We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Do I go by MFP or the gym machines?

twilighter95
twilighter95 Posts: 16
edited January 10 in Fitness and Exercise
According to MFP I would have burnt off 75 calories in 5minutes of working on the elliptical trainer today but on the gym machine itself its says I burnt off 46 calories.. this has been happening for things like the treadmill etc. what should I go by? MFP or the gym machines? It makes me think that exercise classes and weight training doesn't burn off as much as MFP says either :/

Replies

  • bump- I'm also curious.. same thing happens to me
  • megsmom2
    megsmom2 Posts: 2,362 Member
    judging by the machines I use...the 46 is probably more accurate. Does your machine have inputs for weight and age? That helps with accuracy. MFP is a little....over-optimistic with calorie burns.
  • I would go by the machine its better to underestimate than over estimate calories burnt. I think MFP always overestimates my calories burnt.
  • akkimberly
    akkimberly Posts: 63 Member
    I go by the one that has the lowest calories lost. I'd rather underestimate my calories burned than over estimate them. I'm sure there's a better way to log, but this has worked for me.
  • Yeah i'll do that for machines thanks! :) but what about exercise classes? what should I put down for them since MFP overestimates it?
  • for classes I do a google search for calories burned and shoot for the low end , it seems to work ok. another option would be to borrow someones HRM for a class to try and get a better idea.
  • demilade
    demilade Posts: 402 Member
    Get a heart rate moniter. MFP is way off. MFP says I burn over 300 cals doing aerobics, hrm says 120 :)
  • Mighty_Rabite
    Mighty_Rabite Posts: 581 Member
    What I usually do personally is go by the machines at the gym (though I'll only bother with their numbers if I can input at least my weight) and subtract 20%.

    Often on a 15 minute elliptical session I will end up between a 245-260 calorie readout so after my 20% reduction it usually goes between 196-208 calories for the 15 minute period (I feel I can trust it because I do the elliptical at a very high intensity, usually my heart rate is in the mid-160s and up).
  • ashlinmarie
    ashlinmarie Posts: 1,263 Member
    I would go by the lower number, but also would highly recommend investing in a heart rate monitor. I actually burn more than what MFP says when I walk, run, or do machines at a gym which explained a plateau I had (where I wasn't eating enough). The only things MFP overestimates for me is biking and circuit training.
  • luperaz
    luperaz Posts: 26
    I would like to agree with everyone that mentioned about using a HRM. If you are really serious about working out and losing weight. the HRM is the single most important thing you will need beside recording everything in MFP.
    A HRM is the only way to know pretty close to what your calories burnt are. Everyone is different and a lot depends on your metabolism and fitness level. I always record 10% less calories than what my HRM says just to make sure I have a hidden buffer.
    For me on average I normally burn about 10 calories every minute when I am decently exerted. Some machines are less and some are more depending on exertion levels.

    Hope that helps.
  • deb3690
    deb3690 Posts: 59 Member
    Most of the machines will tell you what the mets (effort) value is...you can adjust that to your weight and have a closer estimate

    ...use mets x weight (in kg) x time (portion of an hour) x .48

    Exercise for 30 minutes at 4.1 mets that's 4.1 x 62 (for my weight) x .5 x .48 = 61 calories

    there are lots of web sites with suggested mets values for specific exercises...or it will pop up on the machine with a readout
This discussion has been closed.