3 meals vs. 6 little meals a day

I was wondering who has success in eating 3 meals a day vs. 6 little meals a day. I've been doing some research and they are "studies" that say you increase your metabolism by eating 6 little meals a day; then there are studies that say it doesn't matter.

Isn't it Calories IN vs. Calories OUT that matters!!

What's everybody doing 3 or 6?
«1

Replies

  • navyrigger46
    navyrigger46 Posts: 1,301 Member
    It doesn't matter, your metabolism is like the titanic, it takes forever to change course. Myself, some days I eat three meals, some days two, some days as many as eight and some days just one. Meal timing and frequency are pretty much irrelevant with regard to weight loss.

    Rigger
  • Focus on energy deficit regardless how you do it.

    However, if you want to care about timings, consider getting protein intake in boluses throughout the day to preserve lean mass during your energy deficit.

    Point two is SECONDARY to point one.

    Get energy deficit first, thats the priority, doesnt hugely matter if you do 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 or 20 meals a day as long as your at an energy deficit.
  • willdob3
    willdob3 Posts: 640 Member
    Generally speaking, the number of meals does not matter. This has been proven. Do whatever works best for you & your lifestyle.

    I've followed lots of different meal plans in the past & can look back to what worked best for me. While I had success with all of them (5 & 6 meals per day, too), the best results were from eating 3 good-sized meals per day with no snacks. Different people find other plans work best for them.

    No, it is not ALL about calories in/out. Anyone stating this is not up on their science. Calories do count but there are many other things that also count. Our bodies are very complex in how they use what we eat.
  • laurie04427
    laurie04427 Posts: 421 Member
    I naturaly do 5 meals so I'm just trying to even out the calories and macros between them which is the hard part.
  • deksgrl
    deksgrl Posts: 7,237 Member
    It doesn't matter. Except if having meals more often keeps you more satisfied so you don't eat too much at the 3 meals.
  • OverDoIt
    OverDoIt Posts: 332 Member
    If your can get all of your calories in 3 meals then do it. The reason I, and others i know eat 5-6 meals is because it is really hard to shove 1,200 to 1,400 calories in one sitting of "clean" hahaha food. Do what you dig brother, you know your body better than anybody here.
  • No, it is not ALL about calories in/out. Anyone stating this is not up on their science. Calories do count but there are many other things that also count. Our bodies are very complex in how they use what we eat.

    I Disagree. Saying it's only calories in/out is relevant, because whilst there is more complexity to it than that, the vast majority of users on MFP only need to worry about energy intake.

    Elite athlete? Worry about macronutrients
    Severely obese? Worry about macronutrients
    Metabolic conditions? Worry about macronutrients
    Severe energy deficit? Worry about macronutrients
    Trying to 'bulk up'? Worry about protein intake and energy surplus
    Trying to lose body fat? Maintain energy deficit and perhaps consider protein intake.
  • jimmmer
    jimmmer Posts: 3,515 Member
    I was wondering who has success in eating 3 meals a day vs. 6 little meals a day. I've been doing some research and they are "studies" that say you increase your metabolism by eating 6 little meals a day; then there are studies that say it doesn't matter.

    Isn't it Calories IN vs. Calories OUT that matters!!

    What's everybody doing 3 or 6?

    I eat 2 meals a day. It really doesn't matter. If these meals are less than my TDEE, I'll lose weight. If more, I'll gain it.

    Find an eating style that jives with your lifestyle and you'll stick with it and succeed.

    Try to contort your lifestyle to some arbitrary eating style and you'll stick with it for 2 weeks tops.
  • Lizzy622
    Lizzy622 Posts: 3,705 Member
    Personally I am better eating 3 meals and a snack. It just fits me and my schedule better. Do what is best for you to stay on track.
  • LolBroScience
    LolBroScience Posts: 4,537 Member
    No, it is not ALL about calories in/out. Anyone stating this is not up on their science. Calories do count but there are many other things that also count. Our bodies are very complex in how they use what we eat.

    I Disagree. Saying it's only calories in/out is relevant, because whilst there is more complexity to it than that, the vast majority of users on MFP only need to worry about energy intake.

    Elite athlete? Worry about macronutrients
    Severely obese? Worry about macronutrients
    Metabolic conditions? Worry about macronutrients
    Severe energy deficit? Worry about macronutrients
    Trying to 'bulk up'? Worry about protein intake and energy surplus
    Trying to lose body fat? Maintain energy deficit and perhaps consider protein intake.

    well... that leaves quite a bit of grey area no?
  • VegasFit
    VegasFit Posts: 1,232 Member
    I do four to six because I'm a snacker so that style of eating works for me but I think you can be successful either way. Just do what works for you.
  • kbmnurse
    kbmnurse Posts: 2,484 Member
    I eat 5-6 smaller meals daily. I have to have the full feeling. Once I start to feel hunger I make poor food choices. Smaller more frequent better for me.
  • Since I went from 3 meals and a snack to 3 meals & 3 snacks, Ive been doing great. Im not hungry. I dont binge eat and no late night time snacking. :)
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    For the average Joe/Jane, nutrient timing doesn't matter substantially. You aren't going to substantially "stoke the fires of your metabolism" by eating more frequently...like maybe a few calories. Really, for the average Joe it's more about adherence than anything else...if eating 6 times per day results in greater dietary adherence then you are winning

    Nutrient timing is more important to fitness and training and becomes even more important if you are a competitive athlete...which is what a lot of these "studies" are done on, not the average Joe out there trying lose a little weight and improve their fitness.
  • Rainboots80
    Rainboots80 Posts: 218 Member
    I eat 4
  • serindipte
    serindipte Posts: 1,557 Member
    I usually go with two real meals, breakfast is usually small enough it could pass as a snack at 80-130 calories. Then a snack about 3 most days and a graze period in the evening with several small things (I am actually trying to stop doing as much of that). Still watching my overall calories, though, maintaining that deficit and losing weight.
  • ngyoung
    ngyoung Posts: 311 Member
    eating often changing your metabolism is false. It is not a matter of cals in vs out, it is mainly about controlling hunger and triggering your body to fuel itself with its fat stores.

