Which is More Visually Appealing to You?

Options
«134

Replies

  • pudadough
    pudadough Posts: 1,271 Member
    Options
    Rock climber guy. He looks healthy and not so much like he's going to spontaneously pop a forehead vein...
  • ElinWest
    ElinWest Posts: 2
    Options
    I would say average. Or even less toned than that, honestly. Definitely not the body builder. Personally, I think that if you look healthy, you don't have to be ripped like Jesus to be attractive. Hope that helps!
  • britttttx3
    britttttx3 Posts: 458
    Options
    Thee rock climber guy..the other is waaay too muscley omg O.O
  • oregonzoo
    oregonzoo Posts: 4,251 Member
    Options
    Well the more visually appealing of the two is the first.

    But I kind of like a bit more... ehh meat. That's just me.
  • Nikki31104
    Nikki31104 Posts: 816 Member
    Options
    Definitely the rock climber. The whole vein popping look always creeped me out.
  • 2stepscloser
    2stepscloser Posts: 2,900 Member
    Options
    Most definitely the rock climber!
  • TeachTheGirl
    TeachTheGirl Posts: 2,091 Member
    Options
    Sorry? Did someone ask a question?

    I was too busy staring at the second guys crotch. ._.
  • dynamitegalxo
    dynamitegalxo Posts: 299 Member
    Options
    of the two, the rock climber is more attractive. but i greatly prefer what's generally known as 'builtfat'. dudes with too little body fat just don't do it for me.
  • slkehl
    slkehl Posts: 3,801 Member
    Options
    Rock climber. I've always gone for skinnier guys.
  • Ed98043
    Ed98043 Posts: 1,333 Member
    Options
    Of the two, the rock climber. But he's a bit skinny - my ideal would have a little more meat on him. Refer to the Man Candy thread. ;)
  • 5erious
    5erious Posts: 469
    Options
    Atleast the bottom guy trains legs! (no homo)
  • deemartin2
    deemartin2 Posts: 168 Member
    Options
    I actually like both it depends on how the guy carries himself and his frame. Though if i had to choose I tend to like bigger guys. (i'm only 4'9 :P)
  • oregonzoo
    oregonzoo Posts: 4,251 Member
    Options
    of the two, the rock climber is more attractive. but i greatly prefer what's generally known as 'builtfat'. dudes with too little body fat just don't do it for me.
    Same here.

    I love a bit of extra weight but HUGE strong broad shoulders.
  • StArBeLLa87
    StArBeLLa87 Posts: 1,582 Member
    Options
    Rick climber the other makes me wanna :sick:

    Bronson on your photo? Lol
  • Mom4Liz
    Mom4Liz Posts: 55
    Options
    Number 1. Number 2 guy looks scary.
  • Going4Lean
    Going4Lean Posts: 1,077 Member
    Options
    someone in between
  • squirrelzzrule22
    squirrelzzrule22 Posts: 640 Member
    Options
    I prefer #1, but my ideal is probably even less toned but just big and masculine....this is NOT every woman's opinion by any means, but my big, tall, broad boyfriend with muscular arms and shoulders and an admittedly squishy tummy is just perfection to me. What I like is that he's big and strong and solid....I certainly wouldn't DISLIKE him if he had abs but I just don't find it important.

    He's got a great butt though!

    Edit to add- just looked back and many of you other ladies responded with similar comments! Hooray lets forma we like big men club :P (I've been study drinking....)
  • SmartAlec03211988
    SmartAlec03211988 Posts: 1,896 Member
    Options
    More appealing: Rock climber dude, but even he's visually uneasy to look at. Jeez.
  • jenilla1
    jenilla1 Posts: 11,118 Member
    Options
    Neither one is my preferred body type, although I find nothing wrong with either of them. Personally, if I had to pick between the two, the first is more aesthetically pleasing.
  • skinnylynnie74
    skinnylynnie74 Posts: 154 Member
    Options
    The man on top.

    But then again I usually like the man on top.

    Unless he's on the bottom, that is...

Categories