Harvard: Time to end the Low Fat Myth
bostonwolf
Posts: 3,038 Member
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/fats-full-story/
It’s time to end the low-fat myth. For decades, a low-fat diet was touted as a way to lose weight and prevent or control heart disease and other chronic conditions, and food companies re-engineered products to be reduced-fat or fat-free, often compensating for differences in flavor and texture by increasing amounts of salt, sugar, or refined grains. However, as a nation, following a low-fat diet hasn’t helped us control weight or become healthier.
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
Why hasn’t cutting fat from the diet paid off as expected? Detailed research shows that the total amount of fat in the diet isn’t really linked with weight or disease. What really matters is the type of fat and the total calories in the diet. (7-15)
•Bad fats, meaning trans and saturated fats, increase the risk for certain diseases.
•Good fats, meaning monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, do just the opposite. They are good for the heart and most other parts of the body
It’s time to end the low-fat myth. For decades, a low-fat diet was touted as a way to lose weight and prevent or control heart disease and other chronic conditions, and food companies re-engineered products to be reduced-fat or fat-free, often compensating for differences in flavor and texture by increasing amounts of salt, sugar, or refined grains. However, as a nation, following a low-fat diet hasn’t helped us control weight or become healthier.
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
Why hasn’t cutting fat from the diet paid off as expected? Detailed research shows that the total amount of fat in the diet isn’t really linked with weight or disease. What really matters is the type of fat and the total calories in the diet. (7-15)
•Bad fats, meaning trans and saturated fats, increase the risk for certain diseases.
•Good fats, meaning monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, do just the opposite. They are good for the heart and most other parts of the body
0
Replies
-
Agreed - eating fat DOESN'T make you fat! Our bodies need fat.0
-
Yes.0
-
/signed0
-
Agreed.0
-
here, here! :drinker:0
-
TL;DR:
Avoid trans fats
Limit Saturated fats
Keep calories at appropriate level
???
Profit0 -
I'd love to start seeing Starch Free food one day in most foods instead of fat free. That will be VERY interesting.0
-
trying to keep to a more vegetarian diet, passing on ff or semi skimmed milk, cheese, yoghurt, cream in favour of skimmed and not to mention avoiding eggs can have you very low in your iodine levels. This is only needed in tiny amounts 150 microns which equals half a teaspoon in a life time but it is essential. It can help you overcome so many health problems because it not only supports the over worked thyroid it creates with other minerals the natural antiseptic barrier in saliva and other mucus linings.
Fat free milk products probably have no iodine in them at all.0 -
Thank you! Eating fat does not make you fat. Eating fat free does NOT make you skinny, nor healthier. Its all a balance. :drinker:
edited for spelling.0 -
I don't see much news there.
So yeah...people are still fat because they take in too many calories and we should pay attention to the type of fats we eat and not the amount necessarily. The low ft diets were super popular in the 90's and early 2k. I don't think anyone really follows that for diet anymore, but still use 'good' fat balances for health benefits.
That is all the study says.0 -
Bring on the avocados and olives!0
-
Avoiding high fat foods is mostly a means to help reduce your calorie consumption. Fat has more calories per gram than protein or carbohydrates. SInce fats weigh in at twice the calorie per gram it's pretty easy to see that cutting back on fats will reduce your calorie intake
Fat: 1 gram = 9 calories
Protein: 1 gram = 4 calories
Carbohydrates: 1 gram = 4 calories
Too bad alcohol isn't free. :-(
Alcohol: 1 gram = 7 calories
TLDR; - Stay within your calorie goal.0 -
trying to keep to a more vegetarian diet, passing on ff or semi skimmed milk, cheese, yoghurt, cream in favour of skimmed and not to mention avoiding eggs can have you very low in your iodine levels. This is only needed in tiny amounts 150 microns which equals half a teaspoon in a life time but it is essential. It can help you overcome so many health problems because it not only supports the over worked thyroid it creates with other minerals the natural antiseptic barrier in saliva and other mucus linings.
Fat free milk products probably have no iodine in them at all.
This is why most salts have iodine added. Most people don't get enough in their everyday diet.0 -
Avoiding high fat foods is mostly a means to help reduce your calorie consumption. Fat has more calories per gram than protein or carbohydrates. SInce fats weigh in at twice the calorie per gram it's pretty easy to see that cutting back on fats will reduce your calorie intake
Fat: 1 gram = 9 calories
Protein: 1 gram = 4 calories
Carbohydrates: 1 gram = 4 calories
Too bad alcohol isn't free. :-(
Alcohol: 1 gram = 7 calories
TLDR; - Stay within your calorie goal.
I'm guessing you did not read the article. Fats keep you satiated far, far longer than an equivalent amount of carbohydrates. So you end up eating less overall, not more.
Your thinking here is misguided, and exactly the type of thinking the Harvard School of Public Health has decided to publicly fight against.0 -
Since this must have been missed before:
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)0 -
Avoiding high fat foods is mostly a means to help reduce your calorie consumption. Fat has more calories per gram than protein or carbohydrates. SInce fats weigh in at twice the calorie per gram it's pretty easy to see that cutting back on fats will reduce your calorie intake
Fat: 1 gram = 9 calories
Protein: 1 gram = 4 calories
Carbohydrates: 1 gram = 4 calories
Too bad alcohol isn't free. :-(
Alcohol: 1 gram = 7 calories
TLDR; - Stay within your calorie goal.
I'm guessing you did not read the article. Fats keep you satiated far, far longer than an equivalent amount of carbohydrates. So you end up eating less overall, not more.
Your thinking here is misguided, and exactly the type of thinking the Harvard School of Public Health has decided to publicly fight against.
I didn't say you should avoid fats. Just eat whatever you like (within reason) and stay within your calorie goal. Fats aren't evil but that double Whopper with cheese is 1,000 calories. Don't go all in and have bacon for every meal.0 -
I'd love to start seeing Starch Free food one day in most foods instead of fat free. That will be VERY interesting.
i suppose but it seems to me that the same principals would applie. i.e. what really matters is how many calories.0 -
The thing is a successful diet is not simply stay within your calories. That is far too simplistic and naive. A successful diet is one that provides you with the energy you need (and not in excess); is satisfying (satiating), helps you have the energy output you need throughout the day, provides you with the essential nutrients your body needs to repair and help you resist disease, and is one you can actually maintain over an extended period of time. What that diet actually is in terms of food is highly dependent on who you are, your natural strengths and weaknesses, what diseases or disorders you might have, your culture and economic environment, and a host of other factors. These simplistic "just count calories" statements are misguided at best.
Sorry for the rant.0 -
It's a shame they're still on the saturated fat is bad kick. What makes it even worse is they promote industrial seed oils (which contain trans fats) over nutritious whole foods just because they contain saturated fat -- it ruins the whole article and Harvard's credibility, IMO. Eggs, red meat, and full fat dairy are all healthful and delicious.0
-
It's a shame they're still on the saturated fat is bad kick. What makes it even worse is they promote industrial seed oils (which contain trans fats) over nutritious whole foods just because they contain saturated fat -- it ruins the whole article and Harvard's credibility, IMO. Eggs, red meat, and full fat dairy are all healthful and delicious.
This struck me as well. While suggesting people eat "less" of these items, the author didn't actually define what "less" meant and compared to what amount.
On a personal note - if I read the phrase ".....and the like." one more time I was going to scream. I think the author used it three times in one paragraph for gosh sake!0 -
Avoiding high fat foods is mostly a means to help reduce your calorie consumption. Fat has more calories per gram than protein or carbohydrates. SInce fats weigh in at twice the calorie per gram it's pretty easy to see that cutting back on fats will reduce your calorie intake
Fat: 1 gram = 9 calories
Protein: 1 gram = 4 calories
Carbohydrates: 1 gram = 4 calories
Too bad alcohol isn't free. :-(
Alcohol: 1 gram = 7 calories
TLDR; - Stay within your calorie goal.
I'm guessing you did not read the article. Fats keep you satiated far, far longer than an equivalent amount of carbohydrates. So you end up eating less overall, not more.
Your thinking here is misguided, and exactly the type of thinking the Harvard School of Public Health has decided to publicly fight against.
I didn't say you should avoid fats. Just eat whatever you like (within reason) and stay within your calorie goal. Fats aren't evil but that double Whopper with cheese is 1,000 calories. Don't go all in and have bacon for every meal.
I don't like that sentance at all.0 -
To the OP and those who want to weigh in:
There is the underlying truth when they point out the difference between good and bad fat. With that said, the reason more are obese today with less fat is the fact people or gorging themselves with excessive amount of calories. We live in a nation that is much better off than it was in the 60s. With success comes excess. So, we have an excessive about of fast foods, junk foods, etc. Yet when you look at poor, impurvished nations, they have many skinny people suffering from malnutrition.
So, there has to be a balance. Reduce the calories, monitor your bad fat and return to the roots of a healthy diet (basic food groups - now called macros). Or, you can pout your lips and live like you want. IDC - I eat my fat but I do so in moderation because I realize the journey I am on is mine to control.0 -
Since this must have been missed before:
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
because portion size is a thing. the average meal was much much smaller in the 60s. if i'm going to get my protein in, 33% of cals from fat is pretty close to the right amount for the way i set my macros0 -
Don't go all in and have bacon for every meal.
You're wrong.
Get out.0 -
Since this must have been missed before:
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
because portion size is a thing. the average meal was much much smaller in the 60s. if i'm going to get my protein in, 33% of cals from fat is pretty close to the right amount for the way i set my macros
Not to mention the increase in cars, fast food, drive throughs and general portion sizes.
correlation =/= causation.0 -
Since this must have been missed before:
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
because portion size is a thing. the average meal was much much smaller in the 60s. if i'm going to get my protein in, 33% of cals from fat is pretty close to the right amount for the way i set my macros
Not to mention the increase in cars, fast food, drive throughs and general portion sizes.
correlation =/= causation.
they are going to go "low protein" next and then I'm going to want to die. Seriously. It'll be sad.
First low fat-
now low-carb
we know it's coming.
And I'm going to be sad. So very very sad.0 -
Since this must have been missed before:
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
because portion size is a thing. the average meal was much much smaller in the 60s. if i'm going to get my protein in, 33% of cals from fat is pretty close to the right amount for the way i set my macros
Not to mention the increase in cars, fast food, drive throughs and general portion sizes.
correlation =/= causation.
they are going to go "low protein" next and then I'm going to want to die. Seriously. It'll be sad.
First low fat-
now low-carb
we know it's coming.
And I'm going to be sad. So very very sad.
Screw that
0 -
I know right.0
-
Since this must have been missed before:
•In the 1960s, fats and oils supplied Americans with about 45 percent of calories; (1) about 13 percent of adults were obese and under 1 percent had type 2 diabetes, a serious weight-related condition. (2,3)
•Today, Americans take in less fat, getting about 33 percent of calories from fats and oils; (4) yet 34 percent of adults are obese and 11 percent have diabetes, most with type 2 diabetes. (5,6)
because portion size is a thing. the average meal was much much smaller in the 60s. if i'm going to get my protein in, 33% of cals from fat is pretty close to the right amount for the way i set my macros
Not to mention the increase in cars, fast food, drive throughs and general portion sizes.
correlation =/= causation.
they are going to go "low protein" next and then I'm going to want to die. Seriously. It'll be sad.
First low fat-
now low-carb
we know it's coming.
And I'm going to be sad. So very very sad.
first they came for my fats, but i said nothing
then they came for my carbs, but i still didn't speak up
and now they came for my protein, and all i have on my plate is this sad *kitten* piece of kale
0 -
A micron is a unit of length, a teaspoon is a unit of volume.This is only needed in tiny amounts 150 microns which equals half a teaspoon in a life time but it is essential.
That makes as much sense as the rest of what you wrote.
How about showing us links to where you're doing your 'research' to support your assertions about iodine, and especially that it isn't in fat-free milk products?
Because I've been browsing the USDA site trying to find how much iodine is in milk, as well as other foods, and they don't even list iodine as something they track.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 436 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions