MFP calories goal VS other websites?
Suzibluski
Posts: 43 Member
SO after reading topic after topic of BMR VS TDEE on this site it seems like MFP has way under estimated my calorie intake.
They set me for 1230 a day and the other sites that people recommend have me at 1393-1450. So I manually imputed calories on here to 1340. I have been successful with the 1230 but feel tired most of the time. Thoughts on MFP automated Calorie consumption VS other websites?
They set me for 1230 a day and the other sites that people recommend have me at 1393-1450. So I manually imputed calories on here to 1340. I have been successful with the 1230 but feel tired most of the time. Thoughts on MFP automated Calorie consumption VS other websites?
0
Replies
-
Your required to eat back calories from exercise on MFP, where TDEE means those calories are already accounted for. The types of food we eat can have an impact on energy levels.0
-
They're all estimates so each site may use a slightly different algorithm so you'll get different numbers if you put the same information in. Of course a TDEE calculator will give you a different number as it includes exercise unlike MFP. These sites rely on us using some common sense which you have it wasn't quite working for you so you upped your calories. There is only so much an algorithm can do and is in fact a guide the rest is down to us which a lot of people seem to forget0
-
Your required to eat back calories from exercise on MFP, where TDEE means those calories are already accounted for. The types of food we eat can have an impact on energy levels.
This. That is why you see a difference.
Ive done the calculations both ways and pretty much end up in the same spot when you average over the week.0 -
My TDee is 1780 on a couple of sites and 1300+ for BMR that is what I don't understand... why is MFP so low compared to all of the ones I have read?0
-
edited because I realize there is som einfo in your OP
reposting answer.0 -
My TDee is 1780 on a couple of sites and 1300+ for BMR that is what I don't understand... why is MFP so low compared to all of the ones I have read?
What did you choose for a weight loss goal on MFP?
What did you choose for activity level on MFP?
What did you choose for activity level for TDEE?
Its hard to explain without knowing those.
I'll give an example.
If your TDEE is 1780, then most recommend eating TDEE minus 20% to lose weight, which would put you at 1424. You would eat 1424 every day. That would be a total of 9968 for the week.
MFP has you at 1230. On days you exercise, you are supposed to log your exercise and eat those calories back. If you burn 450 calories a workout, 3 days a week, you eat 1680 calories on those days and 1230 on the rest. That would bring you to a total of 9810 calories over the week or an average of 1401. Not exactly the same but close.
You aren't meant to eat only 1230 calories every day.
This is just an example of how it works. It depends on what you actually selected and how active you are.0 -
Simple tip: Just use the IIFYM calculator, and input the macros and calories into mfp.
^THIS = RESULTS0 -
SO after reading topic after topic of BMR VS TDEE on this site it seems like MFP has way under estimated my calorie intake.
They set me for 1230 a day and the other sites that people recommend have me at 1393-1450. So I manually imputed calories on here to 1340. I have been successful with the 1230 but feel tired most of the time. Thoughts on MFP automated Calorie consumption VS other websites?
You're supposed to eat back exercise calories with MFP...other calculators assume an estimate of your exercise calories in the activity level. Done correctly, it's really six of one. Here's what my numbers look like...
MFP to lose 1 Lb per week:
1,850...Add exercise to that...1,850 + 400 exercise calories = 2,250.
TDEE = 2,750...TDEE - 20% to lose 1 Lb per week = 2,200 calories.
A mere 50 calorie difference.
You also have to make sure you're selecting apples to apples weight loss goals...most people elect 2 Lbs per week with MFP...and they do a 20% cut with other calculators. A 20% cut is usually closer to 1 Lb per week loss rate goal for most people...that's a 500 calorie difference right there plus any exercise activity that is unaccounted for with MFP but included in your activity level with other calculators.
In a nutshell, you just need to figure out what method you are using and use the proper tool for that method and stick with it.0 -
1390 and 1911 On that site0
-
1390 and 1911 On that site
I don't understand what that means.0 -
1390 BMR and 1911 TDEE0
-
Your BMR is just your basal calories...you'd burn those calories in a coma Your TDEE is your total calories burned with all activity. Example...my BMR is 1753...my TDEE is around 2,750.0
-
1390 BMR and 1911 TDEE
Ok, so you have to create a deficit from TDEE, which is usually 20%, that gives you a calorie goal of 1529.
I assume you selected lightly active, exercising 1-3 times a week.
What did you choose for a weight loss goal on MFP?
What do you do for exercise?
Like I said its difficult to explain without all the info.0 -
Yes I did choose that for exercising 1-3 times a week . I walk everyday for 3o minutes or more and I do strength training every other day.
weight loss goal on MFP is 1 lb a week0 -
Yes I did choose that for exercising 1-3 times a week . I walk everyday for 3o minutes or more and I do strength training every other day.
weight loss goal on MFP is 1 lb a week
So every day you log walking (I didn't realize your diary was open and see one day was 168 calories). So with your 1230 calories, plus the exercise calories, that puts you up to 1400 calories. Plus the strength training every other day will add a bit more.
That alone puts you at the same number as the sites in your OP. You will get variations depending on different calculations.0 -
K I get it.. Thanks so much.. I just wanted to make sure my 1230 wasn't to low.. have a great day!0
-
SO after reading topic after topic of BMR VS TDEE on this site it seems like MFP has way under estimated my calorie intake.
They set me for 1230 a day and the other sites that people recommend have me at 1393-1450. So I manually imputed calories on here to 1340. I have been successful with the 1230 but feel tired most of the time. Thoughts on MFP automated Calorie consumption VS other websites?
It all balances out to the same thing if you eat your exercise calories back and select the correct activity levels. MFP doesn't assume you are going to workout, so they have a deficit built in to account for that. Other sites that your word for working out.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions