We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

My New NET Calorie Goal (Based on TDEE-20%) - Crazy?

ScubaBobOC
ScubaBobOC Posts: 13
edited January 19 in Health and Weight Loss
I apologize in advance for a long post, but speaking out loud in hopes of a sanity check from anyone listening out there..

With a starting weight of 275lbs, I've been using MFP since August 2012 and have lost 42lbs. At 6'2", I've set a goal of 205lbs, based primarily on where I've been before and where I feel I would be at a healthy weight. My NET calorie goal in MFP has hovered around 1600-2000 for most of my weight loss, which has basically plateaued for the last 2 months. I didn't question this goal too much, as I was losing the weight at a comfortable pace. With the plateau I've considered going for more of TDEE-20% approach.

I recently had my body fat, RMR and V02 tests completed at a local testing facility. My body fat is currently at 22%, which is lower than I had expected (and had manually calculated). My RMR - which I would assume would be very close to my BMR - is 2750 cals/day. According to my regular workout schedule and lifestyle (workout 6 days a week doing P90X and average 10k steps), my calculated "Total Energy Output" (or TDEE as I saw it) is 3918 cals/day. Based on this RMR, I've also calculated my true average TDEE using data from fitbit (stairs/floors) and digifit (all exercize logged using a HRM) over the last several months and came up with a very comparable 3987 calories/day.

Given this information, I've calculated my new "NET" calorie goal as approx 3200 cals/day. Does this seem high/low? As I use my fitbit every day, and log all of my calorie burns using an HRM with digifit, I feel using the net goal would be more accurate and realistic given the reality of life for days/week when I'm not as active, or more active than the average. Thanks in advance for any feedback!

Replies

  • dixiewhiskey
    dixiewhiskey Posts: 3,333 Member
    I think that's a good start.. you can always cut back on that net goal if you don't happen to exercise or be as active on certain days. I would said minimum is 2750 or around that area based on the RMR/BMR you mentioned
  • ScubaBobOC
    ScubaBobOC Posts: 13
    Thanks! My current plan is to stick to the current calorie goal for 2-3 weeks before making any changes. Having just "survived" the first weekend of March Madness (and all the very bad things that I tend to consume during it) - that time period starts today :-)
  • ScubaBobOC
    ScubaBobOC Posts: 13
    <bump>
  • Craigamears
    Craigamears Posts: 65 Member
    Bob, those numbers look right based upon your RMR. Wish I had your RMR with my 6'6" and 200#LBM. I haven't had mine done in a lab but according to the charts it should be about 2400. I recently upped my cals to 3200... I was in the basement and plateaued.
  • __RANDY__
    __RANDY__ Posts: 1,036 Member
    Seems right on to me. Go ahead and change. Just be sure to eat healthy with those new calories.
  • geekyjock76
    geekyjock76 Posts: 2,720 Member
    Don't underestimate how much energy you need. Activity and RMR contribute a lot but so does a person's starting weight. The heavier the person, the more energy he/she needs.
  • ScubaBobOC
    ScubaBobOC Posts: 13
    Thanks all! Yes, I was actually pretty shocked my RMR was that high. I agree on trying to make sure the added calories are healthy - but it's definitely not easy to add calories period after eating at a lower rate for so long. Granted if I could add unrestricted cheese and alcohol to my daily intake - I would reach the total no problem!

    I've found that there is no way to change the BMR within the fitbit app, so technically I have to consider this difference when calculating my calorie goal for the day too..
This discussion has been closed.

Categories