BEST Cardio?
Replies
-
all aspect of mma, but grappling makes you EXHAUSTED!
Is that boxing (sorry i'm confused at 'mma') if it is, i'm thinking of trying that. Would you go for kick boxing or normal?
i find jujitsu/wrestling more exhausting kick boxing/muay thai
Theres lots of womens juijitsu classes nowadays.0 -
all aspect of mma, but grappling makes you EXHAUSTED!
Is that boxing (sorry i'm confused at 'mma') if it is, i'm thinking of trying that. Would you go for kick boxing or normal?
i find jujitsu/wrestling more exhausting kick boxing/muay thai
Theres lots of womens juijitsu classes nowadays.
Thanks. I'll look into a class near me. It's something i've been wanting to try for a while0 -
Best cardio for weight loss? Table pushbacks. Nothing else is nearly as effective0
-
Whichever one you will actually do.0
-
Swimming0
-
Zumba! Super fun and burns mad calories!
How many calories do you typically burn per hour, how do you measure the burn?0 -
Not necessarily for weight loss because cardio doesn't make you lose weight, your diet does. But I would pick hiking. Because it's the most entertaining to me.0
-
Best cardio for weight loss? Table pushbacks. Nothing else is nearly as effective
Combine that with a reverse fork curl and you are all set!0 -
Sprinting0
-
Per minute, running is one of the most effective ways of burning calories. The problem is that not many people can do it long enough to burn huge amounts without becoming injured. Don't know of many non-professional athletes that can run for 2-3 hours regularly.
If you're looking for the most calories burned in the least amount of time, spinning and swimming are great choices.
If you just want to burn the most amount of calories in general, I've found cycling (outdoors on a road bike with hills and flats, not in a gym) burns more calories overall because you can do it longer without hurting yourself.
For example, on a 5 hour weekend ride, I routinely burn 2,000 to 3,000 calories and am still able to walk the next day. If someone were to try to run for even half that time they would probably injure themselves. During the work week, I'll do three 2 hour rides where I can burn between 600-900 calories depending on the type of riding I'm doing that day. Since cycling is low impact, your joints and muscles don't take a pounding and it is easier for your body to recover from the activity from one day to another.
Here are a couple of recent examples.
Long weekend ride - 3500+ calories http://app.strava.com/activities/25605695
2 hour weekday ride - ~900 calories http://app.strava.com/activities/26668697
These numbers are all using a heart rate monitor and at my current weight of 135lbs. Someone heavier putting out the same effort would burn more calories because they're carrying more weight.0 -
Cycling - good instead of bad for your knees.
Swimming is a close second but not nearly as visually and mentally stimulating while working out.0 -
Whichever one you will actually do.
Great answer.0 -
INSANITY (the workout)
Hands. Down.0 -
Whichever one you will actually do.
^THIS.0 -
Whichever one your joints will tolerate and you will stick with.0
-
The elyptical machine. Or, just plain walking 30-60 minutes a day. The best cardio is the cardio that you don't hate so much that you won't do it.0
-
Per minute, running is one of the most effective ways of burning calories. The problem is that not many people can do it long enough to burn huge amounts without becoming injured. Don't know of many non-professional athletes that can run for 2-3 hours regularly.
If you're looking for the most calories burned in the least amount of time, spinning and swimming are great choices.
If you just want to burn the most amount of calories in general, I've found cycling (outdoors on a road bike with hills and flats, not in a gym) burns more calories overall because you can do it longer without hurting yourself.
For example, on a 5 hour weekend ride, I routinely burn 2,000 to 3,000 calories and am still able to walk the next day. If someone were to try to run for even half that time they would probably injure themselves. During the work week, I'll do three 2 hour rides where I can burn between 600-900 calories depending on the type of riding I'm doing that day. Since cycling is low impact, your joints and muscles don't take a pounding and it is easier for your body to recover from the activity from one day to another.
Here are a couple of recent examples.
Long weekend ride - 3500+ calories http://app.strava.com/activities/25605695
2 hour weekday ride - ~900 calories http://app.strava.com/activities/26668697
These numbers are all using a heart rate monitor and at my current weight of 135lbs. Someone heavier putting out the same effort would burn more calories because they're carrying more weight.
Couldn't agree more. Cycling burns alot of calories and not only that, it can be enjoyed in many different ways. Mountain Biking, Road cycling, by yourself, in large groups you name it! Not to mention if you have kids, it is a great way to get some time with your kids whilst getting some exercise. Try commuting to work by cycling rather than driving and if you get hooked you may end up not driving at all and cycling everywhere! I know I have.0 -
Per minute, running is one of the most effective ways of burning calories. The problem is that not many people can do it long enough to burn huge amounts without becoming injured. Don't know of many non-professional athletes that can run for 2-3 hours regularly.
If you're looking for the most calories burned in the least amount of time, spinning and swimming are great choices.
If you just want to burn the most amount of calories in general, I've found cycling (outdoors on a road bike with hills and flats, not in a gym) burns more calories overall because you can do it longer without hurting yourself.
For example, on a 5 hour weekend ride, I routinely burn 2,000 to 3,000 calories and am still able to walk the next day. If someone were to try to run for even half that time they would probably injure themselves. During the work week, I'll do three 2 hour rides where I can burn between 600-900 calories depending on the type of riding I'm doing that day. Since cycling is low impact, your joints and muscles don't take a pounding and it is easier for your body to recover from the activity from one day to another.
Here are a couple of recent examples.
Long weekend ride - 3500+ calories http://app.strava.com/activities/25605695
2 hour weekday ride - ~900 calories http://app.strava.com/activities/26668697
These numbers are all using a heart rate monitor and at my current weight of 135lbs. Someone heavier putting out the same effort would burn more calories because they're carrying more weight.
This...
Today's four hour and fifteen minute ride burned approximately 3,500 calories and I am hang around the 160 lb mark.0 -
I vote the elliptical. But I'm biased because I'm pretty much glued to that thing. Lmao.0
-
Not necessarily for weight loss because cardio doesn't make you lose weight, your diet does. But I would pick hiking. Because it's the most entertaining to me.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.8K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 415 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.6K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions