Going over Fat but Under Carb and Protein Macros

People vary in how closely they adhere to their macros. My personal approach is to exceed (or at least hit) my minimum protein target, try to exceed or hit my minimum fat target, and then let the rest fall where they may. In that priority, with protein and fat being minimums not maximums. And my reasoning is that (1) adequate protein intake while in a calorie deficit, when combined with resistance training, greatly limits the loss of muscle as weight is lost (i.e., lose mostly fat); (2) adequate fat is important for health; and (3) I like the flexibility thereafter. BTW - when taking this approach, I have fixed targets in grams and don't increase my fat and protein targets when MFP automatically adjusts my targets upward after logging exercise.

In your case, you still have a little room in the day - maybe some greek yogurt for a dessert or before bed would have bumped your protein up a bit and still allow you to meet or beat your calorie goal?

Thank you so much! So I basically have to focus on meeting my protein and fat with a maximum 5-10 margin to exceed and let the rest fall under carbs and with that I'll still stay under my caloric needs right?

I wouldn't worry about exceeding - IMHO it's fine if you are way over protein or fat. Sometimes I end up eating very few carbs on a particular day, and that's OK. However, I personally find if I don't get enough carbs I can feel it in my energy / activity levels at workouts. As to staying under your caloric needs - that's something you have to manage regardless of where your macro intakes settle out. When I am cutting (losing fat) my priorities in order are: (1) protein; (2) calorie deficit; (3) fat; (4) any and every random other concern -- but ultimately, if I want to lose body fat I have to be in a deficit. So macro targets are helpful for certain goals (avoid muscle loss; give my body what it needs for health reasons), but for weight loss maintaining the calorie deficit is paramount.

Looks fine to me.