Probably of interest to most....
![haley255](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/1101/b8d2/23db/a60b/9270/6a71/cfb7/710e423cc579a6d2835410672fa9cc957fb1.jpg)
haley255
Posts: 117 Member
Article: "Calorie Counts: Fatally Flawed, Or Our Best Defense Against Pudge?"
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/02/20/172403779/calorie-counts-fatally-flawed-or-our-best-defense-against-pudge?ft=1
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/02/20/172403779/calorie-counts-fatally-flawed-or-our-best-defense-against-pudge?ft=1
0
Replies
-
Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.0
-
Thank you for sharing! I enjoyed reading that! And it doesn't surprise me one bit!0
-
bump0
-
This is fascinating :O I like that almonds might be less calories than we think, and that we use 5 to 30 percent of the energy in food while digesting it. So cool!0
-
"Neistat took some of his favorite New York City foods to a laboratory at the New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center for testing. Four out of the five items tested had more calories than the label promised. The Subway turkey sandwich was the only one to contain fewer calories, while a "healthy" tofu sandwich from another outlet had almost twice as many calories as listed."
This is one good argument for doing your own food preparation as much as possible.0 -
Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/03/11/174028830/sleep-less-eat-more-gain-weight
i like this one better. when i am off i can eat more calories and dont gain, cuz i sleep more
but dont we eat less cuz there isnt as much time to eat if you sleep more?! (5 hours sleep makes 19 hours food possible, 9 hours sleep makes 15 hours food possible...) maybe?0 -
Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
I thought that was interesting too. Maybe whole and raw foods are less well-digested and "pass through" before all the potential energy is extracted. This also means you can eat more of them for the same cal as processed/cooked. Processing and cooking them does some of the cellular breakdown for us.0 -
Who eats raw steak...0
-
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/03/11/174028830/sleep-less-eat-more-gain-weight
i like this one better. when i am off i can eat more calories and dont gain, cuz i sleep more
but dont we eat less cuz there isnt as much time to eat if you sleep more?! (5 hours sleep makes 19 hours food possible, 9 hours sleep makes 15 hours food possible...) maybe?
My sleep is awful. I often wake in the middle of the night to work when the house is quiet. It effs with my hormones, stress, and for sure slows my weight loss, mostly because either I don't work out when I don't sleep or because my workouts suck. But I don't eat when I'm up. I used to, and that was part of my 20 lb gain. But I don't eat that way anymore.0 -
Who eats raw steak...
Those who want to die from e.coli perhaps?
I thought the same thing.0 -
Who eats raw steak...
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
Who eats raw steak...
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
Well be careful, wasn't joking about the e.coli. My brother got it and almost died.0 -
Mmmmm bleu steak, or medium rare, depends on the mood
Havent their been quite a few studies done that calorie content on boxes is rarely acurate, because companies can have a 30% margin of it and they can change receipes to a degree without stating if its changed the calorie contents?
I reckon each change they should update their numbers and do tests.
Whats the point of eating 'diet meals' if the package is fibbing and the normal one would of kept you full for longer?
business wins =/0 -
Calorie counting has worked for many people for many years and is working for me right now. If I started worrying about how accurate labels were now and how much I need to chew my food to get all the calories out of it, I'd drive myself insane.0
-
thanks for sharing
The video is interesting but also frightening haha sigh my anxiety is working up again and thinking about all the processed foods I ate lately ): ):0 -
Calorie counting has worked for many people for many years and is working for me right now. If I started worrying about how accurate labels were now and how much I need to chew my food to get all the calories out of it, I'd drive myself insane.0
-
Calorie counting has worked for many people for many years and is working for me right now. If I started worrying about how accurate labels were now and how much I need to chew my food to get all the calories out of it, I'd drive myself insane.0
-
I find this extremely interesting as a PCOS sufferer I am sensitive to carb intake so eating whole grains can mean that while my calorie intake seems low I gain weight real quick. Who would have thought that fibre would have unseen calories? How we measure our food intake definitely needs reviewing.0
-
Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
I know. I noticed that.0 -
Who eats raw steak...
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
I eat mine very rare as well0 -
bump for later0
-
Tagging because this is fascinating and want to re read later.
It's much easier for the body to extract nutrients from cooked and processed foods than from whole or raw foods. People get more energy per ounce out of cooked hamburger than they would from a raw steak.
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
I thought that was interesting too. Maybe whole and raw foods are less well-digested and "pass through" before all the potential energy is extracted. This also means you can eat more of them for the same cal as processed/cooked. Processing and cooking them does some of the cellular breakdown for us.
That's how I took that too. I think the article is interesting, but who here is surprised to find out that calorie counting is not an exact science? I just use it as a basis for monitoring what I eat so I don't go waaaay overboard.
On a side note, we have a calorimeter in the lab where I work. We do not use it for food testing (we use it to test biofuel potential), but I could if I wanted to. I may check some of my favorite foods and see how accuarte they are.0 -
Who eats raw steak...
Me. Steak tartare.
As for the rest of the piece. I thought it had already been established that highly processed foods and refined carbs are more easily converted into energy and that you get hungry quicker after them? At least all the low-carb literature I've read in the last 10 years has gone down that path. The same thing on the thermic effect - the 30% upper end of calories spent digesting food is lean protein, the bottom end (3%) is fat/sugar/refined carbs.
I didn't know about almonds though.0 -
Who eats raw steak...
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
Well be careful, wasn't joking about the e.coli. My brother got it and almost died.
E.coli is found on the surface of beef. A steak cooked rare would not be a risk for e.coli since the surface is seared. The inside of the steak does not contain E.coli.
As for steak tar tar, an experinced chef is fully aware of food safety concerns and knows how to prepare it to avoid any food contaminations.0 -
I figure it all comes out in the wash...
Not getting all the calories out of X.
Underestimating the calories from fibre in Y.
Not counting the 5-30% calorie reduction used to actually chew and digest food Z.
Just like I'm sure that the slight overestimation of my calorie burn on the treadmill at the gym evens out if you consider all the random fidgeting I do all day at work and don't log.0 -
"Calorie counts don't account for the 5 to 30 percent of energy used up in digesting and absorbing a meal."
ummmm.... If they want to deduct the calories it takes me to digest my food from that food's calorie count... well, you better stop counting digestion as part of my BMR...
Telling people the food they eat is actually lower in calories than they thought, without adding that using those "new" numbers means you also need fewer calories in a day just doesn't make sense. Seems like a recipe for INCREASED incidences of obesity.
ETA: I'm 92 pounds down based almost completely on calorie counting... if it ain't broke, don't fix it.0 -
Common sense..
Every pre-made, prepackaged food is going to be made differently. Every sandwich will have more or less filling depending on who's making it. It's impossible to get an accurate number unless the people making it are also required to weigh and measure each portion of things that they use- which in 'fast food' is highly unlikely. If you eat out you can't expect that the food that you get will be the exact proportion that was used to get the calorie estimates..all you can do is hope it's close and go from there. The things that will be closest in calories will be the mechanically created 'foods' that are portioned by machines (stuff I wouldn't want to eat anyway)
All the more reason to cook at home and weigh EVERYTHING - at least you can be reasonably assured that you are closer than you would be by letting someone else make it for you.0 -
WOW!!
Thank you so much for posting! Very informative. This video is definitely something that makes me feel better about eating fresh not processed foods!0 -
good read! thanks for posting.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 438 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions