What do YOU think about "BMI"?
EmmaReed84
Posts: 263 Member
I see so much about BMI plastered everywhere and it sort of seems people can be obsessive about their BMI.
My issue with it is it used to say I was OBESE! I was about 18 years old, a size 8 (UK sizes) I was very slim and quite toned, but very busty... As in 32GG/30H (UK sizes) Once I was weighed at the doctors and was told I needed to lose weight!!
Anyway after having 2 children I had a breast reduction (my Mum was diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 42 quite by fluke during a breast reduction and was told it was so deep she would have never found it, until it was too late) So anyway during this time I was doing slimming world, I lost almost 10lbs just from having my breasts significantly reduced.
Now I am "ideal" I still think, if I had not had my reduction I could very well be 10lbs heavier and classed as Overweight with a BMI of just over 25.4!
My issue with it is it used to say I was OBESE! I was about 18 years old, a size 8 (UK sizes) I was very slim and quite toned, but very busty... As in 32GG/30H (UK sizes) Once I was weighed at the doctors and was told I needed to lose weight!!
Anyway after having 2 children I had a breast reduction (my Mum was diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 42 quite by fluke during a breast reduction and was told it was so deep she would have never found it, until it was too late) So anyway during this time I was doing slimming world, I lost almost 10lbs just from having my breasts significantly reduced.
Now I am "ideal" I still think, if I had not had my reduction I could very well be 10lbs heavier and classed as Overweight with a BMI of just over 25.4!
0
Replies
-
I prefer BF% to BMI.0
-
Gives me lots of laughs ... I am Obese by BMI0
-
LOAD OF CRAP, completely inaccurate bs. BF% all the way,0
-
My brother is a triathete and ultramarathon runner who is very densely muscled. According to his BMI, he is obese. Anyone looking at him would know he was in fantastic shape, though.
BMI is a flawed method of analysis because it does not take body composition into account.0 -
BMI is stupid. Body fat % is more important. BMI has me as underweight but I still have a little weight to lose.0
-
Completely inaccurate and not useful for much.
Body fat is a much better indicator.0 -
If you have huge breasts, you'll have high body fat too. That's what they are composed of. No measurement works for everybody.0
-
I prefer BF% to BMI.
this!0 -
How do you get your BF%? (feel so thick for asking that lol)0
-
BMI is a quick and dirty way for *most* people to come to an understanding of where they stand weight wise. It's extremely imperfect. Body fat percentage, hip-waist ratio, physical endurance, etc are all better measurements of health.
With that said, BMI is a good indicator for me (a small busted female) so I know I am on the right track (not obese). For what my goals are, I need to know my body fat %.0 -
My BF% is 26 which is healthy, but my BMI is 32.4 is which is obese. My hip to waist ratio and height to hip ratio are within normal range. I think I'll take the BF% over the BMI. My goal was to get down to 160lbs, now it's to get my BF% down to between 19-20.
I've tried different online calculators which uses measurements and I came up with an average, though I would really like to get a more accurate reading at some point.0 -
How do you get your BF%? (feel so thick for asking that lol)
BMI doesn't take into consideration what is muscle and what is fat in your body.
You should be able to find a calculator online for this, as a rough estimate. I use this one with a measuring tape.
http://www.linear-software.com/online.html0 -
well according to BMI I'm borderline between healthy and overweight (24.6 BMI) - and some charts list me as well into the overweight range
5'1"
130lb
100-101lb lean body mass
BMI range for my height: 100-132lb (some charts say 100-124lb)
My body fat percentage is about 22%. My ribs stick out when I raise my arms above my head (stick out as in can count individual ribs). I have muscle definition when I flex. I am a novice at lifting, I can't even squat my bodyweight yet (so I'm nowhere near "jacked" or "ripped" or anything like that)
My lean body mass is in the healthy range for my height according to BMI.
So guess what I think of BMI lol0 -
BMI is total crap for people who have low body fat.
According to the BMI chart, all elite athletes (think Vikings player Adrian Peterson) are overweight or even obese simply because BMI doesn't distinguish between fat and muscle.
Adrian Peterson has a BMI of 28.6 which puts him in the Overweight category according the chart. See his picture below, no one would consider him fat!
http://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/adrian-peterson-02_.jpg0 -
It's not completely off base as a measurement of standard, but it is because it's not for everyone. BF% is a good standard, but so is saying someone is morbidly obese. There's no getting around the fact that morbidly obese is not good. Lots of people like to excuse their BMI by saying that it doesn't fit them because of xyz, but it's still a standard and the exceptions are semi-rare. For instance a body builder with so much muscle mass that he is overweight or obese in bmi standards is rare, or a woman with such disproportionately large breasts that they send her into overweight status is rare. For the norm, it's a good, broad measure of health to start with. Anyone can quickly calcuate their BMI on the interwebs and figure out if maybe there's something they need to reevaluate in their life. (This is coming from someone who's still morbidly obese for another 2 pounds or so)0
-
BF is superior to BMI. for the reasons everyone has already pointed out.
However, Body fat percentage has its own issues. Mainly that the methods most of use to measure it are pretty inaccurate. It is a lot of work to reduce your bodyfat by 3% which is the margin of error for electrical impedance machines.
Even the electrical impedance and calipers are harder for most people to get access to than a scale, and how many people really get dexa scans?0 -
OK so I have just gone on a website that said based on my calculations, my BF% is 24% that good right?
(there are people shaking their heads at me right now due to my thickness LOL) *BLUSHES* I am just learning about this stuff0 -
Yes, the healthy range is 20-250
-
i think it sucks a big one. what about muscly people?0
-
How do you get your BF%? (feel so thick for asking that lol)0
-
I'm in normal bmi but my hip to waist ratio is high... boom already disproved BMI.0
-
Ways you can get your BF%
1) skinfold calipers
2) DEXA scan
3) hydrostatic testing
4) online calculator
none of these methods are totally reliable and there are a number of variables that can change the reading. The main thing is to track it as best you can, say monthly, and see it decreasing.0 -
I vote for eat clean and healthy, work out hard often, and get to where you look defined and reasonably lean in the mirror. Don't sweat the numbers too much.0
-
I agree the DEXA scan will be your best bet0
-
I vote for eat clean and healthy, work out hard often, and get to where you look defined and reasonably lean in the mirror. Don't sweat the numbers too much.
MFP needs a like button *like*
I am just learning to "let go" of numbers and concentrate on my body image, also my confidence in my own skin. But I do like numbers, weights, inches etc... it all fascinates me... I think I am a bit sad LOL!!!0 -
I wont even get started on BMI, its an inaccurate system that seriously needs thought.
I tell my clients to focus on bodyfat% and measurements. As long as the numbers are going in the right direction (down) then they're on the right track.0 -
Oh you mean the Bogus Measurement Index? It's really horrible... I don't know how to tell my mother-in-law to stop using it, or just save that battle.
But yes, my best indicator is your body fat percentage. I wouldn't do any of the calculations online. Go to your doctor (or even the gym), they may have a few things that could calculate your BF % (with a smaller margin of error, i.e. BodPod, dunk test, handheld, etc.)0 -
I was 14 and the girl said that I needed to lose weight. But the doctor looked at the regular weight for most girls my age instead of my age! I was 5'8 and weighed 147 pounds. I went to a new doctor and was told that I was perfectly fine. I wouldn't use the BMI.0
-
I think it is unrealistic. At best, a very basic guideline or idea of where one should be at.
Then again, maybe because of how we eat, not you and I personally but people in general, we don't realize how overweight we really are.
Take away all the processed stuff and fast food and go back to how we are technically SUPPOSED to eat - organic and raw and THEN it might be more realistic. At least, for today's society...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions