PLEASE ASSIST ME

jdad1
jdad1 Posts: 1,899 Member
in Chit-Chat
Thank you for taking the time to assist me in my great time of desperate need. I am having complex emotional intensities that are leaving others around me feeling a sense of desirous envy. The pools of brightness and inhabited creatures that follow the stream are following suit. Within cosmic revelation’s that leave the size and density of gravitational pull i can see that eating back caloric nutrients might be a failure in the larger scheme of gravitational differences. Advice given to this point on this pressing matter has included references to heaviness with no real contextual information as to what there actual measurements would be to suffice the goals in question. As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.
«1

Replies

  • oX_Vanessa_Xo
    oX_Vanessa_Xo Posts: 478
    Too...many...big...words.
  • LonLB
    LonLB Posts: 1,126 Member
    LOUD NOISES!
  • stormygirl_82
    stormygirl_82 Posts: 44
    that is correct
  • FitnessCharl
    FitnessCharl Posts: 166
    I concur... *insert shifty eyes*
  • jdad1
    jdad1 Posts: 1,899 Member
    thank you for your assistence
  • ereinik
    ereinik Posts: 73
    Reading through that paragraph was a bit to reminiscent of reading through the vocab section in my GRE study books. Definitely beyond my mental capacity until after I have had a few cups of coffee.
  • TylerJ76
    TylerJ76 Posts: 4,375 Member
    I don't know what you just said...


    Can you dumb it down for MFP???
  • billsica
    billsica Posts: 4,741 Member
    Next time, stop at eating half the mushrooms.
  • Sparkle_Princess
    Sparkle_Princess Posts: 926
    Thank you for taking the time to assist me in my great time of desperate need. I am having complex emotional intensities that are leaving others around me feeling a sense of desirous envy. The pools of brightness and inhabited creatures that follow the stream are following suit. Within cosmic revelation’s that leave the size and density of gravitational pull i can see that eating back caloric nutrients might be a failure in the larger scheme of gravitational differences. Advice given to this point on this pressing matter has included references to heaviness with no real contextual information as to what there actual measurements would be to suffice the goals in question. As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.

    Its late down here and that is really too much for me to comprehend while fulfilling the job description you have already set for me. I will say this though, ask them to explain the complexities of it all and things should become so much clearer to you by morning. If not ask me when I wake again and I will re explain the effects on your body :laugh: :laugh:
  • AllonsYtotheTardis
    AllonsYtotheTardis Posts: 16,947 Member
    I don't know what you just said...


    Can you dumb it down for MFP???

    That's a tall order
  • P90XBowler
    P90XBowler Posts: 152 Member
    My french canadian brain just exploded!
  • Mother_Superior
    Mother_Superior Posts: 1,624 Member
    Next time, stop at eating half the mushrooms.

    Bill's response makes me feel like I used to when I'd watch Michael Jordan take off from the foul line for a massive dunk.
  • LonLB
    LonLB Posts: 1,126 Member
    I like turtles
  • BurtHuttz
    BurtHuttz Posts: 3,653 Member
    Mussels way more than feta.
  • jackpotclown
    jackpotclown Posts: 3,275 Member
    33110506_1131_zps2a0016d3.jpg \m/
  • LindsayLL30
    LindsayLL30 Posts: 154 Member
    Bi-Polar for sure
  • wowser5
    wowser5 Posts: 51 Member
    So what I got from that paragraph of scientific words is that you are eating too much? I think you watch Big Bang Theory too often!
  • jdad1
    jdad1 Posts: 1,899 Member
    I like turtles


    Turtles huh.........That might be the solution. What do you think i should do about Turtles Burt?
  • BreeNJesse
    BreeNJesse Posts: 150 Member
    Huh.
  • darkguardian419
    darkguardian419 Posts: 1,302 Member
    their*
  • JaneDough_
    JaneDough_ Posts: 301 Member
    Too...many...big...words.

    http://oxforddictionaries.com/us
  • Derpes
    Derpes Posts: 2,033 Member
    "There's that word again. "Heavy." Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?"

    DocHD.jpg
  • lacroyx
    lacroyx Posts: 5,754 Member
    Thank you for taking the time to assist me in my great time of desperate need. I am having complex emotional intensities that are leaving others around me feeling a sense of desirous envy. The pools of brightness and inhabited creatures that follow the stream are following suit. Within cosmic revelation’s that leave the size and density of gravitational pull i can see that eating back caloric nutrients might be a failure in the larger scheme of gravitational differences. Advice given to this point on this pressing matter has included references to heaviness with no real contextual information as to what there actual measurements would be to suffice the goals in question. As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.

    The answer is bacon. It always has and always will be bacon.
  • GJRicketts
    GJRicketts Posts: 52 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value in relation to mass and the resultant gravitational forces that may be applied should said mass increase. So first of all you need to apply the same principles used in calculating the mass of the earth to yourself, so try these simple steps, which show how to calculate the mass of the earth:

    1. F = GmM/r2 = ma, where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth, and m is the mass of another object (near the surface of the Earth).

    2. GM/r2= a (The m's canceled out.) Now solve for M, the mass of the Earth.

    3. M = ar2/G, where a = 9.8m/sec2, r = 6.4 x 10 to the power of 6m, and G = 6.67 x 10-11m3/(kg sec2).

    4. M = 9.8 x (6.4 x 106)2/(6.67 x 10-11) = 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg

    We know the mass of the Earth is 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg.

    Now application of these simple principles will allow you to calculate your own mass, density and gravitational pull and allow you to ascertain whether or not it will be prudent to consume back the calorific values consumed post aerobic or anaerobic exercise.

    Logic will of course dictate that ante aerobic or anaerobic calorific intake to a significant quantity will be completely counter productive and as a result we will no more than mention this as being of the magnitude 'Critical' in error status.

    I trust this will be of assistance to you and wish you all the greatest of success in your endeavors to reduce said mass and resultant gravitational influence upon your immediate environment.
  • darkguardian419
    darkguardian419 Posts: 1,302 Member
    Thank you for taking the time to assist me in my great time of desperate need. I am having complex emotional intensities that are leaving others around me feeling a sense of desirous envy. The pools of brightness and inhabited creatures that follow the stream are following suit. Within cosmic revelation’s that leave the size and density of gravitational pull i can see that eating back caloric nutrients might be a failure in the larger scheme of gravitational differences. Advice given to this point on this pressing matter has included references to heaviness with no real contextual information as to what there actual measurements would be to suffice the goals in question. As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.

    Try experimenting with your exercise calories. More than a few people have had success with eating 1/2 of them, but the same goes for eating all or none.. it all comes down to what works for you.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    Thank you for taking the time to assist me in my great time of desperate need. I am having complex emotional intensities that are leaving others around me feeling a sense of desirous envy. The pools of brightness and inhabited creatures that follow the stream are following suit. Within cosmic revelation’s that leave the size and density of gravitational pull i can see that eating back caloric nutrients might be a failure in the larger scheme of gravitational differences. Advice given to this point on this pressing matter has included references to heaviness with no real contextual information as to what there actual measurements would be to suffice the goals in question. As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.

    The answer is bacon. It always has and always will be bacon.

    :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart:
  • Fozzi43
    Fozzi43 Posts: 2,984 Member
    You what?
    That hurt my brain.
  • jdad1
    jdad1 Posts: 1,899 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value in relation to mass and the resultant gravitational forces that may be applied should said mass increase. So first of all you need to apply the same principles used in calculating the mass of the earth to yourself, so try these simple steps, which show how to calculate the mass of the earth:

    1. F = GmM/r2 = ma, where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth, and m is the mass of another object (near the surface of the Earth).

    2. GM/r2= a (The m's canceled out.) Now solve for M, the mass of the Earth.

    3. M = ar2/G, where a = 9.8m/sec2, r = 6.4 x 10 to the power of 6m, and G = 6.67 x 10-11m3/(kg sec2).

    4. M = 9.8 x (6.4 x 106)2/(6.67 x 10-11) = 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg

    We know the mass of the Earth is 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg.

    Now application of these simple principles will allow you to calculate your own mass, density and gravitational pull and allow you to ascertain whether or not it will be prudent to consume back the calorific values consumed post aerobic or anaerobic exercise.

    Logic will of course dictate that ante aerobic or anaerobic calorific intake to a significant quantity will be completely counter productive and as a result we will no more than mention this as being of the magnitude 'Critical' in error status.

    I trust this will be of assistance to you and wish you all the greatest of success in your endeavors to reduce said mass and resultant gravitational influence upon your immediate environment.


    I bow...

    h5EBB61D2
  • Crankstr
    Crankstr Posts: 3,958 Member
    33110506_1131_zps2a0016d3.jpg \m/

    :angry:
  • Deipneus
    Deipneus Posts: 1,854 Member
    As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.
    Your situation is fairly common in that the universe is expanding at such a rapid rate we feel that we can hardly keep pace. When the forces of nature are such that the people that matter most to us are not experiencing the same ecstasy and natural-high Nirvana, it's understandable that you would need assistance. I suggest you lay off the weed for a while and see if that helps.

Categories