BMI? Meh...
NotBonJovi
Posts: 187 Member
0
Replies
-
according to the bmi chart, I should look like a bag of bones, because that's how I'd be if I were smack in the middle of the "normal" range for my height.0
-
Ticks me off that some people - even health professionals - still use BMI. It's just a dumb number - not taking into account muscle mass or body fat %. Despite the fact that my body fat % is firmly in the "healthy" range and have more muscle mass than at any other time in my life, my BMI still tells me I'm "overweight".0
-
I think the BMI chart is an archaic tool from the World War era. To make it fit to everyone is the biggest error.0
-
B M I = Bull Manure Index0
-
I think it's pretty accurate. Obviously not for most athletes but for your average joe it's a great guideline0
-
according to the bmi chart, I should look like a bag of bones, because that's how I'd be if I were smack in the middle of the "normal" range for my height.
Yep me too0 -
I think it's pretty accurate. Obviously not for most athletes but for your average joe it's a great guideline
Sorry but I beg to differ. Ive posted about this many times. At 175ish and 5'3 my BMI has me at obese. I am having a hard time getting more life insurance at a reasonable rate because they see me as obese. I'm in a size 10 or 12 depending. Even when I get to my goal of a size 8 I will be in the high level of overweight. I'm currently on day 9 of Insanity. Take it for what its worth but I'm far from obese0 -
Insurance companies need any excuse to charge you more. No wonder they champion this age-old BMI.
Both Brad Pitt and Russell Crowe are termed as overweight or obese by this chart. (Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2006/nov/28/healthandwellbeing.health1)
The BMI tool needs a serious rethink.0 -
For the general public I think it is a good guide. IMO there are too many people who now claim that the BMI charts "don't apply to them" which I think is just a form of denial. I can understand that for some it isn't as good of a guide due to muscle mass but honestly the average everyday person wouldn't have to worry about this. Of course this is MY opinion and yes I know some will disagree but the great thing is it really doesn't matter.0
-
I wonder if it's more accurate for women than men, since men typically have more muscle mass.
I'm 6'2", 206 pounds with 15% body fat. My BMI is 26.4 - overweight.
In order for my BMI to be in the healthy range, I'd have to weigh 194. So I'd need to lose another 12 pounds. If I lost another 12 pounds of fat, I'd have 9% body fat.
Is it really necessary for me to go single digit body fat in order to have a healthy BMI? And keep in mind, that's just to creep into the "healthy" BMI range with a 24.9. Crazy!0 -
according to the BMI chart i am dangerously underweight LOL.0
-
For the general public I think it is a good guide. IMO there are too many people who now claim that the BMI charts "don't apply to them" which I think is just a form of denial. I can understand that for some it isn't as good of a guide due to muscle mass but honestly the average everyday person wouldn't have to worry about this. Of course this is MY opinion and yes I know some will disagree but the great thing is it really doesn't matter.
I couldn't agree more!0 -
I wonder if it's more accurate for women than men, since men typically have more muscle mass.
I'm 6'2", 206 pounds with 15% body fat. My BMI is 26.4 - overweight.
In order for my BMI to be in the healthy range, I'd have to weigh 194. So I'd need to lose another 12 pounds. If I lost another 12 pounds of fat, I'd have 9% body fat.
Is it really necessary for me to go single digit body fat in order to have a healthy BMI? And keep in mind, that's just to creep into the "healthy" BMI range with a 24.9. Crazy!
So, you got pictures of your ripped abs? I'd like to see it.
My point being is how do you know that you have 15% BF? I assume you have a 32" waist at your belly button? That you have 15 or 16 inch arms? Fit to Fat website says I'm at 15.5% BF. My hand held device, set on normal, says less than 11%. I'm 6'4" 180ish.
BMI isn't perfect, but used for a wide range of the population it works fairly well. Each individual may not fit into the model. It doesn't mean it doesn't work over a population. Not that you aren't right and that it doesn't apply to you as an individual, but the fact is most people grossly overestimate their LBM. Every way you test BF%, even the best ones, like Dexascan can be off 5%.0 -
Unfortunately for 5'3" you ARE obese at 175. I'm 5'9 and 180 and still considerably overweight...despite the muscles mass which there is alot of. Take a good hard honest look at your body and you'll see plenty of areas to trim off the weight and get to a healthier level.0
-
For the general public I think it is a good guide. IMO there are too many people who now claim that the BMI charts "don't apply to them" which I think is just a form of denial. I can understand that for some it isn't as good of a guide due to muscle mass but honestly the average everyday person wouldn't have to worry about this. Of course this is MY opinion and yes I know some will disagree but the great thing is it really doesn't matter.0
-
I wonder if it's more accurate for women than men, since men typically have more muscle mass.
I'm 6'2", 206 pounds with 15% body fat. My BMI is 26.4 - overweight.
In order for my BMI to be in the healthy range, I'd have to weigh 194. So I'd need to lose another 12 pounds. If I lost another 12 pounds of fat, I'd have 9% body fat.
Is it really necessary for me to go single digit body fat in order to have a healthy BMI? And keep in mind, that's just to creep into the "healthy" BMI range with a 24.9. Crazy!
Im a woman and if I got to the recommend weight for my height according to my bmi. I would need to lose about 30 pounds. I am now in a size 10 or 12 depening more like an 11 if I had to pin it down. a 30 pound weight lose would have me a zero0 -
Unfortunately for 5'3" you ARE obese at 175. I'm 5'9 and 180 and still considerably overweight...despite the muscles mass which there is alot of. Take a good hard honest look at your body and you'll see plenty of areas to trim off the weight and get to a healthier level.
Yes I agree. the main one being my belly. but to look at me I am not obese. I am overweight. I am tryng to get to a size 80 -
Unfortunately for 5'3" you ARE obese at 175. I'm 5'9 and 180 and still considerably overweight...despite the muscles mass which there is alot of. Take a good hard honest look at your body and you'll see plenty of areas to trim off the weight and get to a healthier level.
Yes I agree. the main one being my belly. but to look at me I am not obese. I am overweight. I am tryng to get to a size 8
All Im saying is Im not obese. Ill admit that Im overweight. thats why im here. LOL0 -
That makes sense, and I meant absolutely no offense by saying that. The distinction between overweight, obese, and morbidly obese is perhaps where the problem comes. Most important is recognizing when your not at a healthy level and striving to get there...no matter where your healthy falls. Just by being here you've started down the right path!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions