We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

treadmill underestimates cals burned&MFP overestimates HELP

jenarball
jenarball Posts: 1
edited February 8 in Health and Weight Loss
So I tested out my new treadmill and I used it for 21 minutes since I am very busy and I did 15% incline at 3.5mph
The treadmill said I burned 29 calories (how feeble lol) but I wasn't using a heart rate monitor etc I was just using it with the safety thing clipped onto my trousers
So I went on MFP and typed in "treadmill" and it comes up with ONE option -.- so I typed in the amount of minutes I did and it overestimated

So then I typed into google and found on sparkpeople a calories burned thingy and I calculated the median of two calculations I used on there (one was 15% incline and 4mph the second was 15% and 3mph) since I did it at 3.5mph (lol)
I typed in my weight and the minutes I did it and it said I burned 247 at 4mph and 193 at 3mph and the median of that is 220 calories so do you think that's okay??? IDK if I should trust this but damn I don't think I burned 29 calories at 15% INCLINE at 3.5mph that just doesn't seem right y'know?

Anyone suggest anything for me to find out how many calories I burn? I hear something about "polar" thing? does that count cals burned?

thanks!

Replies

  • kiwitechgirl
    kiwitechgirl Posts: 145 Member
    Heart Rate Monitor. I have a Polar FT4 and it does tell you how many cals you burned - it's not 100% accurate but it's as close as you'll get. I'd say 21 cals is too low but 220 is too high - I burn about 340 in 40 mins of running, but it does depend on weight and fitness level - I'm fairly close to goal weight and reasonably fit, so my burn isn't massive.
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    21 minutes at 3.5mph is just over one mile. Net calories burned for that is 0.3 * body weight in pounds.

    An incline of 15% adds about 250m in elevation change. Rule of thumb is 1 calorie per 100kg (220 pounds) of body weight per meter climbed. So add roughly your bodyweight/220 * 250.

    So if you weigh 180 pounds, it's 60 calories + 200 calories.
  • Mokey41
    Mokey41 Posts: 5,769 Member
    I burn about 300 calories running on the road for 30 to 35 minutes measured with my Polar FT4 heart rate monitor. 220 for 20 minutes seems a bit high for walking unless you are very heavy and very out of shape.

    If you want to be more exact I'd suggest getting a HRMM.
  • lucan07
    lucan07 Posts: 509
    At 209lbs a 21 minute walk at 4mph uphill carrying 18kg I burnt 155 calories so depending on your size etc it sounds a little high to me!
  • Greywalk
    Greywalk Posts: 193 Member
    Runners use the following...walk or run 1 mile equals 100 calories. I operate on the KIS principle...and this fits.
  • UpToTheChallenge
    UpToTheChallenge Posts: 247
    I would suggest a heart rate monitor with a chest strap for the most accurate. You input your data and it records your heart rate while you're working out!

    I have the Polar FT watch and love it!
  • STrooper
    STrooper Posts: 659 Member
    Though a "calibrated" heart rate monitor is best, your estimate is probably just fine. I have been told by a few individuals that the calorie estimates that my heart rate monitoring program estimates is too high as a replacement for the calories that MFP would normally assign (note: I make sure that my allowance for calories from exercise isn't double counted). But the formulas and the underlying research data is all published and I haven't found any issues or errors that counter their use.

    My treadmill under estimates calorie expenditure by 10-20% depending upon the particular program I am using.
  • kr1stadee
    kr1stadee Posts: 1,774 Member
    If you don't use the HRM part of the treadmill and it doesn't ask for weight, it won't be accurate.

    I would log my walk on a treadmill as a walk at whatever speed you were using.

    A good HRM is the best indicator of how many calories burned. I would use MFP's suggestion and eat half back (or log half the time, if you aren't tracking time)
This discussion has been closed.

Categories