Calorie counting. . . HELP
eswartz0728
Posts: 47
this may be a dumb question.. . but if u are supposed to add on all the calories that you burn for the day how are you losing weight?
0
Replies
-
Your body burns a set amount by just breathing/digesting/moving etc.
Then you burn a certain amount through daily activity. You specify your daily activity when you set a weight loss goal on the website (Sedentary, lightly active, etc.)
You then subtract some of those calories so your body isn't getting all the energy it needs to maintain weight. This causes you to lose weight to adapt to the lower energy consumption.
You only add more calories if you did something strenuous out of your normal activity (ie. you decided to go for a run), otherwise the website already takes into everything into account.0 -
so when it says you've earned "x" amount of calories from exercise I should eat more? I just want to make sure Im reading right. Like my calorie intake is 1200 but today it says 1600 so that's because of the exercise I did?0
-
Well, MFP calculates your daily needs based on how fast you want to lose the weight, and sets it accordingly. It takes -3500 calories to equal a pound lost. Over 7 days, that's -500 calories per day cut.
So lets say you maintain weight eating at 1600. To lose a pound per week, you'd have to chop that back to 1100 (MFP doesn't set itself any lower than 1200 though).
So, MFP says eat 1200 per day. That will slice off a pound a week, but wait, you worked out! you busted *kitten* in the gym, and burnt 400 calories being a MONSTER on the eliptical..
Should you still only eat 1200 for that day?
That's why they add back exercise calories.
Which makes me scratch my head, since MFP also asks you if you are sedentary, lightly active, moderately active, or work in construction. It uses that activity factor to increase your daily energy expenditure (bear with me here). BMR is how many calories you burn by breathing and being a couch potato (Basal Metabolic Rate). If you are sedentary, the amount of calories you spend a day is slightly higher (by about 20%) than your BMR, since walking around spends energy (we all really don't sit all day).
Ok, so if you work out 3-5 times a week, MFP takes your BMR and multiplies it by the moderately active factor (BMR x 1.55). so why is it adding exercise calories on top of that?? isn't that what the factor is adjusting for? I think MFP double counts calories spent when you add exercise cals.
If you want to log your exercise cals and eat them back, just set MFP to sedentary and log all your workouts, and eat them0 -
The calculations on MFP are about 500 calories less than what you'd need to just maintain your current weight. The calorie goal the site gives you is the amount you should aim for to lose weight. It has you set so that number is your deficit. If you don't 'eat back' your exercise calories, you'll end up at too much of a deficit, and that's not healthy and won't help you lose weight. Stick close to the number that MFP gave you, and you'll lose. It's just how MFP works.0
-
If you put sedentary as your daily activity level and are actually sedentary (desk job or whatever) then YES you do eat those.
If you put active and you're just maintaining that active lifestyle, then no you don't eat them because they've already been accounted for.
Given that your daily allowance is 1200 (which is really low in my opinion), I'd say that you should eat them.
A lot of this is guesswork since there's no real way to tell EXACTLY how many calories you're burning. You have to do some trial and error to figure it out for yourself.0 -
thank you all for trying to help me understand but I still don't get it :sad: for example my thing says goal:1200/ food:1288/ exercise:-409/ net=879. . . is this good or bad?0
-
If your goal is 1200 and you burned an extra 400 through exercise then you need 1600 to keep to the weight loss goals you set.
Without any exercise you'd lose 1lb? per week eating 1200. Since you exercised today, if you didn't eat that extra 400 then your body will have only received 800.
This is generally frowned upon since that's really way too low for the body to function.
It may seem like exercising more and eating less will make you lose weight faster (mathematically at least) but this isn't the case. Feeding yourself too little will only hurt your body in the long run and you'll end up right back where you started.0 -
I am thinking if it says you should eat 1200 calories a day and you go and burn 300 extra... you could eat your workout calories if you choose and you will be safe.... but if you don't eat them and remain at 1200 calories... then that is just going to be more weight lost in the long run. If you need 2000 calories a day to maintain your weight and you only eat 1200 and burn 300 at the gym. Your calories to maintain became 2300 for the day, you could then eat 1500 and it would effect your weight the same as 1200 would. if you need 2000 to maintain and you eat 1200 that is an 800 calorie deficit and if you burn 300 at the gym your net calories are now 900 instead of the 1200 you consumed. so you would be at a 1200 calorie deficit. right?0
-
thank you all for trying to help me understand but I still don't get it :sad: for example my thing says goal:1200/ food:1288/ exercise:-409/ net=879. . . is this good or bad?
With MFP you set up with your information, job type activity, and how many pounds a week you want to lose. If it gives you an initial goal of 1200 calories that has your weight loss deficit figured in. So if you do nothing outside of the work activity you should lose that number of pounds or around that number just by meeting the calorie goal. That's why when you exercise your goal goes up. So if you exercise and burn 400 calories your new goal will be 1600 for the day. It's expected that you will now eat 1600 so the deficit doesn't get too large. This way you are still netting your original goal, not under it.0 -
Look on your main page. The way it's displayed there makes it a little more clear, to me.
At the top of mine right now, It say "31calories remaining"
Under that it says "Goal: 1490/ Food: 1544/ Exercise: -85/ =Net: 1459
OK, I didn't exercise very much today, lol. But the math is there. Food is addition. Exercise is subtraction. Net is the result. Your goal weight is what you would eat on a day with no exercise, and that number would allow you to lose weight at the rate you said you wanted.
Exercise subtracts numbers from the food you're eating that day. If your goal is 40 calories and you eat 50 calories and exercise away 35 calories then your body only retains 15 calories. So you need to eat 25 more calories to make sure your at that healthy 40 calorie goal. So you're eaten a total of 75 calories that day.
Flip that around. Say you exercise first thing in the morning before eating. Your goal is 40. You've eaten 0. You exercise away 35 calories. Your body is now holding -35 calories. Obviously that's no good! So you need to eat the 35 to bring yourself back up to 0, and then you also need to eat 40 to meet your goal. So you've eaten a total of 75 calories that day.
It's only confusing because it's too simple. MFP already did the math for you. You don't need to introduce more math into it. It gave you your deficit already. Not eating back calories would be like having a double deficit, and that wouldn't be healthy.0 -
Wow! I am glad y'all posted so much on here. It has really helped all my questioning as well!!!!0
-
o so if I eat 1200 calories a day, I'm fine? No matter how much exercise I do?0
-
That it how I understand it. I "don't" eat the extra calories I worked off. So far I've lost 16 lbs in 2 months so it seems to be working the way I do it. So if your goal is 1200 and you worked off 400 your total would be 1600. I would say still keep your eating at 1200 and have a +400 calories left at the end of the day and you should lose weight quicker. Hope this helps. Like I say it's working for me great!0
-
o so if I eat 1200 calories a day, I'm fine? No matter how much exercise I do?
If you net 1200 you might be okay. Not if you eat 1200 and also exercise. If you eat 1200 and expend 400 calories in exercise, then you have only netted 800. That is not enough.0 -
Thanks!0
-
I would say yes. Stick to your 1200 cal intake no matter how much you exercise. I am ALWAYS under my calorie goal but I eat healthy on a consistent basis all day. So I know my body is "starving". I try not to focus to much on the calories and more on the protein, sugar and sodium intake. Keep your protein high, keep your sugar and sodium low and stay within your 1200 calorie intake and you should be good to go. I have lost 16 pounds since living a healthier life style (April 5, 2013) and I hope it continues!0
-
o so if I eat 1200 calories a day, I'm fine? No matter how much exercise I do?
No! If you do more exercise than you allowed for when you signed up to MFP (you chose from sedentary, lightly active, active, very active...) you SHOULD eat at least half of the calories you've earned from doing that extra exercise, otherwise the deficit for that day is too big.0 -
What I've noticed before, reading posts debating "To eat back exercise calories or not" is that the people saying "Yes, eat them" have lost a LOT of weight and the people saying "No, you want a bigger deficit" haven't! There are thousands of similar posts out there - have a look!0
-
The easiest answer I can give is where it says "Your Daily Goal"..... eat that number. If you eat that number you're getting a 1200 calorie day regardless of what the actual number is.0
-
I would say yes. Stick to your 1200 cal intake no matter how much you exercise. I am ALWAYS under my calorie goal but I eat healthy on a consistent basis all day. So I know my body is "starving". I try not to focus to much on the calories and more on the protein, sugar and sodium intake. Keep your protein high, keep your sugar and sodium low and stay within your 1200 calorie intake and you should be good to go. I have lost 16 pounds since living a healthier life style (April 5, 2013) and I hope it continues!
So lets say the OP does a whole day hiking with her family? 6-7 hours walking. That would burn a lot of calories. Should she not eat more then? You think she should still stick to her 1200 calorie goal?0 -
Because exercise is "extra." Think of it this way, I burn about 2200 calories in a day without any additional exercise. So if I have my calories set to 1700, that's a 500 calorie deficit. But if I burn 500 calories through exercise, that bumps my deficit to 1000 calories, which is way too low. I won't have enough "fuel" to get through my day, for my body to perform all of it's functions and to power me through my work outs. Calories are fuel, not fat. Your body needs fuel to run, same as your car needs gas. If you don't give your body what it needs, it's not going to work properly. We can eat below our requirements to lose weight, but if you bring it down too low, you're simply going to burn out. It's just not sustainable in the long run! Hope this helps!0
-
ok so I set mine to lightly active because I thought that had to do with working. I run approx. 3 miles a day, walk to do crunches pushups, etc and also weight training should I change it to active or whatever the higher choice is?0
-
ok so I set mine to lightly active because I thought that had to do with working. I run approx. 3 miles a day, walk to do crunches pushups, etc and also weight training should I change it to active or whatever the higher choice is?
There are 2 ways of doing this. You can either -
1) Keep your setting at "lightly active" to reflect your work and add in the extra stuff you do (Running, walking etc) and eat the extra calories MFP gives you.
or you can -
2) change your setting to "active" or "very active" depending on what you usually do and how often. MFP will automatically give you more calories to eat and you don't add more unless you do waay more than normal.
Personally, I've set my activity level as "sedentary" and I add everything I do via my Fitbit and eat those extra calories. Before I had the Fitbit gadget I'd add in all my daily exercise - walking to the shops, cleaning the house if I did it for an hour or more, gardening, everything. And eat at least half of the extra calories earned as calculated by MFP's database of exercise (which I've noticed is a bit more generous that the Fitbit)0 -
Silly me, double post!0
-
I would keep things simple.
1. Pick one of the two middle activity levels (Lightly Active or Active) to start
2. Only track things that are true workouts. If you walk, or do some other other activity daily, just count that as part of your Daily Activity Level set above
3. Set your desired goal loss
4. Eat your goal calories for sure, and logic says you can eat all of your exercise calories because your goal is already set for a deficit. But some people like to leave a few exercise cals on the table
5. Track this for 6 - 8 weeks and see how you are doing
6. If you are losing at the proper rate, keep going. If you plateau or gain, then you need to adjust your Activity Level. This assumes you aren't starving your system by not eating close to your NET. So if you are eating close to your NET, then adjust your activity level down, and it will reduce your goal calories
7. Track for 6 - 8 weeks and rinse/repeat
The biggest thing to understand which most people miss is the fact that if you set a goal loss of say 1 pound a week, MFP already includes that deficit in your goal calories/day. When you workout, you are burning more than what MFP expects, so it gives you BONUS calories to eat. I normally leave more on the table than I should of those exercise cals, but that's also because I end up with more cheat days as we eat out a lot for lunch (STUPID BUFFETS!!!). But even what I'm doing is probably frowned upon. But I'm losing weight exactly at the rate I need, so it's working for me.
Good luck! :happy:0 -
It's already calculated in how many calories your body burns just by being "still" I.E. sleeping, breathing, just LIVING....any exercise above and beyond will add bonus points, per say, for caloric intake. If you took a step class, did yoga, walked a mile, etc. but don't calculate daily mundane tasks such as "fidgeted, walked down the hall to the bathroom, etc." that's already been calculated in as LIFE.0
-
That's fantastic!! It's not about "diet" it's about a lifestyle change! I HATE the 'D' word!! Nothing should be off limits, but moderation needs to be set in our brains. You want pizza: have it for goodness sake!! Just sit back and savor the flavor of what you just put in your mouth...that bite...the flavor....the texture (Not to sound crude, but it's almost like making love to your food! Appreciate it!). Wait and figure out if you're still hungry or just wanting to eat. I've struggled all my life and have finally gotten ahold of my process.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 421 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions