question about weight watchers

WarmDontBurn
WarmDontBurn Posts: 1,253 Member
edited September 21 in Health and Weight Loss
I have no clue about any of it but I am curious is it the same as calorie counting? I got the impression that you get meals worth points and you are allowed so many points. To me it sounds like calorie counting simplified and without the extra cost. Is that correct?

Replies

  • Aeriel
    Aeriel Posts: 864 Member
    There is a cost, as you have to pay a monthly fee to be a member. Other than that, people say that is it similar in the approach, but you have a bit more control with calorie counting and measuring I think.
  • ptdr
    ptdr Posts: 25 Member
    It's been awhile since I was a member. But when I was a member (back in 2008); you would look at 3 values on all your food nutrient value list. Calories, Fat, Dietary Fiber. They give you a device that calculates these 3 values to find out how many points the food you want to eat is. And the point value it gives you is per serving. So let's say you look up the point value for a gallon of ice cream and it reads 6 points. That is for the serving size NOT the whole gallon.

    The great thing about WW is that alot of brands put the Point Value on their packaging (Healthy Choice Soup/Lean Cuisine/Smart Ones/ etc).

    Out of everything that I have tried, WW is my favorite beside myfitnesspal.com. You lose weight at a reasonable amount of time to avoid gaining it back, it's really not a diet but a lifestyle change, and the meetings give you support that some people need to get through it.

    Good luck!
  • ghalliday
    ghalliday Posts: 46 Member
    Points values of foods are calculated by the number of calories & saturated fat in the food ...... using a specific calculator. A similar concept, yet you work on points vlaues....& can save points values for the wkend etc. You earn extra points by exercising, just as you earn extra calories for exercise. I agree you have to be careful with portion sizes and packaging etc.....yet this is the same with watching calories. I lost almost 6 stone on weight watchers a few years ago.....so it definately works!!!! :-)
  • MariSama44
    MariSama44 Posts: 340 Member
    When I was in high school, I went to Weight Watchers with my mom every week. The point system then seemed effective to me, and I did loose a good bit of weight doing it. However, when we stopped attending the meetings and weigh in every week, the poundage came right back. While they're system works, it lacks the tools and education you need to make your change permanent in the long run (atleast for me). Some people have been successful, bit when I started my fitness pal in December of last year, I gave calorie counting and exercising a try. I have lost more weight by changing my attitude and lifestyle than with any diet, though I have to say, weight watchers did help me when I used it.

    In my opinion, Weight Watchers DOES NOT:

    Stress the idea of a permanent healthy lifestyle (They want you to need the program for a long time to make money)
    The program doesnt teach you to eat clean or wholesome (one of their favorite slogans is "you can eat whatever you want!")
    The program costs money and has you looking for their brand name in the grocery store, as well as other places
    Teach the indivudual what is BEHIND the point system, what types of nutrients they need to look for and avoid.
    Encourage individual will-power, strength and self esteem through real education (again, they want you to need them)

    This is why it didnt work for me, and why educating myself and making the change on my own time with MFP has worked instead. I dont think it should cost money to be healthy, I think every person (especially in the US!!) should have free access to the knowledge they need to empower themselves and take care of their own bodies.
  • I tried WW and wasn't a big fan. Only have 23 points per day was a lot more intimidating then being allowed 1200 calories per day. On WW I felt like I was depriving and starving myself. I would yo yo back and forth. The most I lost was 10 lbs but that number would fall and then rise and then fall. WW also only looks at calories, fat, and fiber. So you have no idea how much sodium or sugar, etc you are consuming which can also hinder your weight loss.

    Just my experience.
  • FoamyRiver
    FoamyRiver Posts: 276 Member
    WW is essentially the same. But the one thing that I believe has made a HUGE difference in my weight loss, and overall feeling better, is that MFP allows you to customize what you keep track of; it's not just calories and fat grams. I have high blood pressure and I like the fact that I can keep up with my sodium intake each day.
  • cj0725
    cj0725 Posts: 28 Member
    I am currently in WW. I much prefer MFP (free and easier). The only thing I get from the meetings is having someone else tracking my weight for me - so not worth the cost.

    I have the application on my phone for both programs, but I never use the WW one. MFP is a much more user friendly program. For me, the points seem to hover right around my daily calorie goal of 1200.

    Once this session of our WW is done, I will not go back, unless my friend I go with asks me to.

    Also, I find more motivation and inspiration on the message boards on here than I do at any 1/2 hour long meeting. CJ
  • tiptoe6
    tiptoe6 Posts: 68 Member
    I did WW online, for about 16-ish bucks a month? After a down payment. Something like that. The point system is based on calories, fat, and fiber. I did it twice and had some results; moreso the first time. They have a community area like MFP, but I have found MFP's to be more effective. So far, I still choose this over that. I feel like I have a tad more control; especially during plateaus. I like the flexibility. Although, some like the accountability that weighing in at meetings give you. I would just not go to the meetings as easily as I wouldn't sign into a site like this. This I can do much more conveniently and have had great results, thus far. Good luck :)
This discussion has been closed.