early bird workout freaks.....

2»

Replies

  • Amy_B
    Amy_B Posts: 2,317 Member
    I have been known to get up at 4am to exercise. I don't eat beforehand either. I don't have time honestly.
  • superwmn
    superwmn Posts: 936
    I eat after a morning workout.

    GOOD LUCK!

    Charmagne
  • telcochik
    telcochik Posts: 1,643 Member
    I get up at 4:30am every day to do Turbo Fire and then get ready for the work day. I don't eat beforehand but I do drink 1.5L of water before and during my workout.

    Sharon
  • edorice
    edorice Posts: 4,519 Member
    .
  • I get up at 4:15 to go to Bootcamp workouts. I wait until right after I finish then I consume a protein drink and a banana to restore protein and carbs. I have determined I will not get up any earlier to allow for food to digest.
  • dchin25
    dchin25 Posts: 3 Member
    I usually up by 5:30 am for a long run. All I have is a glass of water and off I go. Exercising on an empty stomach does not hurt.
  • Sweedie77
    Sweedie77 Posts: 1 Member
    I drink a glass of water and eat a couple of spoonfuls of the yogurt I plan on eating for breakfast. Just a little something to get my metabolism started. Good Luck :smile:
  • runningneo122
    runningneo122 Posts: 6,962 Member
    Can a car run with an empty tank of gas? No. and Neither will you. It's best to eat BEFORE you workout. Your body needs fuel to function as well as perform intense workouts. Another girl just asked this and a guy that works out or at a gym was saying he seen some lady workout before she ate and she ended up fainting and breaking her jaw as well as a few teeth. Not trying to be rude .. Just tell it how it is. Use common sense everyone .. we don't need any injuries :-)

    How do you know this happened to her because lack of food? she could have a pre-existing condition...how do you know? I've seen people, including myself get better results from not eating before a morning workout. It's not a bad thing to do. And FYI, my body isn't a car, you can't compare the two, we have fat reserves our body can draw from, when a tank is empty it's got nothing to draw from. If you want to debate the topic, have some actual data to back you up, and not "welll..a friend of a friend, saw someone who knocked her teeth out cause ..well...I think she didn't eat before she worked out. For some people it works, for others it doesn't your body will let you know.

    Aerobically, the body can only work out at a maximum of about 60% of VO2 max if it is relying solely on fat as a fuel substrate. That's just a fact of beta oxidation. So, someone who is able to perform a hard workout, even in a "fasted" state, is still using the usual amount of carbs/glycogen. Just because you are "fasted" does not mean that your glycogen stores are depleted. Despite the cliches thrown about the subject, the vast majority of exercisers will not come close to using up their stored glycogen.

    The body doesn't really care what you "want" to do or not. It is going to choose a fuel substrate mix based on the intensity demands of the exercise. High intensity = higher percentage of fuel from glucose/glycogen.

    And the acute event of substrate utilization during a workout has little if any long-term effect on weight loss. A number of studies have shown that, in the 24 hour period following a workout, fat oxidation occurs inversely compared to the rate of fat oxidation during the workout--e.g. if you burn more fat during the workout, you will burn less during the post-workout period and if you burn less fat during a high-intensity workout, you will burn more during he post-exercise period--so it all evens out over time.

    Pre and post-workout feedings should be designed to optimize workout performance and enhance recovery. No other reason. Research supports the preference of pre-workout feeding in general, however, there is enough variability among individuals that I would never criticize anyone's individual choice.


    Ditto to the personal choice. I get up at 5AM, drink a 12 oz. cup of hot tea, wait 20 - 30 minutes for absorption and run my miles. When I run for 40 minutes+ every day and eat ALL my exercise cals I lose from 2 -3 pounds per week. Last year when I started running and worked up to every day, I hadn't even read a book about weightloss. I started running this early just to avoid the traffic in my neighborhood and I lost 16 pounds in 6 weeks. Not knowing any better I overdid my mileage build up and the resulting injury sidelined me for a while. I learned what I did wrong and got back to it and maintained only. Difference? I was running any time of the day that I could spare b/c I had bought a T/M. When I read about "fasted cardio" in Tom Venuto's book: Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle, I switched to running in the morning. I joined MFP on 1/3/11 and you can see my weight loss already in my siggy down below. Check my diary to see what my calorie numbers are.
  • Wow lots of amazing ideas... I am going to do it.... wake up at 4:45 to work out by 5, who else is on board with me? I will commit to doing it all this week!
  • Can a car run with an empty tank of gas? No. and Neither will you. It's best to eat BEFORE you workout. Your body needs fuel to function as well as perform intense workouts. Another girl just asked this and a guy that works out or at a gym was saying he seen some lady workout before she ate and she ended up fainting and breaking her jaw as well as a few teeth. Not trying to be rude .. Just tell it how it is. Use common sense everyone .. we don't need any injuries :-)

    How do you know this happened to her because lack of food? she could have a pre-existing condition...how do you know? I've seen people, including myself get better results from not eating before a morning workout. It's not a bad thing to do. And FYI, my body isn't a car, you can't compare the two, we have fat reserves our body can draw from, when a tank is empty it's got nothing to draw from. If you want to debate the topic, have some actual data to back you up, and not "welll..a friend of a friend, saw someone who knocked her teeth out cause ..well...I think she didn't eat before she worked out. For some people it works, for others it doesn't your body will let you know.

    Aerobically, the body can only work out at a maximum of about 60% of VO2 max if it is relying solely on fat as a fuel substrate. That's just a fact of beta oxidation. So, someone who is able to perform a hard workout, even in a "fasted" state, is still using the usual amount of carbs/glycogen. Just because you are "fasted" does not mean that your glycogen stores are depleted. Despite the cliches thrown about the subject, the vast majority of exercisers will not come close to using up their stored glycogen.

    The body doesn't really care what you "want" to do or not. It is going to choose a fuel substrate mix based on the intensity demands of the exercise. High intensity = higher percentage of fuel from glucose/glycogen.

    And the acute event of substrate utilization during a workout has little if any long-term effect on weight loss. A number of studies have shown that, in the 24 hour period following a workout, fat oxidation occurs inversely compared to the rate of fat oxidation during the workout--e.g. if you burn more fat during the workout, you will burn less during the post-workout period and if you burn less fat during a high-intensity workout, you will burn more during he post-exercise period--so it all evens out over time.

    Pre and post-workout feedings should be designed to optimize workout performance and enhance recovery. No other reason. Research supports the preference of pre-workout feeding in general, however, there is enough variability among individuals that I would never criticize anyone's individual choice.

    Dammit Az you beat me to it. That's what I was going to say word for word! Alright in all honesty, great and informative post. I highly enjoy watching you own people through the use of scientific research.
This discussion has been closed.