weight affected by muscle building

I have restarted my workout program over the past 3 months (yea me!) slowly at first- up until now- where I am 5-6 days a week anywhere from 60 min- 120 minutes a day. I cross train from jogging, road biking, spinning, aerobics, or walking. I have not added any weight training yet.

Here is my question. For those of you that have been training for a while and did lose a lot of weight through diet and exercise- did you hit those "set back points" where your body was building muscle and you just did not lose any weight but you could visibly see changes in your body? If so, how long did it take to get past that point? Did it just one day kick back in gear and the scale start losing again and the muscle building slow a little bit?

I am thrilled about toning my body and thrilled about the aerobic condition I'm getting into- but I also still want to lose 30 lbs from where I am and need that scale to keep a moving. I will give it as much time as it takes, but just was hoping for some insight from those of you that have been here.

Thanks
«1

Replies

  • difabu
    difabu Posts: 143
    Posting though I don't have an answer, since this is exactly where I am and I'm curious about responses. I've been doing CrossFit for four months now, and definitely building strength, and I've lost some pounds and MANY inches but I also need to lose some more fat-weight. I see the body changes and get many comments from people about my new body definition.
  • sylo1609
    sylo1609 Posts: 36
    Even with intense weight training, you can only build a couple of pounds of muscle per year (seen apart from steroids etc). Perhaps your body will store some additional water/glycogen as well, but it shouldn't be too much, so I wouldn't really worry about that.
    Furthermore, more muscle mass = higher BMR!
    Don't be afraid of lifting weights! :)
  • murphy612
    murphy612 Posts: 734 Member
    From what I've read you won't gain any (or much) muscle if you are eating at a deficit, but if you do strength training you can maintain the lean muscle you have while losing fat (notice I didn't say losing weight). If you start lifting weights your actual scale weight will REALLY fluctuate, especially in the beginning with muscle water retention and what they call nooby gains. My advice don't get caught up on what the scale says and to go by body composition and measurements.

    I haven't lost any weight in about 3 months, actually I've gained a pound. However, I am a pants size smaller than 3 months ago. I don't know if the scale weight will start going back down or not, but I'm not concerned about that. I also don't do near the amount of cardio you do, so you may lose weight faster but you'll lose some lean muscle too.

    Also, we are about the same age so it's going to take some time, my weight loss has taken about a year and a half, ugggg. Be patient and stick with it.
  • ladyphoto
    ladyphoto Posts: 192 Member
    Thank you- this is great information. It is definitely harder in my 40's! I'm not used to it being so hard. I do need to add weight in and was looking at them this morning in the gym- they are so intimidating to me- plus my build is so muscular already- I worry about really getting muscular. I know- every girl worries about that- but my natural build really is already that way.

    That you for all the input. All good food for thought. Murphy- how much lifting do you do?
  • murphy612
    murphy612 Posts: 734 Member
    Thank you- this is great information. It is definitely harder in my 40's! I'm not used to it being so hard. I do need to add weight in and was looking at them this morning in the gym- they are so intimidating to me- plus my build is so muscular already- I worry about really getting muscular. I know- every girl worries about that- but my natural build really is already that way.

    That you for all the input. All good food for thought. Murphy- how much lifting do you do?
    The age thing really got me too. In my 20's and early 30's I could lose weight just skipping dinner. Nope, not anymore. I'm glad I've done it slow and steady though, it feels like the right way :)

    I lift 3 days a week, and a little fun cardio on other days. I'm not a fitness fanatic (hehe) and I prefer to work out efficiently instead of excessively. As for getting muscular, that's actually what I want and what I am working for. The thing with muscle is the more you have the higher your metabolism and the more I can eat :smile: It’s also great for bones, especially as we get older.

    Being a woman you'll have to eat at a large surplus and most likely take steroids to get extremely muscular, so I wouldn’t worry about you getting to muscular (aka bulky). However, if you mean you don’t like to see as much muscle definition (the cut look) then you just have to keep your body fat % a little higher, but still lift weights for the other benefits. I have learned and what works for me is my diet is for weight/fat loss, exercise is for body composition and fitness and weight lifting has been awesome.
  • darwinwoodka
    darwinwoodka Posts: 322 Member
    You're not going to "really get muscular" -- you're going to get fit and toned. You don't bulk up without a lot of testosterone and steroids. ;^)
  • KatLifter
    KatLifter Posts: 1,314 Member
    This is a great story about Staci, and how the number on the scale doesn't always reflect what you see in the mirror - and why the scale isn't as important. http://www.nerdfitness.com/blog/2011/07/21/meet-staci-your-new-powerlifting-super-hero/

    In the pic on the right, she is 11 pounds heavier than the left.
    Screen-Shot-2011-07-21-at-9.23.11-AM1.jpg
  • ladyphoto
    ladyphoto Posts: 192 Member
    Wow. That is amazing. I know almost every woman says the same thing about not wanting to get bulky- I should know better by now. I would like to start adding weights into my routine- actually- when you guys first started- did you start on the machines or free weights? Did you use trainers or just go for it?
  • ladyphoto
    ladyphoto Posts: 192 Member
    I always worried about bulking up because I'm so tall (5'10) so the last thing I want is to lose any femininity at all. I do like the fit look on a woman and would love that for myself as long as it's not bulky.
  • ahviendha
    ahviendha Posts: 1,291 Member
    3 months.

    you WILL NOT become bulky. you do not have enough testosterone, nor the specific dietary goals required to bulk up.

    i started on machines, then moved to free weights, then flat out barbell and 45lb plates.

    i recently saw a photo of me from several years ago, and from then to now, my waist is beautifully tapered, my arm muscles are defined and strong, and just everything has tightened up. i look much better since heavy weight lifting (i do 5x5 stronglifts)
  • HIITMe
    HIITMe Posts: 921 Member
    in the beginning of weight training, the scale may even go UP even as inches go down... or you may weight increase and no change in inches but will have visible changes to your body ...all due to water retention & glycogen stores....
  • diannethegeek
    diannethegeek Posts: 14,776 Member
    I wouldn't worry about becoming bulky. It won't happen overnight or by accident. If you find yourself looking more muscular than you want you can just back off from the weights.
  • KatLifter
    KatLifter Posts: 1,314 Member
    I always worried about bulking up because I'm so tall (5'10) so the last thing I want is to lose any femininity at all. I do like the fit look on a woman and would love that for myself as long as it's not bulky.

    I'm 5'10" and I love lifting heavy - and what it's done for my body. The scale hasn't moved for a little while, but I've lost inches and gained definition. This weekend a friend spanked me and said how tiny my butt is getting (I squat 150 lbs and deadlift over 200). I really wouldn't worry about getting bulky; women naturally don't have the testosterone for it, and you have to eat at a calorie surplus while working really hard to build that much muscle.

    I do free weights, if you haven't used them before I'd suggest a session or 2 with a trainer to teach you proper form, then follow a program like Stronglifts or Starting Strength. Don't be intimidated by the men in the free weight area! At least where I am they are all great, and always willing to lend a hand or answer a question.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    I consider muscle gain to be a benefit, not a setback. The more lean mass I have, the more calories I burn.
  • holothuroidea
    holothuroidea Posts: 772 Member
    Under perfect conditions, a woman can only gain about 1lb of muscle per month. There is no way you're offsetting fat loss with muscle gain, especially if you're eating a deficit.

    You're probably just at a plateau, which is normal. If you've increased your activity that much without increasing your calories, you're probably not eating enough. Something very similar happened to me, and the weight started coming off again when I increased my calories by about 400/day.

    Women don't get bulky for a couple of reasons. We gain muscle at about half the rate of men because of a lack of testosterone, our skeletal structure cannot support that much muscle mass (our bones are smaller and less dense), and it's very difficult (and unhealthy) for us to get to a bf% low enough to show significant muscle definition.

    So unless you're taking steroids and making severe cuts to extreme bf%'s, there's no reason to worry about being "bulky."
  • Philllbis
    Philllbis Posts: 801 Member
    I lost my weight through cardio and body weight strength training. About 3 months ago I started Strong Lifts. I've seen a little jump in the number on the scale but my waist has gotten smaller. I'm also eating more. I'm not looking any bulkier and even have gotten comments on I look more lean but also fit.

    I doubt if you'll look less feminine by lifting. Plus, you really have to eat quite a bit above your TDEE to bulk.
  • meshashesha2012
    meshashesha2012 Posts: 8,329 Member
    i've been consistently weight lifting since i was around 17. between 17-24 I was doing that as an athlete (rugby) so it was combined with heavy workouts (weightlifting and running), and lots of good food. after i gave that up and entered the working world, i pretty much continued the weight lifting, lost the running and continued the eating :laugh:

    so essentially i had a 20+ year bulk cycle. The result is that I have some pretty impressive lean body mass especially considering that I technically have a small frame (which was the entire point of me working so hard to gain weight as a rugby flanker). When i first decided to lose all this extra weight last year, I took a body fat scan and it had my LBM at around 150.

    last year i lost a lot of fat but not a lot of weight. it was around 30 pounds but 5 pant sizes. i know people with same body shape (ruler) who needed to drop way more weight to get the same results in clothing changes.. so really i think for someone like me, i'm going to see more of a difference in my body composition rather than anything on the scale

    ETA: regarding the bulky thing, i just wanted to say that even when i was in the middle of intentionally trying to pack on 20-30 pounds and eating over maintenance and working out like she-hulk i was never ever called manly looking. i think there are some chicks who are just manly looking anyway regardless if they weight lift or not :laugh:
  • ksy1969
    ksy1969 Posts: 700 Member
    From what I've read you won't gain any (or much) muscle if you are eating at a deficit, but if you do strength training you can maintain the lean muscle you have while losing fat (notice I didn't say losing weight).

    My trainer, who has been doing this for 30+ years would call this a load of crap. He says, the human body is actually quite simple. When you lift you make miniscule tears in your muscle tissue. Every time your body repairs one of those tears there is a little more mass added to that muscle. He says your body doesn't say, "oops, Joe is eating at a deficit now so we cannot repair the muscle", no, it does what it is programmed to do. It repairs the muscle tissue and in the process adds more mass.

    This is coming from a man that has been training people for 30+ years. He has trained all kinds of shapes and sizes and he says it is all about the basics.
  • holothuroidea
    holothuroidea Posts: 772 Member
    Wow. That is amazing. I know almost every woman says the same thing about not wanting to get bulky- I should know better by now. I would like to start adding weights into my routine- actually- when you guys first started- did you start on the machines or free weights? Did you use trainers or just go for it?

    Do free weights. Machines isolate muscle groups and completely bypass your core. Having to balance yourself on your feet throughout the movement makes a huge difference. You'll never get the same kind of athleticism from machines. Also it's a lot more fun.

    I have a trainer, but you can learn a lot from youtube and do it yourself. It really helps to have a friend to watch your form and spot you, though.
  • HIITMe
    HIITMe Posts: 921 Member
    From what I've read you won't gain any (or much) muscle if you are eating at a deficit, but if you do strength training you can maintain the lean muscle you have while losing fat (notice I didn't say losing weight).

    My trainer, who has been doing this for 30+ years would call this a load of crap. He says, the human body is actually quite simple. When you lift you make miniscule tears in your muscle tissue. Every time your body repairs one of those tears there is a little more mass added to that muscle. He says your body doesn't say, "oops, Joe is eating at a deficit now so we cannot repair the muscle", no, it does what it is programmed to do. It repairs the muscle tissue and in the process adds more mass.

    This is coming from a man that has been training people for 30+ years. He has trained all kinds of shapes and sizes and he says it is all about the basics.

    well your trainer of 30 years is WRONG on this subject, if that is what he says

    when eating at deficit, a woman will not gain lean muscle... she can, however, protect what lean muscle she has by lifting heavy...She will, however, lose fat in the process
  • holothuroidea
    holothuroidea Posts: 772 Member
    From what I've read you won't gain any (or much) muscle if you are eating at a deficit, but if you do strength training you can maintain the lean muscle you have while losing fat (notice I didn't say losing weight).

    My trainer, who has been doing this for 30+ years would call this a load of crap. He says, the human body is actually quite simple. When you lift you make miniscule tears in your muscle tissue. Every time your body repairs one of those tears there is a little more mass added to that muscle. He says your body doesn't say, "oops, Joe is eating at a deficit now so we cannot repair the muscle", no, it does what it is programmed to do. It repairs the muscle tissue and in the process adds more mass.

    This is coming from a man that has been training people for 30+ years. He has trained all kinds of shapes and sizes and he says it is all about the basics.

    well your trainer of 30 years is WRONG on this subject, if that is what he says

    when eating at deficit, a woman will not gain lean muscle... she can, however, protect what lean muscle she has by lifting heavy...She will, however, lose fat in the process

    I don't think either of these is entirely true.

    Your body will repair muscle tears, and that is how you get stronger. You need the materials to add mass, though, and the fuel to make that happen. If you don't have significant body fat stored, and if your body is using all of it's incoming energy for more important things (i.e. you're eating a significant deficit), then no- it won't be able to make those changes to the muscle tissue.

    It's also not entirely true that you can't gain muscle mass or strength on a deficit, though. If your body has a lot more fat than muscle and you're new to weight training, more likely than not you'll end up gaining muscle mass as long as you're eating above your BMR.

    I've made some pretty significant gains in strength over the past couple of months and I've been eating a deficit the whole time. I think the difference is that my muscles were completely untrained to start with and my deficit is pretty small.
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    From what I've read you won't gain any (or much) muscle if you are eating at a deficit, but if you do strength training you can maintain the lean muscle you have while losing fat (notice I didn't say losing weight).

    My trainer, who has been doing this for 30+ years would call this a load of crap. He says, the human body is actually quite simple. When you lift you make miniscule tears in your muscle tissue. Every time your body repairs one of those tears there is a little more mass added to that muscle. He says your body doesn't say, "oops, Joe is eating at a deficit now so we cannot repair the muscle", no, it does what it is programmed to do. It repairs the muscle tissue and in the process adds more mass.

    This is coming from a man that has been training people for 30+ years. He has trained all kinds of shapes and sizes and he says it is all about the basics.

    jaguars-fan-confused-wtf.gif
  • murphy612
    murphy612 Posts: 734 Member
    Wow. That is amazing. I know almost every woman says the same thing about not wanting to get bulky- I should know better by now. I would like to start adding weights into my routine- actually- when you guys first started- did you start on the machines or free weights? Did you use trainers or just go for it?

    Free weights and a trainer. But I know a lot of women have success doing it on their own, I'm just not that disciplined and coordinated hehehe The trainer is expensive but it was really the best decision I made for myself.
  • adopt321
    adopt321 Posts: 111
    I respectfully disagree. In three months I gained 4.5 lbs muscle and 1.5 lbs fat per my trainer's measurements. He said he wouldn't expect as much muscle and low fat but it is definitely possible.

    I do agree to get on the weight wagon! Don't be afraid to lift and lift heavy. It's a body transformation waiting to happen!
    Even with intense weight training, you can only build a couple of pounds of muscle per year (seen apart from steroids etc). Perhaps your body will store some additional water/glycogen as well, but it shouldn't be too much, so I wouldn't really worry about that.
    Furthermore, more muscle mass = higher BMR!
    Don't be afraid of lifting weights! :)
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    I respectfully disagree. In three months I gained 4.5 lbs muscle and 1.5 lbs fat per my trainer's measurements. He said he wouldn't expect as much muscle and low fat but it is definitely possible.

    I do agree to get on the weight wagon! Don't be afraid to lift and lift heavy. It's a body transformation waiting to happen!
    Even with intense weight training, you can only build a couple of pounds of muscle per year (seen apart from steroids etc). Perhaps your body will store some additional water/glycogen as well, but it shouldn't be too much, so I wouldn't really worry about that.
    Furthermore, more muscle mass = higher BMR!
    Don't be afraid of lifting weights! :)

    Um, how did they measure it and are you super human?
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    I respectfully disagree. In three months I gained 4.5 lbs muscle and 1.5 lbs fat per my trainer's measurements. He said he wouldn't expect as much muscle and low fat but it is definitely possible.

    I do agree to get on the weight wagon! Don't be afraid to lift and lift heavy. It's a body transformation waiting to happen!
    Even with intense weight training, you can only build a couple of pounds of muscle per year (seen apart from steroids etc). Perhaps your body will store some additional water/glycogen as well, but it shouldn't be too much, so I wouldn't really worry about that.
    Furthermore, more muscle mass = higher BMR!
    Don't be afraid of lifting weights! :)
    Wow, you put it on faster than a champion bodybuilder. Congrats!
  • KatLifter
    KatLifter Posts: 1,314 Member
    I respectfully disagree. In three months I gained 4.5 lbs muscle and 1.5 lbs fat per my trainer's measurements. He said he wouldn't expect as much muscle and low fat but it is definitely possible.

    I do agree to get on the weight wagon! Don't be afraid to lift and lift heavy. It's a body transformation waiting to happen!
    Even with intense weight training, you can only build a couple of pounds of muscle per year (seen apart from steroids etc). Perhaps your body will store some additional water/glycogen as well, but it shouldn't be too much, so I wouldn't really worry about that.
    Furthermore, more muscle mass = higher BMR!
    Don't be afraid of lifting weights! :)


    Just so you know, most methods of measuring body fat vs. muscle aren't amazingly accurate. Unless it was in a BodPod, I'd take it with a chunk (not just a grain) of salt.
  • murphy612
    murphy612 Posts: 734 Member
    I've made some pretty significant gains in strength over the past couple of months and I've been eating a deficit the whole time. I think the difference is that my muscles were completely untrained to start with and my deficit is pretty small.

    Strength gains and muscle gains are not exactly the same thing. I have also gained a ton of strength. My lean body mass has not increased but stayed the same and my fat % has decreased. I have also heard you can get beginners gains (which I did and then they went away) and also gains if you are very overweight when you start. The OP doesn't have a lot to lose so I didn't bring that up. Regardless, congrats on your process, you look fabulous!!
  • meshashesha2012
    meshashesha2012 Posts: 8,329 Member
    I respectfully disagree. In three months I gained 4.5 lbs muscle and 1.5 lbs fat per my trainer's measurements. He said he wouldn't expect as much muscle and low fat but it is definitely possible.

    I do agree to get on the weight wagon! Don't be afraid to lift and lift heavy. It's a body transformation waiting to happen!
    Even with intense weight training, you can only build a couple of pounds of muscle per year (seen apart from steroids etc). Perhaps your body will store some additional water/glycogen as well, but it shouldn't be too much, so I wouldn't really worry about that.
    Furthermore, more muscle mass = higher BMR!
    Don't be afraid of lifting weights! :)
    Wow, you put it on faster than a champion bodybuilder. Congrats!

    couldnt these also be newb gains? from what i've read the first 6-12 months newbies can see a lot of growth but after that it becomes harder
  • HIITMe
    HIITMe Posts: 921 Member
    From what I've read you won't gain any (or much) muscle if you are eating at a deficit, but if you do strength training you can maintain the lean muscle you have while losing fat (notice I didn't say losing weight).

    My trainer, who has been doing this for 30+ years would call this a load of crap. He says, the human body is actually quite simple. When you lift you make miniscule tears in your muscle tissue. Every time your body repairs one of those tears there is a little more mass added to that muscle. He says your body doesn't say, "oops, Joe is eating at a deficit now so we cannot repair the muscle", no, it does what it is programmed to do. It repairs the muscle tissue and in the process adds more mass.

    This is coming from a man that has been training people for 30+ years. He has trained all kinds of shapes and sizes and he says it is all about the basics.

    well your trainer of 30 years is WRONG on this subject, if that is what he says

    when eating at deficit, a woman will not gain lean muscle... she can, however, protect what lean muscle she has by lifting heavy...She will, however, lose fat in the process

    I don't think either of these is entirely true.

    Your body will repair muscle tears, and that is how you get stronger. You need the materials to add mass, though, and the fuel to make that happen. If you don't have significant body fat stored, and if your body is using all of it's incoming energy for more important things (i.e. you're eating a significant deficit), then no- it won't be able to make those changes to the muscle tissue.

    It's also not entirely true that you can't gain muscle mass or strength on a deficit, though. If your body has a lot more fat than muscle and you're new to weight training, more likely than not you'll end up gaining muscle mass as long as you're eating above your BMR.

    I've made some pretty significant gains in strength over the past couple of months and I've been eating a deficit the whole time. I think the difference is that my muscles were completely untrained to start with and my deficit is pretty small.
    I've made some pretty significant gains in strength over the past couple of months and I've been eating a deficit the whole time. I think the difference is that my muscles were completely untrained to start with and my deficit is pretty small.

    Strength gains and muscle gains are not exactly the same thing. I have also gained a ton of strength. My lean body mass has not increased but stayed the same and my fat % has decreased. I have also heard you can get beginners gains (which I did and then they went away) and also gains if you are very overweight when you start. The OP doesn't have a lot to lose so I didn't bring that up. Regardless, congrats on your process, you look fabulous!!

    QFT