BMI... I'm not sure that is quite right

according to everything (wii fit, here, other bmi calculators) I'm 5'3, 182 pounds, and up there in the 'obese' category.

I'm not sure what the medical definition of "obesity" is (I'm sure someone on here knows), but I know that for me, being just 30 pounds overweight would still put me in the "obese" category. One of those disadvantages to being short... taller people have a bit more leeway on weight range for being at a healthy weight or overweight. I'm not sure how tall you are, but I'm guessing with a goal weight of 125 you aren't *that* tall.

according to everything (wii fit, here, other bmi calculators) I'm 5'3, 182 pounds, and up there in the 'obese' category.

i'm also 5'3 i was 182 and i think my bmi was 32.2 and now i'm at 177 and it's at 31.4 so i'm in the obese category too until i reach 169.4 it sucks

I wouldn't worry too much about BMI. Before I started binge eating (which is why I joined the site :P ) I was in the underweight category. But everyone always told me I looked healthy and that I DID have curves. My BMI was 17, which as far as numbers go, can be alarming, but the truth is I was in perfect health and nobody thought I looked too thin. My bmi is now far into the average category, but I have less energy and motivation and I get sick more often. Go figure! The point being, base your progress more on how you look and feel, not by a silly number! :P Science is greatly flawed.

I'm short very thick boned (I have an inch of gap on a finger wrap test and don't have short fingers), very wide shoulders and barrel chested. In years past when I worked out daily and kept in very good shape I was considered over weight and nearly got put out of the Navy due to standardized height /weight BMI indexes. After a water bath test I went from 22.5%body fat by BMI standards to 16% by float. Muscle and bone density play a huge role. to put it in perspective I am 5'8" tall and Was 202lbs. this would still be obese today by BMI.

BMI is not super accurate, but it is a great guildeline. The weight doesn't matter by itself. It is the combination of weight and height. How tall are you?
Also, muscle weight is not taken account, people who are extremely muscular will have a higher BMI, because they weigh more but may look smaller and more fit, so like I said it is subjective.

I'm 5'4'' and the last time i was reallly in what they call the healthy range was when i was in high school and i ran track i weighed about 120 pounds, was on the dance team and i ate once a day.

Sounds like 120 was an unhealthy weight for you then and yet your final goal is 125. My advice is to not push yourself to the point where you are starving yourself and over exercising which sounds like what was happening. Go by what you feel like, health and energy wise, and what you think when you look in the mirror. don't say 'well, according to a scientific formula I'm overweight' say 'do I, myself, think I look and feel overweight' and if the answer is no, then screw science!

BMI isn't exactly right. A different type of test may be better for you.
I like BMI. For me, it works. I am now 118 and I am perfectly healthy and this is the weight I feel healthiest at. So I like BMI. It considered me overweight when I was in the 150's (and i FELT it.) so I like BMI. But it's different for every person.

I think a lot of it has to do with our culture. In America, we think often think of someone who is "obese" as just being "overweight" and someone who is "morbidly obese" as being just "obese". I know that I was surprised to find out that I am technically overweight, not just heavier than I'd like to be...and I know plenty of people who would tell me that I look fine. It's obviously not a "one size fits all" type thing, which is why (at 5'6") my healthy range is anywhere from 108-154 when I personally would look sick at 108 and still a bit heavy at 154!

I'm not trying to be rude in any way, I'm just pointing out that our interpretations of what is healthy, overweight, and obese (as far as BMI goes) are sometimes as skewed as our interpretations of what a normal portion size is!

BMI is not the most accurate tool, but it is accurate enough for the vast majority of people. There are extremes like athletes who should not pay much attention, but for most people it is a great tool, and often, an eye opener.

There seems to be a lot of 'excuses' being given on this thread... which is a shame. At the end of the day, if you are in the obese category then you probably have a substantial amount of weight to lose. The healthy range is a wide range and most people would be able to achieve a weight within that range.

I was shocked to discover my BMI before my weight loss began. I was 'overweight' with a BMI of around 26 - I'd never realised I was anywhere close to being out of the healthy range. Sometimes it's the wake up call we need xxx

I also think people say they are "big boned" cause they are overweight and it sounds better to add that in, I know I use to do it all the time. I was in for the shock of my life when I lost all the weight and realized I was no-where NEAR big boned. Granted, some people sure are, but I would be most of us are not .