If Obama decides to attqck syria. Im fleeing
Options
whiteberry17
Posts: 124
in Chit-Chat
Am I the only one whos afraid of what obama is going to decide? If they decide to attack, everyone is going to gain up on America.
0
Replies
-
Where you going to go?0
-
Somewhere where I wont get bombed. Like maybe finnland0
-
lol ok. have fun0
-
Welp we are. #breakingnews :P0
-
This thread may not end well........0
-
Here in the UK we our government decided to not intervene in Syria, thankfully.
Giving these hardcore Jihadists more excuses to commit domestic terrorism in the West is the last thing we need.0 -
He is a lot more hawkish than I expected him to be when first elected.....fortunately0
-
Frankly, having just heard Obama's speech, all I can say is that he's totally nuts. Has he learned nothing from Afghanistan? You simply can't win in that region; get rid of one nutjob head of state and an even nuttier bunch of fundamentalists drop into the vacuum. When it comes to the Middle East, a thousand years of strife should have taught the West to leave well alone.
I'm absolutely thankful to our UK parliament for voting against action. You're on your own on this one America!0 -
:frown: iam moving to Canada.
Nobama0 -
Is there some way I can profit by betting against the people who say they're going to move?0
-
Frankly, having just heard Obama's speech, all I can say is that he's totally nuts. Has he learned nothing from Afghanistan? You simply can't win in that region; get rid of one nutjob head of state and an even nuttier bunch of fundamentalists drop into the vacuum. When it comes to the Middle East, a thousand years of strife should have taught the West to leave well alone.
I'm absolutely thankful to our UK parliament for voting against action. You're on your own on this one America!
Thank you.0 -
I suspect OP may be in Syria. If so, fleeing may be a good option. I'd worry more about the Syrian government than Obama though.0
-
Is there some way I can profit by betting against the people who say they're going to move?
yes, since none of them will ACTUALLY move haha0 -
Here in the UK we our government decided to not intervene in Syria, thankfully.
Giving these hardcore Jihadists more excuses to commit domestic terrorism in the West is the last thing we need.
um....
Do you really believe this will give them ANOTHER reason????
Wake up. They don't need another reason. Sit back and let Syria use chemical weapons on its own people or act, doesn't matter. Jihad will not be affected either way.0 -
Is there some way I can profit by betting against the people who say they're going to move?
Can't blame them for wanting to. American bombs Syria.....Syria bombs Israel........and begin ****storm.0 -
Frankly, having just heard Obama's speech, all I can say is that he's totally nuts. Has he learned nothing from Afghanistan? You simply can't win in that region; get rid of one nutjob head of state and an even nuttier bunch of fundamentalists drop into the vacuum. When it comes to the Middle East, a thousand years of strife should have taught the West to leave well alone.
I'm absolutely thankful to our UK parliament for voting against action. You're on your own on this one America!
Syria is a UN member. The UN has a blanket ban against chemical weapons.
So if the Syrian government is indeed using chemical weapons, what should be done? If the UN does nothing then its conventions and treaties are meaningless.0 -
So the world should do nothing while a country gasses 1,500 innocent men, women and children in violation of international law and human decency? We should shrug our shoulders and say "Not our business"? Perhaps just wag our fingers at them and say "Bad dictator! But don't worry - there will be no repercussions. Carry on."
The US is already the bulls eye in every single Jihadist target. Nothing's going to change that. I have to say I'm disappointed in the UK's decision to condone these actions. I mean, even France thinks we should do something about it.0 -
Looks like the US is moving forward... But Obama just said he's going to ask for congressional approval. That's a good move but Congress may say no. Good move regardless.0
-
So the world should do nothing while a country gasses 1,500 innocent men, women and children in violation of international law and human decency? We should shrug our shoulders and say "Not our business"? Perhaps just wag our fingers at them and say "Bad dictator! But don't worry - there will be no repercussions. Carry on."
FYI, chemical weapons have been used in Syria 14 times before and nothing was done then. Obama has also come out stating he wants to strike and the UN weapon's inspectors haven't even reported their findings yet.
Then we have all the other acts of genocide around the world that we (the West) did absolutely f-all about.
A cynic may say that the West only tends to get involved when the country's location has strategic value or resources we'd really rather like to continue syphoning off.0 -
I am so, so thankful I am from the UK. Having a parliamentary debate was the right move, and demonstrates true democracy. We are learning our lessons from the disaster that was the Iraq war.
Enjoy your pseudo- democracy, Americans0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 402 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 998 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions