Think ive cracked my weight loss problem
jmhurley87
Posts: 49
Ok so no matter what diet i go on it never ever works, unless i basicaly starv myself lol. o i brought a heart rate monitor so it can tell me my burnt calories at rest and on normal day... well i found out that my heart rate is 70 bpm ( low) at rest and i only burn about 1440 calories in 24hrs. No wonder i dont lose weight on normal diet as my body doesnt burn much lol.
I ve always know i have low blood pressure but come one lol
I ve always know i have low blood pressure but come one lol
0
Replies
-
your reading is very inaccurate. a heart rate monitor is not meant to be worn all day. it is meant to be used for activities where you exert more energy than you normally would, such as running, using an elliptical, zumba, swimming if it's water proof, etc. etc. etc.
If you attempt to use a heart rate monitor for walking walking around at stores, going to work and taking part in other routine daily activites you will come up with a reading similar to what you do, and that, as I said, is very very wrong.
For that, you would want a Fitbit, Bodybugg or Body media fit....
Please note, this applies to ALL Heart rate monitors (with and without a chest strap)
The fact that you view this as a diet (it should be seen as a lifestyle change) and stated that you "practically starve yourself" could be why you don't lose weight, but your diary is not open so that is merely an assumption on my part.0 -
So far as I am aware 70 bpm is not low. Don't rely on that for an answer. Friend of mine has a rate of 55 bpm. THAT is low.0
-
Google BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate). It will give you calories you burn to exist based upon height, weight, age, sex. The 1400 number you quote is roughly what my BMR is. However, I eat 1800-2400 calories per day depending upon my activity level, as you shouldn't be netting below your BMR.0
-
My bpm is 60, how has that got anything to do with me losing weight? Shouldn't your heart rate during exercise be the number you should be most concerned with?0
-
70 is not low. It's within normal range. Also, as stated HRM's are not meant to be worn all day and will not tell you how many calories you burn in a day. A Body Media Fit or Body Bugg will tell you your daily calorie expenditure.0
-
HRMs are designed to calculate calories burned during relatively steady-state aerobic activity. The algorithms they use don't work for day-round use. They are also inaccurate for weight training due to the spikes in HR.
Use an online TDEE calculator for the best estimate of your daily calories used and eat 500 less than that. If you don't want to do the hard sums, MFP's calculation bears up well against the most well-regarded. Set yourself to lose 1lb a week, eat back a good proportion of your exercise calories and Bob's your uncle.
If you follow MFP to the letter you will lose weight. If that's not happening, chances are you're not tracking accurately, overestimating your exercise burn (here's where you use your HRM!) or not checking your portion sizes.
70BPM isn't that low, by the way. The more cardio training you do the lower it will get. I run and mine's down to 55BPM.0 -
I was told 70 was low !
I dont like repeating myself but i will for 1 persons sake... I have been on EVERY diet possible and not lost weight, i then lowered my calories even more and found i lost weight, it seems to be the only way.
which no i dont like but i need to find out why.
Im using watch on a day of rest to test the difference between a day of rest and when im exercising. Only yesterday i used it all day. today im using it just for exercise.0 -
Also http://fat2fitradio.com will give you a pretty accurate number on how many calories you expend in a day and how many calories you should eat to lose weight.
My HR is 60 sitting at work typing this message. It's probably lower at rest. Resting HR really has nothing to do with weightloss.0 -
Mine is between 50-70 bpm resting. I eat 1500 calories a day and usually lose around 2lbs a week. I'm also a big girl with a lot more to lose.0
-
bump0
-
Also http://fat2fitradio.com will give you a pretty accurate number on how many calories you expend in a day and how many calories you should eat to lose weight.
My HR is 60 sitting at work typing this message. It's probably lower at rest. Resting HR really has nothing to do with weightloss.
according to that i should eat 2323 at rest0 -
70 is definetely not low. And the others are right. HRM will not give you an accurate reading for just doing day to day activities. You need a BodyBugg or something similar to track that.
Following a diet plan won't get you anywhere anyway, it is destined to fail. Thinking of it as a healthy lifestyle and making your own choices is what will help you lose weight not following whatever meal plan is in fashion at the time.0 -
Im not longer on a diet plan, im trying to sort that out myself0
-
TDEE calculator says 1824 when at rest0
-
Hiah
Have you tried the BMR thingy in the tools page? That tells you how many calories you would burn if you stayed in bed all day? I found that quite interesting, I would burn 1500 or so and they've got me on 1200 calories a day to eat!! Eeek0 -
yeah and they have also put me on 1200 to burn, do you have much weight to lose? do you exerciise alot?0
-
TDEE calculator says 1824 when at rest0
-
Ok so no matter what diet i go on it never ever works, unless i basicaly starv myself lol. o i brought a heart rate monitor so it can tell me my burnt calories at rest and on normal day... well i found out that my heart rate is 70 bpm ( low) at rest and i only burn about 1440 calories in 24hrs. No wonder i dont lose weight on normal diet as my body doesnt burn much lol.
I ve always know i have low blood pressure but come one lol
Let me get this straight.......Your trying to lose weight by starving yourself and also by doing nothing all day so you can burn 1440 calories a day? Did I read this correctly?
0 -
If you were to have a low resting heart rate that's probably a great sign. The HRM is a great tool for finding out how to workout and how hard to push.
You may have a lower metabolism than the calculators tell you because of all the starving. to increase metabolism you would need to exercise regularly and eating more also speeds up the metabolism. This is why the fat2fit radio guys preach 'eat more to lose more'.
You are not way out of shape. Only about 20 to lose is a great place to start.
I'd hate to suggest you may not be honest with yourself but mindless eating can ruin anybody's best effort. Extra little bit of ketchup here, butter on your toast, extra sugar in the coffe, a lot of dressing in your salad and even portion measurements can trick us. You may be eating 3/4 of a cup or a cup of rice when you think you are eating 1/2 a cup. Do you measure your intake and religiously log what you eat?
I think I have a slow metabolism but I get to that conclusion by logging absolutely everything I put in my mouth, exercising with a HRM and then comparing that with how much I lost. I know it's a lot of calculating but it may be the best way for you to find out what your BMR is.
I hope this helps0 -
70 is not low. It's within normal range. Also, as stated HRM's are not meant to be worn all day and will not tell you how many calories you burn in a day. A Body Media Fit or Body Bugg will tell you your daily calorie expenditure.
This makes me feel better, I thought my hear rate, typically 72 BPM, was high and I have been working out in the hopes of lowering it a little, perhaps 60 range. Then again I knew a guy with a normal HR in the low 40s, he ran a lot. Amazing how our experiences affect our perceptions.0 -
im 35 & recently went to have a heart scan as i have had open heart surgery 3 times in my life this was a heart condition from birth, but when i went for my heart scan they have recently introduced by seimens a brand new scan machine, seimens say that generally depending on age the txt book BPM should be anything between 60 & 70 BPM so ur not low by any means,
how are you finding cutting down ur callories & using MFP ? i have found cutting down on the fat intake is much better & you see results more0 -
Im not starving myself atall, im justeating lower calories that on other diets i been on.
breakfast
smoothie and fruit salad
or
porridge and fruit
Lunch
salad with tuna and sweetcorn
Dinner
pasta, sauce and small amount of cheese
I snack on fruit, cereal bars and drink lots
I exercise as much as i can, i walk alot with daughter ( she is 2 )
i burn about 400calories a day on a lazy day lol, more if i can0 -
70BPM is NOT that low by the way. A normal resting heart rate could be anywhere from 60 to 100. I am a student nurse, this is the first thing I got taught.
Also, a HRM is not a accurate device to calculate TDEE. I use a fitbit for that and youd be surprised at how much you really burn. Also "starving" yourself is not a great thing to do, its a wonder you are losing weight. Also saying you dont starve yourself is wrong because you burn about 400 on a "lazy day", you know you have to at least eat some of that back to be at a healthy deficit? :noway:0 -
bump0
-
70 BPM for a lady between 30 and 40 is good but not below average. Mine ranges between 58 and 64 which for 33 is below average. If you were 84 years old and your BPM was 70, that would be low!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions