"US moves to ban trans fats in foods"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24856146

Thoughts?

Edit: It has been brought to my attention by another user that this article has been posted previously. I do apologize.

Replies

  • nomeejerome
    nomeejerome Posts: 2,616 Member
    This thread might not end well......
  • firefoxxie
    firefoxxie Posts: 381 Member
    This thread might not end well......
    We're just going to have to see...
  • wheird
    wheird Posts: 7,963 Member
    Good. Then we can move towards criminal penalties for pastry chefs and restaurants that serve fattening food.
  • ldrosophila
    ldrosophila Posts: 7,512 Member
    www.fda.gov that front page has consumer information and the press release
  • tonynguyen75
    tonynguyen75 Posts: 418 Member
    My city has had regulations on trans fat in food for years...
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    so what do we do about trans fat from fatty meat?
  • tonybalony01
    tonybalony01 Posts: 613 Member
    And that's why I only eat Krispy Kreme donuts.
    They're healthy.
    krispy-kreme-zero-trans-fat-.jpg
  • firefoxxie
    firefoxxie Posts: 381 Member
    My city has had regulations on trans fat in food for years...
    Interesting, what city is this? How does it effect your city and the residence?
  • flinchyny
    flinchyny Posts: 106 Member
    This is awesome. There is no good reason to "cook" with this stuff.
  • Confuzzled4ever
    Confuzzled4ever Posts: 2,860 Member
    And that's why I only eat Krispy Kreme donuts.
    They're healthy.
    krispy-kreme-zero-trans-fat-.jpg

    want- hot ones please
  • firefoxxie
    firefoxxie Posts: 381 Member
    Oh, my apologies. I had no awareness of this being posted previously.
  • KeViN_v2pt0
    KeViN_v2pt0 Posts: 375 Member
    This is awesome. There is no good reason to "cook" with this stuff.

    There are just as many good reasons to not.
  • shellma00
    shellma00 Posts: 1,684 Member
    And that's why I only eat Krispy Kreme donuts.
    They're healthy.
    krispy-kreme-zero-trans-fat-.jpg

    You had me at Krispy Kreme...
  • Erin_goBrahScience
    Erin_goBrahScience Posts: 1,215 Member
    Good. Then we can move towards criminal penalties for pastry chefs and restaurants that serve fattening food.

    :flowerforyou:
  • And that's why I only eat Krispy Kreme donuts.
    They're healthy.
    krispy-kreme-zero-trans-fat-.jpg

    Love the 2pt font "Per Serving." Should really say "0.4g Trans Fat [nanosize writing] Per Serving [/nanosize writing]"

    That being said...mmmm, donuts.
  • shining_light
    shining_light Posts: 384 Member
    I live in Canada. I don't think trans fats have been banned, per se, but most restaurants and food manufacturers are moving that way with changing cooking oils and things.

    For me, the biggest problem with trans fat labeling is that there's no distinction made between natural trans fats, as is listed as an area of concern in the other thread. I noted that my Greek yogurt has trans fats in it that come from nothing but the milk products.

    I really think people have this "want to have my cake and eat it too" mentality with their fast food. They want their delicious tasting junk to be "healthy" too. I think this is ridiculous behavior. Just try to prove to me that banning trans fats will have any discernible impact on people's overall health when they're still eating crap food.
  • love2cycle
    love2cycle Posts: 448 Member
    My thought is I should be in control of what I want to do with my food, what I want to eat and how I want to fix it. Even if you personally feel it is not right for you, it is not right to force that opinion on others. I personally don't like cigarette smoking and don't like being around people who smoke, but a smoker chooses that, and it is his/her business, not mine. Just because we don't like something, we should not cheer when other people's rights are affected.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    I would love it if they did this.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24856146

    Thoughts?

    Edit: It has been brought to my attention by another user that this article has been posted previously. I do apologize.

    So tired of the police-state mentality.
  • BillRicks1
    BillRicks1 Posts: 473 Member
    As always, it is the end consumer (you) who is responsible for what goes in your body not the FDA or any agency. You have always had choices. Read the label and choose wisely!
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    As always, it is the end consumer (you) who is responsible for what goes in your body not the FDA or any agency. You have always had choices. Read the label and choose wisely!

    Restaurants don't usually have ingredient labels. Same with many foods prepared by someone other than myself. It seems easier to ban trans fats, than to force ingredient labels on all prepared foods.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    I really think people have this "want to have my cake and eat it too" mentality with their fast food. They want their delicious tasting junk to be "healthy" too. I think this is ridiculous behavior. Just try to prove to me that banning trans fats will have any discernible impact on people's overall health when they're still eating crap food.

    The article says "a ban could prevent 7,000 deaths and 20,000 heart attacks in the US each year". Obviously this would be based on a projection derived from current figures re: consumption and disease. But true results would be impossible to know unless the ban were enacted. So, saying "prove" it to me before you ban is an impossible request.
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    My thought is I should be in control of what I want to do with my food, what I want to eat and how I want to fix it. Even if you personally feel it is not right for you, it is not right to force that opinion on others. I personally don't like cigarette smoking and don't like being around people who smoke, but a smoker chooses that, and it is his/her business, not mine. Just because we don't like something, we should not cheer when other people's rights are affected.

    Technically speaking, it's not a ban. The FDA wants to remove partially hydrogenated oils and other sources of artificial trans fats from the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) list. It effectively "bans" them, because a company has to prove that the inclusion of a non-listed item is safe (under existing law), but it's not a ban in the sense that they got Congress to pass a new law to make it illegal to use.

    As for the removal of it from the GRAS list, that's actually not an easy feat. It has to be basically proven beyond reasonable doubt that the item is harmful, and that's what's been done. Even then, there are still a lot of barriers to it actually happening, including lobbying from people and stonewalling from Congress (via riders and slashed funding) to keep an item on the list.

    http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/05/10/1982851/fda-slow-to-regulate-harmful-substances/

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/07/health/fda-trans-fats/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
  • Showcase_Brodown
    Showcase_Brodown Posts: 919 Member
    Great, because banning things always turns out well.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Oh, my apologies. I had no awareness of this being posted previously.

    No need to apologize. Many articles are posted more than once. My guess is this one will be posted many more times over the next few weeks. There is no forum rule against it.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    so what do we do about trans fat from fatty meat?

    considering that artificial trans fats from partially hydrogenated oils makes up the bulk of trans fat intake and pretty much everyone with a brain knows that it's some nasty ****, I have no problem with removing partially hydrogenated oils from the food supply. Naturally occurring trans fats from meat and dairy are minuscule in comparison.