WHY DO PEOPLE EAT BACK THEIR EXERCISE CALS?!

Because MFP, unlike most calorie counting websites, doesn't include the exercise you SAY you'll do into your calorie goal. It doesn't matter if you say you're going to sit on your *kitten* 7 days a week, or run a marathon every day, MFP will give you the same base calories. Surely you understand that someone who exercises a lot needs more fuel than someone who doesn't?

When I just cut calories, when I believed that creating a large deficit was all it took to get the body I wanted, I lost weight, but too much of that weight was my lean body mass... my muscle. By "eating my exercise calories," I was able to maintain a moderate deficit, which allowed me to retain most of my lean mass and lose mostly body fat.

What that means in terms everyone can understand... The jeans on the bottom are the size 8 jeans I wore at 130 pounds about 5-6 years ago when I didn't eat enough, and the top pair is the size 5 jeans I'm wearing NOW, eating my exercise calories, at about 135-138 pounds. (Typically a 2 or 4 in misses.)



Here's me at about 130 pounds 5-6 years ago, and me at 133 pounds in February.



Then I still had a muffin top, back fat rolls, double chin, and cellulite out the wazzo. Now?



http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/494091-i-just-don-t-care-anymore

Thank you for this! I always thought that people who just stuck to a strict calorie limit and worked out and didn't eat anything else seemed to have a harder time losing the weight they wanted and what you are saying and showing proves it! You have to replenish yourself and make sure you are eating enough!

Basically you NEED those extra calories...the more you ask of your body (AKA exercise) the more you have to give it (food/calories) to perform.

I gotta say I'm both amused and amazed that this thread is still going.

RIGHT. It could've been solved in like 2 posts.

Because it's about developing a healthy lifestyle, not starving yourself.

Part of the issue, though, is that while doctors may recommend 1200 or 1500 calories, they likely do with the assumption that one is doing the minimum recommended exercise of about a half hour a day.... NOT with the assumption that people are spending hours in they gym and burning 800-1000 calories.

If you're eating 1200 calories and walking for a half hour on the treadmill and burning 100 calories, not eating that back isn't that big of a deal.

If you're eating 1200, and doing an hour of spin class, followed by an hour of zumba, then coming home and doing a DVD and burning 1200 calories... you're going to crash and burn.

People also hear a phrase like, "You have to burn more than you eat," and don't take into account the calories your body is burning every minute of every day. They think they if they eat 1200 calories, they need to burn 1200 calories through exercise alone. But the body is already burning more than 1200 calories a day, before you even tie your shoelaces.

I'll throw in my 2cents on the subject. Disclaimer: This is what works for me.

I eat back my exercise calories, sometimes all of them. The way I understand it, MFP does not include your exercise, it only includes it as a goal to work towards. The allowance it spits out for you already includes a deficit. I have mine set at lightly active, because I'm all over the place usually at work. I work out 5 days a week, and 2 of those 5 days include a pretty intense (for me) lifting circuit.

I eat them back because it helps me mentally to feel like I'm not short changing myself, I still enjoy all the foods I love, I don't ever feel hungry, and most importantly, I've been steadily loosing on average 1 pound per week since I started. That can't be all terrible, can it?

My advice to others? Try eat some back for awhile. Maybe it'll work, maybe it won't. You have to figure out what's right for your body, and what you feel comfortable doing.

Keep seeing the same posts over and over and over.. surprised this threads still going

No 1000 calories is one pound so if you want to lose 2 pounds per week you need to burn 2000 a week not 7000

jajajajaaajaja:laugh: jajajajaaaa:sad: jajajaajajaa:laugh:

http://www.caloriesperhour.com/tutorial_pound.php

I always eat my exercise calories back. Your body needs those calories to burn off the fat; technically you could not exercise at all and still lose 1 pound a week if you're eating 500 calories LESS than what your body needs to maintain weight safely and healthily. If you're only consuming 1200 calories (which honestly is too little for anybody, in my opinion) then burning 600, your body only has 600 calories to fuel its system and do what it needs to do, which means your body is going to hold on to the fat. Yes, you work hard to burn the calories, but you need to make sure you are giving your body enough energy to handle burning those calories off AND burning off the excess fat. If you exercise without putting at least half of those exercise calories back you're not going to lose effectively; sure the scale will go down but you'll be losing muscle instead of fat, and the goal is the opposite.

Nicely said! Agreed!

Because MFP builds a deficit in for you. If I burn 600 calories while eating 1500 a day, that means I'm only netting 900, which is far too low to maintain an active lifestyle and health. Eating back your exercise calories is perfectly fine, especially if you're eating healthy whole foods.

Low calories is not necessarily better.

I just DO NOT get it!! You spend an hour in the gym working off burning 600 cal and then you just eat them back???
Why would you eat even a LITTLE back??

I thought the point was to burn these calories. WHY does MFP then add them to your food?!

we eat them back so we can lose weight. that simple.

These are my reasons.

Last year I joined MyFitnessPal. I am 5"3 and went from 140lbs to 90lbs within 8 weeks.

I did not eat back exercise calories. I was a massive advocate for NOT doing it. I was burning off my eating calories not eating up my exercise calories!!!

I developed anorexia and then binge eating/bulimia ... I have always had a difficult relationship with food so don't for a second blame MFP but it did facilitate it.

Over 4 months I gained weight to 155lbs. (highest ever)

Now I am on my mfp journey once more.

This time I am eating back my exercise calories. I am aiming to eat TO my goal and am happy when I am within 200 cals above it but not as happy when under.

By doing this my body isn't crving food. And my binges have stopped (sometimes one day would be over 15,000 calories - I never ate anything close to that before my diet) To me eating back exercise calories makes weight loss slower but mentally and for physical health it is essential. It stops my binges, it allows me to indulge without feeling guilty and then I forgive myself and don't give up.

The second time around on MFP I have greatly changed my approach - it is a much slower approach but SO SO much healthier.

No 1000 calories is one pound so if you want to lose 2 pounds per week you need to burn 2000 a week not 7000

Sorry, but no...

Obese people feel better knowing they can eat more after they workout and as long as they're still in a caloric deficit it works but it just makes people feel better about eating more for the most part.

Why won't this topic Die. Look if you want to eat them back and that works for you, Go for it, if you don't eat them back and that works for you Go For It!! Can we stop dictating what others should do with their bodies.