BMR: what does it mean?

I recently looked at my BMR score and found out that in a 24 hour day of doing nothing my body would need 1,717 calories. But I am, of course, trying to lose weight. So my calorie goal everyday is 1650 (less than my BMR). Does this mean I am eating too few Calories? Or does eating less than my BMR allow me to lose weight?


What does this number mean and should it affect anything I am currently doing?
«1

Replies

  • acogg
    acogg Posts: 1,870 Member
    Base metabolic rate. Essentially, it is the calories your body burns with no exercise.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    I recently looked at my BMR score and found out that in a 24 hour day of doing nothing my body would need 1,717 calories. But I am, of course, trying to lose weight. So my calorie goal everyday is 1650 (less than my BMR). Does this mean I am eating too few Calories? Or does eating less than my BMR allow me to lose weight?


    What does this number mean and should it affect anything I am currently doing?

    Your basic metabolic rate is the amount of calories you would need if you were comatose or if you sat on the sofa all day long and did nothing at all but lay on the sofa all day long.

    It's important to eat above your BMR not below. In order to lose weight you must eat below your TDEE-total daily energy expenditure.

    How did you figure a BMR of 1,717 and calorie goal of 1,650? Seems to me your calculations might be off just a bit.

    For example, I am 52 and 5 ft. 4.5 inches tall and my last weight was 153. I strenuously work out every day. Using this calculator I came up with the following:

    http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/

    BMR: 1,370 <
    must not eat below this amount
    TDEE:2,364 <
    must not eat above this amount
    Calorie goal to lose .5 pounds a week: 2,127 <
    10 percent reduction of calories.

    The starting place is to not eat below your BMR or above your TDEE, but reduce calories from your TDEE according to how much you want to lose each week (2 pounds is usually the max, especially if you have lots of weight to lose, and .5 is healthy if you have little to lose).
  • tiggerlgh
    tiggerlgh Posts: 73 Member
    You need to calculate you TDEE if you want to use this method and then take a cut off of that. Do not cut from your BMR.

    ETA: Or Read SLLRunners very informational post
  • Cedura
    Cedura Posts: 184 Member
    I calculated my calorie goal by using what MFP gave me when I put in my height, weight, goal weight and amount to lose a week, along with daily activity level. MFP also calculated my BMR under thier apps tab.

    This is why I am confused about the 2 numbers. Because it would not seem healthy to eat less than what my body needs simply to survive.
  • michellekicks
    michellekicks Posts: 3,624 Member
    When you have a fair amount to lose it's not that bad to start there, but really you're better off with a goal that is slightly over your BMR and then you're going to add your exercise as you "earn" it.

    So do about 1800+exercise calories daily. So make your target 1800 (over BMR) and then eat your exercise calories back. Your whole daily deficit will come from other activity you do in a day. Then you can stick with that goal for the entire duration of your weight loss. Over time, as your BMR decreases, so will your deficit and you'll slowly ease in to your healthy weight.
  • This content has been removed.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    I calculated my calorie goal by using what MFP gave me when I put in my height, weight, goal weight and amount to lose a week, along with daily activity level. MFP also calculated my BMR under thier apps tab.

    This is why I am confused about the 2 numbers. Because it would not seem healthy to eat less than what my body needs simply to survive.

    Eating under your BMR IS unhealthy. When MFP figures out your calorie count based on how much per week you want to lose, the deficit is already built in. Therefore, you only need to not go over that calorie limit, unless you exercise, in which case you eat back your exercise calories and NET that calorie limit given to you.

    TDEE and MFP is an either/or situation: you use on or the other not both.
  • HollyB1223
    HollyB1223 Posts: 41 Member
    My net calories burned is supposed to be 1200, but honestly, I DO NOT lose weight eating 1200 calories/day!

    My metabolism is extremely efficient when I cut calories and increase exercise.

    The only thing I have found that works for me, is from the advice of a nutritionist. She said I need to cut out ALL sugars - even fruits except for non-sweet fruit. Also cut out all starchy anything, and all grain - based anything.

    Basically this leaves some citrus fruits, lean meats, veggies of all types in any amount especially fresh veggies, nuts, and legumes.

    What a surprise, it is actually much simpler to plan around a simple, healthful diet such as this.
  • Cedura
    Cedura Posts: 184 Member


    Eating under your BMR IS unhealthy. When MFP figures out your calorie count based on how much per week you want to lose, the deficit is already built in. Therefore, you only need to not go over that calorie limit, unless you exercise, in which case you eat back your exercise calories and NET that calorie limit given to you.

    TDEE and MFP is an either/or situation: you use on or the other not both.

    So the 1650 that MFP gives me has already taken into consideration the BMR? And I should be eatting almost all of those 1650 + exercise cals back? Having a day where I only get 1300/1650 is then not good?
  • WalkingAlong
    WalkingAlong Posts: 4,926 Member
    Eating under your BMR is not unhealthy if you're overfat, which is why MFP and every other diet plan has no BMR floor. 1200 is the floor in the MFP plan and many other plans. Most of us have a BMR above 1200. Though people here will defend that myth tooth and nail so it's easier to just let it go unchallenged.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    I recently looked at my BMR score and found out that in a 24 hour day of doing nothing my body would need 1,717 calories. But I am, of course, trying to lose weight. So my calorie goal everyday is 1650 (less than my BMR). Does this mean I am eating too few Calories? Or does eating less than my BMR allow me to lose weight?


    What does this number mean and should it affect anything I am currently doing?

    you cut from TDEE, not BMR. There is no reason really to eat below your BMR...you BMR is what you'd burn in a coma. Obviously, you're not in a coma...you crawl out of bed, **** shower and shave, and do any manner of other daily activity...exercise on top of that too. Eating below your BMR consistently for prolonged periods of time will ultimately lead to more muscle loss than anything else. It can be sustained by largely overweight and obese individuals who have a lot of fat storage for longer...but once you start leaning out, you're really doing yourself a disservice.
    So the 1650 that MFP gives me has already taken into consideration the BMR? And I should be eatting almost all of those 1650 + exercise cals back? Having a day where I only get 1300/1650 is then not good?

    MFP is just a tool...it spits out whatever based on what you input...you supply the brains.

    again, if you have substantial fat stores you can sustain larger calorie deficits longer and being slightly below your BMR isn't as big of an issue as some people make it out to be...it's not like if you're under your BMR by a hundred calories or something that the sky is going to fall...where people do run into substantial issues in not understanding their BMR is that they have a BMR of 1500 calories or something, but they're on a 1200 calorie plan and they exercise like crazy and don't eat back exercise calories and end up netting like 500 calories or whatever...then they end up back here on MFP wondering why they're lost their periods and why their hair is falling out, etc.
  • BenjaminMFP88
    BenjaminMFP88 Posts: 660 Member
    I recently looked at my BMR score and found out that in a 24 hour day of doing nothing my body would need 1,717 calories. But I am, of course, trying to lose weight. So my calorie goal everyday is 1650 (less than my BMR). Does this mean I am eating too few Calories? Or does eating less than my BMR allow me to lose weight?


    What does this number mean and should it affect anything I am currently doing?

    BMR = Basel Metabolic Rate this is mostly interchangable with RMR = Resting Metabolism Rate

    TDEE = Total Dialy Energy Expenditure = how many calories are burned by an individual during a 24-hour period

    TDEE is cromprised of three primary components:
    1 - RMR = Resting Metabolism Rate AND TEF = Thermic Effect of Feeding - These two essentially make up the amount of energy required to keep homeostatic processes (regulation of organ systems and body temperature)
    2 - TEPA = Thermic Effect of Physical Activity - This is also known as NEAT = Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
    3 - TEF = Energy required for digestion/absorption/transport/metabolism and storage of consumed food

    Under general circumstances, you don't want to net a caloric intake below BMR as this can have negative effects on your bodies systems. Ideally, for healthy fat loss, you should net a caloric intace slightly above BMR which should equate to a value to what most will call TDEE - %20.
  • Cedura
    Cedura Posts: 184 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    I calculated my calorie goal by using what MFP gave me when I put in my height, weight, goal weight and amount to lose a week, along with daily activity level. MFP also calculated my BMR under thier apps tab.

    This is why I am confused about the 2 numbers. Because it would not seem healthy to eat less than what my body needs simply to survive.

    Did you select the recommended 1 lb weekly goal loss?

    Are you honestly sedentary for 45 hrs a week with desk job and long commute, and on the weekends just a bump on a log - out side exercise you log separately?

    So are correct, no confusion.

    MFP needs to show fast results if they are going to retain subscribers. So give you options and add some confusion to allow you to make it a tad faster - never mind the weight loss can be bigger and bigger portion of muscle mass.
    The fact your weight loss may slow down or stop later doesn't matter then because you'll stay on MFP trying to make it work.
    Number of active subscribers is what gives MFP the ability to charge ad prices wherever they are at.

    And even if you did the above options correctly, perhaps Lightly Active and 1 lb weekly goal, and got 1650, with BMR at 1717, that is only the eating level on non-exercise days.
    Any exercise is logged and eaten back, therefore you are eating more.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.

    Unlike a car where you may never have the tools to diagnose or work on it - you'll have your body forever, and the knowledge as to how it works and how you use it is invaluable.

    So gonna go pay a nutritionist each time you have a change because you don't want to understand some basic (perhaps not easy though) principles?
    That's valid, but it means you can never make good decisions, or you'll get stressed out about stuff that doesn't matter, or you'll do things that do matter and you should be aware about.
  • pittdan77
    pittdan77 Posts: 98 Member
    Ding, ding, ding!

    Yes, let a pro figure out what your goals should be and then keep track of everything. Just be honest with yourself and your logging. Wouldn't hurt to see a doctor for a physical too just in case there is some other issue.
  • WalkingAlong
    WalkingAlong Posts: 4,926 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.
    They try to make it into rocket science here. The vast majority of people will lose weight on 1500 calories a day.

    Or even simpler-- are you maintaining? Eat less, move more. Are you gaining? Eat a lot less, move more.
  • JMD412
    JMD412 Posts: 1 Member
    Hi Cedura, my recommendation for you is to visit scoobys workshop and calculate your TDEE. I find it to be the easiest way to go about the weight loss process. Establish your TDEE and then substract 500 calories from that and eat that. For example my TDEE is 2283. I set my calories for 1750 a day so that gives me a deficit at the end of the week of 3500 which equates to a one pound loss. I understand it can be confusing, it was confusing for me at first too. I have done extensive research into it, and instead of calculating every exercise I do daily and putting it in on my fitness pal I find it easier to just substract 500 from my TDEE. I do track my exercise though by just putting it in an exercise note. Keep in mind though as you lose weight, your TDEE will go down. The scoobys workshop site recommends recalculating your TDEE every 5 lbs you lose. I use the mifflin-st jeor method because it is regarded as more accurate then the Harrison benedict. I hope that helps! Best of luck!
  • QuietBloom
    QuietBloom Posts: 5,413 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.

    The nutritionist is going to use the same calculations to 'guess' what to set you at. You might as well put a little effort into it yourself, as weight loss and maintenance (the hardest part of weight loss) are all up to you.
  • QuietBloom
    QuietBloom Posts: 5,413 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.
    They try to make it into rocket science here. The vast majority of people will lose weight on 1500 calories a day.

    Or even simpler-- are you maintaining? Eat less, move more. Are you gaining? Eat a lot less, move more.

    *sigh*
  • BenjaminMFP88
    BenjaminMFP88 Posts: 660 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.

    Sorry, didn't mean to inundate you with mumbo jumbo, but you did ask what BMR meant :) I thought a more indepth explination would help answer as many questions at once.

    Seeing a nutritionist when you first get started is always a wise decision. However, unless you are willing to fork over a significant amount of $$, there are basic concepts/principals you will need to comprehend as they will guide you through your fitness goals for the rest of your life. These concepts will help you adjust your needs basid on your situation and desires and it just isn't optimal to visit a nutritionist every time your goals change. Learning things like BMR and TDEE are basic steps into discovering your caloric needs. From there it's learning how to fill up those Calories and how to efficiently burn them in the way you want to.
  • Goal175lbs
    Goal175lbs Posts: 21 Member
    Your BMR is the amount of calories you burn if you slept all day. In reality, if you are a sedentary person, you still do more than sleep all day, so to get an accurate estimate of the amount of calories you burn in a day, multiply your BMR by 1.2. Yes, you can eat below your BMR number, people do it all the time, this is not starving yourself. Your body will simply use the fat off your *kitten* as calories. I eat below my BMR and have been losing between 2 to 3 pounds a week on average. Currently, at 5'10" and 241lbs, my BMR is 2266 calories per day. You better believe I eat less than that. I eat less than 1630 a day. Using the Harris-Benedict equation and multiplying my BMR by 1.2, I burn approximately 2,720 calories a day. I'm running a deficit of just over 1000 calories a day leading up to a theoretical 2 pounds of fat lost per week. I eat below my BMR and I'm losing weight at a reasonable pace, and I feel fine.
  • WalkingAlong
    WalkingAlong Posts: 4,926 Member
    All of these acronyms make me think I just need to go see a nutritionist and be done with internet guess work.
    They try to make it into rocket science here. The vast majority of people will lose weight on 1500 calories a day.