    More recent studies that I have been hearing is that more people are finding success doing to opposite of what you're asking. Doing intermittent fasting. Skipping a meal, usually breakfast or a whole day even then feasting. The common misconception is that it just causes you to just over eat later but when tested subjects often still maintained a caloric deficit.
  • suremeansyes
    suremeansyes Posts: 962 Member
    I generally do 3 meals and a couple snacks. I get hungry every 2-3 hours or so, it works for me.
  • bigmamabird
    bigmamabird Posts: 55 Member
    I find that if I eat a lot of little meals rather than three main ones, I'm less likely to get hungry in between and therefore make a bad food choice. I have very little willpower and if I get hungry the first thing I'm going to want to reach for is some prepackaged, processed conveinence food rather than something nutritious and healthy.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    meal timing and metabolism is a myth …eat one meal, three meal, six meals, or 24 meals spaced over one hour each and the impact to metabolism is zero...
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member

    No, it is not ALL about calories in/out. Anyone stating this is not up on their science. Calories do count but there are many other things that also count. Our bodies are very complex in how they use what we eat.

    please explain the science behind this statement, as you seem to be up on "the science"….
  • PetulantOne
    PetulantOne Posts: 2,131 Member
    Do what YOU can stick too.

    I eat many small meals throughout the day because that's what works for me, not because I think it will speed up my metabolism.
  • ComradeTovarich
    ComradeTovarich Posts: 495 Member
    The whole "increasing metabolism by eating several small meals a day" thing is bs. I do eat that way, but it's because I've found that I don't feel that hungry throughout the day when I do it that way. If I eat a big meal, I'll feel full for a while and then I get super hungry later.
  • FoxyLifter
    FoxyLifter Posts: 965 Member
    It's personal preference. Meal timing has no effect on weight loss.

    I eat 6 meals Monday through Friday to keep me from going insane at my desk... and I like to have a snack before my workouts.

    I eat a big breakfast, small lunch, and moderate dinner on the weekends because... I want to.

    Find what works for you. :drinker:
  • I'm doing much much better and slimming down eating 3 meals a day and one protein snack between lunch and dinner and one small carb, such as organic puffed corn with unsweetened almond milk (sugarless) snack before bed. ( i sleep better) I also eat after my Hiit and weight training session. I am slimming in my waistline and my body its shaping up nicely. Hope this helps.

    I was doing 5-6 small meals and It just never made me feel satisfied and i was always hungry because i never got a good plate of food in. all the meals were mini and i never stopped thinking of food. once i had 3 regular healthy meals, i felt fine between meals. And i stopped binging at night too.

    6 small meals doesn't work for me but it may for you. try both and see which one you have more energy with, and feel thinning after a week or so.
  • As one member has said, the 6 meals a day has been debunked. There is no benefit except when you are eating say 5000 + calories a day. It's hard to eat that much in 3 meals.

    I do IF and I only eat on avg 2 meals a day. I might eat an apple in between on some days.

    6 meals a day if it works for you sure, but as you said in your original post. Calories In and Out is one of the biggest factors.
  • wijody
    wijody Posts: 26 Member
    3 (or sometimes 2). I'm the kind of person who LOVES to eat and when I eat a meal, I want to eat a MEAL, not a 200-calorie 'snack' - so when I eat less times per day, I can eat more when I do eat. Works for ME - but some people love their plan of eating 6x per day and if that works for them, awesome! :)
  • sarafischbach9
    sarafischbach9 Posts: 466 Member
    I eat 3 meals and a snack.

    I'd rather have the bigger meals because they make me feel full. I do not get super hungry in between meals. When I maintain, I will have 3 meals and 2 snacks. My 3 meals will be slightly bigger than now and there will be an extra snack. I think the 6 small meals sounds like a good idea in theory, but with work and school its hard to eat in that frequency.

    It all matters with personal preference. I don't know about the whole metabolism thing, but some people might find that eating 6 times a day keeps them from getting hungry because they eat frequently. I find that eating the bigger meals and the feeling of fullness works for me.

    It's up to you. Maybe experiment to see what you like?
  • sarafischbach9
    sarafischbach9 Posts: 466 Member
    3 (or sometimes 2). I'm the kind of person who LOVES to eat and when I eat a meal, I want to eat a MEAL, not a 200-calorie 'snack' - so when I eat less times per day, I can eat more when I do eat. Works for ME - but some people love their plan of eating 6x per day and if that works for them, awesome! :)

    Same here!
  • ashleycde
    ashleycde Posts: 622 Member
    I just eat whenever I'm hungry. I have my food diary set with 3 meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner), midday snacks, and late snacks, but I'd say I probably eat 6-8 times a day on average. I snack a lot on things like carrots and mangos, so I wouldn't consider those meals, and if I were to count my full meals, I'd say I eat 2-3, but realistically I'm eating all throughout the day so I don't pay too much concern to a meal structure at all. It all depends on personal preference. I found even before coming on here, I never ate a lot in one sitting. I'm the kind of person who gets full quickly, but is hungry every hour. It was normal for me to eat part of my dinner, then keep going back to it every hour until it was done. Now I just give myself smaller portions, and snack on healthy choices or meal leftovers when I need to.