Probably of interest to most....

haley255
haley255 Posts: 117 Member
edited January 17 in Food and Nutrition
«1

Replies

  • CoachReddy
    CoachReddy Posts: 3,949 Member
    Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
  • chels0722
    chels0722 Posts: 465 Member
    Thank you for sharing! I enjoyed reading that! And it doesn't surprise me one bit!
  • Mom0819
    Mom0819 Posts: 77 Member
    bump
  • This is fascinating :O I like that almonds might be less calories than we think, and that we use 5 to 30 percent of the energy in food while digesting it. So cool!
  • Xiaolongbao
    Xiaolongbao Posts: 854 Member
    "Neistat took some of his favorite New York City foods to a laboratory at the New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center for testing. Four out of the five items tested had more calories than the label promised. The Subway turkey sandwich was the only one to contain fewer calories, while a "healthy" tofu sandwich from another outlet had almost twice as many calories as listed."

    This is one good argument for doing your own food preparation as much as possible.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,091 Member
    Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
    Lol, this ought to be good because one of the contentions is:

    It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • sabimausl85
    sabimausl85 Posts: 219 Member
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/03/11/174028830/sleep-less-eat-more-gain-weight

    i like this one better. when i am off i can eat more calories and dont gain, cuz i sleep more ;)

    but dont we eat less cuz there isnt as much time to eat if you sleep more?! (5 hours sleep makes 19 hours food possible, 9 hours sleep makes 15 hours food possible...) maybe? ;)
  • caribougal
    caribougal Posts: 865 Member
    Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
    Lol, this ought to be good because one of the contentions is:

    It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    I thought that was interesting too. Maybe whole and raw foods are less well-digested and "pass through" before all the potential energy is extracted. This also means you can eat more of them for the same cal as processed/cooked. Processing and cooking them does some of the cellular breakdown for us.
  • thehka
    thehka Posts: 74 Member
    Who eats raw steak...
  • caribougal
    caribougal Posts: 865 Member
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/03/11/174028830/sleep-less-eat-more-gain-weight

    i like this one better. when i am off i can eat more calories and dont gain, cuz i sleep more ;)

    but dont we eat less cuz there isnt as much time to eat if you sleep more?! (5 hours sleep makes 19 hours food possible, 9 hours sleep makes 15 hours food possible...) maybe? ;)

    My sleep is awful. I often wake in the middle of the night to work when the house is quiet. It effs with my hormones, stress, and for sure slows my weight loss, mostly because either I don't work out when I don't sleep or because my workouts suck. But I don't eat when I'm up. I used to, and that was part of my 20 lb gain. But I don't eat that way anymore.
  • haley255
    haley255 Posts: 117 Member
    Who eats raw steak...

    Those who want to die from e.coli perhaps?
    I thought the same thing.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,091 Member
    Who eats raw steak...
    Steak Tar Tar? I eat my steak rare (really red).

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • haley255
    haley255 Posts: 117 Member
    Who eats raw steak...
    Steak Tar Tar? I eat my steak rare (really red).

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Well be careful, wasn't joking about the e.coli. My brother got it and almost died.
  • Delicate
    Delicate Posts: 625 Member
    Mmmmm bleu steak, or medium rare, depends on the mood

    Havent their been quite a few studies done that calorie content on boxes is rarely acurate, because companies can have a 30% margin of it and they can change receipes to a degree without stating if its changed the calorie contents?

    I reckon each change they should update their numbers and do tests.

    Whats the point of eating 'diet meals' if the package is fibbing and the normal one would of kept you full for longer?

    business wins =/
  • lauren3101
    lauren3101 Posts: 1,853 Member
    Calorie counting has worked for many people for many years and is working for me right now. If I started worrying about how accurate labels were now and how much I need to chew my food to get all the calories out of it, I'd drive myself insane.
  • wllwsmmr
    wllwsmmr Posts: 391 Member
    thanks for sharing :)

    The video is interesting but also frightening haha sigh my anxiety is working up again and thinking about all the processed foods I ate lately ): ):
  • majope
    majope Posts: 1,325 Member
    Calorie counting has worked for many people for many years and is working for me right now. If I started worrying about how accurate labels were now and how much I need to chew my food to get all the calories out of it, I'd drive myself insane.
    This. We're told the MFP food database is wrong, label calorie counts are wrong, our HRMs are wrong (but not as wrong as the burn counts on gym equipment or in MFP), the kitchen scales that weigh our food are wrong, the bathroom scales that weigh our bodies are wrong...and yet somehow, I'm definitely smaller than I used to me. At least according to my lying eyes.
  • NHoughton13
    NHoughton13 Posts: 303
    Calorie counting has worked for many people for many years and is working for me right now. If I started worrying about how accurate labels were now and how much I need to chew my food to get all the calories out of it, I'd drive myself insane.
    This. We're told the MFP food database is wrong, label calorie counts are wrong, our HRMs are wrong (but not as wrong as the burn counts on gym equipment or in MFP), the kitchen scales that weigh our food are wrong, the bathroom scales that weigh our bodies are wrong...and yet somehow, I'm definitely smaller than I used to me. At least according to my lying eyes.
    ^^Agree with both!!
  • Fitburd
    Fitburd Posts: 92 Member
    I find this extremely interesting as a PCOS sufferer I am sensitive to carb intake so eating whole grains can mean that while my calorie intake seems low I gain weight real quick. Who would have thought that fibre would have unseen calories? How we measure our food intake definitely needs reviewing.
  • CoachReddy
    CoachReddy Posts: 3,949 Member
    Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
    Lol, this ought to be good because one of the contentions is:

    It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    I know. I noticed that.
  • buffybabe
    buffybabe Posts: 180 Member
    Who eats raw steak...
    Steak Tar Tar? I eat my steak rare (really red).

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    I eat mine very rare as well
  • bump for later
  • lporter229
    lporter229 Posts: 4,907 Member
    Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
    Lol, this ought to be good because one of the contentions is:

    It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    I thought that was interesting too. Maybe whole and raw foods are less well-digested and "pass through" before all the potential energy is extracted. This also means you can eat more of them for the same cal as processed/cooked. Processing and cooking them does some of the cellular breakdown for us.

    That's how I took that too. I think the article is interesting, but who here is surprised to find out that calorie counting is not an exact science? I just use it as a basis for monitoring what I eat so I don't go waaaay overboard.

    On a side note, we have a calorimeter in the lab where I work. We do not use it for food testing (we use it to test biofuel potential), but I could if I wanted to. I may check some of my favorite foods and see how accuarte they are.
  • MsPudding
    MsPudding Posts: 562 Member
    Who eats raw steak...

    Me. Steak tartare.


    As for the rest of the piece. I thought it had already been established that highly processed foods and refined carbs are more easily converted into energy and that you get hungry quicker after them? At least all the low-carb literature I've read in the last 10 years has gone down that path. The same thing on the thermic effect - the 30% upper end of calories spent digesting food is lean protein, the bottom end (3%) is fat/sugar/refined carbs.

    I didn't know about almonds though.
  • Ultragirl2374
    Ultragirl2374 Posts: 390 Member
    Who eats raw steak...
    Steak Tar Tar? I eat my steak rare (really red).

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Well be careful, wasn't joking about the e.coli. My brother got it and almost died.

    E.coli is found on the surface of beef. A steak cooked rare would not be a risk for e.coli since the surface is seared. The inside of the steak does not contain E.coli.
    As for steak tar tar, an experinced chef is fully aware of food safety concerns and knows how to prepare it to avoid any food contaminations.
  • tachyon_master
    tachyon_master Posts: 226 Member
    I figure it all comes out in the wash...

    Not getting all the calories out of X.

    Underestimating the calories from fibre in Y.

    Not counting the 5-30% calorie reduction used to actually chew and digest food Z.

    Just like I'm sure that the slight overestimation of my calorie burn on the treadmill at the gym evens out if you consider all the random fidgeting I do all day at work and don't log.
  • elyelyse
    elyelyse Posts: 1,454 Member
    "Calorie counts don't account for the 5 to 30 percent of energy used up in digesting and absorbing a meal."

    ummmm.... If they want to deduct the calories it takes me to digest my food from that food's calorie count... well, you better stop counting digestion as part of my BMR...

    Telling people the food they eat is actually lower in calories than they thought, without adding that using those "new" numbers means you also need fewer calories in a day just doesn't make sense. Seems like a recipe for INCREASED incidences of obesity.


    ETA: I'm 92 pounds down based almost completely on calorie counting... if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  • Koldnomore
    Koldnomore Posts: 1,613 Member
    Common sense..

    Every pre-made, prepackaged food is going to be made differently. Every sandwich will have more or less filling depending on who's making it. It's impossible to get an accurate number unless the people making it are also required to weigh and measure each portion of things that they use- which in 'fast food' is highly unlikely. If you eat out you can't expect that the food that you get will be the exact proportion that was used to get the calorie estimates..all you can do is hope it's close and go from there. The things that will be closest in calories will be the mechanically created 'foods' that are portioned by machines (stuff I wouldn't want to eat anyway)

    All the more reason to cook at home and weigh EVERYTHING - at least you can be reasonably assured that you are closer than you would be by letting someone else make it for you.
  • wareagle8706
    wareagle8706 Posts: 1,090 Member
    WOW!!

    Thank you so much for posting! Very informative. This video is definitely something that makes me feel better about eating fresh not processed foods!
  • ekaustin7
    ekaustin7 Posts: 185 Member
    good read! thanks for posting.
This discussion has been closed.