HFCS to be 'renamed.'
bacardigirl
Posts: 17 Member
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39169416/?GT1=43001
It still doesn't make it any better for you!!!
It still doesn't make it any better for you!!!
0
Replies
-
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39169416/?GT1=43001
It still doesn't make it any better for you!!!
Agreed. Sticking feathers on a pig does not give it the ability to fly....0 -
Well at least I know to be on the look out for "Corn Sugar" and "HFCS"
Thanks for the article!0 -
seriously! Do they think we're stupid?0
-
Thanks for the heads up! The FDA needs to get off of their fat butts and ban this crap already.0
-
I think it's been renamed already? Saw "corn sugar" on a package the other day and thought "well that's HFCS".0
-
seriously! Do they think we're stupid?
Yes they do.0 -
I think it's kind of ironic that they're trying to convince people it's no worse than "regular" (cane) sugar. This may be true, but I've researched how regular sugar is made, and I'm avoiding that too! Both cane sugar and HFCS/corn sugar are highly processed sugars that have no nutritional value and don't resemble what they came from in any way. This is NOT a good selling point to me.
The sugar industry (corn, cane, whatever) probably hates people like me, who've woken up and realized that I don't NEED or WANT added sugars in my life. I get plenty of natural sugar from fruit and some veggies, and I don't feel like most food needs to be sweet to be delicious.0 -
seriously! Do they think we're stupid?
Yes they do.
I think there are people out there who really are. Like how they don't always call MSG 'MSG'. Some people are just too lazy to care. Sad.0 -
Thanks for the heads up! The FDA needs to get off of their fat butts and ban this crap already.0
-
Thanks for the heads up! The FDA needs to get off of their fat butts and ban this crap already.
Well that's also a given. There is so many things messed up with our country its not funny. Especially because no one with power seems to think it needs to be addressed. Its just sad. I'm just glad the people are waking up...slowly but surely, we'll get our way...hopefully.0 -
bump, thanks! gonna read it later, not eat it, read it!:sick:0
-
Thanks for the heads up! The FDA needs to get off of their fat butts and ban this crap already.
The FDA is never going to ban it as long as Big Pharma and Con Agra are in their back pockets................
HFCS is going to keep America Fat and Unhealthy which = Big Pharma and lots of expensive meds that have side effects, which leads to more meds.....................see the cycle that is going...........
And Con Agra, I won' t even get started on them.0 -
Thanks for the heads up! The FDA needs to get off of their fat butts and ban this crap already.0
-
This ranks right up there with those stupid commercials they have been running lately. "Letting parents know" that it's okay to feed your kids HFCS...0
-
I think it's kind of ironic that they're trying to convince people it's no worse than "regular" (cane) sugar. This may be true, but I've researched how regular sugar is made, and I'm avoiding that too! Both cane sugar and HFCS/corn sugar are highly processed sugars that have no nutritional value and don't resemble what they came from in any way. This is NOT a good selling point to me.
The sugar industry (corn, cane, whatever) probably hates people like me, who've woken up and realized that I don't NEED or WANT added sugars in my life. I get plenty of natural sugar from fruit and some veggies, and I don't feel like most food needs to be sweet to be delicious.
Exactly!!!!
People's taste buds don't even know what true tastes are.......................until they go all natural...........0 -
I guess I'm the only one who doesn't get what is so bad about the renaming of HFCS. Yep, cane sugar and "corn sugar" are pretty bad for you. "Fruit sugar?" Also bad for you (but it comes along on the back of so many nice vitamins & fiber!).
The reason I don't have much of a problem with the renaming is that people have in their heads that HFCS is SATAN and then they ignorantly choose something equally as bad for them just because it's sweetened with cane sugar instead. When you stop and really think about it, there isn't so much wrong with levelling the playing field between 2 substances that are pretty equally detrimental to your health.
My problem is that there's such a better use for the money being spent on this campaign. Perhaps those funds would be better spent educating people that all kinds of sugar can be detrimental to your health and that you should look out for not only HFCS, but also cane sugar and honey and excessive consumption of fruit & juice, etc. Or maybe put the money to use feeding the hungry or giving it to some other charitable cause. But you know, folks with stakes in the corn industry can do whatever they want to do with their own money just as I can do whatever with mine.0 -
bump0
-
Question: "How do you spell CR@P?"
Answer: "HFCS"--no matter WHAT they want to call it!!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions