Do YOU eat back your calories burned with exercise?

Options
2

Replies

  • Donnarose82
    Options
    No even though I own a Polar Heart Rate Monitor, I know exactly how many calories I burn at the gym etc. The program I'm currently on recommends that I eat 1200 and to not eat back calories, but I would be interested to see if it actually helps people.
  • DPernet
    DPernet Posts: 481 Member
    Options
    Yes I do, but with a MAJOR proviso. I go by the principal that the calories burned numbers in MFP are usually too high.

    The exercise that I record is always underestimated. For instance if I do an hour of laps in the pool, I record it as "Swimming, Leisurely, General" If I walk for an hour and 10 mins at 3.5mph, then it gets recorded as an hour at 3mph...and so on.

    The onyl things I record exactly are the cardio machines from the Gym where I have the HRM attached

    Seems to work for me so far :drinker:
  • brevislux
    brevislux Posts: 1,093 Member
    Options
    I do my best but if I'm not feeling hungry then I won't eat all of them. Listen to your body.
  • avsingleton
    avsingleton Posts: 98 Member
    Options
    i don't eat back my calories burned bc one, it would be way to much food for me and two, i don't get the desired results. additionally, i think mfp's calculations are a bit off...i don't trust them completely. have u checked to see if u have lost any inches? i've noticed that sometimes the scale appear to be stuck and it seems as if i'm not losing weight, but i lose inches, then low and behold, one morning i wake up and have dropped 2 to 2.5 pounds. just keep hanging in there, if u continue doing what u're doing consistently u'll get the results u seek...guaranteed!
  • Capt_Apollo
    Capt_Apollo Posts: 9,026 Member
    Options
    well, to be blunt, you say you've only lost a pound doing this. you've only been doing this less then a month. it's going to take a while to lose the weight.

    you should find out your TDEE and BMR. your tdee is your total daily energy expenditure, which is the amount of calories you need to maintain your weight at your current activity level. your BMR is you basal metabolic rate, which is the bare minimum of calories you need to survive if you were just laying in bed not moving.

    TDEE- http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators/tdee-calculator.html

    BMR- http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators/bmr-calculator.html

    you should never eat under your BMR. ever ever ever. that could possibly hurt you and force your body to resist weight loss, as it is trying to conserve itself. if i were you, i would find out my TDEE at "light exercise," and then your BMR. find a number about half way in between those two, and then log and drink your exercise calories.

    to accurately measure your burned calories, you should start working out with a heart rate monitor. polar ones, with a chest strap, are generally good ones.
  • Clcleeds2012
    Options
    Yes, but to a point. I'm exercising to lose weight so it would be counter intuitive to eat back everything I burned! I try not to go below 1200 calories a day. My calories are set at about 1400 and I mentally have 1200 as a minimum. If I have done a lot of exercise that takes me below that I will try to eat back to my 1200 minimum. When I was younger I could diet and basically eat barely anything and be fine. Now I'm 31 if I go below 1200 for a sustained period my hair starts falling out!!!! I did a 1200 and under calorie diet about six months ago and it made me really ill. I don't know why my body has changed its tolerance but it has. After having my son two years ago I seem to have lost a lot of physical resilience. The odd day of under 1200 seems to be ok for me but I won't do in on purpose again.
  • shiftysheep
    shiftysheep Posts: 44 Member
    Options
    I don't even log my exercise on here anymore I lift weights, sprint, cross country running & yoga). I just work out my TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) based on my BMR (Basil Metabolic Rate) & then go from there.

    I'm 27 years old, 5"9' & 159.2lbs @ just over 10.69% body fat this give me a BMR of 1,761 calories. That's what my body uses just maintaining current body weight & body function. So if I was just eating my BMR then I would log & eat my exercise calories (using a HR monitor with a strap). But if you take your BMR & use it to find your TDEE. You don't have to worry about exercise calories, Think of your TDEE like your BMR plus workout calories.

    To find my TDEE from my BMR I need to use the Harris Benedict equation (All links are given so you can workout your own).

    Harris Benedict Formula

    To determine your total daily calorie needs, multiply your BMR by the appropriate activity factor, as follows:

    If you are sedentary (little or no exercise) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.2
    If you are lightly active (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/week) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.375
    If you are moderatetely active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.55
    If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.725
    If you are extra active (very hard exercise/sports & physical job or 2x training) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.9

    So I take my BMR of 1,761 calories & multiply that by 1.55 because I exercise hard 5-6 times a week but also have plenty of time to rest because I'm out of work. This gives me a TDEE of 2,729 calories.

    This means that I need, 2,729 calories to maintain my current body weight at my current activity level. So 2,729 is my maintenance calories, if I want to lose or gain weight I can plus or minus this by about 20%.

    To gain weight I would, 2,729 x 1.20 = 3,274.

    To lose weight I would, 2,729 x 0.80 = 2183.

    So based on this I know how many calories I need for all scenarios.

    BMR = 1,761
    TDEE/Maintainence = 2,729
    Cutting calories = 2,183 (As you can see even when cutting I don't go under my BMR)
    Bulking calories = 3,274

    Forget about exercise calories, workout your BMR (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/) then use the Benedict formula to get your TDEE (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/harris-benedict-equation/), once you have your TDEE just plus or minus it by about 20%.

