How to Calculate Calories in a Marinade...FINALLY!!!
Replies
-
Aha! Just questioned this. Oops.
Ta though, very helpful0 -
I hate to burst the bubble here, but the total surface area has a lot more to do with amount of marinade you actually eat than the weight of what you're marinating. But to calculate half of what you pour out of the bottle divided by the % of the entire amount that you eat would have to be close and probably over a bit so it's on the safe side.0
-
Bump0
-
Bump.. thanks0
-
Saving this. I love to marinate things, but I always get so confused on how to log it.0
-
Bump0
-
Really helpful!0
-
I just divide the marinade calories by the serving, then you at least know you aren't underestimating.
I don't weigh the leftovers because of a little thing called osmosis. It's almost impossible to calculate what has been absorbed. so just bite the bullet and over book the calories/sodium/sugar.0 -
I don't see this method being terribly accurate. I prefer to weigh the marinade before and then after, and log the difference. Same for frying, btw, for the person who asked.0
-
I don't see this method being terribly accurate. I prefer to weigh the marinade before and then after, and log the difference. Same for frying, btw, for the person who asked.
^^this^^0 -
I don't see this method being terribly accurate. I prefer to weigh the marinade before and then after, and log the difference. Same for frying, btw, for the person who asked.
Marinade is always more watery and weaker after removing the item being marinaded.
Nit picking for sure, but if one is counting calories, it's surely better to err on the high side.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
I don't see this method being terribly accurate. I prefer to weigh the marinade before and then after, and log the difference. Same for frying, btw, for the person who asked.
Marinade is always more watery and weaker after removing the item being marinaded.
Nit picking for sure, but if one is counting calories, it's surely better to err on the high side.
Well, if the options are this way, OP's way, or logging all of it, any of those options is going to be slightly inaccurate. I have always approached calorie counting with the philosophy that one should get as close as one can without making oneself crazy. If I worry about the sugar/sodium from osmosis then how do I account for the fact that the calories I'm using for raw chicken breast are just an average? Or the fact that food labels can be off by 20%? I just get as close as possible, then I adjust based on my actual results.
If you've got a method that's 100% accurate I'd be interested to hear it though.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions