Pros and cons to slow or fast weight loss

1200 calories never worked for me personally. Got stuck for months and months on end. High calorie and slow progress is the only way to go. Sure it's slow, but it's worth it in the end and lasts long term.

What are you eating for meals & snacks?

I keep reading on her various opinions to losing weight fast or slow. Going low calorie vs 15% reduction! I'm down 40 pounds but on the fence as how to proceed, the first 40 fell off fast at 1200 calories per day! My last month of 1800 calories (with exercise) has showed no loss. 1200 per day is sounding awesome. What has worked for YOU????

Eating what I want, when I want. When I count calories I pay attention to the quantity of what I'm eating and it reminds me to eat less. This is the longest I've gone staying on track because I'm not being so restrictive. I could have lost more than 40 pounds this year, but I'm not disappointed at this pace. I'm eating a way that I could maintain the rest of my life.

Lost all my weight at 1650 net. If you aren't losing. I'd first ensure accuracy, if you haven't, invest in a food scale and weigh all solids, only use measuring cups for liquids. If you still aren't losing after a week or two. Reduce calories by maybe 100. Keep doing that until you see steady loss.

I actually moved to TDEE, so I wouldn't have to deal with not eating as much on off exercise days. I lose at 1900+ average at my stats.

Drastic weight loss often results in muscle loss, which means you'll achieve being a smaller version of your current self instead of leaner. It's why I chose to slowly lose the 53 lbs I did over racing.

What are you eating for meals & snacks?

Why does that even matter?

Lost all my weight at 1650 net. If you aren't losing. I'd first ensure accuracy, if you haven't, invest in a food scale and weigh all solids, only use measuring cups for liquids. If you still aren't losing after a week or two. Reduce calories by maybe 100. Keep doing that until you see steady loss.

I actually moved to TDEE, so I wouldn't have to deal with not eating as much on off exercise days. I lose at 1900+ average at my stats.

Drastic weight loss often results in muscle loss, which means you'll achieve being a smaller version of your current self instead of leaner. It's why I chose to slowly lose the 53 lbs I did over racing.

I'm a fanatic with measuring and weighing with my food scale. I'm not really question 'why' I haven't lost this past month I'm playing with amounts on purpose trying to get an accurate TDEE. My question is more what has been successful for others, long term, for weight loss. High or low calories and why! I'm interested in hearing what others have found as the right solution for their weight loss and health.

??? She answered your questions. Losing slowly means (relatively) high calorie compared with losing quickly. And she's been successful.

Me? I lost 15 pounds that are NOT shown on my ticker very quickly on very low-cal/carb medically supervised diet. And it was fine for that 15, but absolutely the wrong solution for me long-term. For two reasons:
1. I have so much weight to lose that it would take me long enough to possibly cause other health problems.
2. Exacerbated underlying issue of life and food imbalance. I really needed to relearn being okay with feeling comfortable (not starving, not stressed or beating myself up or angsting) and eating a reasonably balanced diet.

Notice I didn't say "eating clean" or specify macros. I will say that my food was off the rails to the extent of eating only tea (w/milk & sugar) and lots of buttered toast as my day's only intake. I'm certainly pro-carb, but think we can all agree that's a far-from balanced diet.

So...the 21 lbs on my ticker have come off fairly slowly and steadily, and I'm very happy with how I'm eating - multiple times a day, and with attention on ensuring I get some veggies worked in there. The carb macro remains a bit of a bugaboo for me, as I'm perfectly happy to ONLY eat bread or pasta. Which are NOT evil...just sayin' that it's important to *also* have fruits & veggies in the mix.

The uber-low-cal diet was tough to come out of gracefully. No feel for how to eat moderately. In contrast, I just had a 2.5 month hiatus from MFP due to some huge and stressful life events. Yet, the practice in balancing things out and using moderation were immeasurably helpful.

I'm happy to be back, and consider the slow/steady approach (high calorie, I guess you'd call it) to be the best one for me. It's sustainable over my lifetime.

Slow weightloss is the key to great long term success!

If you've already developed healthy eating habits then you can go ahead and eat at a bigger calorie deficit to lose faster.

The only problem with that is you're going to feel miserable eating so little every day. If I drop under 1700 I start to feel like crap.