PLEASE ASSIST ME

2»

Replies

  • jackpotclown
    jackpotclown Posts: 3,275 Member
    33110506_1131_zps2a0016d3.jpg \m/

    :angry:
    :flowerforyou: \m/
  • SoDamnHungry
    SoDamnHungry Posts: 6,998 Member
    They jelly.
  • billsica
    billsica Posts: 4,741 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value in relation to mass and the resultant gravitational forces that may be applied should said mass increase. So first of all you need to apply the same principles used in calculating the mass of the earth to yourself, so try these simple steps, which show how to calculate the mass of the earth:

    1. F = GmM/r2 = ma, where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth, and m is the mass of another object (near the surface of the Earth).

    2. GM/r2= a (The m's canceled out.) Now solve for M, the mass of the Earth.

    3. M = ar2/G, where a = 9.8m/sec2, r = 6.4 x 10 to the power of 6m, and G = 6.67 x 10-11m3/(kg sec2).

    4. M = 9.8 x (6.4 x 106)2/(6.67 x 10-11) = 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg

    We know the mass of the Earth is 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg.

    Now application of these simple principles will allow you to calculate your own mass, density and gravitational pull and allow you to ascertain whether or not it will be prudent to consume back the calorific values consumed post aerobic or anaerobic exercise.

    Logic will of course dictate that ante aerobic or anaerobic calorific intake to a significant quantity will be completely counter productive and as a result we will no more than mention this as being of the magnitude 'Critical' in error status.

    I trust this will be of assistance to you and wish you all the greatest of success in your endeavors to reduce said mass and resultant gravitational influence upon your immediate environment.

    Epic_Win_by_danzilla3.jpg
  • mank32
    mank32 Posts: 1,323 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value

    this is the winner! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
  • dinosnopro
    dinosnopro Posts: 2,177 Member
    What him say?
  • SeaRunner26
    SeaRunner26 Posts: 5,143 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value in relation to mass and the resultant gravitational forces that may be applied should said mass increase. So first of all you need to apply the same principles used in calculating the mass of the earth to yourself, so try these simple steps, which show how to calculate the mass of the earth:

    1. F = GmM/r2 = ma, where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth, and m is the mass of another object (near the surface of the Earth).

    2. GM/r2= a (The m's canceled out.) Now solve for M, the mass of the Earth.

    3. M = ar2/G, where a = 9.8m/sec2, r = 6.4 x 10 to the power of 6m, and G = 6.67 x 10-11m3/(kg sec2).

    4. M = 9.8 x (6.4 x 106)2/(6.67 x 10-11) = 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg

    We know the mass of the Earth is 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg.

    Now application of these simple principles will allow you to calculate your own mass, density and gravitational pull and allow you to ascertain whether or not it will be prudent to consume back the calorific values consumed post aerobic or anaerobic exercise.

    Logic will of course dictate that ante aerobic or anaerobic calorific intake to a significant quantity will be completely counter productive and as a result we will no more than mention this as being of the magnitude 'Critical' in error status.

    I trust this will be of assistance to you and wish you all the greatest of success in your endeavors to reduce said mass and resultant gravitational influence upon your immediate environment.

    Sorry, but Einstein proved that F=GmM/r2 is only an approximation. You have to account for the relative motion of inertial frames of the subject and the observer. Jeesh. How could you overlook that?
  • SteelySunshine
    SteelySunshine Posts: 1,092 Member
    The answer of course is 6 small meals and raspberry ketones. Don't eat after 7 pm. Stand on your head first thing in the morning whilst eating breakfast one. Stand on one leg juggling 6 bananas and a grapefruit for breakfast number 2. Lunch number one shouldn't contain any protein, fat, or carbohydrates and should be eaten on your roof while avoiding being spotted by black helicopters. Never eat lunch 2 without your tin foil hat, cuz calories will leak through your head through osmosis. Dinner 1 should always be eaten while under water and finally your last meal should be eaten while singing the entire sound track from the sound of music. I hope that clears everything up for you.
  • jdad1
    jdad1 Posts: 1,899 Member
    Contextually perhaps but what does the sphere of informed planetary dieticians have to say on the matter?
  • food is the answer
  • GJRicketts
    GJRicketts Posts: 52 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value in relation to mass and the resultant gravitational forces that may be applied should said mass increase. So first of all you need to apply the same principles used in calculating the mass of the earth to yourself, so try these simple steps, which show how to calculate the mass of the earth:

    1. F = GmM/r2 = ma, where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth, and m is the mass of another object (near the surface of the Earth).

    2. GM/r2= a (The m's canceled out.) Now solve for M, the mass of the Earth.

    3. M = ar2/G, where a = 9.8m/sec2, r = 6.4 x 10 to the power of 6m, and G = 6.67 x 10-11m3/(kg sec2).

    4. M = 9.8 x (6.4 x 106)2/(6.67 x 10-11) = 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg

    We know the mass of the Earth is 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg.

    Now application of these simple principles will allow you to calculate your own mass, density and gravitational pull and allow you to ascertain whether or not it will be prudent to consume back the calorific values consumed post aerobic or anaerobic exercise.

    Logic will of course dictate that ante aerobic or anaerobic calorific intake to a significant quantity will be completely counter productive and as a result we will no more than mention this as being of the magnitude 'Critical' in error status.

    I trust this will be of assistance to you and wish you all the greatest of success in your endeavors to reduce said mass and resultant gravitational influence upon your immediate environment.

    Sorry, but Einstein proved that F=GmM/r2 is only an approximation. You have to account for the relative motion of inertial frames of the subject and the observer. Jeesh. How could you overlook that?

    Aw heck! Such a simple oversight too, you're absolutely correct. I most humbly apologize :happy: I shall reprimand myself most severely and spend the weekend processing complex quadratic equations in penance.
  • GJRicketts
    GJRicketts Posts: 52 Member
    Hmmm. So your major area for concern appears to lie within the realms of consumption of items of calorific value in relation to mass and the resultant gravitational forces that may be applied should said mass increase. So first of all you need to apply the same principles used in calculating the mass of the earth to yourself, so try these simple steps, which show how to calculate the mass of the earth:

    1. F = GmM/r2 = ma, where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth, and m is the mass of another object (near the surface of the Earth).

    2. GM/r2= a (The m's canceled out.) Now solve for M, the mass of the Earth.

    3. M = ar2/G, where a = 9.8m/sec2, r = 6.4 x 10 to the power of 6m, and G = 6.67 x 10-11m3/(kg sec2).

    4. M = 9.8 x (6.4 x 106)2/(6.67 x 10-11) = 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg

    We know the mass of the Earth is 6.0 x 10 to the power of 24 kg.

    Now application of these simple principles will allow you to calculate your own mass, density and gravitational pull and allow you to ascertain whether or not it will be prudent to consume back the calorific values consumed post aerobic or anaerobic exercise.

    Logic will of course dictate that ante aerobic or anaerobic calorific intake to a significant quantity will be completely counter productive and as a result we will no more than mention this as being of the magnitude 'Critical' in error status.

    I trust this will be of assistance to you and wish you all the greatest of success in your endeavors to reduce said mass and resultant gravitational influence upon your immediate environment.


    I bow...

    h5EBB61D2

    LOL! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: My pleasure my young Padawan. The Force is strong with you i feel. You will go far.
  • Nutella91
    Nutella91 Posts: 624 Member
    too...much...free...time
  • GJRicketts
    GJRicketts Posts: 52 Member
    The answer of course is 6 small meals and raspberry ketones. Don't eat after 7 pm. Stand on your head first thing in the morning whilst eating breakfast one. Stand on one leg juggling 6 bananas and a grapefruit for breakfast number 2. Lunch number one shouldn't contain any protein, fat, or carbohydrates and should be eaten on your roof while avoiding being spotted by black helicopters. Never eat lunch 2 without your tin foil hat, cuz calories will leak through your head through osmosis. Dinner 1 should always be eaten while under water and finally your last meal should be eaten while singing the entire sound track from the sound of music. I hope that clears everything up for you.

    The entire soundtrack to the sound of music? Ye Gods that's a harsh diet!
  • zyxst
    zyxst Posts: 9,149 Member
    Just break up.
  • jdad1
    jdad1 Posts: 1,899 Member
    yes
  • mustang289
    mustang289 Posts: 299 Member
    their*

    x2
  • RushBabe214
    RushBabe214 Posts: 469 Member
    Thank you for taking the time to assist me in my great time of desperate need. I am having complex emotional intensities that are leaving others around me feeling a sense of desirous envy. The pools of brightness and inhabited creatures that follow the stream are following suit. Within cosmic revelation’s that leave the size and density of gravitational pull i can see that eating back caloric nutrients might be a failure in the larger scheme of gravitational differences. Advice given to this point on this pressing matter has included references to heaviness with no real contextual information as to what there actual measurements would be to suffice the goals in question. As to potential solutions i am at a complete loss. This is my concern, and your educated and informative insight is requested.

    Long-winded1_zps7c71667d.jpg


    :wink: