3500 calories might only be a pound for women...
omma_to_3
Posts: 3,265 Member
Just found this interesting in an article I was reading. Not saying it's fact or anything, just an interesting concept.
"But, speaking in terms of evolution, Nature seems protective of women's role as child bearer, and wants women to maintain adequate body fat for nourishing healthy babies. Hence, women are more energy efficient. Obesity researchers at NY's Columbia University suggest a pound of weight loss in men equates to a deficit of about 2,500 calories, while women need a 3,500-calorie deficit. No wonder women have a tougher time losing weight then do men."
http://www.active.com/nutrition/Articles/5-Myths-About-Running-Calories-and-Weight-Loss.htm?page=3
"But, speaking in terms of evolution, Nature seems protective of women's role as child bearer, and wants women to maintain adequate body fat for nourishing healthy babies. Hence, women are more energy efficient. Obesity researchers at NY's Columbia University suggest a pound of weight loss in men equates to a deficit of about 2,500 calories, while women need a 3,500-calorie deficit. No wonder women have a tougher time losing weight then do men."
http://www.active.com/nutrition/Articles/5-Myths-About-Running-Calories-and-Weight-Loss.htm?page=3
0
Replies
-
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)0 -
Interesting!0
-
Hmmmm.....0
-
Obviously it's harder for women to lose weight , I thought everyone knew this...0
-
Nice read...thanks!0
-
Obviously it's harder for women to lose weight , I thought everyone knew this...
Not everyone it seems.0 -
yay I'm not fat, I'm just "energy efficient!" :laugh:0
-
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
:laugh: :laugh: BTW, Your sammich is in the kitchen waiting for you.0 -
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
Hey, if it gets the burn who cares :laugh:0 -
I think nature can feel free to protect me a little less nowadays ... kkthx.0
-
Dang - thats crazy ... but it explains why husband can lose weight in 2 seconds and it takes me a week...0
-
yay I'm not fat, I'm just "energy efficient!" :laugh:
LOL - I like this :laugh:0 -
If this is true, then MFP is putting me into starvation mode.0
-
yay I'm not fat, I'm just "energy efficient!" :laugh:
LOL - I like this :laugh:
Love this!!! ^^0 -
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
Anything else I can do for you darling?0 -
Obviously it's harder for women to lose weight , I thought everyone knew this...
Not everyone it seems.
Rudeness. I've never seen it QUANTIFIED before.0 -
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
:laugh: :laugh: BTW, Your sammich is in the kitchen waiting for you.
Is it a knuckle sammich? :laugh:0 -
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
Anything else I can do for you darling?
Need a sandwich, thanks.0 -
Obviously it's harder for women to lose weight , I thought everyone knew this...0
-
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
Wife: "A woman's work is never done"
Husband: "Maybe you should start a bit earlier in the morning?0 -
More reason for women for hoover up and clean then, you know, having more energy and all....
*ducks*
:-)
Let's not forget about making us sammiches too.0 -
That's really interesting. I feel like that would make a lot of sense, too. Since, in general, men often lose the weight quicker and can often eat a lot without gaining. I wonder if it's actually true!0
-
I think nature can feel free to protect me a little less nowadays ... kkthx.
Lol! I agree! I had my babies.. I'm good now Nature!!0 -
Wish mother nature would go pick on the guys. We get PMS and the natural ability to be fat storage facilities, well thanks a lot.0
-
yay I'm not fat, I'm just "energy efficient!" :laugh:
I prefer to say that I am "too short for my weight". It has been my informal observation that obese men are big eaters and that some really big women are too. But most moderately obese women that I know are not particularly big eaters. In my case, it only took eating a few more calories than I apparently needed and moving a little less than I needed to move (because of arthritis setting in), and the body fat rises over time. Just a very slight surplus over your needs adds up to big amounts of b.f. over time (a 100 calorie daily surplus over 10 years would be 100 lbs gained over that ten years--if my numbers are correct). Then you add (metabolism-damaging) yo-yo dieting into the mix and it isn't long before your body fat is waaaay out of control. No wonder so many women complain that they are "doing everything right" and not losing weight anywhere close to the rate that men lose it. :grumble:
It has been my life-long experience that I was either losing or gaining but never staying the same. :sad: The greater victory for me will not be losing all the weight I want to lose (another 30 or so pounds--maybe not quite that much) but rather being able to maintain it once I get there.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions