I would suggest everyone to read Alan Aragon's latest blog h
Options
Replies
-
bump0
-
Bump - far too long to read on my phone!!0
-
Yep, you can pretty much guarantee that anything Alan Aragon has to say about nutrition will be worth listening to.0
-
I actually like this article, it has most of the same principles that I follow on a Paleo diet (which some see as a low carb diet), particularly the Applying Moderation: The 10-20% Guideline section. I can also guarantee the group that consumed 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar) felt awful in doing so, but numbers and math never lie. I also don't see where bread was mentioned though as a source of carbohydrate, only fruit, unless that is categorized under the sucrose label. Can someone enlighten me?0
-
tagging0
-
Saving. Thanks!0
-
bump for later!0
-
bump for later0
-
There ya go a balanced diet rules. :drinker:0
-
bump0
-
what is this?! A knowledgeable post on MFP forums that doesn't start a **** fight with nutritional myths being thrown around all the place?!
+rep0 -
Bump0
-
Thanks.... saving to read later.0
-
love any article that debunks the carb myth!! :bigsmile:
ME TOO!!
Bread Eaters-UNITE!
Um... since when does fruit = bread? Not in my world.0 -
Bump - everyone should read this.0
-
Bump0
-
Bump to finish reading later0
-
I can also guarantee the group that consumed 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar) felt awful in doing so, but numbers and math never lie. I also don't see where bread was mentioned though as a source of carbohydrate, only fruit, unless that is categorized under the sucrose label. Can someone enlighten me
The referenced study on sucrose did include behaviour and there wasn't a statistically significant difference between the two high carb diets (Table 7, reference below).
The article didn't debunk anything about carbs that I could see, the sucrose study was a comparison of two high carbohydrate diets where it was the sucrose content that was varied, not the carb content - which was over 70% of calories in both cases (eek) http://www.ajcn.org/content/65/4/908.full.pdf+html0 -
Bump for later0
-
I can also guarantee the group that consumed 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar) felt awful in doing so, but numbers and math never lie. I also don't see where bread was mentioned though as a source of carbohydrate, only fruit, unless that is categorized under the sucrose label. Can someone enlighten me
The referenced study on sucrose did include behaviour and there wasn't a statistically significant difference between the two high carb diets (Table 7, reference below).
The article didn't debunk anything about carbs that I could see, the sucrose study was a comparison of two high carbohydrate diets where it was the sucrose content that was varied, not the carb content - which was over 70% of calories in both cases (eek) http://www.ajcn.org/content/65/4/908.full.pdf+html
Thank you, I didn't see that part about behavior. I also came to the same conclusion you did, so all this hurray bread cheering has me scratching my head...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 394 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 956 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions