g with a 2000mg intake....:huh:
  • DianeinCA
    DianeinCA Posts: 307 Member
    I have read this entire thread and didn't see the answer to this. Apologies if I missed it.

    I have figured out my macros based on my current weight and last known BF% (from 5 lbs ago), based on a 2000 calorie a day diet. I set MFP to "highly active", which guesses my TDEE at about 2500.

    Often, however, according to my Fitbit, I go over 2500 -- often to 2750, 2800, or higher. And the Fitbit tells MFP to give me more calories.

    My question is: do I dole out these extra calories using the same 50/25/25 ratio I set up the 2000 calories in? Or, as long as I get my 112g of protein and 55g of fat every day, it doesn't matter what the extra 250-300 calories are made up of?

    And in general should I set my daily calorie goal to be higher (last month, my Fitbit calculated my daily TDEE as 2771) and just work the extra calories into the equation? My average daily intake in May was 2059 and I lost 5.5 lbs, which was the single best month I've had since January. (My weight loss has been very slow this time, so I was slightly more aggressive in May.)
  • rocky503
    rocky503 Posts: 430 Member
    My general understanding (and I'm not claiming to be an expert here) is once youv'e statisfied your general protein requirement for the day and your'e other basic macros, additionally needed calories can be carbs mostly....I don't think you want to add a lot of extra fat and protein is generally more expensive and just broken down anyway.

    Anyway I posted my question because I see women maybe dedicating an hour a day to fitness including some weight lifting and then being compelled to eat a ton of protein, like 135 or 150 grams a day. I think it may be much more than they really need.

    Kinda off track but I remember reading a study of sugar cane workers who burnt 6,000 cals a day and pure cane juice accounted for their additional energy calories beyond their general diet (so providing about 4,000 calories from just sugar) and they were lean and healthy.

    I'm concerned that some can get tunnel vision with the protein intake .
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    I have read this entire thread and didn't see the answer to this. Apologies if I missed it.

    I have figured out my macros based on my current weight and last known BF% (from 5 lbs ago), based on a 2000 calorie a day diet. I set MFP to "highly active", which guesses my TDEE at about 2500.

    Often, however, according to my Fitbit, I go over 2500 -- often to 2750, 2800, or higher. And the Fitbit tells MFP to give me more calories.

    My question is: do I dole out these extra calories using the same 50/25/25 ratio I set up the 2000 calories in? Or, as long as I get my 112g of protein and 55g of fat every day, it doesn't matter what the extra 250-300 calories are made up of?

    And in general should I set my daily calorie goal to be higher (last month, my Fitbit calculated my daily TDEE as 2771) and just work the extra calories into the equation? My average daily intake in May was 2059 and I lost 5.5 lbs, which was the single best month I've had since January. (My weight loss has been very slow this time, so I was slightly more aggressive in May.)

    Since protein and fat is grams based on weight, not how much you eat, the carbs is what will increase.

    Sadly the way MFP works, if your burn increases, then your eating level increases, and since they go by % of food eaten only, those grams go up.

    So you could just memorize your protein and fat grams, since they are shown at the bottom of your Food diary, and then just work to hit those along with total calories if Fitbit says you actually burned a lot more.
    Round to a nice even number. Couple grams below or above truly calculated grams is no big deal if easier to memorize.

    Nothing wrong with trying to hit the ratio with more food, but as rocky said, it can start to get interesting figuring out how to get the extra in, plus it can be more expensive if that matters. But it doesn't hurt, but generally won't help either unless you got some metabolic syndrome or pre-diabetes.
  • DianeinCA
    DianeinCA Posts: 307 Member
    Since protein and fat is grams based on weight, not how much you eat, the carbs is what will increase.

    Sadly the way MFP works, if your burn increases, then your eating level increases, and since they go by % of food eaten only, those grams go up.

    I figured that all I needed to concentrate on was the grams, but then there's so much talk about macros as percentages that I wondered, maybe I need to keep the percentages stable too? (Which can be a pain, because sometimes I feel like I'm doing nothing but eating entire chickens.)

    Thanks.
  • Dana121970
    Dana121970 Posts: 19 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Since protein and fat is grams based on weight, not how much you eat, the carbs is what will increase.

    Sadly the way MFP works, if your burn increases, then your eating level increases, and since they go by % of food eaten only, those grams go up.

    I figured that all I needed to concentrate on was the grams, but then there's so much talk about macros as percentages that I wondered, maybe I need to keep the percentages stable too? (Which can be a pain, because sometimes I feel like I'm doing nothing but eating entire chickens.)

    Thanks.

    Macros are talked about as % first because that's how MFP does it, second it's a quick and rough way to get enough protein in just saying 40/30/30, almost guarantees you'll get the grams in, without doing any math.

    While many people throw out that ratio that came from Dr Sear's Zone diet and prior Maffetone's workout and diet method, rarely do they advocate eating as few calories as Zone gives you.

    I think it's turned into total fad.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?

    0.35 gram per lb of body weight?

    protein 0.82 gram per lb of body weight?

    No way anyone could answer your question if correct without the stats to actually check it like you did.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?

    That does seem high. What is your calorie target (gross)? What are your stats?
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Since protein and fat is grams based on weight, not how much you eat, the carbs is what will increase.

    Sadly the way MFP works, if your burn increases, then your eating level increases, and since they go by % of food eaten only, those grams go up.

    I figured that all I needed to concentrate on was the grams, but then there's so much talk about macros as percentages that I wondered, maybe I need to keep the percentages stable too? (Which can be a pain, because sometimes I feel like I'm doing nothing but eating entire chickens.)

    Thanks.

    It is best to base your goals off grams. Of your intake goes up, this does not mean that your protein or fats should necessarily go up - which it will if you use a % based approach.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    My general understanding (and I'm not claiming to be an expert here) is once youv'e statisfied your general protein requirement for the day and your'e other basic macros, additionally needed calories can be carbs mostly....I don't think you want to add a lot of extra fat and protein is generally more expensive and just broken down anyway.

    Anyway I posted my question because I see women maybe dedicating an hour a day to fitness including some weight lifting and then being compelled to eat a ton of protein, like 135 or 150 grams a day. I think it may be much more than they really need.

    Kinda off track but I remember reading a study of sugar cane workers who burnt 6,000 cals a day and pure cane juice accounted for their additional energy calories beyond their general diet (so providing about 4,000 calories from just sugar) and they were lean and healthy.

    I'm concerned that some can get tunnel vision with the protein intake .

    My target is 160g of protein a day when cutting, so those numbers do not look that out of whack to me. Protein is not necessarily more expensive. Not sure what you mean by 'broken down'. .

    However, generally, once you have hit your protein and fat target, it is often best to get the balance from carbs for energy and performance reasons. However, personal preference and individual circumstances (such as PCOS) may mean that it is best to limit carbs a bit and get the balance from other macros.
  • Dana121970
    Dana121970 Posts: 19 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?

    That does seem high. What is your calorie target (gross)? What are your stats?

    I weigh 260 and I'm eating 1750 calories to lose 1lb per week. I did .35 x 260 = 91 x 9 = 819/1750 = .468 which I rounded to 47%. Is that correct? I appreciate the help.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?

    That does seem high. What is your calorie target (gross)? What are your stats?

    I weigh 260 and I'm eating 1750 calories to lose 1lb per week. I did .35 x 260 = 91 x 9 = 819/1750 = .468 which I rounded to 47%. Is that correct? I appreciate the help.

    The fat recommendation is for people who do not have a significant amount of weight to lose. I would cap your fat minimum at about 60g, which would be about 30% of your intake.

    I assume you 'eat your exercise calories back' as I would imagine that you should be at more than 1lb a week based on your stats.
  • Dana121970
    Dana121970 Posts: 19 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?

    That does seem high. What is your calorie target (gross)? What are your stats?

    I weigh 260 and I'm eating 1750 calories to lose 1lb per week. I did .35 x 260 = 91 x 9 = 819/1750 = .468 which I rounded to 47%. Is that correct? I appreciate the help.

    The fat recommendation is for people who do not have a significant amount of weight to lose. I would cap your fat minimum at about 60g, which would be about 30% of your intake.

    I assume you 'eat your exercise calories back' as I would imagine that you should be at more than 1lb a week based on your stats.

    Thanks for the advice I will do that. Sometimes I do eat my exercise calories back, but not always. I just started and I did lose more than 1lb in a week. That is just what MFP says I will lose per week. :)
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    When I figured out my macros it worked out to be 28% Protein, 47% fat and 25% carbs. The fat seems really high to me. Can that be correct?

    That does seem high. What is your calorie target (gross)? What are your stats?

    I weigh 260 and I'm eating 1750 calories to lose 1lb per week. I did .35 x 260 = 91 x 9 = 819/1750 = .468 which I rounded to 47%. Is that correct? I appreciate the help.

    The fat recommendation is for people who do not have a significant amount of weight to lose. I would cap your fat minimum at about 60g, which would be about 30% of your intake.

    I assume you 'eat your exercise calories back' as I would imagine that you should be at more than 1lb a week based on your stats.

    Thanks for the advice I will do that. Sometimes I do eat my exercise calories back, but not always. I just started and I did lose more than 1lb in a week. That is just what MFP says I will lose per week. :)

    After a few weeks, your weight loss should settle down to something more predictable (at first, you lose quite a bit of water and food weight as well as fat) - you can tweak your intake up or down, depending on the way your losses are trending (looking at it over a few weeks rather than day to day).
  • moparjer
    moparjer Posts: 125 Member
    Thank you for your information. At 5'0", every extra pound shows!
  • beautyh2t
    beautyh2t Posts: 18 Member
    Hello everyone, first off I totally apologise as I am a COMPLETE newb to all this and to the forums but I am in desperate need of some help as I am completely lost! after losing 3 stone myself in the last 4 years with little knowledge and just cutting out drink and altering what i was eating ( student lifestyle!) I stopped losing, so to shift the last stone I spent a year on slimming world (UK) which I really didn't agree with nutritionally and it has been a slow year of low fat. I am only now looking into learning about macros etc as this last stone keeps creeping back ( no doubt thanks to the unlimited eating of some foods slimming world allows!) but I am still very confused. I weigh around 68 kgs and am 5'7 and have a moderately active lifestyle ( walk 7kms a day 5 days a week, gym a couple of times- need to learn how to lift but dont currently just do 30 mins of moderate bike) I am trying to use myfitness pal and it is saying 1200 cals a day with 150gs of carbs, 40 fat and 60 protein. Is this right? reading up on this thread has made things a little clearer but just so much information. so sorry to sound so new- but any help/guidance thoughts on what I should be aiming for would be amazing. I am aiming to lose a little weight maybe a stone maximum and generally improve nutirtion and then work on learning to lift.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Hello everyone, first off I totally apologise as I am a COMPLETE newb to all this and to the forums but I am in desperate need of some help as I am completely lost! after losing 3 stone myself in the last 4 years with little knowledge and just cutting out drink and altering what i was eating ( student lifestyle!) I stopped losing, so to shift the last stone I spent a year on slimming world (UK) which I really didn't agree with nutritionally and it has been a slow year of low fat. I am only now looking into learning about macros etc as this last stone keeps creeping back ( no doubt thanks to the unlimited eating of some foods slimming world allows!) but I am still very confused. I weigh around 68 kgs and am 5'7 and have a moderately active lifestyle ( walk 7kms a day 5 days a week, gym a couple of times- need to learn how to lift but dont currently just do 30 mins of moderate bike) I am trying to use myfitness pal and it is saying 1200 cals a day with 150gs of carbs, 40 fat and 60 protein. Is this right? reading up on this thread has made things a little clearer but just so much information. so sorry to sound so new- but any help/guidance thoughts on what I should be aiming for would be amazing. I am aiming to lose a little weight maybe a stone maximum and generally improve nutirtion and then work on learning to lift.


    How much did you set your weekly weight loss goal at and what did you set your activity level at?
  • Jaye_27
    Jaye_27 Posts: 3 Member
    Hello! I'm new to all this (especially the forum thing) so I'm sorry if this is a bit awkward...
    I worked out my TDEE as 1560 a day (I'm 5'2 and weigh 156lbs, and am currently doing around 90mins of cardio a week but looking to up that/include strength exercises. My target weight is around 133lbs). I've set my projected weight loss as 1lb a week. I worked out my LBM using an online calc so it might be incorrect but I do have a lot of fat to lose/muscle to build. I was just wondering if someone could check my calculations to see if I've got my macros right?

    Protein: 1x 155 x 0.55 (LBM) = 82.3g x 4 calories = 341 calories divided by 1560 = 22% - round down to 20% (I wanted more protein in my diet though so upped this to 25%)
    Fat: 0.35 x 155 = 54.25g x 9 calories = 488.25 calories divided by 1560 = 31% round down to 30% (I brought this down to 25% for weight/fat loss)
    Carbs = 50%

    I then entered this all in to MFP and it worked out the grams etc.
    Does this look okay? I was also wondering if someone could advise me on sugar intake? It's currently set to 40g a day on MFP - is this okay? I just want to get it all right so I don't have to worry so much about it.

    Thanks in advance! :smile:
  • Jessahbee
    Jessahbee Posts: 4
    Hello! Thank you for this helpful post!
    I had a body scan last month which was rather confronting. The suggestion given is to lose 18kg of body fat.
    Currently have a lean muscle mass of 53%.
    I work out 4-5 times per day and I am in a job that has me on my feet 80% of the time.

    Calorie intake was suggested at 1600 increasing to 1800 on work out days with a macro breakdown of 30/35/35 (120g carbs, 140g protein and 62g fat).

    Until today I hadn't been able to make sense of the numbers so I couldn't give you any results.

    I've also been told I need to stay away from the scales as previous diets have had me in such a deficit I need to feed my body back up?

    Do you think I'm on the right track here?
    Thank you
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Hello! I'm new to all this (especially the forum thing) so I'm sorry if this is a bit awkward...
    I worked out my TDEE as 1560 a day (I'm 5'2 and weigh 156lbs, and am currently doing around 90mins of cardio a week but looking to up that/include strength exercises. My target weight is around 133lbs). I've set my projected weight loss as 1lb a week. I worked out my LBM using an online calc so it might be incorrect but I do have a lot of fat to lose/muscle to build. I was just wondering if someone could check my calculations to see if I've got my macros right?

    Protein: 1x 155 x 0.55 (LBM) = 82.3g x 4 calories = 341 calories divided by 1560 = 22% - round down to 20% (I wanted more protein in my diet though so upped this to 25%)
    Fat: 0.35 x 155 = 54.25g x 9 calories = 488.25 calories divided by 1560 = 31% round down to 30% (I brought this down to 25% for weight/fat loss)
    Carbs = 50%

    I then entered this all in to MFP and it worked out the grams etc.
    Does this look okay? I was also wondering if someone could advise me on sugar intake? It's currently set to 40g a day on MFP - is this okay? I just want to get it all right so I don't have to worry so much about it.

    Thanks in advance! :smile:

    Principle is correct, math is wrong.

    You are getting your % by using the TDEE figure - but are you going to be eating your TDEE figure?
    No, you are going to be eating less than TDEE.

    Also, just know the grams for protein and fat - when you go in to manually set them, MFP shows you the grams, even though you change the %'s. Just change the % until you hit or go over the required grams.
    First set the eating goal, save out, then go back in though to change the macros.
This discussion has been closed.