I feel like I MUST be making a huge mistake here
honeylissabee
Posts: 217 Member
I've been trying the TDEE-20% method for 3 days now, and I just cannot comprehend that I can eat this much and still lose weight.
I currently have MFP set for my Sedentary TDEE-20% and then I plan on eating back all of the exercise calories from my Fitbit.
Friday, I ate 1846 calories, but had 115 remaining. Yesterday, I ate 2140 calories with 81 leftover. Today, I've eaten 1268 calories and I still have 928 left!
Coming from years and years of being told to stick to a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet as a female, I'm having a hard time accepting that I can eat over 2,000 calories a day and lose weight.
I currently have MFP set for my Sedentary TDEE-20% and then I plan on eating back all of the exercise calories from my Fitbit.
Friday, I ate 1846 calories, but had 115 remaining. Yesterday, I ate 2140 calories with 81 leftover. Today, I've eaten 1268 calories and I still have 928 left!
Coming from years and years of being told to stick to a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet as a female, I'm having a hard time accepting that I can eat over 2,000 calories a day and lose weight.
0
Replies
-
I've been trying the TDEE-20% method for 3 days now, and I just cannot comprehend that I can eat this much and still lose weight.
I currently have MFP set for my Sedentary TDEE-20% and then I plan on eating back all of the exercise calories from my Fitbit.
Friday, I ate 1846 calories, but had 115 remaining. Yesterday, I ate 2140 calories with 81 leftover. Today, I've eaten 1268 calories and I still have 928 left!
Coming from years and years of being told to stick to a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet as a female, I'm having a hard time accepting that I can eat over 2,000 calories a day and lose weight.0 -
I've been trying the TDEE-20% method for 3 days now, and I just cannot comprehend that I can eat this much and still lose weight.
I currently have MFP set for my Sedentary TDEE-20% and then I plan on eating back all of the exercise calories from my Fitbit.
Friday, I ate 1846 calories, but had 115 remaining. Yesterday, I ate 2140 calories with 81 leftover. Today, I've eaten 1268 calories and I still have 928 left!
Coming from years and years of being told to stick to a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet as a female, I'm having a hard time accepting that I can eat over 2,000 calories a day and lose weight.
See how it works for you long term. You may not be able to consistently lose weight eating back that much. Just chart it and adapt your program as you go.0 -
believe it. this **** works.the end.
just make sure your numbers and activity level are correct.
and that you're not counting your calories burned twice, a common mistake for fitbit users.0 -
How many of the people that told you 1200-1500 have managed to keep the weight off permenantly?0
-
first, you should be upping your calories by 100 per week, not jumping to 2000+ all at once, or you will definitely gain weight, just from the major change. start adding the calories more slowly. your weight should remain stable as you do that. Once you get to TDEE-20%, stay there. within a month, the weight should start dropping pretty quickly.0
-
Well I've learned that you definitely need to eat in order to lose weight but that you need to eat right. You should also give yourself a few weeks of eating at your current calorie settings to give your body time to adjust. Yes you'll probably see a gain in the beginning but just give it time and it should start to come off.0
-
Eating back your calories is actually not a good idea, because caloric burn is typically way overestimated. In general, if you know you're exercising with some effort, stick to eating half of them back, not all of them, because chances are the number you see on MFP is higher than the number of calories you've actually burned, so you're just going above your limit. But yeah, everyone's individual ideal numbers are different. If you're very overweight, eating 1200 calories would make you lose more than 2lbs a week, which is generally a higher goal than is considered safe. What's more, losing 2lbs a week can be unsustainable and there's no reason to try to do it if you're in no rush.
Edit: How tall are you, actually? I'm trying to calculator your TDEE as well.0 -
You just have to eat at a dificit to lose weight. 1200-1500 calories can be a big dificit for some people but not others. Might as well try to eat as much to lose weight, that way if you stall you can have some where to go to lose more. If your really active you probably can lose weight with 2000 calories or more.0
-
I've been trying the TDEE-20% method for 3 days now, and I just cannot comprehend that I can eat this much and still lose weight.
Well, let's make it simple. Your body burns x amount of calories per day. If you eat x amount of calories, you will see no change in muscle or fat mass. If you eat less than x amount of calories per day, your body will begin breaking down muscle and fat mass to make up for the energy deficit.
Also, 3 days is NOT long enough to say whether a diet is working or not.I currently have MFP set for my Sedentary TDEE-20% and then I plan on eating back all of the exercise calories from my Fitbit.
Friday, I ate 1846 calories, but had 115 remaining. Yesterday, I ate 2140 calories with 81 leftover. Today, I've eaten 1268 calories and I still have 928 left!
Coming from years and years of being told to stick to a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet as a female, I'm having a hard time accepting that I can eat over 2,000 calories a day and lose weight.
We call this brainwashing. You've been brainwashed into thinking one way, but it isn't logically true. Saying all women should eat 1,200-1,500 calories is like saying all vehicles, from a moped to a tank, should have the same MPG.0 -
Eating back your calories is actually not a good idea, because caloric burn is typically way overestimated. In general, if you know you're exercising with some effort, stick to eating half of them back, not all of them, because chances are the number you see on MFP is higher than the number of calories you've actually burned, so you're just going above your limit. But yeah, everyone's individual ideal numbers are different. If you're very overweight, eating 1200 calories would make you lose more than 2lbs a week, which is generally a higher goal than is considered safe. What's more, losing 2lbs a week can be unsustainable and there's no reason to try to do it if you're in no rush.
Edit: How tall are you, actually? I'm trying to calculator your TDEE as well.
If she is set at sedentary, then yes, eating back exercise calories is necessary, particularly since it is more likely that she is lightly active and should be eating exercise calories back on top of that. The fitbit method is generally accepted as accurate.
As another poster mentioned, just keep at it. If you don't add your calories slowly in, you will see a small weight gain initially (which is why I encourage people who are switching to this method to add 100 calories per week). Doing that also lets your hunger hormone, called leptin, adjust to your new intake so that you don't feel like you are stuffing yourself.0 -
I guess you'll know when you weigh in if those caloric numbers are working for you! I have a fitbit too and I try not to eat back all of my exercise calories. Most days I eat around 1500-1800 calories and I exercise 6 days a week and have been consistently losing without being hungry. After the initial 2-3 weeks on the plan my constant hunger went away and now I eat when I'm hungry, smaller portions and try to make better choices. Remember, this is for life, not for 'just now' so you have to do what works best for you. Good luck! 0
-
I'm 5'5"
Fitbit gives an adjustment based on my activity. If Fitbit says I burned an estimated 2,500 calories per day and MFP originally estimated my burn to be 2,000, then it adds 500 calories to my goal. If I do a workout that my Fitbit doesn't track well, I put in the time and it will override the Fitbit data for that time period with the custom entry.
Thing is, with my constant binges, I probably was consuming well over 3,000-4,000 calories more often than not, so it's not like I've been on a 1,200 calorie diet for very long.In fact, I do know that I lost about 2.5 pounds overnight just because I pretty much drank the entire content of fresh water on the planet AND I was just getting off a major binge.
Because my activity levels vary SO much, I determined that I would just initially set my goal based on being sedentary and let the Fitbit adjustment make up the difference. That also helps me by giving me an incentive to get in an extra little workout if I go over my goal (like yesterday when I went to California Pizza Kitchen), and it also keeps me motivated to move more overall. If I know I might be going out, I won't sit still as much because I'll want the extra calories to help cover half a dessert or some frozen yogurt. (I've also been eating more nuts and drinking more milk than before).0 -
Yep, it works. Due to my high activity levels, I eat at around 2000 calories a day to lose.
I do use a scale to weigh my food (the food that isn't prepackaged, anyway), that way I know I'm being as accurate as I can be. When I eyeball it, my portions become more generous than they should be.0 -
I eat over 2500 calories a day. And I'm still losing weight.I've been trying the TDEE-20% method for 3 days now, and I just cannot comprehend that I can eat this much and still lose weight.
I currently have MFP set for my Sedentary TDEE-20% and then I plan on eating back all of the exercise calories from my Fitbit.
Friday, I ate 1846 calories, but had 115 remaining. Yesterday, I ate 2140 calories with 81 leftover. Today, I've eaten 1268 calories and I still have 928 left!
Coming from years and years of being told to stick to a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet as a female, I'm having a hard time accepting that I can eat over 2,000 calories a day and lose weight.0 -
I was on Weight Watchers for about 2 weeks, went on a 2 day binge and then continued for another 4 weeks or so when I switched to MFP (using their goals). I did that for less than a week before going on a 3-4 day binge (eating more than 4,000 calories some days) and then switching to this method- and I had more than my fair share of days where I overate on WW, so I'm not really concerned about needing to up my calories gradually.0
-
Yep, it works. Due to my high activity levels, I eat at around 2000 calories a day to lose.
I do use a scale to weigh my food (the food that isn't prepackaged, anyway), that way I know I'm being as accurate as I can be. When I eyeball it, my portions become more generous than they should be.
I weigh my food too, though I'm comfortable eyeballing certain foods when out. I'll count out cherry tomatoes from a veggie tray or estimate the size of a banana.0 -
if you are doing TDEE why are you eating back exercise cals..? or am I missing something?0
-
It works. Just ask the last 15lbs I dropped off my *kitten* since January using TDEE-20%.0
-
Eating back your calories is actually not a good idea, because caloric burn is typically way overestimated. In general, if you know you're exercising with some effort, stick to eating half of them back, not all of them, because chances are the number you see on MFP is higher than the number of calories you've actually burned, so you're just going above your limit. But yeah, everyone's individual ideal numbers are different. If you're very overweight, eating 1200 calories would make you lose more than 2lbs a week, which is generally a higher goal than is considered safe. What's more, losing 2lbs a week can be unsustainable and there's no reason to try to do it if you're in no rush.
Edit: How tall are you, actually? I'm trying to calculator your TDEE as well.
If she is set at sedentary, then yes, eating back exercise calories is necessary, particularly since it is more likely that she is lightly active and should be eating exercise calories back on top of that. The fitbit method is generally accepted as accurate.
As another poster mentioned, just keep at it. If you don't add your calories slowly in, you will see a small weight gain initially (which is why I encourage people who are switching to this method to add 100 calories per week). Doing that also lets your hunger hormone, called leptin, adjust to your new intake so that you don't feel like you are stuffing yourself.
No way. If she's sedentary she definitely SHOULDN'T be eating back calories, and most people tend to OVERESTIMATE their activity levels, so it's highly unlikely she's underestimating.0 -
Eating back your calories is actually not a good idea, because caloric burn is typically way overestimated. In general, if you know you're exercising with some effort, stick to eating half of them back, not all of them, because chances are the number you see on MFP is higher than the number of calories you've actually burned, so you're just going above your limit. But yeah, everyone's individual ideal numbers are different. If you're very overweight, eating 1200 calories would make you lose more than 2lbs a week, which is generally a higher goal than is considered safe. What's more, losing 2lbs a week can be unsustainable and there's no reason to try to do it if you're in no rush.
Edit: How tall are you, actually? I'm trying to calculator your TDEE as well.
If she is set at sedentary, then yes, eating back exercise calories is necessary, particularly since it is more likely that she is lightly active and should be eating exercise calories back on top of that. The fitbit method is generally accepted as accurate.
As another poster mentioned, just keep at it. If you don't add your calories slowly in, you will see a small weight gain initially (which is why I encourage people who are switching to this method to add 100 calories per week). Doing that also lets your hunger hormone, called leptin, adjust to your new intake so that you don't feel like you are stuffing yourself.
No way. If she's sedentary she definitely SHOULDN'T be eating back calories, and most people tend to OVERESTIMATE their activity levels, so it's highly unlikely she's underestimating.
She is not actually sedentary. She simply has her activity set at sedentary for easier calculation. Many people (including me) do it this way. You did not understand the OP.0 -
Be sure to let us know how it goes. I'm curious about this now.0
-
I felt exactly the same way when I started eating TDEE-20%!!! I was terrified! I figured that I would give it a month or two and worst case scenario, I would gain back a pound or two and realize it wasn't for me or nothing would happen at all. Weight-loss and maintaining it is a life long deal, if it takes you an extra month or two or sort out what's best for your body, it's not the end of the world! Luckily for me, increasing my cals was EXACTLY what my body needed and I started losing weight again! It's scary, but the best things in life certainly can be!0
-
Eating back your calories is actually not a good idea, because caloric burn is typically way overestimated. In general, if you know you're exercising with some effort, stick to eating half of them back, not all of them, because chances are the number you see on MFP is higher than the number of calories you've actually burned, so you're just going above your limit. But yeah, everyone's individual ideal numbers are different. If you're very overweight, eating 1200 calories would make you lose more than 2lbs a week, which is generally a higher goal than is considered safe. What's more, losing 2lbs a week can be unsustainable and there's no reason to try to do it if you're in no rush.
Edit: How tall are you, actually? I'm trying to calculator your TDEE as well.
If she is set at sedentary, then yes, eating back exercise calories is necessary, particularly since it is more likely that she is lightly active and should be eating exercise calories back on top of that. The fitbit method is generally accepted as accurate.
As another poster mentioned, just keep at it. If you don't add your calories slowly in, you will see a small weight gain initially (which is why I encourage people who are switching to this method to add 100 calories per week). Doing that also lets your hunger hormone, called leptin, adjust to your new intake so that you don't feel like you are stuffing yourself.
No way. If she's sedentary she definitely SHOULDN'T be eating back calories, and most people tend to OVERESTIMATE their activity levels, so it's highly unlikely she's underestimating.
She is setting it to sedentary and using a HRM to track her exercise calories. She is doing it properly.0 -
I'm 5'7, 135 and my maintenance cals are set to 1780 on rest days and I eat back as much of my workout cals as I can stuff in my face lol I have my MFP set to "lightly active" b/c I'm a school bus driver who sweeps, fuels, and throws myself bodily into the turns when I'm turning a 15-ton vehicle. With MFP guidelines I've been maintaining...although I've been maintaining long before the Internet and MFP lol0
-
As far as I can tell, fitibit is a glorified pedometer, NOT an HRM, so the calories she's tracking probably aren't accurate.0
-
I think you should actually read up on it then, as it goes way beyond what most HRMs are capable of.As far as I can tell, fitibit is a glorified pedometer, NOT an HRM, so the calories she's tracking probably aren't accurate.0 -
I think you should actually read up on it then, as it goes way beyond what most HRMs are capable of.As far as I can tell, fitibit is a glorified pedometer, NOT an HRM, so the calories she's tracking probably aren't accurate.
Everything I see just talks about counting steps, and how good it is at counting every step you take. I can't find anything that indicates it measures your heart rate at all. Counting steps doesn't tell you how many calories you've burned.0 -
Eating back your calories is actually not a good idea, because caloric burn is typically way overestimated. In general, if you know you're exercising with some effort, stick to eating half of them back, not all of them, because chances are the number you see on MFP is higher than the number of calories you've actually burned, so you're just going above your limit. But yeah, everyone's individual ideal numbers are different. If you're very overweight, eating 1200 calories would make you lose more than 2lbs a week, which is generally a higher goal than is considered safe. What's more, losing 2lbs a week can be unsustainable and there's no reason to try to do it if you're in no rush.
Edit: How tall are you, actually? I'm trying to calculator your TDEE as well.
If she is set at sedentary, then yes, eating back exercise calories is necessary, particularly since it is more likely that she is lightly active and should be eating exercise calories back on top of that. The fitbit method is generally accepted as accurate.
As another poster mentioned, just keep at it. If you don't add your calories slowly in, you will see a small weight gain initially (which is why I encourage people who are switching to this method to add 100 calories per week). Doing that also lets your hunger hormone, called leptin, adjust to your new intake so that you don't feel like you are stuffing yourself.
No way. If she's sedentary she definitely SHOULDN'T be eating back calories, and most people tend to OVERESTIMATE their activity levels, so it's highly unlikely she's underestimating.
She is setting it to sedentary and using a HRM to track her exercise calories. She is doing it properly.
I'm unemployed, so there are plenty of days where I barely get out of bed, but there are also days (like today) where I do a ton of walking. For me, if I used last week as a baseline for my activity level, it would be a lot different than if I used this week, so I decided to just start at sedentary and let my Fitbit calculate the difference for me.0 -
So far I come in low every day (by design) because I am afraid I am not counting my calories right on the money, so a little under is better. Only been at it a little over a week but surpassing my goal so far. And I know it is longer term changes that really mean something. Just nice to see the slider going left and not right WOOT0
-
if you are doing TDEE why are you eating back exercise cals..? or am I missing something?
I'm confused too. If you do TDEE - 20%, you aren't supposed to eat back your exercise calories.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions