When to bulk?
bredbin
Posts: 5 Member
So I am 6 ft 4, in June I was 257 now I'm 223. I am pure skinny fat. By next summer I would preferably like to add a little bit of muscle and potentially be down at 200 lbs. Any tips or thoughts on it?
Cheers peeps.
Cheers peeps.
0
Replies
-
Id say lots of cardio, and when I say lots, I mean at least 20 minutes a day of steady cardio, along with regular weight training. If your fairly knew to fitness then bulking and cutting shouldnt even be in your vocabulary. Just simply eat what you have been eating, or even perhaps a little more with the additional cardio, and you will see results.0
-
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.0 -
Thanks for the replies.0
-
Well some people would say cut down to 10-12% bodyfat and then bulk. Some people would say don't bother cutting if you have nothing to cut down to. I would recommend eating at maintenance or slightly below until your lifts stall and then evaluate and decide at that time. Here is a ton more info http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/686963-large-collection-of-info-for-beginners0
-
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Really? I would tend to politely disagree. If you bulk before goal, yes you'll obviously add a little fat, but if you're prepared to live with that then you're a step ahead before cut.
I would put it down to personal preference.0 -
Well you can cut but if you have nothing to cut to.....why bother? Perso, I cut for 2 years and was still not happy with the results. I am now bulking and while it is hard to see the scale go up, I know that is what I need to do in order to have the results I want. I just wish I didn't wait that long.0
-
Well you can cut but if you have nothing to cut to.....why bother? Perso, I cut for 2 years and was still not happy with the results. I am now bulking and while it is hard to see the scale go up, I know that is what I need to do in order to have the results I want. I just wish I didn't wait that long.
This! If you don't have much lean mass now, why lose some more in order to try and rebuild it? Build some, cut away the fat, rinse and repeat.0 -
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????0 -
Bulk now!!0
-
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????0 -
Same here, i've been trying to cut my midsection fat, and its impossible to lose it. I decided to bulk up instead, but that didnt give any definition. *stuck*0
-
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????
Oddly enough, that's the one part that I understood. Sounds weird but I know what he means. It's only about 50% correct tho.0 -
I once read a really good article about this, but now I can't find it. This one is okay.
http://truehealthandfitness101.blogspot.com/2012/04/anorexic-ripped-is-not-same-as-swoll.html
You don't want to be this guy, or i hope you don't:
0 -
If you want to put on lean mass, then lift weights. Big heavy compound lifts.
The stronglifts 5x5 programme is a great place to start. Very straight forward to follow, and will deliver results.
Lifting weights will increase your muscle mass, which will help you get that more muscular look you are going for0 -
it depends on your goals.
if you want to be bigger, go ahead and bulk.
if you want to be skinny with a 6 pack and no muscles, then cut.0 -
I once read a really good article about this, but now I can't find it. This one is okay.
http://truehealthandfitness101.blogspot.com/2012/04/anorexic-ripped-is-not-same-as-swoll.html
You don't want to be this guy, or i hope you don't:
What a ridiculous comment! If you look carefully (for example his traps) the guy is actually in pretty good shape. But to link a blog with the title "anorexic ripped" is beyond the pale.0 -
So I am 6 ft 4, in June I was 257 now I'm 223. I am pure skinny fat. By next summer I would preferably like to add a little bit of muscle and potentially be down at 200 lbs. Any tips or thoughts on it?
Cheers peeps.
If you are able to maintain your current weight but add muscle and reduce body fat over the next year, that would be a significant accomplishment, although probably doable for somebody your age. But...you need to hit the gym. The muscle doesn't just happen.
You may also find that the next 20 lbs will be harder than the first 30 but don't dismay. Steady, consistent workout routines while eating healthy and drinking less beer are the way to go. Take it from somebody who's been there.0 -
I once read a really good article about this, but now I can't find it. This one is okay.
http://truehealthandfitness101.blogspot.com/2012/04/anorexic-ripped-is-not-same-as-swoll.html
You don't want to be this guy, or i hope you don't:
What a ridiculous comment! If you look carefully (for example his traps) the guy is actually in pretty good shape. But to link a blog with the title "anorexic ripped" is beyond the pale.
