fasting, yes or no?

My Husband is convinced he wants to fast for one or two days a week to lose weight and I have to say i strongly disagree with not eating food for an entire day.

what are the arguments here?

Replies

  • MysticRealm
    MysticRealm Posts: 1,264 Member
    Some people intermittent fast 5:2, where they fast for 2 separate 24 hours (could do 8 am one morning then eat at 8 pm the next night) or they eat 500-600 calories for two separate days and a higher amount (like a good 2000) the other 5 days.
  • Some people intermittent fast 5:2, where they fast for 2 separate 24 hours (could do 8 am one morning then eat at 8 pm the next night) or they eat 500-600 calories for two separate days and a higher amount (like a good 2000) the other 5 days.

    do you mean fasting 2 days in a row? That sounds even worse, My Husband was just thinking 2 non consecutive days.

    has anyone done it?
    does it work?
    is it healthy?
  • MysticRealm
    MysticRealm Posts: 1,264 Member
    No, like I said, 2 separate days.
  • crisanderson27
    crisanderson27 Posts: 5,343 Member
    My Husband is convinced he wants to fast for one or two days a week to lose weight and I have to say i strongly disagree with not eating food for an entire day.

    what are the arguments here?

    Go look at my gallery. I currently mix two intermittent fasting protocols, leangains and Eat, STOP, Eat. When I was losing weight (rather than simply recomping), I fasted 3x a week...fast Sunday night to Monday night...eat normally Tuesday...fast Tuesday night to Wednesday night, eat normally Thursday...fast Thursday night to Friday night...eat normally Saturday and Sunday. Then repeat. Eating in this format, I maintained about a 1-3lb/wk loss...even though my calorie deficit was steady at 3500cal/wk, or 500cal/day.

    If your husband wants to fast two nights, that will work as well. And if you PM me your email address (or his), I'll send you some information that might help you both make up your minds.
  • Joehenny
    Joehenny Posts: 1,222 Member
    My Husband is convinced he wants to fast for one or two days a week to lose weight and I have to say i strongly disagree with not eating food for an entire day.

    what are the arguments here?

    It would work but totally unnecessary, especially if you're uncomfortable while doing it.
  • HartJames
    HartJames Posts: 789 Member
    Have him read through leangains.com to fast safely
  • stines72
    stines72 Posts: 853 Member
    i do a form of intermittent fasting
    i stop eating around 11pm-midnight, and dont eat until 3 or 4 pm the next day. so its like a 17:7... fast 17 hours, eat 7 hours.
    i do it so im not hungry though, i like eating food back to back (big amounts) and i find im not hungry in the hours between when i stop eating until i eat again.
  • mareeee1234
    mareeee1234 Posts: 674 Member
    bumpp
  • shutterbug21
    shutterbug21 Posts: 66 Member
    Fasting can be great for cleansing. I fast on some days from sunrise to sunset. I wake up and have a small meal before the sun rises, and then break my fast at sunset with a nutritious meal. I find the longer you go, the easier it gets and you also cannot fit as much food, so you eat less.
  • RumpusP
    RumpusP Posts: 163 Member
    Fasting for a day won't do a single thing wrong to him unless he has health issues of some sort that would be directly effected such as diabetes by it. 24hrs without food is nothing on a body that is healthy.

    I wouldn't really suggest fasting as a method of weightloss, but the occasional day without food won't harm him. People safely fast for longer and sometimes much longer than that for other reasons.

    I fast on the rare occasion for reasons other than weightloss for more than a couple days. Never lost a pound, had the same energy as always, never had any ill effects. Our bodies are made to be able to cope with such things while working to survive... going without food for a day of regular life?

    But yeah, the occasional one day without eating... his body isn't even gonna blink.
  • crisanderson27
    crisanderson27 Posts: 5,343 Member
    Fasting for a day won't do a single thing wrong to him unless he has health issues of some sort that would be directly effected such as diabetes by it. 24hrs without food is nothing on a body that is healthy.

    I wouldn't really suggest fasting as a method of weightloss, but the occasional day without food won't harm him. People safely fast for longer and sometimes much longer than that for other reasons.

    I fast on the rare occasion for reasons other than weightloss for more than a couple days. Never lost a pound, had the same energy as always, never had any ill effects. Our bodies are made to be able to cope with such things while working to survive... going without food for a day of regular life?

    But yeah, the occasional one day without eating... his body isn't even gonna blink.

    Our bodies were actually designed to function without food for regular periods every day (and no...not just while we're sleeping), not just 'cope'. How many years have humans existed? How many years has food been a readily available commodity for pretty much everyone? If we weren't made the way we are in regards to how we fuel ourselves...we'd have died out as a species looooong ago. As a matter of fact I find it very ironic that food being so very available nowadays is slowly killing us off anyhow lol. Obesity and obesity related diseases are a real issue, and are directly related to the abundance of food in our first world society.

    As for fasting in an effort to assist weight loss...why not? If it helps you maintain a healthy deficit (around 500cal/day for most people...averaged out of course), what exactly would be wrong with it? Some people (like me) prefer eating large meals once or twice a day (some of my meals are 2500cal or more), rather than smaller meals throughout the day. I feel much more satisfied and 'full' when I do so. If I eat smaller meals, I feel hungry all day. I'd rather skip a few...and eat something really good...than skimp all day in order to meet my calorie target.

    Anyhow...those are my personal reasons for preferring 'fasting' as stated. There are other reported benefits to health and longevity, but those are still up for debate. For weight loss, a deficit is a deficit, and so whether you fast or not in order to achieve it is a matter of preference (as I stated).

    You are absolutely right that it won't harm him though.
  • Cp731
    Cp731 Posts: 3,195 Member
    I (a lot of us) naturally fast from the last thing we put in our mouths and go to sleep, until we wake and workout then eat
    Which is about 6-9 hrs.
    Sometimes I don't eat till noon, which means Ive fasted for 12-15 hours.
  • thanks, allot i think all your comments are right, i dont know why i was so against it.

    Maybe i just didnt like the thought of him being hungry :)

    i will check out leangains.com
  • nikilis
    nikilis Posts: 2,305 Member
    i do a form of intermittent fasting
    i stop eating around 11pm-midnight, and dont eat until 3 or 4 pm the next day. so its like a 17:7... fast 17 hours, eat 7 hours.
    i do it so im not hungry though, i like eating food back to back (big amounts) and i find im not hungry in the hours between when i stop eating until i eat again.
    I (a lot of us) naturally fast from the last thing we put in our mouths and go to sleep, until we wake and workout then eat
    Which is about 6-9 hrs.
    Sometimes I don't eat till noon, which means Ive fasted for 12-15 hours.

    yah, the other option to 5:2 is to have an "eating window" every day, meaning that you eat all your calories in X hour period and fast the rest.


    I'm doing 16/8, 16 hour fast 8 hour eating window, so I eat from 12pm to 8pm. its pretty easy, and has had quite a profound effect on my eating, and seems to have jumpstarted my weight loss again.

    it puts hunger in perspective. I wake up in the morning, and havent eaten for 12+ hours, I might feel a little hungry, but I have a drink of water, or maybe a tea/black coffee, and I'm good till 12pm. it makes it easier to control yourself. thats what I've found.

    id prefer this way to 5:2 - if I did 5:2 id still eat 500cals a day.
  • whether you do 17:7 or 5:2 or what not how many cals do you do when you can eat? if you are only say 1500 a day do you eat all 1500 in your eating window or less? then go back to 1500 the next day?
  • slkehl
    slkehl Posts: 3,801 Member
    It's safe and effective if you do it right. He needs to make sure to stay hydrated and eat nutrient dense foods on days when he isn't fasting.

    I don't fast because it makes me cranky and fatigued. Not worth it for me.
  • LolBroScience
    LolBroScience Posts: 4,537 Member
    whether you do 17:7 or 5:2 or what not how many cals do you do when you can eat? if you are only say 1500 a day do you eat all 1500 in your eating window or less? then go back to 1500 the next day?

    You eat your total daily allowance in that given period. Leangains.com (most popular method) will lay this out in a 16 hour fast/8 hour feed window. For example, on most days my calories are consumed between Noon and 8:00 PM.

    My calorie goals are specific to me but my calories for workout days are: 2,696 calories (256 protein, 283 carbs, 61 fat) and non workout days: 2,381 calories (256 protein, 179 carbs, 71 fats). He would need to figure out his TDEE, which can be done if you simply google a calculator for it and plug in the variables.
  • nikilis
    nikilis Posts: 2,305 Member
    whether you do 17:7 or 5:2 or what not how many cals do you do when you can eat? if you are only say 1500 a day do you eat all 1500 in your eating window or less? then go back to 1500 the next day?

    ok, if you eat 16/8 - which is a daily fast, you would just eat your 1500 calories in that 8 hour period, every day of the week.

    if you are on 5:2 5 feed days, 2 fast days - on your fast days you would eat 500 cals a day (well I would personally) and on your feed days you eat 1500 + 400 to make up for the fast days.

    NOTE: I could be wrong about the 5:2 feed day calculation, I think you would increase your feed cals at least somewhat, especially if you were already on a deficit - someone else may know better.


    so, if hes trying to loose weight and hasn't calculated his numbers already, go here http://physiquelore.com/harris-benedict/
  • LolBroScience
    LolBroScience Posts: 4,537 Member
    whether you do 17:7 or 5:2 or what not how many cals do you do when you can eat? if you are only say 1500 a day do you eat all 1500 in your eating window or less? then go back to 1500 the next day?

    ok, if you eat 16/8 - which is a daily fast, you would just eat your 1500 calories in that 8 hour period.

    if you are on 5:2 5 feed days, 2 fast days - on your fast days you would eat 500 cals a day (well I would personally) and on your feed days you eat 1500 + 400 to make up for the fast days.

    NOTE: I could be wrong about the 5:2 - someone else may know better.


    so, if hes trying to loose weight and hasn't calculated his numbers already, go here http://physiquelore.com/harris-benedict/

    Yes, calories during the period of 12:00 Noon to 8:00 PM unfer the 16/8 fast.

    5:2 would have 5 normal calorie days and 2 low calorie days so it averages out being less calories over the period of a week. (I would add in some extra calories on days that you are more physically active)