I think I broke physics

Options
24

Replies

  • jasonmh630
    jasonmh630 Posts: 2,850 Member
    Options
    c82a791547aa439fd76b9fdee32c0483.jpg
  • GretchenReine
    GretchenReine Posts: 1,427 Member
    Options
    Gary-Coleman-wtf.gif
  • runningagainstmyself
    runningagainstmyself Posts: 616 Member
    Options
    giphy.gif
    \m/

    This. <3 \m/
  • SunofaBeach14
    SunofaBeach14 Posts: 4,932 Member
    Options
    Estimating and TEF?
  • Catchphrase33
    Catchphrase33 Posts: 40 Member
    Options
    The answer is Orange because my cat likes to dance.
  • BigT555
    BigT555 Posts: 2,068 Member
    Options
    lol to everyone asking what i was calculating; its a conversion of the 9 calories contained in a gram of fat to the 3500 calories contained in a pound. basically if you go full circle you get 1 gram of fat eaten yeilding a fat gain of 1.166 g's

    im going to assume its some sort of rounding error, but most numbers i got for calories in a gram of fat had a few zeros after the decimal place inferring a higher accuracy than just to one integer
  • jasonmh630
    jasonmh630 Posts: 2,850 Member
    Options
    The answer is Orange because my cat likes to dance.

    No, the answer is blankets because pigeons don't like spaghetti.
  • FaylinaMeir
    FaylinaMeir Posts: 661 Member
    Options
    cat-meme-i-cannot-brain-today-dumb.jpg
  • BigT555
    BigT555 Posts: 2,068 Member
    Options
    Um...

    You need to show your work. What in the hell are you talking about?

    1241025633_motivational_poster_time_paradox.gif
    i totally showed my math!

    though i dont even know what the hell im talking about anymore
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    Options
    ...3500 cals/lbs ....

    That number is an approximation. Any number ending in double zeros is likely to be.
    9 calories...

    So is that one.
  • JTick
    JTick Posts: 2,131 Member
    Options
    The answer is Orange because my cat likes to dance.

    No, the answer is blankets because pigeons don't like spaghetti.

    Purple, because dinosaurs don't wear hats.
  • BigT555
    BigT555 Posts: 2,068 Member
    Options
    So bear with me here, I was just doing some brain thinking and realized something

    if you eat 1 gram of pure fat, thats 9 calories. And to lose 1 lb you need to burn 3500 calories, or conversely to gain a lb you need to eat 3500 calories (above/below TDEE).

    so 1 g of fat= 9 cals

    9 cals divided by 3500 cals/lbs = 0.0025714285714286 lbs

    0.0025714285714286 lbs times 453.592 g's per pound = 1.16637942857 g's

    so 1 g of fat eaten = 1.166 g's gained? what happened to conservation of mass and energy?

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1376778-recomp-math

    ??

    ETA: OPs Quote from link above.

    So one lb of fat is as much as one lb of muscle its all mass right but that is where the mistake comes in. So let me go over the numbers

    1 lb = 453.6g
    1g of fat=9 cal
    1g of protein= 4 cal
    1g of water = 0 cal

    This is stuff we all know, we also know that one lb of fat =3500 cal but 453.6g x 9cal= 4082cal. So how can this be right the numbers just don't add up right. The problem is fat is not all "fat", fat is made up of cells, that are mostly made up of water, but they hold a large amount of oil in them. So a lb of fat is made up of about 86% oil so that would about 390g of fat and 63g of water. Ok so more math now.

    1lb=453g
    390g oil x 9= 3510
    63g water x0=0
    390g+63g= 453g=1 lb
    this makes sense. so its more of a wording issue that fails to mention the oils and whatnot in a pound of fat
  • Barbellarella_
    Barbellarella_ Posts: 454 Member
    Options
    giphy.gif
  • wkwebby
    wkwebby Posts: 807 Member
    Options
    3500cal / 9 = 388.88 grams of fat / lb

    where's the 453.592 g's / lb coming from?
    453.592 is the conversion from pounds to grams. what you calculated is the inverse of what i calculated in my first equation;

    3500cals/ lb divided by 9 cals = 388.88 lbs^-1. gotta watch those units

    These are still estimations which lead to truncation errors. Calories and Kilocalories are units of heat. Lbs and grams are units of mass. Apples and oranges until we take into consideration density and energy expended, etc. The energy/heat expended to change food into fat and get it back again, will affect the overall outcomes and estimations.

    Did I throw a monkey wrench into your theory yet? When all else fails turn to the Law of Entropy. :bigsmile:
  • cmcollins001
    cmcollins001 Posts: 3,472 Member
    Options
    Jrmlt.jpg
  • UsedToBeHusky
    UsedToBeHusky Posts: 15,229 Member
    Options
    lol to everyone asking what i was calculating; its a conversion of the 9 calories contained in a gram of fat to the 3500 calories contained in a pound. basically if you go full circle you get 1 gram of fat eaten yeilding a fat gain of 1.166 g's

    im going to assume its some sort of rounding error, but most numbers i got for calories in a gram of fat had a few zeros after the decimal place inferring a higher accuracy than just to one integer

    Yeah... you're forgetting the part where your body actually uses the dietary fat.

    Are you really a woman catfishing us? Are the doughnuts going straight to your thighs?

    :wink:
  • KseRz
    KseRz Posts: 980 Member
    Options
    So bear with me here, I was just doing some brain thinking and realized something

    if you eat 1 gram of pure fat, thats 9 calories. And to lose 1 lb you need to burn 3500 calories, or conversely to gain a lb you need to eat 3500 calories (above/below TDEE).

    so 1 g of fat= 9 cals

    9 cals divided by 3500 cals/lbs = 0.0025714285714286 lbs

    0.0025714285714286 lbs times 453.592 g's per pound = 1.16637942857 g's

    so 1 g of fat eaten = 1.166 g's gained? what happened to conservation of mass and energy?

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1376778-recomp-math

    ??

    ETA: OPs Quote from link above.

    So one lb of fat is as much as one lb of muscle its all mass right but that is where the mistake comes in. So let me go over the numbers

    1 lb = 453.6g
    1g of fat=9 cal
    1g of protein= 4 cal
    1g of water = 0 cal

    This is stuff we all know, we also know that one lb of fat =3500 cal but 453.6g x 9cal= 4082cal. So how can this be right the numbers just don't add up right. The problem is fat is not all "fat", fat is made up of cells, that are mostly made up of water, but they hold a large amount of oil in them. So a lb of fat is made up of about 86% oil so that would about 390g of fat and 63g of water. Ok so more math now.

    1lb=453g
    390g oil x 9= 3510
    63g water x0=0
    390g+63g= 453g=1 lb

    Quoting because people's brains are still exploding.


    scanners-explosion-o.gif


    ^^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081455/
  • UsedToBeHusky
    UsedToBeHusky Posts: 15,229 Member
    Options
    3500cal / 9 = 388.88 grams of fat / lb

    where's the 453.592 g's / lb coming from?
    453.592 is the conversion from pounds to grams. what you calculated is the inverse of what i calculated in my first equation;

    3500cals/ lb divided by 9 cals = 388.88 lbs^-1. gotta watch those units

    These are still estimations which lead to truncation errors. Calories and Kilocalories are units of heat. Lbs and grams are units of mass. Apples and oranges until we take into consideration density and energy expended, etc. The energy/heat expended to change food into fat and get it back again, will affect the overall outcomes and estimations.

    Did I throw a monkey wrench into your theory yet? When all else fails turn to the Law of Entropy. :bigsmile:

    Not to mention that the chemical structure of dietary fat is completely different than the chemical structure of body fat. There is a lot more going on than physics.
  • BigT555
    BigT555 Posts: 2,068 Member
    Options
    3500cal / 9 = 388.88 grams of fat / lb

    where's the 453.592 g's / lb coming from?
    453.592 is the conversion from pounds to grams. what you calculated is the inverse of what i calculated in my first equation;

    3500cals/ lb divided by 9 cals = 388.88 lbs^-1. gotta watch those units

    These are still estimations which lead to truncation errors. Calories and Kilocalories are units of heat. Lbs and grams are units of mass. Apples and oranges until we take into consideration density and energy expended, etc. The energy/heat expended to change food into fat and get it back again, will affect the overall outcomes and estimations.

    Did I throw a monkey wrench into your theory yet? When all else fails turn to the Law of Entropy. :bigsmile:
    i would expect bolded to result in less than a gram of fat gained then though, since energy is used in the conversion process rather than gained.

    questions been answered though, oils n stuff are the *kitten* of this equation