The Ariel Castro case...1000 years??
Replies
-
No sentence would suffice that crazy!0
-
and then when hes in prison theyre probably going to segregate him from the general population...wheres the justice/punishment in that?!!!~0
-
Anything short of a death penalty is mercy for this piece of crap. A sentence of 1000 years is symbolic because he's not going to survive it, it's just a ridiculous number designed to make everybody feels better.0
-
and then when hes in prison theyre probably going to segregate him from the general population...wheres the justice/punishment in that?!!!~0
-
AGREED!! I wish our justice system allowed victims of violent/sexual crimes to pick the punishment for their abusers0
-
Death ...in a Chinese torture chamber0
-
So basically for the rest of his miserable life we have to pay for his food and health care? This sounds horrible, but things like this make me wish we had back alley executions. Just put a bullet in the back of his head and be done with it.0
-
and then when hes in prison theyre probably going to segregate him from the general population...wheres the justice/punishment in that?!!!~
life w/Bubba - that'd do just fine....0 -
OK, the man was vile and evil, and nothing will undo what he has done. You are all quite rightly angry with everything you say. So what would you do in the judges position. It's a serious question, so sensible answers would be welcomed from a Brit who gets frustrated with the meddling of the European Human Rights Court - a court that would certainly overturn the 1000 years (they have done that in a similar situation where the UK court 'took away any hope of parole' and 'infringed his human rights'.0
-
It's also so he will never be paroled.0
-
I despise this sick monster but at the end of the day we are better than him. No punishment whatsoever will take away the pain and misery he inflicted upon his victims.
I do know that it would cost us taxpayers more to get this guy run through death row then it would for use to house him for 40 years.
I don't have all the answers and I agree with the sentiment behind what you are all saying.
I just don't like the idea of the government having the right to execute humans. Any power given to a government body is power that we are giving to other humans. They don't change in to something else when they become government officials. If we instituted the back alley executions mentioned above then over time leadership would change and that power would start getting abused.
Like so many other government power we already see abused today. All a person would have to do is claim that a person was guilty of some sort of crime that will stimulate an emotion response from people and they could justify killing anyone.0 -
I despise this sick monster but at the end of the day we are better than him. No punishment whatsoever will take away the pain and misery he inflicted upon his victims.
I do know that it would cost us taxpayers more to get this guy run through death row then it would for use to house him for 40 years.
I don't have all the answers and I agree with the sentiment behind what you are all saying.
I just don't like the idea of the government having the right to execute humans. Any power given to a government body is power that we are giving to other humans. They don't change in to something else when they become government officials. If we instituted the back alley executions mentioned above then over time leadership would change and that power would start getting abused.
Like so many other government power we already see abused today. All a person would have to do is claim that a person was guilty of some sort of crime that will stimulate an emotion response from people and they could justify killing anyone.
Very well said.
Agreed.0 -
That whole story made me sick to my stomach.0
-
Not even speaking politically about the merits of the death penalty-- there are experiences worse than death. Death may be more painless than an utterly miserable life in prison- after all, people commit suicide for the very reason that they would prefer death to a painful life. Misery in prison may be less merciful than an abrupt end.0
-
The reason they pile on the years in cases like this is so that if any part of his conviction is overturned on appeal at some point in the future, he will still have all the other years left to serve.
It also serves the purpose of being symbolic for the victims of his heinous crimes. But that's not the reason for the sentencing structure. It's just based on the law.0 -
Yeah, justice would be to put him in the same cell with Bubba, where he would be 'loved' every day for the rest of his life.
I believe they call that 'hard time.'No sentence would suffice that crazy!
He's not crazy, he's evil.0 -
If they will not sentence him to death, lock him up with a rope. Things will eventually sort themselves out.0
-
Im a firm believer in the death penalty. He should be killed. And not in a humane manner but that's just me0
-
the death penalty would be the easy way out for him. let him rote in prison rember jeffery dahmer they couldn't protect him in prison0
-
Being a taxpayer and having worked in the criminal justice system for many years, I will tell you that the death penalty needs to be outlawed, for financial reasons if no other. The cost of housing these folks on death row as well as all of the automatic appeals is astronomical compared to regular prison committments.
I also have an issue with all the cases recently overturned due to DNA evidence exonerating people on death row. I'm not talking about a criminal walking away from prison due to a legal technicality. I'm talking there was DNA available and it didn't belong to the person convicted. How many died wrongly before the DNA testing was available????
I also wonder about the folks who perform these executions. That's got to mess with your head that you are taking someone's life. Even if they are a disgusting, vile human being. I wonder how many of them suffer from PTSD as a result...0 -
I also have an issue with all the cases recently overturned due to DNA evidence exonerating people on death row. I'm not talking about a criminal walking away from prison due to a legal technicality. I'm talking there was DNA available and it didn't belong to the person convicted. How many died wrongly before the DNA testing was available????
It's like they've never seen The Life of David Gale movie.0 -
I'm happy we don't televise that stuff here....0
-
So basically for the rest of his miserable life we have to pay for his food and health care? This sounds horrible, but things like this make me wish we had back alley executions. Just put a bullet in the back of his head and be done with it.
I hate posts like this. The problem with people who want to 'skip the trial to save money' or 'shoot people in the head to be done with it', is that there are laws in place to prevent innocent people or wrongfully convicted from being executed!!
Now, I am not saying that this guy deserves to live a life of luxury. Prison should not be fun. They should be self sufficient, grow their own food, make their own clothes and NOT be funded by tax payers. No reason criminals can't work while in jail rather than watching tv.0 -
I despise this sick monster but at the end of the day we are better than him. No punishment whatsoever will take away the pain and misery he inflicted upon his victims.
I do know that it would cost us taxpayers more to get this guy run through death row then it would for use to house him for 40 years.
I don't have all the answers and I agree with the sentiment behind what you are all saying.
I just don't like the idea of the government having the right to execute humans. Any power given to a government body is power that we are giving to other humans. They don't change in to something else when they become government officials. If we instituted the back alley executions mentioned above then over time leadership would change and that power would start getting abused.
Like so many other government power we already see abused today. All a person would have to do is claim that a person was guilty of some sort of crime that will stimulate an emotion response from people and they could justify killing anyone.
QFT0 -
I despise this sick monster but at the end of the day we are better than him. No punishment whatsoever will take away the pain and misery he inflicted upon his victims.
I do know that it would cost us taxpayers more to get this guy run through death row then it would for use to house him for 40 years.
I don't have all the answers and I agree with the sentiment behind what you are all saying.
I just don't like the idea of the government having the right to execute humans. Any power given to a government body is power that we are giving to other humans. They don't change in to something else when they become government officials. If we instituted the back alley executions mentioned above then over time leadership would change and that power would start getting abused.
Like so many other government power we already see abused today. All a person would have to do is claim that a person was guilty of some sort of crime that will stimulate an emotion response from people and they could justify killing anyone.
Said better than I could0 -
I despise this sick monster but at the end of the day we are better than him. No punishment whatsoever will take away the pain and misery he inflicted upon his victims.
I do know that it would cost us taxpayers more to get this guy run through death row then it would for use to house him for 40 years.
I don't have all the answers and I agree with the sentiment behind what you are all saying.
I just don't like the idea of the government having the right to execute humans. Any power given to a government body is power that we are giving to other humans. They don't change in to something else when they become government officials. If we instituted the back alley executions mentioned above then over time leadership would change and that power would start getting abused.
Like so many other government power we already see abused today. All a person would have to do is claim that a person was guilty of some sort of crime that will stimulate an emotion response from people and they could justify killing anyone.
/endthread0 -
I cannot fathom how someone like him has the audacity to say "I'm not a violent predator… I'm not a monster, I'm a normal person."????
I was staring at my computer screen in disbelief when I read it.0 -
I cannot fathom how someone like him has the audacity to say "I'm not a violent predator… I'm not a monster, I'm a normal person."????
I was staring at my computer screen in disbelief when I read it.0 -
Im a firm believer in the death penalty. He should be killed. And not in a humane manner but that's just me
YES THIS!0 -
I actually believe him when he said sometime the women asked for sex. If you're a prisoner it's in your interest to curry favor with your captor, in the hope that he would not kill you, would beat you less, or let his guard down and give you a chance to escape. Given the circumstances only an idiot would consider the sex consensual.
We might never know what happened that fateful day when she managed to go to the front door, but without a doubt the monster let his guard down and got careless that day.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions