Organic vs. Non-organic

2

Replies

  • tonyrocks922
    tonyrocks922 Posts: 172 Member
    i swear sometimes this forum feels like the break room at the DMV
  • floppybackend
    floppybackend Posts: 52 Member
    I'm UK based so the farming rules are a lot stricter here and believe me when it comes to UK farming its one of the best in the world for strictness, traceability, welfare and rules.

    When it comes to eggs - yes absolutely as the practice is fantastic against barn fed. Lamb and beef is pretty much the same, pork again not fantastic as its mainly barn (not free range as labelled). With meat in the UK antibiotics or any form of addition is not legally allowed. Animals are still given medicines and really with the price of meds and vets not many are keen to use them.

    Again when it comes to land UK farmers are not continually spraying the land (too expensive) its the stocking density and fallow land which is better. Organic (under soil association label) as a label is based on land management as there is little difference between animal welfare. I have been on many organic farms and seen some very bad practices.t

    We have the EU to bow down to on rules and reg. I do agree organic is a fantastic concept but would only work if the public accepted that food prices would have to have a massive hike and see less food available.

    I do try to buy organic veg if I see it, and I do like to see old varieties which have more taste and prob more value.

    Pretty well pointless if you live most of yr life using non-organic, use household sprays & perfumes, non-organic clothing, live close to a pollution etc etc.

    I would concentrate on buying quality foods direct from cottage industry suppliers, farmers markets, and making more of yr own from scratch.
  • Weeblessings
    Weeblessings Posts: 38 Member
    Commerical dyes have long been known to cause health issues. In Europe many of our popular foods are made dye free over there. I'm not saying these are healthy, just that they are made without petroluem (sp) commerical dyes: Kraft Mac n Cheese is made with yellow dye 5 and 6 here in the US, NOT in Europe. Fruit Loops is made with natrual dyes over in Europe, it's commercial dyes like Red 40 here. Ever wonder why commercial pickles here in the US have dyes yellow 5 and 6? Or commercial cereals have BHT as a preservative...which is also used in Jet Airline fuel. In Europe, it's been long known that yellow 5 causes problems with people who suffer from Asthma...so any products that go into that country with yellow 5 has to have a warning label....guess what? That doesn't happen here.

    In my family we grow as much of our own produce as possible, by from farmer's markets, and trusted sources. We also follow a program called Feingold Diet. www.feingold.org it's a diet developed back in the 70's that takes out dyes, preservatives, artifical junk and etc for kids/adults who suffer from ADHD...and now it's been show to benefit a lot of other people. We also avoid anything with HFCS, and due to food allergies avoid gluten, dairy, eggs and peanuts for our meals/most snacks.
  • tonyrocks922
    tonyrocks922 Posts: 172 Member
    Or commercial cereals have BHT as a preservative...which is also used in Jet Airline fuel.

    Dihydrogen monoxide is an ingredient in many foods and is also used in concrete, cleaning products, and in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. You should avoid that too.
  • Frank_Just_Frank
    Frank_Just_Frank Posts: 454 Member
    Or commercial cereals have BHT as a preservative...which is also used in Jet Airline fuel.

    Dihydrogen monoxide is an ingredient in many foods and is also used in concrete, cleaning products, and in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. You should avoid that too.

    I miss Penn & Teller!
  • chadraeder3
    chadraeder3 Posts: 279 Member
    Or commercial cereals have BHT as a preservative...which is also used in Jet Airline fuel.

    Dihydrogen monoxide is an ingredient in many foods and is also used in concrete, cleaning products, and in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. You should avoid that too.

    I miss Penn & Teller!

    I will second that BS was a great show. It is amazing the things people will believe without any proof or evidence. I think I would know a little more about produce then the average city dweller since I grew up on a farm and still help the family out, waiting for the neighbor to sell so I can buy my own farm and start my winery.
  • magerum
    magerum Posts: 12,589 Member
    Which is better organic or non-organic? Where do you like to shop for produce and other groceries? Do you eat organic or non-organic foods and drinks? I just got back from whole foods. I bought a lot of organic stuff. I just read an article about preservatives in our food. How they use stuff like tar and beetle skin to dye our foods. Plus it is harmful for our health. Certain food dyes and preservatives cause health issues such as ADHD and certain cancers and diabetes and other health issues. So, I am starting to go the organic route.