    Or even simpler-- are you maintaining? Eat less, move more. Are you gaining? Eat a lot less, move more.

    *sigh*

    Sigh all you want, it's true. Let me guess... you think 1500 is unsafe because it's below BMR for some? Show me any book or authoritative article that says it is unsafe to eat below one's BMR (not 'VLCD') and I will never post that here again.
  • Cedura
    Cedura Posts: 184 Member
    Well for those concerned I have no interest in learning for myself how to set my goals, rest assured that is not the case. The reason I said "maybe I should just see a nutritionist" is because, in my opinion, it is their JOB to understand, and help me understand all these numbers. They can TEACH me how to set my own goals (similar to my personal trainer at the Gym teaching me how to use all the machines- now I have learned and no longer feel the need to have a trainer).

    My Body fat is over 37%- so yes I have a LOT to lose. Long term, I have over 80 lbs to lose.

    I have a desk job where I sit in a chair for 8 hours a day. When I am not at work, I am in school (or doing homework) where I also sit. My life is constant sitting unless I take a walk on my lunch break- and then I strap a pedometer on and log that activity. I do housework, and log that activity as accurately as possible. Obviously I have been doing a little of something right, because I have lost 14 lbs and an inch or so from my waist line.

    Really what I am most concerned about is based on this BMR number, and based on what my allotted calories are for one day, is this sustainable for my body, or am I eating too little.

    I am going to check out the TDEE calculator that has been mentioned. It seems like it works for a lot of people.
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    My Body fat is over 37%- so yes I have a LOT to lose. Long term, I have over 80 lbs to lose.

    If you have over 80 lbs to lose, your BF% is almost certainly considerably above 37% and more like 50%. In which case, try this calculator, using the Katch-McCardle option...

    http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,956 Member
    As mentioned, it's better to reduce your moderate deficit from your TDEE. Now just for clarification, if you're sedentary and your TDEE ends up being 2150 and you end up eating 1650 (under your BMR), then you should be fine. It's probably not good if your TDEE is over 3000 (unless of course you're morbidly obese).
    Just be safe and smart. Get your TDEE and subtract 500 calories (a pound a week average weight loss).

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • MyChocolateDiet
    MyChocolateDiet Posts: 22,281 Member
    Basal Metabolic Rate. So yeah you'd probably lose weight if you ate that number since you are probably not in a coma and that has been described as coma status cal burn. like NO MOVEMENT at all the cals it would take to sustain your comatose body at the size it is currently.

    Likely you move around to the tune of at least 300 cals per day just with getting up to eat, bathroom breaks, and getting dressed and other incidentals even if you have a sedentary job so yeah, I bet you would lose weight on that. You are supposed to calculate your TDEE though and take a percent off of that to lose weight though. at least that's how I heard it.
  • Cedura
    Cedura Posts: 184 Member
    Using the Catch-McCardle BMR Calculator from the IIFYM website and the BMI-calculator.net (which gives me 37.7 as my BMI)

    Inputting my height and weight and age appropriately- and including my desk job, sedentary activity level
    My TDEE score is: 2047
    My BMR is : 1706

    And if I subtract from my TDEE the recommended 20% (409) then I am at 1638 (MFP had given me 1650) And that is STILL below my BMR.

    Have I done something wrong? My math makes sense. But I am, indeed, below my BMR. Is that ok?
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    Using the Catch-McCardle BMR Calculator from the IIFYM website and the BMI-calculator.net (which gives me 37.7 as my BMI)

    BMI is not the same as body fat %. What you did will inflate your BMR number.

    Also, with 80+ pounds to lose, you can safely go a bit below BMR anyway. But I don't think you'll need to, once you see what your BMR (more or less) actually is.
  • MyChocolateDiet
    MyChocolateDiet Posts: 22,281 Member
    Using the Catch-McCardle BMR Calculator from the IIFYM website and the BMI-calculator.net (which gives me 37.7 as my BMI)

    BMI is not the same as body fat %. What you did will inflate your BMR number.

    Also, with 80+ pounds to lose, you can safely go a bit below BMR anyway. But I don't think you'll need to, once you see what your BMR (more or less) actually is.

    no pun intended, right?