    To lose weight TDEE x 0.80

    To gain weight TDEE x 1.20

    To maintain eat at TDEE also know as maintenance.

    Peace.
  • shiftysheep
    shiftysheep Posts: 44 Member
    Options
    Everyone gets so hung up on the 1200 calories, as if it has some bearing on real life. You need to workout YOUR own BMR & TDEE. My three year old daughter eats more than 1200 calories.

    "For ages 2 to 3, the USDA recommends a child consume 1,000 to 1,400 calories, depending on his activity level. For age 4, the calorie intake increases to between 1,200 and 2,000. Here are examples of how much your child should be getting in all five food groups." - http://www.babycenter.com/0_nutrition-guidelines-for-young-children_64359.bc
  • jjscholar
    jjscholar Posts: 413 Member
    Options
    I have to admit that I do eat back my calories burned from exercise as well... I think that one of the possible reasons why I have been able to maintain my weight at between 175-180 lbs...

    I have a weakness for food... But, the good thing is that I do not eat red meat, fried food, and fast food anymore... In addition, I avoid soda even diet soda. I drink water, powered drink mix, fruit juice, or sports drinks...
  • CassieReannan
    CassieReannan Posts: 1,479 Member
    Options
    I try, sometimes its difficult to.
  • Caspiana
    Options
    Depends how I feel. if I have had a BUSY BUSY day I may eat more but not over my limit for that day. Go with your feelings that's what i feel anyway. No point starving when going to bed. Makes for a bad night's sleep.:smile:
  • geebusuk
    geebusuk Posts: 3,348 Member
    Options
    I do now that I'm getting close to my goal weight - didn't so much before, but I'm willing to accept that it probably is bad to lose big chunks of weight as I'm now in the low teens BF.

    These days sadly I tend to be burning back my eaten calories; generally a late night cycle ride to make sure my calories expended on my motoactv is 1000 or so under my calories eaten on here.
    But does seem to be working well enough for me and means I'm getting fitter at the same time :).
  • sohmui
    sohmui Posts: 108 Member
    Options
    i don't eat back my calories burned bc one, it would be way to much food for me and two, i don't get the desired results. additionally, i think mfp's calculations are a bit off...i don't trust them completely.

    I agree 100 per cent with this. Sometimes I struggle to get to 1200 calories. I've been stuck at 133 lbs for the past 3 weeks, so really hope I'll get a sudden drop like yours. :smile:
  • caroleannlight
    caroleannlight Posts: 173 Member
    Options
    I aim to eat back 50 % for formal workouts as I think I need more on those days and it gives me an incentive to exercise more. Generally I don't record additional walking etc as I set my profile for lightly active and feel it fits in to this. I set a meal in MFP called 50 percent exercise and log a calories on that line so I can't see the extra and get tempted.
  • Suzyqall72
    Options
    Usually I do. I am not one of these people who burn 800 calories. I exercise 30 min a day usually on the Wii. My calories are 1500, so I may eat 1600 with exercise. It seems to be working. I don't believe in eating too few calories or skipping meals, etc. I've seen too many of my friends do this, and they wreck their metabolism and they can't lose weight even on restrictive diets.
  • Triplel79
    Triplel79 Posts: 3 Member
    Options
    I so agree. 2 hours of swimming it says burns of 2,000 calories, yet I am not loosing anything but motivation!
  • geebusuk
    geebusuk Posts: 3,348 Member
    Options
    And that's the problem - 2 hours swimming for one person may well burn 2000 calories.
    It seems most reasonably intensive stuff will be around that - I can hit around 500 calories for 30 mins if I'm properly trying when cycling and just about running.
    But for a lot of others it may be a lot less for a lot of reasons. May be a better swimmer, a worse swimmer, taking more breaks than they expect, fitter than they expect etc.

    I've found that the calories burnt as listed by my motoactv (with HRM) has dropped.
    I suspect it's because I've been getting fitting and especially for cycling, generally doing the same route.
    While these may still not be as accurate as they could be (a power meter would enhance it a bit, but are silly expensive), it's going to be a hell of a lot better guess than MFP can make just knowing the time and my weight - the motoactv can figure in heart rate, pedalling speed in which gear and how steep a hill I'm going up or down.
  • emzack
    emzack Posts: 26 Member
    Options
    YES, honestly its the only reason I exercise.

    Yep.
  • PinkHurricane88
    PinkHurricane88 Posts: 156 Member
    Options
    No, unless I have burned 500 calories, in which case I would eat back maybe half, if that.
  • sohmui
    sohmui Posts: 108 Member
    Options
    And that's the problem - 2 hours swimming for one person may well burn 2000 calories.
    It seems most reasonably intensive stuff will be around that - I can hit around 500 calories for 30 mins if I'm properly trying when cycling and just about running.
    But for a lot of others it may be a lot less for a lot of reasons. May be a better swimmer, a worse swimmer, taking more breaks than they expect, fitter than they expect etc.
    This is why I don't eat back my calories burned. Every day, I swim for 45 mins and walk fast pace for another 45 minutes, and MFP tells me I have burned 648 calories. Fine. But I am 70 years old and suspect I do not burn at the rate of the 20-somethings I see jogging around.

    The problem with the MFP calculations is not that they are inaccurate per se, but that they are just not - and perhaps can never be - detailed and individual enough to take at face value.