Oh come on......I have bigger pecs than this guy!!!!0 -
I once read a really good article about this, but now I can't find it. This one is okay.
http://truehealthandfitness101.blogspot.com/2012/04/anorexic-ripped-is-not-same-as-swoll.html
You don't want to be this guy, or i hope you don't:
What a ridiculous comment! If you look carefully (for example his traps) the guy is actually in pretty good shape. But to link a blog with the title "anorexic ripped" is beyond the pale.
Oh come on......I have bigger pecs than this guy!!!!
Easy to focus on the pecs. The guy just doesn't have a beefy build. But I see well developed obliques and the biceps are fine as well. After all, the guy isn't pumped and posing, he's just standing there.0 -
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????
Oddly enough, that's the one part that I understood. Sounds weird but I know what he means. It's only about 50% correct tho.
Strong enough to gain some muscle.....
If you are squatting say 0.75x BW for example, unless you look like a competitive marathoner, your are so neurologically inefficeint with your strength that you aren't strong enough to really work your muscles all that well. When you are in the noob gains area, able to make rapid session to session strength gains on a linear progression, you're muscles aren't really getting worked as well as you think they are. The gains come fast and furious whether on a surplus or deficit diet-wise. It is only once you get strong enough to start really accounting for fatigue, where lifts begin stalling, that you are working your muscles with high enough neural effiency to really start packing on mass at an efficient rate.
Here's a good article by Lyle McDonald on why you should diet down first.
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/initial-body-fat-and-body-composition-changes.html
Basically, muscle gain is most efficient in the 10-15% BF area. Above and below that a greater % of your surplus tends to go to fat.
The shortest distance between point A and B, when fat loss and muscle gain is the goal, is to lose most of the fat first before beginning to eat for muscle gain.0 -
it depends on your goals.
if you want to be bigger, go ahead and bulk.
if you want to be skinny with a 6 pack and no muscles, then cut.0 -
it depends on your goals.
if you want to be bigger, go ahead and bulk.
if you want to be skinny with a 6 pack and no muscles, then cut.
everyone has a six pack pretty much.......you just have to diet.
I wasn't reccommending that he cuts, but it depends on his goals. if he wants to look like a soccer player and just be lean, he should probably cut. if he wants to be jacked and strong he should probably bulk..0 -
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????
Oddly enough, that's the one part that I understood. Sounds weird but I know what he means. It's only about 50% correct tho.
Strong enough to gain some muscle.....
If you are squatting say 0.75x BW for example, unless you look like a competitive marathoner, your are so neurologically inefficeint with your strength that you aren't strong enough to really work your muscles all that well. When you are in the noob gains area, able to make rapid session to session strength gains on a linear progression, you're muscles aren't really getting worked as well as you think they are. The gains come fast and furious whether on a surplus or deficit diet-wise. It is only once you get strong enough to start really accounting for fatigue, where lifts begin stalling, that you are working your muscles with high enough neural effiency to really start packing on mass at an efficient rate.
Here's a good article by Lyle McDonald on why you should diet down first.
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/initial-body-fat-and-body-composition-changes.html
Basically, muscle gain is most efficient in the 10-15% BF area. Above and below that a greater % of your surplus tends to go to fat.
The shortest distance between point A and B, when fat loss and muscle gain is the goal, is to lose most of the fat first before beginning to eat for muscle gain.0 -
it depends on your goals.
if you want to be bigger, go ahead and bulk.
if you want to be skinny with a 6 pack and no muscles, then cut.
everyone has a six pack pretty much.......you just have to diet.
I wasn't reccommending that he cuts, but it depends on his goals. if he wants to look like a soccer player and just be lean, he should probably cut. if he wants to be jacked and strong he should probably bulk..0 -
I have heard more times than I can remember, "Abs are made in the kitchen." This is absolutely true - at least for me.
While I did start a weight-training program (and have since moved on to more lifting), only after I switched my diet up did I begin to see my abs.
I still have a LONG way to go (unless you ask my trainer, who says I'm very close), but switching up my diet was the way I saw my midsection flatten out and my ab muscles start to peek out.
Then again, I'm a girl, and unless I start taking testosterone supplements I won't "bulk" up.0 -
I would base it on a few things:
1) If you're nearing ~10-11% bodyfat you might want to bulk.
or
2) In some situations with skinny-fat, bulking may be a better decision than cutting, but you can't really assess this without scrutinizing physique as stats won't always tell you the full story.
Just as an example, when I was skinny fat, I took a few months at maintenance and lifted heavy, and I decided that I had enough LBM to do a short cut phase. However, there's some physiques (also skinny fat) with so little lean mass that even with a small gut, you just have nothing to cut to and doing a short bulk cycle makes sense.
In both cases I'd keep calories not too far off of maintenance and probably do something less aggressive.I once read a really good article about this, but now I can't find it. This one is okay.
http://truehealthandfitness101.blogspot.com/2012/04/anorexic-ripped-is-not-same-as-swoll.html
You don't want to be this guy, or i hope you don't:
What a ridiculous comment! If you look carefully (for example his traps) the guy is actually in pretty good shape. But to link a blog with the title "anorexic ripped" is beyond the pale.
And just to throw my two cents in here, I don't think the comment was as ridiculous as you think. That guy is in reasonable shape compared to someone who is obese or skinny-fat, but there's not a lot of lean mass there at all.0 -
And just to throw my two cents in here, I don't think the comment was as ridiculous as you think. That guy is in reasonable shape compared to someone who is obese or skinny-fat, but there's not a lot of lean mass there at all.
very true.0 -
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????
Oddly enough, that's the one part that I understood. Sounds weird but I know what he means. It's only about 50% correct tho.
Strong enough to gain some muscle.....
If you are squatting say 0.75x BW for example, unless you look like a competitive marathoner, your are so neurologically inefficeint with your strength that you aren't strong enough to really work your muscles all that well. When you are in the noob gains area, able to make rapid session to session strength gains on a linear progression, you're muscles aren't really getting worked as well as you think they are. The gains come fast and furious whether on a surplus or deficit diet-wise. It is only once you get strong enough to start really accounting for fatigue, where lifts begin stalling, that you are working your muscles with high enough neural effiency to really start packing on mass at an efficient rate.
Here's a good article by Lyle McDonald on why you should diet down first.
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/initial-body-fat-and-body-composition-changes.html
Basically, muscle gain is most efficient in the 10-15% BF area. Above and below that a greater % of your surplus tends to go to fat.
The shortest distance between point A and B, when fat loss and muscle gain is the goal, is to lose most of the fat first before beginning to eat for muscle gain.
I disagree with your disagreement. Yes total noobs gain visual size to their muscles when they start out, but it is mostly due to increased water and nutrient storage, not actual muscle tissue. The best muscle gains come after neural gains.0 -
You shouldn't be thinking about bulking until you've got visible abs.
Bulking = calorie suplus and gaining fat along with muscle.
The metabolism raising effects of more muscle are grossly overstated.
Take advantage of your noob strength gains while cutting down the first time. Whe you switch over to bulking then you should be strong enough to actually gain some muscle.
WAT??????
Oddly enough, that's the one part that I understood. Sounds weird but I know what he means. It's only about 50% correct tho.
Strong enough to gain some muscle.....
If you are squatting say 0.75x BW for example, unless you look like a competitive marathoner, your are so neurologically inefficeint with your strength that you aren't strong enough to really work your muscles all that well. When you are in the noob gains area, able to make rapid session to session strength gains on a linear progression, you're muscles aren't really getting worked as well as you think they are. The gains come fast and furious whether on a surplus or deficit diet-wise. It is only once you get strong enough to start really accounting for fatigue, where lifts begin stalling, that you are working your muscles with high enough neural effiency to really start packing on mass at an efficient rate.
Here's a good article by Lyle McDonald on why you should diet down first.
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/initial-body-fat-and-body-composition-changes.html
Basically, muscle gain is most efficient in the 10-15% BF area. Above and below that a greater % of your surplus tends to go to fat.
The shortest distance between point A and B, when fat loss and muscle gain is the goal, is to lose most of the fat first before beginning to eat for muscle gain.
I disagree with your disagreement. Yes total noobs gain visual size to their muscles when they start out, but it is mostly due to increased water and nutrient storage, not actual muscle tissue. The best muscle gains come after neural gains.0 -
bump0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions