Don't Eat back your exercise Calories !!???/

2»

Replies

  • CyberEd312
    CyberEd312 Posts: 3,536 Member
    I don't trust the eating back your calories theory, just because the fact that people usually over estimate the amount of calories burned through exercise, then people tend to "reward" themselves with food and find themselves over indulging.

    But I also think that no one does themselves a favour by eating only 1200 cals.

    Unless they use a HRM, in which case, over-estimating doesn't happen.

    HRMs don't guarantee anything... they are still just an estimate, and can be horribly inaccurate depending on how they are used.

    But they (HRM) can be a better estimate than not using anything at all over just believing the numbers you see on the gym treadmill or elliptical. I have used the Polar FT60 HRM since I was finally able to support my own weight and get out of the pool. My approach (and yes I know HRM are not completely accurate) has been to take my calorie burn number from my HRM and eat back 85% (just a number a played with til I found a balancing point) of my calories burned leaving 15% for error (in accuracy and logging) which has worked out pretty good for me. OP it comes down to how you figure you caloric intake is it by TDEE (in which case your exercise is already figured in) or are you using the MFP method (which if so you need to be eating those calories back). Best of Luck....
  • CyberEd312
    CyberEd312 Posts: 3,536 Member
    I don't trust the eating back your calories theory, just because the fact that people usually over estimate the amount of calories burned through exercise, then people tend to "reward" themselves with food and find themselves over indulging.

    But I also think that no one does themselves a favour by eating only 1200 cals.

    Unless they use a HRM, in which case, over-estimating doesn't happen.

    HRMs don't guarantee anything... they are still just an estimate, and can be horribly inaccurate depending on how they are used.

    I use one with a chest strap and I find it to be pretty accurate, I don't use the mfp built in calories burns, because they are very inaccurate. I would say using a good HRM is the best way to calculate calorie burn, if you have it set up w/ your weight, age, etc....just my opinion. Better than just trying to guess or using the built ins on mfp.

    It's not accurate at all really - if you're stressed, if you didn't sleep, too much coffee, coming down with a bug... tons of things affect your heart rate other than the effort you're exerting. Use it as a guide, but don't trust the burn figures as being exact purely because you know your average heartrate for the effort.

    I will bet my 311 lbs. lost that using my HRM is far more affective than pulling a number out of the air... :drinker:
  • buildingdreams
    buildingdreams Posts: 173 Member
    Thanks everyone, I will take all the info and do some research. I'm currently set to 1235 per day . exercise is usually 400 calories. I haven't over indulged. I don't eat meat or dairy ( except Skim milk which I'm trying to get off) I eat alot of veggies and 1 cup of beans daily and salads with everything in it !! Been this way for a year and down 17 lbs . Slow but it will last!!
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    I don't trust the eating back your calories theory, just because the fact that people usually over estimate the amount of calories burned through exercise, then people tend to "reward" themselves with food and find themselves over indulging.

    But I also think that no one does themselves a favour by eating only 1200 cals.

    Unless they use a HRM, in which case, over-estimating doesn't happen.

    HRMs don't guarantee anything... they are still just an estimate, and can be horribly inaccurate depending on how they are used.

    But they (HRM) can be a better estimate than not using anything at all over just believing the numbers you see on the gym treadmill or elliptical. I have used the Polar FT60 HRM since I was finally able to support my own weight and get out of the pool. My approach (and yes I know HRM are not completely accurate) has been to take my calorie burn number from my HRM and eat back 85% (just a number a played with til I found a balancing point) of my calories burned leaving 15% for error (in accuracy and logging) which has worked out pretty good for me. OP it comes down to how you figure you caloric intake is it by TDEE (in which case your exercise is already figured in) or are you using the MFP method (which if so you need to be eating those calories back). Best of Luck....

    Correct, in most cases HRMs are a better estimate. But they are still just an estimate. Try using it for strength training. Or wear it all day long to calculate TDEE. Both will give you horrible results. Or use it for intervals... higher level of inaccuracy there too. Or use it for steady state cardio but don't take the time to setup it up correctly.

    I wasn't bashing HRMs... I was merely responding to the suggestion that using an HRM will take away any possible over-estimations.
  • CyberEd312
    CyberEd312 Posts: 3,536 Member
    I don't trust the eating back your calories theory, just because the fact that people usually over estimate the amount of calories burned through exercise, then people tend to "reward" themselves with food and find themselves over indulging.

    But I also think that no one does themselves a favour by eating only 1200 cals.

    Unless they use a HRM, in which case, over-estimating doesn't happen.

    HRMs don't guarantee anything... they are still just an estimate, and can be horribly inaccurate depending on how they are used.

    But they (HRM) can be a better estimate than not using anything at all over just believing the numbers you see on the gym treadmill or elliptical. I have used the Polar FT60 HRM since I was finally able to support my own weight and get out of the pool. My approach (and yes I know HRM are not completely accurate) has been to take my calorie burn number from my HRM and eat back 85% (just a number a played with til I found a balancing point) of my calories burned leaving 15% for error (in accuracy and logging) which has worked out pretty good for me. OP it comes down to how you figure you caloric intake is it by TDEE (in which case your exercise is already figured in) or are you using the MFP method (which if so you need to be eating those calories back). Best of Luck....

    Correct, in most cases HRMs are a better estimate. But they are still just an estimate. Try using it for strength training. Or wear it all day long to calculate TDEE. Both will give you horrible results. Or use it for intervals... higher level of inaccuracy there too. Or use it for steady state cardio but don't take the time to setup it up correctly.

    I wasn't bashing HRMs... I was merely responding to the suggestion that using an HRM will take away any possible over-estimations.

    Totally agree with you, (definitely wearing it during weight training and you might as well throw darts at a dartboard... lol) just wanted to add to your post that for some instead of guessing HRM can be used as another tool in your arsenal to maybe help you get a little more accuracy when figuring your calorie burned....... :smile:
  • motd2k
    motd2k Posts: 5

    I will bet my 311 lbs. lost that using my HRM is far more affective than pulling a number out of the air... :drinker:

    Sure, it's more accurate than pulling a number out of the air, but what i'm saying is don't go eating back 100% of the calories your heartrate monitor (with it's ~+- 25% accuracy) tell you that you expend... especially if the numbers are relatively low anyway. I'd even go so far as to suggest that some higher-end gym based ergometers are more accurate with their calorie figures than basing it purely on a HRM!

    Anyway, we have digressed!
  • Dymatized
    Dymatized Posts: 48
    If you wanna be skinny fat, then don't eat them back. If you wanna look hot and toned, eat them back and hit your macros targets! (If you're using MFP the way it's set up. If you have your own custom calorie setup then it may be different).

    This ^
  • yoovie
    yoovie Posts: 17,121 Member
    dont worry about it - just go workout instead
  • LaLa_Ventura
    LaLa_Ventura Posts: 94 Member
    edited January 2015
    I try my best not to eat them all. Sometimes im just not hungry after working out but I know I need to eat something so I have a obj with only one piece of bread sliced in half, half a serving of peanut buttet and low sugar jam.
  • jillianedwards
    jillianedwards Posts: 67 Member
    I use my HRM while im working out (starting with cardio ending with strength training) If my heart rate is still up around 120-170 during that time would it still be accurate? My resting heart rate is around 80.
  • dukslayer4051
    dukslayer4051 Posts: 66 Member
    this is a loaded question, i am a big dude, 6'5 265lbs i play bball 1 night a week full court, and90-120 min. i wear a hrm and burn 1400-2300 cals a game, there is no way im eating that much back, i cant, its a volume play, do i splurge a bit, ya, i mostly eat whatever i want throughout the day and even have ice cream after often times...if that was a day to day deficit, ya increase your cals, but losing weight aint gonna happen unless your in a deficit regardless how much. each lbs is 3500 cals, thats the deficit u need for a pound of weight loss.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories