HRM-TDEE=?
missemily1124
Posts: 102
So I went for a 45min. jog/walk today and my HRM told me I burned 357 calories. Yahoo! But that got me thinking. If I was wearing my HRM during that time and just sitting around watching tv, I still would've burned some calories. So my question is... do you subtract your TDEE calories from the calories the HRM gives you? So for example... my TDEE is about 1800. Which means I burn 1.25 calories every minute just living my life. 45x1.25= 56.25. So did I burn 357 calories or only 300.75?
Does this make any sense?
Does this make any sense?
0
Replies
-
bump0
-
Theoretically you should but most people don't bother. Just a good idea not to eat back every exercise calorie you burn.0
-
Put simply it depends if your HRM factors in your sedentary living calories or not when it gives you the number.0
-
Actually, I think it's HRM - BMR.
You want to subtract the calories that you would burn during the time you exercised if you had just decided to sit on the couch(BMR....your TDEE should include normal daily activity and thus be higher). Before I got my fitbit (because I thought the other way was just too much math), I'd always log 80% of my exercise calories burned. Now I log the total burn, because of the way fitbit calculates calories.0 -
I lost 35 pounds doing exactly this! Yes subtract your resting calories, it'll make you feel better and more accurate.0
-
TDEE is total daily energy expenditure, which means it includes everything (running, sleeping, sitting, etc).
I believe what you mean is your net burn, which is your energy output minus your resting metabolic rate (RMR). So if you exercise for an hour and burn 500 cals according to your HRM, you'd deduct your normal RMR for that time (let's say 75). This means you netted 425 burned calories.
The simple way to do all this crap is simply to take TDEE - desired deficit = cals you can consume.0 -
You nailed it.
Tables of calories burn and HRM's do not remove calories that would have been burned anyway, they are totally estimating what the total burn was during that time.
And actually, since you are in a diet with a planned amount of activity anyway, what is actually account for during that time is your non-exercise TDEE.
Which true may only be 83 calories (2000/24 say) in an hr, but if you did a long walk that wasn't burning that much anyway, your eatback isn't that much.
Here's a place to put in walking that will be more accurate that HRM anyway, if you can get the speed and grade down at least, and when you select the NET goal, that would be total eatback, not the Gross goal.
http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/WalkRunMETs.html0 -
Awesome! Thanks for the responses guys.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions