Do you really burn all those calories cleaning?

I spent 3 hours cleaning out the garage today and entered it into MFP as light/moderate cleaning. It told me I burned around 500 calories. This seemed really high to me. Do you really burn so many calories just by cleaning?
«1

Replies

  • ekmanning50
    ekmanning50 Posts: 21 Member
    I just spent all day digging, moving flower beds and pulling weeds. I entered in 6 hours general gardening and it gave me over 1000 calories. I just adjusted my time to about 2 hours and counted around 500. I think the estimates are high.
  • debmartin06
    debmartin06 Posts: 8 Member
    I think so too. I do not normally log cleaning, but it was above my normal activity level. I think my activity is set as sedentary because of my desk job.
  • tanashai
    tanashai Posts: 207 Member
    I dunno... if you're doing a lot of sweeping, carrying, moving, lifting, loading, vacuuming, dusting, reaching, garbage runs and shoving furniture around for a few hours, I imagine the calories can add up! But I'm ever the optimist, ha ha
  • lolablitz
    lolablitz Posts: 38 Member
    Yeah it seems high, but those numbers are so nice!
  • heweiland
    heweiland Posts: 42
    I spend a lot of time in the garden sitting and pulling weeds, when I do log it, if I have been out there 2 hours, I will only log 30 minutes. I figure better to error on the side of lower calories burned.
  • tuckerrj
    tuckerrj Posts: 1,453 Member
    Yeah, I wonder, too. I spent 3 hours "moving household items", "moderate cleaning", etc.. and MFP gave me more calories than when I ran a HALF MARATHON. Go figure.
  • quiltlovinlisa
    quiltlovinlisa Posts: 1,710 Member
    I spend a lot of time in the garden sitting and pulling weeds, when I do log it, if I have been out there 2 hours, I will only log 30 minutes. I figure better to error on the side of lower calories burned.

    That's a good idea, I spent several hours in the garden today and I know I worked, but I didn't know what to do with it.
  • genofreek
    genofreek Posts: 75
    MFP is really encouraging, but I always assume it's off by at least 100 calories when I enter my exercises. The numbers for practically everything just seem so high sometimes.
  • Ninguneado73
    Ninguneado73 Posts: 832
    MFP numbers tend to be high imo
  • rhondajoco
    rhondajoco Posts: 16 Member
    I think they are high also. I only included cleaning minutes if I am doing heavy duty cleaning, like today, I scrubbed walls, cupbourds and floors by hand in preparation for painting my kitchen. I don't think regular vacuuming, dishes laundry etc. burns that many calories. If it did, I probably wouldn't have needed to be here in the first place :smile:
  • BarackMeLikeAHurricane
    BarackMeLikeAHurricane Posts: 3,400 Member
    MFP numbers tend to be high imo
    This, plus they include your BMR.
  • phjorg1
    phjorg1 Posts: 642 Member
    All calorie counters include BMR. which will be 100-180 calories an hour give or take. (and about 50 an hour while asleep) So 4 hours of doing XXXX activity will have burned 400-720 just from existing. so you have to subtract that from any total given to you.
  • paotoa
    paotoa Posts: 6 Member
    Hi,

    I am actually having a lot of problems with this. I work as a gardener and generally do 7 hours straight with very quick breaks for water and snacks. I have no idea how many calories I burn and do require more food on work days. I have been giving myself 400-500 extra calories and it feels right at the end of the day (not hungry or full). I like MFP because its so exacting and I would like to know how much I am burning. I've been looking into getting one of the wrist/arm bands that monitor your calories burned. Has anyone tried this? I've been swaying back and forth trying to justify the cost and the eye rolls from friends and family ;)
  • jennifershoo
    jennifershoo Posts: 3,198 Member
    All calorie counters include BMR. which will be 100-180 calories an hour give or take. (and about 50 an hour while asleep) So 4 hours of doing XXXX activity will have burned 400-720 just from existing. so you have to subtract that from any total given to you.

    Is it the same with an HRM?
  • gracielynn1011
    gracielynn1011 Posts: 726 Member
    I generally don't eat back my exercise calories, but I do log it to keep track. On something like that, I only log half the time. I feel like the estimated burn is high.
  • phurst00
    phurst00 Posts: 100 Member
    If your heart rate isn't increasing while you're cleaning, then I doubt you're burning off too many extra calories (ie beyond what your body naturally burns throughout the day).

    I usually only log cleaning if I've done a lot of vacuuming and sweeping, and I adjust what MFP tells me down by a lot.
  • phjorg1
    phjorg1 Posts: 642 Member
    All calorie counters include BMR. which will be 100-180 calories an hour give or take. (and about 50 an hour while asleep) So 4 hours of doing XXXX activity will have burned 400-720 just from existing. so you have to subtract that from any total given to you.

    Is it the same with an HRM?
    most of the time yes.
  • shannongoneau
    shannongoneau Posts: 246 Member
    Theres a way you can figure out how many calories you burned. I think you take your body weight times it by 0.98 (or 0.96 I don't quite remember) and times that number by the minutes you did the activity. Not sure how accurate that is. I think its just a ball park figure.
  • phjorg1
    phjorg1 Posts: 642 Member
    Theres a way you can figure out how many calories you burned. I think you take your body weight times it by 0.98 (or 0.96 I don't quite remember) and times that number by the minutes you did the activity. Not sure how accurate that is. I think its just a ball park figure.
    I don't think math on this one is correct. .98 is .02 away from being 1. Meaning you are claiming I burn 200cal/min when doing activity. the upper limit of human excretion is around 16cal/min for extended cardio. Most people will hit 12-14cal/min as their upper limit before they top out.
  • paintlisapurple
    paintlisapurple Posts: 982 Member
    Probably better to use a heart rate monitor for those things I guess. I don't have one yet, but I'm planning on it. It will be really nice to see better estimates geared toward me and not some standard.
  • MizTerry
    MizTerry Posts: 3,763 Member
    When I go to clean my Moms place, I don't just wipe a rag over everything, I am down in the mix to make sure it is as close to sanitary as possible. Yeah, I log mine and the calorie burn is pretty high.
  • __Di__
    __Di__ Posts: 1,659 Member
    I spent 3 hours cleaning out the garage today and entered it into MFP as light/moderate cleaning. It told me I burned around 500 calories. This seemed really high to me. Do you really burn so many calories just by cleaning?

    Take off the amount you would have burned just sitting watching TV for that amount of time and it actually really amounts to approximately 150 calories.

    Now then, how many ate back those 500 calories?
  • servilia
    servilia Posts: 3,452 Member
    It sounds right for 3 hours.
  • __Di__
    __Di__ Posts: 1,659 Member
    Probably better to use a heart rate monitor for those things I guess. I don't have one yet, but I'm planning on it. It will be really nice to see better estimates geared toward me and not some standard.

    Unfortunately, HRMs are not reliable at all under 120 bpm, even the manufacturers of the devices will admit to that.
  • __Di__
    __Di__ Posts: 1,659 Member
    If your heart rate isn't increasing while you're cleaning, then I doubt you're burning off too many extra calories (ie beyond what your body naturally burns throughout the day).

    I usually only log cleaning if I've done a lot of vacuuming and sweeping, and I adjust what MFP tells me down by a lot.

    This is the best description ^

    If your HR does not increase, then watch that calorie burn, because it will be nowhere near where you think it is, don't let it scupper your weightloss.
  • paintlisapurple
    paintlisapurple Posts: 982 Member
    Probably better to use a heart rate monitor for those things I guess. I don't have one yet, but I'm planning on it. It will be really nice to see better estimates geared toward me and not some standard.

    Unfortunately, HRMs are not reliable at all under 120 bpm, even the manufacturers of the devices will admit to that.

    Well darn! Are there any that will track both types of exercise? :ohwell:
  • Sycoholic
    Sycoholic Posts: 282 Member
    Gah.... I don't understand the reasoning behind this. You have a basic calorie amount given to you based on your amount of daily activity. I lowered mine and it was only about a 500 calorie difference. I don't buy into logging things you do around the house. I mow the lawn and do general yard work and don't enter it. I'm not working out. My heartrate isn't elevated enough for me to even consider it.

    Look, no matter what you want to log, your body keeps an accurate account. Log that you burned 3000 calories doing house cleaning or whatever, your body doesn't read your MFP log. If you don't log those calories, your body still doesn't read your MFP log. I'd rather not log them and be safe than log them and overeat because of it.
  • SteelySunshine
    SteelySunshine Posts: 1,092 Member
    This is why I eat back very few if any of my exercise calories. Then it really doesn't matter if the burn is as high as the database says. I still have my MFP deficit and I will still have a modest exercise calorie deficit. And as the poster above has said, your body logs what it logs doesn't matter if you log the exercise or not.
  • pwnderosa
    pwnderosa Posts: 280 Member
    Getting ready for a marathon cleaning session over here, where I put on my tennis shoes, blast the music, and dance around the house trying to clean and organize as much as I can, as fast as I can, followed by deep cleaning and shampooing the car by hand. I wasn't capable of doing housework at the same speed/intensity a year ago when I was out of shape, and my house was a lot less clean! I will log about half the time I spend at it to account for overestimates on MFP, but I definitely believe I will be burning a LOT more calories today than I would on a regular day at the office, and I'm sure I'll be hungrier at dinner time after all this. Since I'm close to my goal now, if I didn't eat a little extra to compensate for days like this, I would be a shaky, hungry, grouchy mess!
  • horseplaypen
    horseplaypen Posts: 442 Member
    I've also heard people suggest to change your activity level for the day from 'sedentary' to 'light', or to whatever seems appropriate if you spend a considerable amount of time being more active than usual. I've tried that on days that I'm on my feet all day in the clinic, as opposed to most days when I'm sitting in class. My heart rate never increases so it's not really exercising, but I sure am sore and starving at the end of those days!