We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
When I work out, should I eat more?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7c9e/d7c9ed9467b76c93f7c44bbe8aa9cdaaa88c7f5c" alt="mrfunkyland"
mrfunkyland
Posts: 2 Member
I've got a quick question for you. I plugged in all of my info into MFP and it told me that to reach my weight loss goal, I should eat ~1500 cal/day. With my work out I'm burning between 300 and 500 cal/day. Should my goal for actual intake of calories still be 1500, or should I make it 1800-2000 to balance out the workout?
0
Replies
-
Yes, that is part of the plan. A calorie deficit is already built in, so when you exercise you may make the deficit unhealthily large if you don't eat more.0
-
So we SHOULD eat back burned calories?0
-
Yes, if you're using MFP the way it's intended.0
-
I didn't (at least I didn't very often). I just wasn't hungry enough to eat back all the calories.0
-
If you have MFP set to sedentary, yes, you should be eating your exercise calories back, you're suppose to.
If you have your MFP settings set to include your exercise in your activity level, then no.
Hunger is not a good indicator of needing more calories. If we could rely on hunger cues, none of us would need to lose weight.0 -
So we SHOULD eat back burned calories?
Yes, UNLESS you included the exercise as part of your activity level. But since the OP is male and was started at 1500 calories I'm assuming he set his activity level to sedentary.
If you included exercise in your activity level, then you should not eat the extra calories unless you go beyond what you included.0 -
Hunger is not a good indicator of needing more calories. If we could rely on hunger cues, none of us would need to lose weight.
Not true. Many people gain weight by eating when they are not hungry. Hunger can be a good indicator once you get to know your body. But for those that under or over eaten for long periods of time, this can take some time.0 -
Thanks, all! This is what I needed to know. I know it can be painful/difficult, but I think I had a few days where I worked out pretty heavily and didn't eat enough and MAN did I pay for it.
I did set it to sedentary. Before I started MFP I wasn't working out at all so it seemed like the best choice.0 -
Hunger is not a good indicator of needing more calories. If we could rely on hunger cues, none of us would need to lose weight.
Not true. Many people gain weight by eating when they are not hungry. Hunger can be a good indicator once you get to know your body. But for those that under or over eaten for long periods of time, this can take some time.
Exactly my point, thanks.0 -
We don't eat our exercise calories :S have we really been doing it all wrong for 7 months????0
-
I tend to find a lot of people on here way over estimate how many calories they burn whilst training. I personally don't eat the calories i burn on a workout back and believe this is the best way, for me atleast.0
-
We don't eat our exercise calories :S have we really been doing it all wrong for 7 months????
If your exercise is included in your activity setting, then no, you haven't been doing it wrong.0 -
We don't eat our exercise calories :S have we really been doing it all wrong for 7 months????
If your exercise is included in your activity setting, then no, you haven't been doing it wrong.
Machines and Mfp over estimate cals burned too! Heart monitors are more accurate0 -
Should you eat your caloires back? Yes, should you eat all of them? No. The reason I advise you not to eat all maybe 70-80% of them, many people and MFP vastly overestimate how many caloires they have burnt. If you using a HRM and other tracking gadgets which give a slightly better reading eat 75-90% back.0
-
I tend to find a lot of people on here way over estimate how many calories they burn whilst training. I personally don't eat the calories i burn on a workout back and believe this is the best way, for me atleast.
The best way I've found is if you're not sure, or something doesn't look right: Over estimate the calories eaten, and under estimate the calories burned.0 -
I tend to find a lot of people on here way over estimate how many calories they burn whilst training. I personally don't eat the calories i burn on a workout back and believe this is the best way, for me atleast.
The best way I've found is if you're not sure, or something doesn't look right: Over estimate the calories eaten, and under estimate the calories burned.
Agreed. underestimation of calories consumed and over estimation of calories burned will lead to failure.0 -
We don't eat our exercise calories :S have we really been doing it all wrong for 7 months????
If your exercise is included in your activity setting, then no, you haven't been doing it wrong.
Machines and Mfp over estimate cals burned too! Heart monitors are more accurate
Agreed, I do the best I can and eat 80% back what MFP says, my weight loss hasn't suffered. I plan on getting a HRM when I have the last 5-8lbs to lose so I can make sure I'm more accurate.0 -
Hunger is not a good indicator of needing more calories. If we could rely on hunger cues, none of us would need to lose weight.
Not true. Many people gain weight by eating when they are not hungry. Hunger can be a good indicator once you get to know your body. But for those that under or over eaten for long periods of time, this can take some time.
Exactly my point, thanks.
It's not what you said. Eating when not hungry does not mean that hunger is not a good indicator. It means that eating without the indicator can lead to weight gain. If one only ate when they were hungry, we'd have less overweight people. (my point)0 -
If set at sedentary and calculating your calorie burns modestly then yes you should definitely eat them back. When you're at goal you'd continue losing if you didn't eat back, so since your weight loss deficit is already taken away from your base calorie goal you should eat your exercise calories back so that you train your mind and body how to take in more on days that you really need it, and not when you don't. Also you have muscle to feed and you'll only workout regularly if you feel fit and well - which you probably won't over time if you are constantly eating way under.0
-
If you have MFP set to sedentary, yes, you should be eating your exercise calories back, you're suppose to.
If you have your MFP settings set to include your exercise in your activity level, then no.
Hunger is not a good indicator of needing more calories. If we could rely on hunger cues, none of us would need to lose weight.
When I set the nutrition goal tracker at either moderate or active, I get the same result , 1200 cals, 45 proteins 165 carbs and 40 fat.
It doesn't matter what setting I use. I am starting at 2 pound a week loss till August 7 (before trip goal) then I will slow it to 1.5
pounds a week.
I seem to not be able to eat back, or risk weight gain.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 440 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions