Are these results real?

2»

Replies

  • DavPul
    DavPul Posts: 61,406 Member
    Well, my apologies. I thought these message boards were here for support. I won't make that mistake again.

    No problem. We all make mistakes sometimes. Live and learn
  • HeinekenMan
    HeinekenMan Posts: 80 Member
    To be honest, I can't tell much from those photos. I think it's great that you're proud of your hard work and success. But I think the difference is difficult to measure right now. If you stick with it, I am sure the difference will be more noticeable in the future.
  • determinedbutlazy
    determinedbutlazy Posts: 1,941 Member
    Well, my apologies. I thought these message boards were here for support. I won't make that mistake again.

    "People are mean" thread in 5, 4, 3...
  • joshdann
    joshdann Posts: 618 Member
    Ok, whoa...let me clarify what I meant.

    I'm not asking for compliments. I appreciate the feedback--I agree that it could be bloat, food digestion, different lighting, etc. That's why I asked.

    I'm referring to the sarcastic comments about science and what I'm wearing. Maybe I misunderstood those posts.
    Those posts meant that the people find you attractive and would like to see more pictures of you scantily-clad. In one case, he seems to be angling for an increase in the scant factor. "for science" is a common term used to thinly veil an obvious attempt at something unscientific.

    TL;DR: You're hot, they noticed. Send more pics.
  • DavPul
    DavPul Posts: 61,406 Member
    Ok, whoa...let me clarify what I meant.

    I'm not asking for compliments. I appreciate the feedback--I agree that it could be bloat, food digestion, different lighting, etc. That's why I asked.

    I'm referring to the sarcastic comments about science and what I'm wearing. Maybe I misunderstood those posts.
    Those posts meant that the people find you attractive and would like to see more pictures of you scantily-clad. In one case, he seems to be angling for an increase in the scant factor. "for science" is a common term used to thinly veil an obvious attempt at something unscientific.

    TL;DR: You're hot, they noticed. Send more pics.

    Good call. That guy that asked for more pics seems shady.

    ......... Most definitely shady
  • joshdann
    joshdann Posts: 618 Member
    Good call. That guy that asked for more pics seems shady.

    ......... Most definitely shady
    I think I see what you did there.
  • linsey0689
    linsey0689 Posts: 753 Member
    You looks almost bloated in day one don't know if that is the case or not. But we all have our days where we look better than other. Also our cycles have something to do with it. Whatever it is great job, keep it up! :)
  • Cadori
    Cadori Posts: 4,810 Member
    Ok, whoa...let me clarify what I meant.

    I'm not asking for compliments. I appreciate the feedback--I agree that it could be bloat, food digestion, different lighting, etc. That's why I asked.

    I'm referring to the sarcastic comments about science and what I'm wearing. Maybe I misunderstood those posts.
    Those posts meant that the people find you attractive and would like to see more pictures of you scantily-clad. In one case, he seems to be angling for an increase in the scant factor. "for science" is a common term used to thinly veil an obvious attempt at something unscientific.

    TL;DR: You're hot, they noticed. Send more pics.

    Good call. That guy that asked for more pics seems shady.

    ......... Most definitely shady

    In...
    ...for more shady Jof
    ...for Science


    OP - things requested "for science" are frequently a compliment. Scantily clad pictures for science is an MFP wold whistle.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Ok, whoa...let me clarify what I meant.

    I'm not asking for compliments. I appreciate the feedback--I agree that it could be bloat, food digestion, different lighting, etc. That's why I asked.

    I'm referring to the sarcastic comments about science and what I'm wearing. Maybe I misunderstood those posts.
    Those posts meant that the people find you attractive and would like to see more pictures of you scantily-clad. In one case, he seems to be angling for an increase in the scant factor. "for science" is a common term used to thinly veil an obvious attempt at something unscientific.

    TL;DR: You're hot, they noticed. Send more pics.

    Good call. That guy that asked for more pics seems shady.

    ......... Most definitely shady

    In...
    ...for more shady Jof
    ...for Science


    OP - things requested "for science" are frequently a compliment. Scantily clad pictures for science is an MFP wold whistle.

    And to clarify, a "wold" is like a Wolf but with the D.
  • Cadori
    Cadori Posts: 4,810 Member
    Ok, whoa...let me clarify what I meant.

    I'm not asking for compliments. I appreciate the feedback--I agree that it could be bloat, food digestion, different lighting, etc. That's why I asked.

    I'm referring to the sarcastic comments about science and what I'm wearing. Maybe I misunderstood those posts.
    Those posts meant that the people find you attractive and would like to see more pictures of you scantily-clad. In one case, he seems to be angling for an increase in the scant factor. "for science" is a common term used to thinly veil an obvious attempt at something unscientific.

    TL;DR: You're hot, they noticed. Send more pics.

    Good call. That guy that asked for more pics seems shady.

    ......... Most definitely shady

    In...
    ...for more shady Jof
    ...for Science


    OP - things requested "for science" are frequently a compliment. Scantily clad pictures for science is an MFP wold whistle.

    And to clarify, a "wold" is like a Wolf but with the D.

    Exactly. Those pesky letters are right next to each other. :laugh:
  • Gee_24
    Gee_24 Posts: 359 Member
    I sometimes have " lean " days myself where I really see my new loss. Then a few days later I feel as if I look a stone heavier again.

    I think these aren't " results " this early in the game, but your having a hydrated-very-well sort of day. :-)

    Stick to this new regime, as its obviously working for you. Your looking GREAT!
  • jofjltncb6
    jofjltncb6 Posts: 34,415 Member
    Ok, whoa...let me clarify what I meant.

    I'm not asking for compliments. I appreciate the feedback--I agree that it could be bloat, food digestion, different lighting, etc. That's why I asked.

    I'm referring to the sarcastic comments about science and what I'm wearing. Maybe I misunderstood those posts.
    Those posts meant that the people find you attractive and would like to see more pictures of you scantily-clad. In one case, he seems to be angling for an increase in the scant factor. "for science" is a common term used to thinly veil an obvious attempt at something unscientific.

    TL;DR: You're hot, they noticed. Send more pics.

    Good call. That guy that asked for more pics seems shady.

    ......... Most definitely shady

    DavPul just called me shady.

    =\