For J!--Fight for the right to wear skirts!..mean kilts..mea

Options
http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/homestyle/08/07/mailman.wants.to.wear.skirt.ap/index.html

Mailman campaigns to wear skirt
artmailmanwantsskirtsap.jpg

SEATTLE, Washington (AP) -- A 6-foot-tall, 250-pound letter carrier is campaigning for the right to take off his pants. Dean Peterson wants the U.S. Postal Service to add kilts as a uniform option for men.

The idea was soundly defeated in July at a convention of his union, the 220,000-member National Letter Carriers' Association, so Peterson knows convincing management will be an uphill struggle, but at least he'll be comfortable in his kilt, or Male Unbifurcated Garment.

"In one word, it's comfort," he said.

With his build, Peterson said, his thighs fill slacks to capacity, causing chafing and scarring.

Peterson, 48, has Finnish and Norwegian ancestry but not Scottish. He began wearing kilts a couple years ago when his wife brought one back from a trip to Scotland. (A spokeswoman for Britain's Royal Mail said kilts are not allowed as part of its letter carrier uniforms.)

Now Peterson wears them everywhere -- to one son's football games, the other son's concerts, shopping and gardening.

"It's the difference between wearing jammies to bed and wearing your work clothes to bed," he said.

Before the convention in Boston, Peterson spent his family's $1,800 economic stimulus tax rebate to mail about 1,000 letters and photographs of him wearing a prototype Postal Service kilt to union branches in every state, Guam and Puerto Rico.

"Unbifurcated Garments are far more comfortable and suitable to male anatomy than trousers or shorts because they don't confine the legs or cramp the male genitals the way that trousers or shorts do," he wrote. "Please open your hearts -- and inseams -- for an option in mail carrier comfort!"

The union's executive committee recommended disapproval, saying there was not enough demand for kilts to be worth the bother of the resolution, and delegates agreed by a large margin.

But Peterson said there are plenty of approved uniform items that very few mail carriers wear, including a cardigan sweater, vest and pith helmet. He said many convention delegates did express support after his resolution was voted down.

"I got so pumped up after being at such a low that I'm taking this to the next convention in 2010 in Anaheim, California," he said.

Replies

  • shorerider
    shorerider Posts: 3,817 Member
    Options
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/homestyle/08/07/mailman.wants.to.wear.skirt.ap/index.html

    Mailman campaigns to wear skirt
    artmailmanwantsskirtsap.jpg

    SEATTLE, Washington (AP) -- A 6-foot-tall, 250-pound letter carrier is campaigning for the right to take off his pants. Dean Peterson wants the U.S. Postal Service to add kilts as a uniform option for men.

    The idea was soundly defeated in July at a convention of his union, the 220,000-member National Letter Carriers' Association, so Peterson knows convincing management will be an uphill struggle, but at least he'll be comfortable in his kilt, or Male Unbifurcated Garment.

    "In one word, it's comfort," he said.

    With his build, Peterson said, his thighs fill slacks to capacity, causing chafing and scarring.

    Peterson, 48, has Finnish and Norwegian ancestry but not Scottish. He began wearing kilts a couple years ago when his wife brought one back from a trip to Scotland. (A spokeswoman for Britain's Royal Mail said kilts are not allowed as part of its letter carrier uniforms.)

    Now Peterson wears them everywhere -- to one son's football games, the other son's concerts, shopping and gardening.

    "It's the difference between wearing jammies to bed and wearing your work clothes to bed," he said.

    Before the convention in Boston, Peterson spent his family's $1,800 economic stimulus tax rebate to mail about 1,000 letters and photographs of him wearing a prototype Postal Service kilt to union branches in every state, Guam and Puerto Rico.

    "Unbifurcated Garments are far more comfortable and suitable to male anatomy than trousers or shorts because they don't confine the legs or cramp the male genitals the way that trousers or shorts do," he wrote. "Please open your hearts -- and inseams -- for an option in mail carrier comfort!"

    The union's executive committee recommended disapproval, saying there was not enough demand for kilts to be worth the bother of the resolution, and delegates agreed by a large margin.

    But Peterson said there are plenty of approved uniform items that very few mail carriers wear, including a cardigan sweater, vest and pith helmet. He said many convention delegates did express support after his resolution was voted down.

    "I got so pumped up after being at such a low that I'm taking this to the next convention in 2010 in Anaheim, California," he said.
  • jakspak
    jakspak Posts: 260 Member
    Options
    i say good luck to him hell why not if its comfy im all for it go back to the days mean wore those sort of things look at the romans and other cultures.

    if i could id give him my vote.
  • Poison5119
    Poison5119 Posts: 1,460 Member
    Options
    Wow, is that not the coolest thing? Geesh I love a guy in a kilt ! raaawr! hiss hiss.... :love:

    I hope they get it. It takes a real man to wear a kilt, IMO... If a female post-person can wear pants, why can't the men wear a kilt as an option? Lets face it, they do an awful lot of walking, and I can empathize with the reasons. :smokin:

    That cracks me up -- " Male Unbifurcated Garment"!! LMBO:laugh:
  • jamerz3294
    jamerz3294 Posts: 1,824 Member
    Options
    Works for me!
  • yoginimary
    yoginimary Posts: 6,783 Member
    Options
    Now I could wear mirrors on my shoes - ok, so that was very middle school of me