    All nonsense.
  • magerum
    magerum Posts: 12,589 Member
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/998983-misconceptions-of-organic-food-s


    Read the links below. I pulled out the more important ones. Stuff labeled "Organic" isn't what you think.

    Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

    http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=3f34f4c22f9aa8e6d9864cc2683cea02&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title07/7cfr205_main_02.tpl


    § 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production.

    http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9bfd46a9344e3e012d60638859ce1ded&rgn=div8&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7.354.2&idno=7

    § 205.603 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic livestock production.

    http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9bfd46a9344e3e012d60638859ce1ded&rgn=div8&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7.354.4&idno=7

    § 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in or on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).”

    http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9bfd46a9344e3e012d60638859ce1ded&rgn=div8&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7.354.6&idno=7

    § 205.606 Nonorganically produced agricultural products allowed as ingredients in or on processed products labeled as “organic.”

    http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9bfd46a9344e3e012d60638859ce1ded&rgn=div8&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7.354.7&idno=
  • magerum
    magerum Posts: 12,589 Member
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/996243-still-think-eating-organic-isn-t-worth-it

    § 205.603 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic livestock production.
    In accordance with restrictions specified in this section the following synthetic substances may be used in organic livestock production:

    (a) As disinfectants, sanitizer, and medical treatments as applicable.

    (1) Alcohols.

    (i) Ethanol-disinfectant and sanitizer only, prohibited as a feed additive.

    (ii) Isopropanol-disinfectant only.

    (2) Aspirin-approved for health care use to reduce inflammation.

    (3) Atropine (CAS #-51-55-8)—federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the lawful written or oral order of a licensed veterinarian, in full compliance with the AMDUCA and 21 CFR part 530 of the Food and Drug Administration regulations. Also, for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires:

    (i) Use by or on the lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian; and

    (ii) A meat withdrawal period of at least 56 days after administering to livestock intended for slaughter; and a milk discard period of at least 12 days after administering to dairy animals.

    (4) Biologics—Vaccines.

    (5) Butorphanol (CAS #-42408-82-2)—federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the lawful written or oral order of a licensed veterinarian, in full compliance with the AMDUCA and 21 CFR part 530 of the Food and Drug Administration regulations. Also, for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires:

    (i) Use by or on the lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian; and

    (ii) A meat withdrawal period of at least 42 days after administering to livestock intended for slaughter; and a milk discard period of at least 8 days after administering to dairy animals.

    (6) Chlorhexidine—Allowed for surgical procedures conducted by a veterinarian. Allowed for use as a teat dip when alternative germicidal agents and/or physical barriers have lost their effectiveness.

    (7) Chlorine materials—disinfecting and sanitizing facilities and equipment. Residual chlorine levels in the water shall not exceed the maximum residual disinfectant limit under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

    (i) Calcium hypochlorite.

    (ii) Chlorine dioxide.

    (iii) Sodium hypochlorite.

    (8) Electrolytes—without antibiotics.

    (9) Flunixin (CAS #-38677-85-9)—in accordance with approved labeling; except that for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires a withdrawal period of at least two-times that required by the FDA.

    (10) Furosemide (CAS #-54-31-9)—in accordance with approved labeling; except that for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires a withdrawal period of at least two-times that required that required by the FDA.

    (11) Glucose.

    (12) Glycerine—Allowed as a livestock teat dip, must be produced through the hydrolysis of fats or oils.

    (13) Hydrogen peroxide.

    (14) Iodine.

    (15) Magnesium hydroxide (CAS #-1309-42-8)—federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the lawful written or oral order of a licensed veterinarian, in full compliance with the AMDUCA and 21 CFR part 530 of the Food and Drug Administration regulations. Also, for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires use by or on the lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian.

    (16) Magnesium sulfate.

    (17) Oxytocin—use in postparturition therapeutic applications.

    (18) Parasiticides—Prohibited in slaughter stock, allowed in emergency treatment for dairy and breeder stock when organic system plan-approved preventive management does not prevent infestation. Milk or milk products from a treated animal cannot be labeled as provided for in subpart D of this part for 90 days following treatment. In breeder stock, treatment cannot occur during the last third of gestation if the progeny will be sold as organic and must not be used during the lactation period for breeding stock.

    (i) Fenbendazole (CAS # 43210-67-9)—only for use by or on the lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian.

    (ii) Ivermectin (CAS # 70288-86-7).

    (iii) Moxidectin (CAS # 113507-06-5)—for control of internal parasites only.

    (19) Peroxyacetic/peracetic acid (CAS #-79-21-0)—for sanitizing facility and processing equipment.

    (20) Phosphoric acid—allowed as an equipment cleaner, Provided , That, no direct contact with organically managed livestock or land occurs.

    (21) Poloxalene (CAS #-9003-11-6)—for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires that poloxalene only be used for the emergency treatment of bloat.

    (22) Tolazoline (CAS #-59-98-3)—federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the lawful written or oral order of a licensed veterinarian, in full compliance with the AMDUCA and 21 CFR part 530 of the Food and Drug Administration regulations. Also, for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires:

    (i) Use by or on the lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian;

    (ii) Use only to reverse the effects of sedation and analgesia caused by Xylazine; and

    (iii) A meat withdrawal period of at least 8 days after administering to livestock intended for slaughter; and a milk discard period of at least 4 days after administering to dairy animals.

    (23) Xylazine (CAS #-7361-61-7)—federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the lawful written or oral order of a licensed veterinarian, in full compliance with the AMDUCA and 21 CFR part 530 of the Food and Drug Administration regulations. Also, for use under 7 CFR part 205, the NOP requires:

    (i) Use by or on the lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian;

    (ii) The existence of an emergency; and

    (iii) A meat withdrawal period of at least 8 days after administering to livestock intended for slaughter; and a milk discard period of at least 4 days after administering to dairy animals.

    (b) As topical treatment, external parasiticide or local anesthetic as applicable.

    (1) Copper sulfate.

    (2) Formic acid (CAS # 64-18-6)—for use as a pesticide solely within honeybee hives.

    (3) Iodine.

    (4) Lidocaine—as a local anesthetic. Use requires a withdrawal period of 90 days after administering to livestock intended for slaughter and 7 days after administering to dairy animals.

    (5) Lime, hydrated—as an external pest control, not permitted to cauterize physical alterations or deodorize animal wastes.

    (6) Mineral oil—for topical use and as a lubricant.

    (7) Procaine—as a local anesthetic, use requires a withdrawal period of 90 days after administering to livestock intended for slaughter and 7 days after administering to dairy animals.

    (8) Sucrose octanoate esters (CAS #s-42922-74-7; 58064-47-4)—in accordance with approved labeling.

    (c) As feed supplements—None.

    (d) As feed additives.

    (1) DL-Methionine, DL-Methionine-hydroxy analog, and DL-Methionine-hydroxy analog calcium (CAS #'s 59-51-8, 583-91-5, 4857-44-7, and 922-50-9)—for use only in organic poultry production at the following maximum levels of synthetic methionine per ton of feed: Laying and broiler chickens—2 pounds; turkeys and all other poultry—3 pounds.

    (2) Trace minerals, used for enrichment or fortification when FDA approved.

    (3) Vitamins, used for enrichment or fortification when FDA approved.

    (e) As synthetic inert ingredients as classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for use with nonsynthetic substances or synthetic substances listed in this section and used as an active pesticide ingredient in accordance with any limitations on the use of such substances.

    (1) EPA List 4—Inerts of Minimal Concern.

    (2) [Reserved]

    (f) Excipients, only for use in the manufacture of drugs used to treat organic livestock when the excipient is: Identified by the FDA as Generally Recognized As Safe; Approved by the FDA as a food additive; or Included in the FDA review and approval of a New Animal Drug Application or New Drug Application.
  • magerum
    magerum Posts: 12,589 Member
    Here's a, partial, list of substances allowed by the USDA to be used on food and still be labeled "Organic", which includes pesticides:

    (a) As algicide, disinfectants, and sanitizer, including irrigation system cleaning systems.

    (1) Alcohols.

    (i) Ethanol.

    (ii) Isopropanol.

    (2) Chlorine materials—For pre-harvest use, residual chlorine levels in the water in direct crop contact or as water from cleaning irrigation systems applied to soil must not exceed the maximum residual disinfectant limit under the Safe Drinking Water Act, except that chlorine products may be used in edible sprout production according to EPA label directions.

    (i) Calcium hypochlorite.

    (ii) Chlorine dioxide.

    (iii) Sodium hypochlorite.

    (3) Copper sulfate—for use as an algicide in aquatic rice systems, is limited to one application per field during any 24-month period. Application rates are limited to those which do not increase baseline soil test values for copper over a timeframe agreed upon by the producer and accredited certifying agent.

    (4) Hydrogen peroxide.

    (5) Ozone gas—for use as an irrigation system cleaner only.

    (6) Peracetic acid—for use in disinfecting equipment, seed, and asexually propagated planting material.

    (7) Soap-based algicide/demossers.

    (8) Sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate (CAS #-15630-89-4)—Federal law restricts the use of this substance in food crop production to approved food uses identified on the product label.

    (b) As herbicides, weed barriers, as applicable.

    (1) Herbicides, soap-based—for use in farmstead maintenance (roadways, ditches, right of ways, building perimeters) and ornamental crops.

    (2) Mulches.

    (i) Newspaper or other recycled paper, without glossy or colored inks.

    (ii) Plastic mulch and covers (petroleum-based other than polyvinyl chloride (PVC)).

    (c) As compost feedstocks—Newspapers or other recycled paper, without glossy or colored inks.

    (d) As animal repellents—Soaps, ammonium—for use as a large animal repellant only, no contact with soil or edible portion of crop.

    (e) As insecticides (including acaricides or mite control).

    (1) Ammonium carbonate—for use as bait in insect traps only, no direct contact with crop or soil.

    (2) Aqueous potassium silicate (CAS #-1312-76-1)—the silica, used in the manufacture of potassium silicate, must be sourced from naturally occurring sand.

    (3) Boric acid—structural pest control, no direct contact with organic food or crops.

    (4) Copper sulfate—for use as tadpole shrimp control in aquatic rice production, is limited to one application per field during any 24-month period. Application rates are limited to levels which do not increase baseline soil test values for copper over a timeframe agreed upon by the producer and accredited certifying agent.

    (5) Elemental sulfur.

    (6) Lime sulfur—including calcium polysulfide.

    (7) Oils, horticultural—narrow range oils as dormant, suffocating, and summer oils.

    (8) Soaps, insecticidal.

    (9) Sticky traps/barriers.

    (10) Sucrose octanoate esters (CAS #s—42922-74-7; 58064-47-4)—in accordance with approved labeling.

    (f) As insect management. Pheromones.

    (g) As rodenticides. Vitamin D3 .

    (h) As slug or snail bait. Ferric phosphate (CAS # 10045-86-0).

    (i) As plant disease control.

    (1) Aqueous potassium silicate (CAS #-1312-76-1)—the silica, used in the manufacture of potassium silicate, must be sourced from naturally occurring sand.

    (2) Coppers, fixed—copper hydroxide, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, includes products exempted from EPA tolerance, Provided, That, copper-based materials must be used in a manner that minimizes accumulation in the soil and shall not be used as herbicides.

    (3) Copper sulfate—Substance must be used in a manner that minimizes accumulation of copper in the soil.

    (4) Hydrated lime.

    (5) Hydrogen peroxide.

    (6) Lime sulfur.

    (7) Oils, horticultural, narrow range oils as dormant, suffocating, and summer oils.

    (8) Peracetic acid—for use to control fire blight bacteria.

    (9) Potassium bicarbonate.

    (10) Elemental sulfur.

    (11) Streptomycin, for fire blight control in apples and pears only until October 21, 2014.

    (12) Tetracycline, for fire blight control in apples and pears only until October 21, 2014.

    (j) As plant or soil amendments.

    (1) Aquatic plant extracts (other than hydrolyzed)—Extraction process is limited to the use of potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide; solvent amount used is limited to that amount necessary for extraction.

    (2) Elemental sulfur.

    (3) Humic acids—naturally occurring deposits, water and alkali extracts only.

    (4) Lignin sulfonate—chelating agent, dust suppressant.

    (5) Magnesium sulfate—allowed with a documented soil deficiency.

    (6) Micronutrients—not to be used as a defoliant, herbicide, or desiccant. Those made from nitrates or chlorides are not allowed. Soil deficiency must be documented by testing.

    (i) Soluble boron products.

    (ii) Sulfates, carbonates, oxides, or silicates of zinc, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, and cobalt.

    (7) Liquid fish products—can be pH adjusted with sulfuric, citric or phosphoric acid. The amount of acid used shall not exceed the minimum needed to lower the pH to 3.5.

    (8) Vitamins, B1 , C, and E.

    (9) Sulfurous acid (CAS # 7782-99-2) for on-farm generation of substance utilizing 99% purity elemental sulfur per paragraph (j)(2) of this section.

    (k) As plant growth regulators. Ethylene gas—for regulation of pineapple flowering.

    (l) As floating agents in postharvest handling.

    (1) Lignin sulfonate.

    (2) Sodium silicate—for tree fruit and fiber processing.

    (m) As synthetic inert ingredients as classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for use with nonsynthetic substances or synthetic substances listed in this section and used as an active pesticide ingredient in accordance with any limitations on the use of such substances.

    (1) EPA List 4—Inerts of Minimal Concern.

    (2) EPA List 3—Inerts of unknown toxicity—for use only in passive pheromone dispensers.

    (n) Seed preparations. Hydrogen chloride (CAS # 7647-01-0)—for delinting cotton seed for planting.

    (o) As production aids. Microcrystalline cheesewax (CAS #'s 64742-42-3, 8009-03-08, and 8002-74-2)-for use in log grown mushroom production. Must be made without either ethylene-propylene co-polymer or synthetic colors.

    http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=08ed863d93110c01cb0728f8070a052f&rgn=div8&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7.354.2&idno=7
  • BeachIron
    BeachIron Posts: 6,490 Member
    In for more self righteous anger and ranting, but I don't buy organic.

    It's against my principles in regard to not getting ripped off.
  • DuckieSteph
    DuckieSteph Posts: 43 Member
    If you have a local farmer's market, shop there. Local and smaller business is better than feeding the non-organic AND organic companies that both use pesticides and other chemicals on their food; plus the countless amounts of employees and machines that process those foods. Local is your best bet to have healthy, clean foods; without Hep A. ;)
  • BeachGingerOnTheRocks
    BeachGingerOnTheRocks Posts: 3,927 Member
    I wash my fruits and veggies, so I buy the cheapest that still looks fresh and smells yummy. Even at Walmart.
  • Weeblessings
    Weeblessings Posts: 38 Member
    Believe what you want, but this has come from a organization that has researched all of this stuff, companies fill out detailed information in order to be "approved" to have their products on the Feingold list. So it is the truth, otherwise this preservative would be okay for consumption. But it's not. It's not been okay for decades. Some people are okay to have this and commerical dyes, or other artifical crap. But others including myself and my 4 children are not. And I actually break out in hives with products having the preservative BHT and several others.
  • RunningRichelle
    RunningRichelle Posts: 346 Member
    In for more self righteous anger and ranting, but I don't buy organic.

    It's against my principles in regard to not getting ripped off.

    I also dislike paying more for organic.

    The US government subsidizes conventionally grown corn and soy. If sustainable farming methods were subsidized instead, there would be a price flip- McD would be $5 for a burger instead of $1, and a bunch of cauliflower not covered in honeybee-killing shiza would be 50 cents instead of $4.

    So we're kindof being ripped off already, because the taxes we pay are going to support all these chemicals getting put on/in our noms.
  • janebshaw
    janebshaw Posts: 168
    I try and buy organic as much as possible, especially on products where the prices aren't much different.
  • Hexahedra
    Hexahedra Posts: 894 Member
    I like organic stuff when I can afford it. My family has a history of cancer, so I try to shop organic for my daughter's food. However, I'm fully aware that organic food is a first-world issue; people in third world countries are happy to simply have enough food to eat, the cheaper the better.
  • amybg1
    amybg1 Posts: 631 Member
    I don't buy into the whole "organic" craze, we will support local farmer's markets/shop locally and IF we can find a sale or my brother brings home veggies from the farm he works at then we'll eat "organic" but you're really never sure if what you buy is organic or not no matter how deeply you look. So if it's affordable sure - if not cheaper but equally tasty and good-quality foods work for me!

    Though if you really want to go organic IMO grow your own produce
  • Hadabetter
    Hadabetter Posts: 942 Member
    This may come as a shock to many, but there are no reputable studies which show any health benefits from eating organic foods. To-date, the only demonstrated benefits are environmental, and ethical (animal rights).
  • theundead
    theundead Posts: 51 Member
    I buy some organic food because the alternatives have gmo (and there is no requirement in my country to list GMO) , or half the time it's US made and I'm trying to support Australian made products. But I do grow my own fruit and veg, or else get it from the local fruit and veg store (which is not organic but at least it's local compared to the big chain stores which a lot are imported).
    If I had it my way it would all be organic, but I don't and I'm poor. :sad:
  • slkehl
    slkehl Posts: 3,801 Member
    Pink Slime and Bug Juice: Funny food hypocrisy
    By: J. Justin Wilson
    Newspaper: The Washington Times

    Who could be in favor of eating “pink slime” or “bug juice”? Those are the clever hooks adopted by activist food snobs who raised ill-conceived firestorms about lean beef trimmings and cochineal red food dye.

    Now that America has had a moment to recover from the sensationalism, it’s time to take a more sober look at the facts behind these slime campaigns. Contrary to the overhyped reports, lean beef trimmings make meals healthier, safer, cost-efficient and less animal-intensive. Cochineal food dyes, while derived from bugs, are actually all-natural replacements for artificial colors.
    Right off the bat, the emphasis was on beef trimmings’ “yuck factor,” spurred along by a chorus of food snobs like cookbook author and columnist Mark Bittman, who urged the government on Twitter to outlaw lean beef trimmings on school lunch trays. Other activists who want meat off your plate, cream out of your coffee and leather off of your feet hyped up a campaign to get the all-natural dye out of Starbucks coffee drinks. Playing on fashionable prejudices against “processed food,” these people hoped to turn the “yuck factor” into an irrational boycott.

    Because trimmings gross out gourmands and bug-derived dyes offend vegans, they feel themselves entitled to take the products away from consumers and even shutter the businesses that provide them.

    But in slamming modern methods of food processing, these pundits can ironically contradict their philosophy’s own principles: making food safer, healthier and less animal-intensive.

    Beef trimmings are just that: the trimmings left on the bone after primary cuts of beef are butchered. As any butcher will tell you, people have used and eaten trimmings in sausages and hamburger for centuries. Thanks to contemporary innovations, processors now have ways to remove the fat. That’s right: Some of the same food activists who paint Americans as fatty food addicts have turned around and decried a process that makes the oft-maligned hamburger leaner.

    What about the safe, germ-killing treatment with ammonium hydroxide that also has come under criticism? The anti-germ process is actually widely used, in foods ranging from cheese to baked goods to chocolate candies.

    Where’s the outrage? Nowhere – because ammonium hydroxide is used as an anti-bacterial agent that actually makes our food supply safer.

    When it comes to lean beef trimmings, foodies are schizophrenic. On one hand, they generally lament that American farmers raise too many animals for food. Yet the same industries they tar are constantly researching and developing new ways to get more food out of the animals we eat.

    By efficiently using more meat from each cow, lean beef trimmings sustainably reduce our environmental impact and our slaughter rates. Ridding trimmings from school lunches alone means food pundits are signing a death warrant for 10,000 cows, the number needed to replace the meat that otherwise might be thrown out. Eliminate trimmings on a nationwide basis, and one estimate says we’ll need to slaughter an additional 1.5 million cows a year.

    Food snobs who make a living complaining about modern food processing are thrilled by the speed at which the attack on beef trimmings has gone viral on the Internet. Unfortunately, propaganda that passes for information moves so fast today that experts are handicapped getting the truth out. Meanwhile, rash decisions already have been made. Major supermarket chains, fearing a swift and ignorant reprisal, have announced that they will stop using lean beef trimmings.

    It’s often said that a lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth gets its shoes on. The distance traveled by bad information goes much farther and faster today.

    [J. Justin Wilson is senior research analyst at the Center for Consumer Freedom]
  • RoninLife
    RoninLife Posts: 64
    I try to buy organic fruits, veggies, eggs and especially dairy products, with no hormones and other yucky stuff. I have read that you don't have to buy everything organic. But I do go the dirty dozen list:

    The Dirty (loaded with varieties of pesticides)
    1. Peach
    2. Apple
    3. Bell Pepper
    4. Celery
    5. Nectarine
    6. Strawberries
    7. Cherries
    8. Kale
    9. Lettuce
    10. Grapes (Imported)
    11. Carrot
    12. Pear

    The Clean 15 (lowest in pesticides)
    1. Onion
    2. Avocado
    3. Sweet Corn
    4. Pineapple
    5. Mango
    6. Asparagus
    7. Sweet Peas
    8. Kiwi
    9. Cabbage
    10. Eggplant
    11. Papaya
    12. Watermelon
    13. Broccoli
    14. Tomato
    15. Sweet Potato
  • DrPepper000
    DrPepper000 Posts: 48 Member
    Whether or not it is advisable to buy local depends on where you live. In the Seattle area, we get Public Service Announcements telling us there is so much arsenic in the soil we should take our shoes off before entering the house. When I researched the advisability of buying local, I found out that the soil has so few minerals in it that you would suffer if you only ate local food. All soil is not created equal.
  • boognish1972
    boognish1972 Posts: 83 Member
    We eat as much organic as we can, raise our own chickens for eggs, have a big garden, hunt and fish for a good portion of our meat, and have a share in a local CSA (community supported agriculture). But it's hard to be 100% organic, and I still buy conventional items like tortilla chips, cheese, snacks, etc... I'd say we're about 90% organic though.
  • Organic > Non-Organic. Produce is where we really need to pay close attention. They have lists online, of certain fruits/vegetables that are more necessary to buy Organic than others, but I try and go the Organic route as often as I can. For packaged foods, I go by the list of ingredients. They don't ALL need to be organic, in my opinion, but the list should be minimal & you ought to be able to pronounce each ingredient! Milk + Eggs, I would also opt for Hormone-Free Organic. It's your body, and it deserves the best!
  • crystalnichle
    crystalnichle Posts: 126 Member
    I try to buy organic whenever possible..sometimes if its too expensive I'll just stick with non.
  • besaro
    besaro Posts: 1,858 Member
    oh noes!!! not again. [goes running from the room]
  • Markguns
    Markguns Posts: 554 Member
    Non-organic.

    That's like, rocks and metal and stuff, right?


    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :bigsmile:
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,024 Member
    Ironically all meat, vegetables and fruit are all organic. If they were non organic, they wouldn't have came off living matter. Now if your talking plastic fruit and vegetables........................

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • gracetillman
    gracetillman Posts: 190 Member
    You need to do whatever you feel is best for you and your family and not worry about what anyone else is doing or why. People are full of opinions and I have found they are very willing to share them regardless of the basis or support, if any, for those opinions. Other people will go through the internet and find "studies" or other articles which support their opinion -- don't really give any weight to who published, funded, or drafted the study or article.

    Do research on your own -- investigate the source of the information -- then make a decision for you. Don't give a hoot what anyone else does or doesn't do. Don't let other people's decisions affect your decision.