Consciousness as a State of Matter?

_errata_
_errata_ Posts: 1,653 Member
http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219
We examine the hypothesis that consciousness can be understood as a state of matter, "perceptronium", with distinctive information processing abilities. We explore five basic principles that may distinguish conscious matter from other physical systems such as solids, liquids and gases: the information, integration, independence, dynamics and utility principles. If such principles can identify conscious entities, then they can help solve the quantum factorization problem: why do conscious observers like us perceive the particular Hilbert space factorization corresponding to classical space (rather than Fourier space, say), and more generally, why do we perceive the world around us as a dynamic hierarchy of objects that are strongly integrated and relatively independent? Tensor factorization of matrices is found to play a central role, and our technical results include a theorem about Hamiltonian separability (defined using Hilbert-Schmidt superoperators) being maximized in the energy eigenbasis. Our approach generalizes Giulio Tononi's integrated information framework for neural-network-based consciousness to arbitrary quantum systems, and we find interesting links to error-correcting codes, condensed matter criticality, and the Quantum Darwinism program, as well as an interesting connection between the emergence of consciousness and the emergence of time.

What is consciousness? What do you think about the hypothesis that it could be a state of matter?
«1

Replies

  • Docmahi
    Docmahi Posts: 1,603 Member
    this is so above my head i got an aneurysm
  • The_Aly_Wei
    The_Aly_Wei Posts: 844 Member
    Spank/dance...oh wait, wrong thread.




    No way is my actual answer.
  • scot30316
    scot30316 Posts: 169 Member
    I'm gonna need some Camel Wides, an 1/8th of ditch weed, 2 hits of Felix the Cat, a time machine to take me back to 1993 and a box of crayons to think properly on this. I'll be in the corner staring at the wall for the next 6-8 hours. Please put Live Dead on the stereo and check on me once an hour or so
  • Docmahi
    Docmahi Posts: 1,603 Member
    Spank/dance...oh wait, wrong thread.




    No way is my actual answer.

    ^ i refer to her for all non medical responses
  • phuckingbadasscutie
    phuckingbadasscutie Posts: 1,619 Member
    this is so above my head i got an aneurysm

    ^^^This
  • Orion782
    Orion782 Posts: 391
    Did you google "Stuff that nobody will understand" and just quote it? I see what you did there...
  • The_Aly_Wei
    The_Aly_Wei Posts: 844 Member
    Spank/dance...oh wait, wrong thread.




    No way is my actual answer.

    ^ i refer to her for all non medical responses

    Psttt, say "no".


    Oh, and hand me some of those crayons as well.
  • allotmentgardener
    allotmentgardener Posts: 248 Member
    The matter of consciousness is a state of being
  • scot30316
    scot30316 Posts: 169 Member
    Spank/dance...oh wait, wrong thread.




    No way is my actual answer.

    ^ i refer to her for all non medical responses

    Psttt, say "no".


    Oh, and hand me some of those crayons as well.
    Do you know how to do the spider thing to my hands. It'd be cool if you did but hey...what did that guy say earlier about that thing. Want to color?
  • Docmahi
    Docmahi Posts: 1,603 Member
    Spank/dance...oh wait, wrong thread.




    No way is my actual answer.

    ^ i refer to her for all non medical responses

    Psttt, say "no".


    Oh, and hand me some of those crayons as well.

    *hands aly crayons and cupcakes*

    tell megan to put a pizza in the oven
  • la_vie_est_belle_
    la_vie_est_belle_ Posts: 139 Member
    "why do conscious observers like us perceive the particular Hilbert space factorization corresponding to classical space (rather than Fourier space, say), and more generally, why do we perceive the world around us as a dynamic hierarchy of objects that are strongly integrated and relatively independent? Tensor factorization of matrices is found to play a central role, and our technical results include a theorem about Hamiltonian separability (defined using Hilbert-Schmidt superoperators) being maximized in the energy eigenbasis."

    ^^ Ok, I think I found the actual hypothesis amidst all that dense writing. Some questions and then we can talk about consciousness as defined by this piece of writing: (and these are just the questions from this small part)

    What is a particular Hilbert space factorization and what is "classical space"?

    and what is "Tensor factorization of matrices"?

    oh yes, and "Hamilton separability" ?

    Simplest explanations possible please! :D
  • The_Aly_Wei
    The_Aly_Wei Posts: 844 Member
    a) Yes to color.
    b) I will show you the Cat's Cradle (which i am assuming is the "hand spider thing") when i am done with my cupcake as i await my pizza.

    I think that is the answer.
  • _errata_
    _errata_ Posts: 1,653 Member
    I read the abstract as "The universe is a neural network."

    I don't understand the high end physics obviously, but the concept is interesting because there is effectively no other way to explain the emergent phenomenon of consciousness without describing it as a latent property within matter itself.

    At some point in time, "dumb" matter with no apparent ability perceive reality is organized in such a way that it eventually becomes self-aware.

    How the **** does that work?
  • The_Aly_Wei
    The_Aly_Wei Posts: 844 Member

    I just lost my mind laughing while reading the "Warnings"

    Warnings
    •Do not pinch your friend/assistant too hard.
    •Don't scare your friend/assistant into thinking something crazy, like you are pulling HUGE chunks of old skin and germs off their hand. This may scare them.


    HAHAHAHA!
  • beduffbrickie
    beduffbrickie Posts: 642 Member
    google or read the books by David Icke, he has a great theory on Consciousness.

    Its a good question and the sort of question that needs to be asked more often I believe.

    My question would be are we the universe experiencing itself? ?
  • CallMeCupcakeDammit
    CallMeCupcakeDammit Posts: 9,377 Member
    tumblr_m8uubgh5N11qme7gno1_500.gif
  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    My question would be are we the universe experiencing itself? ?

    pretty much in the most basic way of understanding it, yes
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
    Consciousness cannot BE matter, but *could* be a collective function of matter.

    I believe in spirit, personally.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Crimson_Fire
    Crimson_Fire Posts: 2,504 Member
    in to see if I can decode later...
  • DainaLC
    DainaLC Posts: 18,937 Member
    *Googling to see if this comes in simpler terms* I never claimed to be a smart geek!
  • _errata_
    _errata_ Posts: 1,653 Member
    tumblr_m8uubgh5N11qme7gno1_500.gif

    tumblr_ma53hjWace1r7vz9go1_500.gif
  • George_Baileys_Ghost
    George_Baileys_Ghost Posts: 1,524 Member
    Interesting idea. While I don't have time to read the entire article at the moment, I think it's important to keep in mind that;
    "...consciousness can be understood as a state of matter." =/= Consciousness can be understood to be a state of matter. It can be, of course, if that is the intent and the interpretation agrees with it, but not necessarily.

    I'm not sure how absolutely it can be held that conscious understanding is a state of matter, but rather, that the model of matter's various states and how they interact is tantamount to the interactions of the processes (whatever they might be) that lead to conscious understanding.

    It seems more reasonable to me, to say that consciousness exists somewhere in the interaction between matter's various states, not as a state of matter itself. But like I said...I haven't read it yet, so I could be wrong on that.
  • MireyGal76
    MireyGal76 Posts: 7,334 Member
    This gave me a brain-gasm.

    Consciousness as matter...hmm

    Well in the literal sense of the word, matter is defined as
    "physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, especially as distinct from energy."

    State of matter is defined as:
    The three traditional states of matter are solids (fixed shape and volume) and liquids (fixed volume and shaped by the container) and gases (filling the container)


    In my mentally feeble assessment... Consciousness does not possess rest mass (unless you want to deem the weight of your brain as the mass of consciousness :laugh:), so I would think that literally it is not matter. Even in a gaseous state, matter is measurable... and consciousness in not done so in a tangible way. People may perceive "consciousness" in another being... but cannot logically measure if that is the case.

    Is consciousness defined as brain wave activity? If so, then it is measurable in some fashion.... but I've always thought consciousness was more than that...

    hmmm

    *drifts off into a happy place*
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    it's gobbledy-goop.

    that abstract is written to be intentionally confusing.

    it's something i'd expect Johnathan Swift to have written as a parody of scientific jibberish. :wink:

    seems like a fake paper or an April Fools hoax to me.:laugh:
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219
    We examine the hypothesis that consciousness can be understood as a state of matter, "perceptronium", with distinctive information processing abilities. We explore five basic principles that may distinguish conscious matter from other physical systems such as solids, liquids and gases: the information, integration, independence, dynamics and utility principles. If such principles can identify conscious entities, then they can help solve the quantum factorization problem: why do conscious observers like us perceive the particular Hilbert space factorization corresponding to classical space (rather than Fourier space, say), and more generally, why do we perceive the world around us as a dynamic hierarchy of objects that are strongly integrated and relatively independent? Tensor factorization of matrices is found to play a central role, and our technical results include a theorem about Hamiltonian separability (defined using Hilbert-Schmidt superoperators) being maximized in the energy eigenbasis. Our approach generalizes Giulio Tononi's integrated information framework for neural-network-based consciousness to arbitrary quantum systems, and we find interesting links to error-correcting codes, condensed matter criticality, and the Quantum Darwinism program, as well as an interesting connection between the emergence of consciousness and the emergence of time.

    What is consciousness? What do you think about the hypothesis that it could be a state of matter?

    This added one more example to my MFP wormhole theory.
  • George_Baileys_Ghost
    George_Baileys_Ghost Posts: 1,524 Member
    This gave me a brain-gasm.

    Consciousness as matter...hmm

    Well in the literal sense of the word, matter is defined as
    "physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, especially as distinct from energy."

    State of matter is defined as:
    The three traditional states of matter are solids (fixed shape and volume) and liquids (fixed volume and shaped by the container) and gases (filling the container)


    In my mentally feeble assessment... Consciousness does not possess rest mass (unless you want to deem the weight of your brain as the mass of consciousness :laugh:), so I would think that literally it is not matter. Even in a gaseous state, matter is measurable... and consciousness in not done so in a tangible way. People may perceive "consciousness" in another being... but cannot logically measure if that is the case.

    Is consciousness defined as brain wave activity? If so, then it is measurable in some fashion.... but I've always thought consciousness was more than that...

    hmmm

    *drifts off into a happy place*

    That's why I think that, based only on the abstract, it is more a case of understanding the processes of conscious thought in the same way that we understand the states of matter. They may be based on a similar model, as opposed to kindred substance.
  • George_Baileys_Ghost
    George_Baileys_Ghost Posts: 1,524 Member
    it's gobbledy-goop.

    that abstract is written to be intentionally confusing.

    it's something i'd expect Johnathan Swift to have written as a parody of scientific jibberish. :wink:

    seems like a fake paper or an April Fools hoax to me.:laugh:

    High likelihood. *nods* true story.
  • QueenBishOTUniverse
    QueenBishOTUniverse Posts: 14,121 Member
    If you can tolerate the author, Orson Scott Card does some interesting stuff with concepts similar to this in his Ender series, you have to go past Speaker for the Dead (his best book in my opinion), but the books after that deal heavily with the realization of consciousness etc. He's toying with it some in Ender's Game, and more so in speaker, but it's later in the series where he really tries to flesh the concept out.