700 calories burned without a workout?

So how do you know you gained 700 cals?

If you set it as lightly active that already includes some walking around. Set it as sedentary if you want to include your fit bit calories. Even then, maybe take like 100 calories off because sedentary includes some daily activity.

There's no need to do that if you've set up your FitBit to synch with MFP as an adjustment is made that subtracts what MFP expected you to burn from the FitBit data -- you can even adjust a setting so that if you're less active than MFP expected it will reduce the number of calories you are allotted, but the default is to have that switched off.

Unless you are entering FitBit data manually for some reason do NOT mess with your calories.

Chances are you just spend more time chasing around after little ones than you thought you did

I'll mention that if you watch responses for a while, you'll find that most people that wear it are shocked that their sedentary desk job for 40 hrs and 1 hr commuting everyday, on days with no exercise, ends up being Lightly Active at 1.35 multiplier.

If this is what you are getting with normal day, indeed you may have room to move the activity level up a bit so you don't get the big adjustments, and can plan the day out better.
Then when exercise is really done, not so hard to eat even more back.

The BMR multipliers for their levels are:
Sed - 1.25
Lightly Active - 1.35
Active - 1.45
Very Active - 1.55

So whatever you find the FitBit total daily burn being on avg for non-exercise days, divide that by your MFP BMR (Apps - BMR Calculator), and there's your multiplier.

So if you find FitBit saying your TDEE is 2030 calories, and your BMR is 1400, 2030 / 1400 = 1.45. So select Active level.
MFP will set goal to 1530 daily then, and you'll only get adjustments if your TDEE is going over 2030.

Set MFP to that, keep your 1 lb loss goal, and go to town.

i had a fitbit and sent it back for this very reason.
you drive yourself crazy trying to grasp at calories from anything.

i came back and made it simple... MFP gives me a number, i eat that number, if i go to the gym then i log it, if i dont, i dont.

The suggestions so far seem to have already indicated this concept; In simpler terms, exercise should be defined as any activity that is done above and beyond your daily activity.

Full disclosure I don't use FitBit or utilize MFP recommended calorie intake. Through my weight management class we used a formula.

Multiplier:
Women: 10
Men: 11
PA = Physical Activity
(Maintenance weight x multiplier) + (Calories PA) = total daily calories

For a man to maintain 200 calories while burning 300 calories a day, the formula would be:
(200 x 11) + 300 = 2500

If that same man wanted to lose about ~1 lb a week , he would need to deficit 500 calories a day for a net of 2000 calories/day.

I think MFP's sedentary is more like bed-bound, and if you do a little walking through your day, even if it's only walking to the station/bus-stop/round teh shops, you will burn more than the MFP sedentary figures.

I have mine set to sedentary, and I will agree, I get a Fitbit adjustment pretty much every day. I do have a pretty sedentary desk job (unless I purposely get up and move), but my car is not parked close, so I have a 10-15 minute walk each day to and from my car.

I like getting the adjustment each day --- I consider it my reward for making an extra effort to move more, so I keep everything set at sedentary.

I think MFP's sedentary is more like bed-bound, and if you do a little walking through your day, even if it's only walking to the station/bus-stop/round teh shops, you will burn more than the MFP sedentary figures.

I have mine set to sedentary, and I will agree, I get a Fitbit adjustment pretty much every day. I do have a pretty sedentary desk job (unless I purposely get up and move), but my car is not parked close, so I have a 10-15 minute walk each day to and from my car.

Very true.

And think about this - MFP is doing 1.25 BMR multiplier, the other TDEE level tables do 1.20 for Sedentary.

Which means if you select sedentary on those and then take 20% off, you end up less than what you started with.

At least the MFP level includes about the following if you really split it up.

Weekly time - 40 hr work week sitting, 56 hr sleeping, 65 hr sitting/standing, 7 hr slow walking activity

I think MFP's sedentary is more like bed-bound, and if you do a little walking through your day, even if it's only walking to the station/bus-stop/round teh shops, you will burn more than the MFP sedentary figures.

I disagree with that. If I don't do an actual workout, my FitBit routinely tells me to eat about 1000 calories to maintain a 500 calorie deficit (I'm at sedentary on both MFP and FB). I have to have over 5000 steps before I 'break even' with my FB. I turned the negative adjustments off on MFP because of it.

Personally, I wouldn't eat any of those calories back. If you're burning calories simply due to your regular lifestyle activities, those really can't be counted as efforts or changes. This is strictly a personal opinion, but I would ignore them. If you want to eat back activity calories, use up the ones you burn during workouts. I would think you'd lose quite slowly any other way but again - this is solely MY OWN OPINION from my own experience. You'll figure out what works for you!

I thought setting it to sedentary didn't make any sense. I knew that MFP would take the difference between their calculations and Fitbit as the calorie adjustment- it just surprised me that even though MFP lists being a "teacher" as being "lightly active" I am burning well beyond the "lightly active" point according to Fitbit.

Fortunately, this week I'm just getting used to the sites, so I'm switching things up. I decided to put that I'm active today, and I'll see how that works out for me.

I am planning on going to the gym a few times a week, but I also like to sneak in workouts wherever possible by doing little things like parking far away from the door, walking around a little on my lunch break, and I suppose it adds up over the course of the day.

I'm debating using negative calorie adjustments though. That way, on the weekends when I'm a lazy bum, I am not eating 1800 calories. However, I also get nervous about pre-tracking my meals the night before and realizing that I didn't get my expected burn because I was in a less active class, etc.

That's why I got one. I wanted to make sure that I was still hitting my "lightly active" category on the weekends so I don't just sit on my bum all day.

Also, I have found MFP to severely under estimate activity level based on those descriptions. IMO something like Fitbit will give you a much better idea of how active you actually are.

I thought setting it to sedentary didn't make any sense. I knew that MFP would take the difference between their calculations and Fitbit as the calorie adjustment- it just surprised me that even though MFP lists being a "teacher" as being "lightly active" I am burning well beyond the "lightly active" point according to Fitbit.

Fortunately, this week I'm just getting used to the sites, so I'm switching things up. I decided to put that I'm active today, and I'll see how that works out for me.

I am planning on going to the gym a few times a week, but I also like to sneak in workouts wherever possible by doing little things like parking far away from the door, walking around a little on my lunch break, and I suppose it adds up over the course of the day.

I'm debating using negative calorie adjustments though. That way, on the weekends when I'm a lazy bum, I am not eating 1800 calories. However, I also get nervous about pre-tracking my meals the night before and realizing that I didn't get my expected burn because I was in a less active class, etc.

I think a teacher in a classroom with 2 year olds burns significantly more and moves significantly more than say a high school teacher that stands in front of a board.

if you are using a fitbit, it really doesn't matter if you choose sedentary or active. Especially if you have it set up so your exercise calories can be negative. It will adjust your total amount of calories burned.

Honestly, I'd say that it is correct. You are 21 years old (high calorie burn), overweight (high calorie burn), and pretty active chasing kids (high calorie burn). It really doesn't surprise me.

If it makes you feel any better, if I spend the day on my feet, I can easily burn 3-400 extra calories and I am 37 (lower burn) and not overweight (lower burn). I can also tell you that I have been using a fitbit for about a year and my actual weight loss versus my projected weight loss (using fitbits adjustments) have been dead on.

I would suggest that you trust the fitbit until you have a reason not to, and then I would be more inclined to question your food estimation before I would question the fitbit.

So long as you have both MFP and Fitbit set to the same activity level you are good to go.
I sub at a preK and I know when I work I get a pretty good adjustment and on days I go to the grocery store I earn at least 3 or 400 cals just from walking aorund getting groceries! (Mine is set to sedentary on both though so I get extra cals for anything over regular activity)

I find it hard to believe that one can burn 300/400 calories while out shopping. That is how much I burn while running 30 min using a HRM !! Are these FItbits accurate. ??? If they are then I am heading to the mall daily and will be fitting in those skinny jeans real soon